Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Galway GAA Discussion Thread #2

1293294296298299320

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,046 ✭✭✭threeball


    Galway were not the better team today. Armagh actually attacked when they went forward and their defensive structure was much better. We have to give them their due.

    Armagh set up with two a two line defensive set up, 3 in front of 4 which meant they dealt easily enough with Galway switching sides. They left space behind the lines daring Galway to kick to Comer but it was never really on, he was well marshalled.

    Galways defensive set up was similar to the first half against Donegal with pockets of space appearing where Armagh picked off points. Unlike the Donegal game those pockets stayed for the full 70. They never got the set up that they managed against Dublin and Donegal. 1-4 or 1-5 came down the right corner back channel and it cost us the game.

    Only Maher put in a performance for the full 70. McHugh had a great first but faded.

    Armagh were deserving winners



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I get the point on the tactics, not that Armagh were the better team. Galway had the chances to win the game. They just couldn't finish their dinner. Normally Galway shooting is better than that.

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/articles/c0vejxz8rr2o

    From the article above -

    "Galway ended the game with 13 points from 25 shots (nine wides, three dropped short), their profligacy dashing their hopes of ending a 23-year wait for Sam."

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,046 ✭✭✭threeball


    We had more possession and did nothing with it. We didn't challenge the Armagh defensive system so our success ratio from shots was poor. Yes Walsh had a poor day on frees and we could have won it if more clinical but I don't think we'd have deserved it. Armagh played the better football and our composure deserted us on the biggest day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,734 ✭✭✭Robson99




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,169 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    Kerry and Roscommon shooting was similar or worse against Armagh not a coincidence as their defence has been excellent throughout this championship and more often than not the team that defends best wins the All Ireland.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭MattressRick


    The talk here about positives and the future is mental. Need to face the reality first. This was the worst All Ireland loss bar the 83 final when 14 lost to 12 dubs.

    Armagh only scored 1-11 FFS. They had 0-9 points after 42 mins. They still outscored Galway in the next 35 minutes, it's criminal.

    Conroy made up for his quiet game 2 years ago. I feel so sorry for him. 3 points from midfield in a final . He deserved more from Comer and Walsh.

    Comer is our Aidan O Shea. A flat track bully in Connacht.

    Absolute **** bottlers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,066 ✭✭✭gym_imposter


    Speaking as a blow in if I may ?, the game was lost on the sideline as much as on the field

    A legendary player but mediocre manager



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,046 ✭✭✭threeball


    I don't think you can blame Comer, no forward could operate in the position he did today. Hidden behind 2 lines of defence, no chance of ball coming in. Clifford operated in less confined circumstances 2 weeks ago and got no where.

    You have to run at blanket defences and have runners to offload to running in support. Pass the parcel from side to side will only get so far. It works in soccer as the ball can be transferred so quickly. In football it takes 2 to 3 times as long and it's easily covered. The only joy we got in the first half was when mcHugh cut in and took them on. We got 3 or 4pts off just him.

    Walsh is a good ball carrier too and he should have made similar runs to draw defenders. Bring Comer out to run support from deep and he would draw defenders or fouls. We'd get plenty of point and goal chances. Might get turned over the odd time but it's risk reward and we're risk adverse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 329 ✭✭DK224


    One thing I couldn't understand watching yesterday is how they did not have Comer under the goalies nose for every Walsh free given how many he has dropped short the last few games



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭C__MC


    Joyce possibly should have held comer in reserve. He was poor enough against the dubs and donegal if we are being honest. Yesterday will sting Galway for a long long time. Armagh didnt even play well yesterday and Galway just malfunctioned. Still can't belive they butchered the overlap when gleeson broke the kickout in injury time. I cant see an all Ireland going to galway for a long long time given the teams that will reemerge next year. Yesterday was the chance.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭MattressRick


    Yeah I just watched it back. There was a goal on but Galway somehow went out wide like they did all day. Same with the time Walsh ballooned a left footed chance way wide earlier on. Galway counter attacked but somehow Walsh took the shot off his left foot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,580 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    In hindsight, losing Finnerty was a huge loss and maybe cost them the game. He surely would have offered a little more danger, and landed one or two of those frees.

    But I really didn't see that performance coming from Galway. I know that the Armagh defence is of course very tight, and they generally don't concede high scores.

    But Comer, Walsh, Heaney, Tierney, all underperformed IMO, Finnerty was injured and McDaid was quiet by his standards. Even McHugh's accuracy deserted him.

    Post edited by keeponhurling on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,347 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    The best team won because they took more chances when they were presented with them.

    But to be fair to Galway, the finnerty injury was a massive blow so early on. Walsh hasn't been fully fit all year(and while still scoring) his free taking isn't a patch on what he was doing a few years ago. After that first or second one he should have been taken off them - not his fault. I think it was Walshs man that got the goal as well - and again I think if he were tracked that may not have happened.

    I also thought Armagh were more direct - particularily in the first half - they put a lot less effort into scoring points and used their possession much more efficiently, they weren't concerned with Galway in possession as Galway were very rigid. There were very few balls or passes in over that top that let Comer or the other forwards have a race with their marker - I suspect the instructions were not do deploy these types of passes. Very static in there.

    It was definetly one that Galway will rightly think got away, but Armagh were the better team on the day and deserved their win - it hasn't been an overnight success either - McGeeney has been there almost a decade and they've had some seriously crushing defeats in those times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,355 ✭✭✭C__MC


    Galway had enough chances to win the game. I don't think armagh were the better team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 362 ✭✭carfinder


    As a Mayo man I can empathise with Galway fans today. Its devastating to lose a game that you could have won - other teams will be back next year, but so will Galway!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭MfMan


    Leave off! We beat our closest rivals in Connacht, the league champions, and (in knock-out games in very tight finishes) the Leinster and Ulster champions en route. Nothing shabby or weak about that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,612 ✭✭✭MfMan


    So will we. Hopefully PJ (if there) will finally get a freer run from injuries next year. Bar Conroy, the age profile of the team isn't too high, with many of the players now coming into their prime. The likes of Hernon, McLaughlin, O'Conghaile, O'Curraoin, O'Neills x 2 etc. can push on next season and strengthen the team again.

    It's easy to be despondent today, but time heals wounds. Of all our closest rivals, I can only see perhaps Donegal actually improving next year. It'll be wide open again in 2025.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,046 ✭✭✭threeball


    We made hard work of every single score we got bar the McDaid one on the break. Armagh manufactured their scores more easily. Just having possession doesn't make you the better team. Armagh pressure caused some of those misses and they had misses of their own, unless you think we should score everything we kick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,264 ✭✭✭cosatron


    I know you don't agree with me but we have to find a place for John daly and keiran molloy, mulkerrin and Fitzgerald are honest players but offered nothing going forward, mulkerrin had a couple of openings and turned back and you would never see Fitzgerald pass half way.one thing we missed yesterday was sean Kelly's runs from full back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭MayoAreMagic


    Agreed. Anyone talking about possession doesn't get how the Armagh and Galway systems work. They are counter-attacking teams. They draw bodies in, crowd them out, get a turnover and break up the field into space. The opposition are regularly going to have more possession in games. In fact, Id argue the fact that galway had more possession shows that they changed their style a bit and played into Armagh's hands. I see 9 pundits out of 9 picked galway to win in one paper - did this sort of thing have an effect on how they approached the game?

    Galway's conservative approach stopped them from getting up the field at pace, which in turn was the reason why guys had to take on those longer shots under pressure that they subsequently missed. Short kickout after short kickout, when galway were bossing the skies on the armagh kickout underlines this further. This was the way to attack armagh from a galway perspective, but they shied away from it. I have heard a lot of galway fans lionising joyce post-match and blaming the players, but his decisions on the sideline created the situation on the field. The same fans lament finnerty going off, but they dont stop to consider who came on for him - heaney! Good player in his own right, but a goto inside forward he isnt. When you consider those hail-mary points that conroy kicked on top of their misses, it really underlines how galway were struggling to get normal scores. This was happening because they were too conservative, and that ethos came from the sideline. Armagh moved the ball more quickly and with more purpose when they attacked - that was really the only difference between the two teams.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,347 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    Well there very obviously was a "best team" or there'd be no point in any competition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,946 ✭✭✭MayoAreMagic


    Any team who gets into a defensive formation, with extra bodies playing zonally around their goals is setting up to crowd out and counter attack the opposition. That is how a counter attack works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 928 ✭✭✭Butson


    Finnerty going off so early for Galway was the losing of it. Had a real ripple effect on the use of the bench / freetaking etc.

    It has to be said though, what a dreadful spectacle that was. Hopefully the new rule changes help because that sport is on life support.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,034 ✭✭✭✭Utopia Parkway


    Armagh had 15 players defending inside their 45 for the entire game. When people criticise Galway for being conservative there was very little space to attack into. You can't just kick ball into a blanket defence. The defence will come away with it 9 times out of 10. The only time there was space was when Galway turned them over and then you could see they tried to move the ball very quickly. Sometimes they got scores from this but on a couple other occasions they messed up their transition. Like when they got the ball up to Silke and he probably could have taken the score himself but he turned back to give it back to Walsh who blazed his shot wide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,713 ✭✭✭testtech05


    Have to agree with a lot of this. I was up high in the corner behind the Davin end goal and in the first half it gave a great view of the Armagh defence.

    It was impossible to see a yard of space in there they had everywhere clogged up with bodies.

    I would be guilty of watching on tv or from a lower level and asking why we aren't letting the ball in to the FF line but it was an eye opener yesterday to see how tight it was.

    I must also mention it was crazy how fast they all got back every time. Unbelievable fitness levels. They were cute too as you need to be at that level throwing balls out on to the pitch beside the goal to stop us getting a quick kickout away and give an extra chance to get back when they had more men pushed up



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,562 ✭✭✭tobefrank321


    But this is a basic thing. How on earth do teams not prepare for the scenario where player A, B or C is injured?

    Surely there should have been a free taker on the bench ready to come on if Finnerty was injured or tired? In the whole of Galway, there's only one consistent free-taker? Bizarre. And it's not just Galway that has this problem. Typical GAA team preparation for games, ah shur we only have one free-taker and if he gets injured, we'll just wing it. Simple stuff that eludes the average inter county manager.

    Mayo are as bad, no left footed free taker.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,858 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    You couldn't better 1-11.

    That's the bottom line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    They did but context is everything, that will be forgotten in years to come though. Can you honestly see Armagh dominating? Everything fell right for them after Ulster this year. The chances of that happening again is remote.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 356 ✭✭fergalfrog


    Was there a reason Matthew Tierney was not put on frees from Finnerty's side? He took them in the league up until he got injured taking a free in the Tyrone game. He scored a great free from near the sideline in the league game against Roscommon and has a great kick off the ground.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    In Ulster -

    Beat Fermanagh by 11

    Beat Down by 1

    Lost to Donegal on penalties

    Group Stage -

    Beat Westmeath by 5

    Beat Derry by 11

    Drew with Galway

    QF - Beat Roscommon by 6

    SF - Beat Kerry by 2 AET

    F - beat Galway by 1

    I suppose you can say that if Galway did not inexplicably throw away that drawn group game, which Galway dominated. - Armagh would not have topped the group stage and got that nice QF draw v Roscommon.

    Who knows who Galway would have met after that as the permutations would be different? And Armagh would have faced a prelim QF.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



Advertisement