Cold Case Review of Sophie Tuscan du Plantier murder to proceed. **Threadbans in OP**

It's actually quite subtle and clever the way you distort the truth to make your arguments

I'll just go with 1 example of your outright distortion of truth as it would be exhausting to debate ad nauseum with a poster like you.

Your quotes below :

1. "Many of those here who were convinced of Bailey's guilt were of the belief because the family also held that belief."

2. "I didn't say it was many but reading comprehension may not be your forte!"

So your first sentence . It unequivocally infers that many posters here believe bailey is guilty because the family believe same

Second sentence . Your back with a bad faith argument that you didn't say there was many

Your statement that the family now seem not to believe what AGS told them is flat out malinformation

People seem to get hung up on whether there should be a specific suspect for every piece of evidence. In most murder cases the evidence is tied to the murderer and/or their associates. There is a bunch of evidence in this case that has been released, some of which was held back for some time, and I think it is a fair assumption that there is further evidence that has not released, and perhaps even evidence that has been suppressed permanently/destroyed. Whether that evidence points to an 'unknown' suspect or a 'known and named' suspect in the gardai logs, has not been determined. Some may also have been unrelated to the crime.

Examples:

1. Boot prints on ground
2. Fingermarks in the home
3. DNA on Sophie's boot
4. Tire tracks

Somebody that was not Bailey, and not Sophie, made these pieces of evidence. If left by the same person, when all are looked at together it would be a slam dunk case against whoever caused them, if they could not explain their whereabouts at the time of the crime. Even with an alibi I would imagine it would be a cause for arrest and further questioning at a minimum, perhaps likely even the DPP may prosecute if the alibi was at all questionable, and they could have their day in court.

What else do they have in the Garda file, what was removed?

Ah I think it should be read as, her family confirmed that as food she typically consumed for breakfast.

Forgot sketch,

I have spoken to various doctors / GPs whom I know personally about this case.

They all stated that any qualified doctor would have been able to diagnose the time of death in Sophie's case to around 2 hours or less, like 1 hour or 30 minutes, even if the body had been out in the cold overnight. So any physician should have been able to state whether it was more around midnight or morning.

There would not have to have been a long wait for the pathologist from Dublin to arrive at the scene and attempt to diagnose the time of death.

The stomach contents would certainly suggest an early morning death, rather than at or around midnight.