Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART underground - options

Options
1567810

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 6,887 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    At 3m under the tracks, there is definitely scope for level reduction there. It is a controlled environment with full visibility. As it runs perpendicular to the DPT, it's probably only a 10m section for the width of the DPT.

    It really wouldn't be a big engineering undertaking, it just has to be done carefully. We are taking about a relatively shallow excavation above a modern engineered structure which has a huge amount of information available in terms of surveys, geotechnical info, etc. A DART tunnel will require boring close to the Metrolink tunnel, underground, in the city centre with many centuries old buildings, deep basements, mining out stations, etc. A dig at the DPT would be very small beer in the scheme of things.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,959 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The huge weakness in the current DART plans is the absence of any connection between the East/West lines and the North/South line.

    If there was such an option, the case for DART Underground would disappear.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 7,997 Mod ✭✭✭✭liamog


    You can get some really good images of it on Google Earth Pro



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,901 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There aren't many people who have any desire for the case for DART+ Tunnel, as its now called, to go.

    Appalling fag packet/crayon jobs certainly aren't replacements.



  • Registered Users Posts: 27,959 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    All I want is to be able to get a train from Coolmine to Skerries or Malahide.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,901 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    And you already can.

    Even if there was a second cross-Liffey connection, there would not be direct DARTs - you'd have to change. Your fag-packet bodge would still leave there being no direct connection possible for a train to do that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 584 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Spencer Dock Dart will not be underground, per the current proposal. Platforms at minus 2.4 meters, the same level as the Luas sub station.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,901 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Ground is zero metres on that scale.

    2.4 meters under ground is, well, underground.

    It doesn't stop it being yet another crayon rollercoaster



  • Registered Users Posts: 584 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    Underground in the context of railways is quite a different scale, which apparently is lost on you.

    To give some perspective, Tara Street Metro platforms are 22m below ground, with support structures descending as much as 32m below ground.

    But yeah, let's call Spencer Dock Dart "underground" 🧐😅



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,901 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Laugh away all you want, I'm not the one scrawling crayons of rollercoasters on maps and then resorting to pedantry (and not very well, at that) when unable to challenge anything else.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 27,959 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Following DART West, for most of the trains you won't.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,748 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    LMAO, you clearly have no idea about the area!

    The tracks in this area are elevated, they are least a good 10 meters above the surrounding area. That means at 3 meters below the track bed, the port tunnel is actually above ground going through this area!

    If you knew the area, it is easy to see this. If you are on East Wall by the Lidl/Aldi and head up Alfie Byrne Road twoards East Point, you actually walk up a small hill and then you walk back down into East Point. This hill you just walked up is actually the port tunnel!

    It is like a big two storey wall across the area that you want to somehow drill a tunnel through!

    Here you can see the height of the tracks versus the surrounding area. Actually you can also see how the ground in Fairview Park goes up to the right too:

    Here you can see what I mean by a hill as you walk from East Wall towards East Point, that hill is the port tunnel:

    And here from the top of the hill/tunnel:

    And looking down into East Point from a top the tunnel:

    And here is the small hill on the Northern side of the tracks at Fairview Park:

    Seriously take a walk around the area and you will easily see how the port tunnel is basically above ground in this area and what you are suggesting is completely impossible!



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,901 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    For the journey you want to, you will; and always will. They aren't going to reverse them at Connolly for you.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 22,748 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    Perhaps a better picture of the Port Tunnel "hill", the people are walking up the hill:

    Open in Google Maps for a better view:

    https://www.google.ie/maps/@53.3582684,-6.2336388,3a,75y,13.31h,83.58t/data=!3m7!1e1!3m5!1sgsw-7T4alEd-yhsN__eZIw!2e0!5s20170501T000000!7i13312!8i6656?coh=205409&entry=ttu



  • Registered Users Posts: 584 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    @L1011

    Perhaps some constructive interaction on ideas might encourage a constructive conversation on a thread discussing ideas?....

    You responded to my second image implying it was clearer than the first, or to paraphrase your words "less rollercoaster-ish", but it's unclear if, and why, you agree or disagree.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭gjim


    Eh - Macken St is perpendicular to Grand Canal Dock station alignments. Trains can't take 90 degree turns. Even if you were to somehow achieve it (by demolishing buildings), it would solve absolutely nothing and provide no opportunity for increasing DART capacity - you've just shifted the bottleneck from Connolly to Grand Canal Dock - now you're trying to squeeze DARTs from the North which have come over the loop line bridge and DARTs from the West coming over your elevated heavy rail line into a single the alignment at GCD.

    Like I said, every sort of crazy route and alignment has been examined in reports going back 50 years now and not a single one has come up with anything except a link from the SW to the Northern line.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭gjim


    Interesting, but I'd say something like this would work far better with one of the options considered by Jacob - which was to move the interchange with the other DART line from Pearse to GCD - although they admit underground station construction here would be tricky. Not that construction at Pearse would be a cake walk either. But it would mean something like your suggestion could have a much more gentle and natural curve.



  • Registered Users Posts: 182 ✭✭bartkingcole


    This is embarrassing at this point. Report after report after report. Nothing happens - excuse after excuse after excuse. Good plans are shelved while annother feasibility/consultancy is launched. Investment which is completely necessary for a growing city with “ambitions” is killed by short term beancounters and nimbyism. Dublin is a bla bla city which can never be a semi-decent European capital and it will kill any advantages it has. Our council, our politicians, our Government should hang their heads in shame.

    Apologies if this offends - the late posting is a different time zone rather than a skin full of pints.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭gjim


    Besides @loco_scolo route, we are looking at one of two options. Roughly speaking, going over the DPT (red) or going under it (blue):

    For me, I think some variant of the blue (going under the DPT) looks more likely to be feasible. The question around the red route is whether you have enough in the 250m between the DPT and the Tolka to clear the top of the DPT and under the Tolka. The Tolka is not that deep but without knowing how deep the top of the DPT is, it's difficult to say whether the 10m (or less) descent available in that distance is enough to get under the Tolka.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭riddlinrussell


    If you were able to do the red alignment, would it be possible to branch off around the start of the red line, and tie in anywhere to one of the western rail corridors? Just while the crayons are out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 6,887 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    This would be the earliest way to tie-in (including easier than at Docklands);

    We have had a link showing that the DPT is 3m below ground at this location, there is no reason why some of that couldn't be used to accommodate the change in levels. Every other station would be multiples the complexity to construct, mining out under buildings, etc. The DPT even developed a Guidance Notes for Developments in the Vicinity of the Tunnel so obviously envisaged the potential for future developments, including at the cut and cover section. It sets a loading limit, which designers can work to.

    An again, I'm not saying that it certainly works. As I said previously, it depends on the geometry of whether the gradient on such an alignment is suitable to pass over the DPT and then get down below the Tolka.



  • Registered Users Posts: 584 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    There's a bigger fundamental question to be answered before the route of a future tunnel can be decided. What does it's main purpose need to be?

    • Is it a full Dart Line with services every 3-5 minutes? (High capacity)

    • Or will IC and Commuter trains also use the line? (Reduced capacity)

    • Things to consider - a 4-tracked Northern Line should be assumed, I think? IC services need stations with multiple platforms, so we can't just jam Cork-Belfast IC trains through a twin track tunnel - direct access to Heuston Main Station and Connolly are needed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,901 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Your second image is also implausible due to the position of the port tunnel.

    The port tunnel is effectively insurmountable here



  • Registered Users Posts: 39 OisinCooke


    Again apologies for the crayon drawing (as for some reason certain forum members seem to have a real problem with discussing potential designs for this project from a somewhat layperson perspective - something I think is the whole purpose of this forum in the first place…) but would something like this be more feasible…? (In orange)

    It feels like the most natural alignment and there is ample space from the Clontarf Road bridge to the east of the current rail alignment to dive two tracks to below the DPT and Tolka before hitting Spencer Dock and curving southwest (to probably GCD instead of Pearse at this stage…) and on to Heuston.

    I think if possible and feasible, a Clontarf Road connection would be far more favourable as it takes more services out of the already overcrowded North Stand Jnct, and even if a grade separated tie in isn’t possible, with an eventual 4 tracked northern line, an at-grade tie in to the slow lines will be just the same as anywhere else on the DART network. And with the tie in being after rather than before the station, line crossing can be done while other trains are waiting in the station

    Post edited by OisinCooke at


  • Registered Users Posts: 584 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    If only we could engineer something with support columns either side and a crossing to "bridge" the gap. We could even call it a bridge.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,887 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Going under the DPT is far less likely to be possible that going over it. Going over it would be less work and less risks involved.



  • Registered Users Posts: 584 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    I don't think this is feasible as it would require the Spencer Dock Dart station to be closed while a tunnel is dug under the station, or the entire station is dug down deeper with the platforms moved to the other side of the Luas (closer to the river as was originally planned). If they decided to redo the station, then the original alignment would work anyway.

    The scoping reports for Dart West were clear that mining out a tunnel under the proposed Dart Station, after it's built, is not feasible due to the soil composition.

    I don't know the answer to this, but it's possible the soil composition might rule out a tunnel under any of the buildings in that area, if they went with a different alignment....



  • Registered Users Posts: 68,901 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Back to Rollercoaster Tycoon then.

    You keep suggesting stuff that involves implausible elevation changes.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,887 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    If just an underground station at Spencer Dock/Docklands without a tunnel portal, the underground station could be built further south (south of the Luas), leaving the DART+ Spencer Dock station where it is (north of the Luas). If the tunnel portal isn't at Docklands, it solves a lot of issues.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 584 ✭✭✭loco_scolo


    1100m at a 2.5% gradient would allow 27.5m drop. At a 3% gradient, a drop of 33m is possible. Electrified railways are more than capable of doing these gradients and higher.

    The original DU plans had less distance to fall the same height. Your unconstructive commentary is most unhelpful. Perhaps you could add some actual data or intel to back up your view....



Advertisement