Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cold Case Review of Sophie Tuscan du Plantier murder to proceed. **Threadbans in OP**

1253254256258259262

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭bjsc


    My personal view, backed up by professional blood pattern analysis, is that the block was already in situ by the gate when the attack took place. The areas which are clear of blood are called voids and were created when the block was protected from wet blood. This was, in all probability, when Sophie’s body was lying against it at some point during the attack. The block is only on the edge of the dressing gown and may well have been pushed on to it during the attack. Given the weight of the block it is unlikely to have ended up where it was, by Sophie’s left hip, if it was used as a weapon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭jesuisjuste


    @bjsc can I ask if this is the scenario you propose, whether 1. the other missing block from the pump house was used as the weapon to deliver the fatal blow (and then removed from the scene?), or 2. a different weapon was used for the fatal blow (also presumably removed from the scene)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Given the weight of the block it is unlikely to have ended up where it was, by Sophie’s left hip, if it was used as a weapon."

    It's on quite an incline, it may have rolled and come to rest against the briars there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭jesuisjuste


    @tinytobe based on what you're saying do the doctors you have spoken to believe a time of death would have been determined in this case, and that it was not released, or that it was just not captured at all? I thought a physician did come to the scene a few hours later



  • Registered Users Posts: 45 irishspiderplant


    thanks Bridget I appreciate your input. What do you think was used as a weapon if not the block?

    I take your point about the bottle of wine, for me personally it is highly significant, although I accept that its discovery can’t be linked to the murder via evidence.

    on the other hand maybe the fact that it was ‘discovered’ at all speaks volumes.

    But of course I concede that maybe it shouldn’t enter into the discussion at all.

    Do you think the murderer is the one who left the bloodstain on Sophie’s door, and therefore went up to her house for whatever reason?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Dr O'Connor, the local GP, attended within about 30 mins of the body being discovered, and as far as I know he did not touch the body. Maybe @PolicemanFox or @bjsc can confirm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,507 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    The first option of your statment yes. As said, those doctors / GPs I have spoken to said that the time of death would have been able to be determined around 2 hours, most likely around 1 hour to even 30 minutes regardless of cold weather or rain or even snow. Any doctor would have or should have had that capability.

    What info was released and what not is not known to me. Apparently a doctor was at the secene in the morning? Possibly around 10 or 11am? So at that time, it should have been clear to the police whether we're speaking about midnight or 1am to say 2 or 3 am or 6 or 7 am in the morning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭jesuisjuste


    Would Harbison not have been privy to that information when he was doing the pathology examination, is there some formality where he could not include other investigators information on the report or something? Did they hold it back from him or what? Seems like a no brainer then that they would have pinned down the time of death then.



  • Registered Users Posts: 88 ✭✭PolicemanFox


    In relation to the concrete block, we have a lot of evidence to say it was on top of the dressing gown, not merely pushed over a corner. In the Post Mortem report. Harbison specifically refers to the dressing gown "It is of note that the cavity block rested upon this garment." There is also the statement of D/Garda Eugene Gilligan "Under the briars at the left hip of the body was a 18" inch long cavity concrete block on top of a dark blue dressing gown. " D/Garda Pat Joy said the concrete block was positioned "on what appeared to be a dressing gown folded up beside the body."

    There is no ambiguity here, these men were crime scene professionals who saw the body and in some cases helped move it. D/Gda Joy took charge of the exhibits, including the concrete block. They all said it was on top of the dressing gown. It is difficult (I would say impossible) to push a 23kg block with flat surfaces, on top of a fabric garment, it would obviously rumple up. It would have to be lifted, or possibly rolled but you cannot roll a block like that by accident.

    Then we have the DNA analysis done by the French in 2011. They took many swabs from the concrete block and found the victim's profile in almost all of them. Her DNA was found on all 4 long sides of the block.

    I don't see any difficulty where it ended up. The killer was able to lift it and bring it down on her skull he was able to lift it again and throw it to the side, if it did not simply roll over in that direction.

    23 kg is heavy, but it is not impossible to wield for a person with average strength. It is about the weight of a car battery or 5 year old child and most parents could lift a child that age. It only makes sense as a weapon when the unfortunate victim was prostrate and probably immobilized by the assault at that stage. So it is not like it was being waved about. It just had to be carried to the location.

    If you have a blood pattern analysis that you or someone else has done please share that analysis and then we can understand better what you mean.



  • Registered Users Posts: 88 ✭✭PolicemanFox


    He didn't say but from his description I think he deliberately avoiding touching the body. Garda Byrne logged his arrival at 11:10am, which is a bit more than an hour afterwards.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 58 ✭✭Mannesmann


    It may never be solved at this stage, unfortunately. I can see why the Gardai focused on Bailey but there were other avenues as evidenced in this thread. Maybe some high tech new developments will give a new avenue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,507 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    I am afraid, I can't answer that as I don't have that information.

    It is hard to say what happened nearly 30 years ago and who spoke to whom.

    I am guessing or at least it would appear that competence was not one of the atributes of most involved, neither the police nor the doctor.

    As said, any doctor / GP should have given a more closer time of death at the night / morning of the murder. As far as I know a doctor was on the scene soon after the police arrived. What the doctor said to Harbison I don't know.

    We only have a guess about the time of the murder that its was in the morning upon Harbison's examination and the content of the stomack and what she has eaten is more likely to be consistent with a breakfast, rather than a dinner.



  • Registered Users Posts: 58 ✭✭Mannesmann


    Yes but this was quoted about the local GP's observations.

    'A local GP, Dr Larry O'Connor, attended Toormore shortly after 11am and pronounced the woman dead at the scene. It was clear to Dr O'Connor, from his preliminary examination, that the woman had been dead for a number of hours. However, he could not speculate as to the time of death.'

    Also the cold conditions of that morning would slow down rigor mortis possibly pushing back the time of death even further?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,507 ✭✭✭tinytobe


    Still the doctor should have been able to state "around midnight" or "around morning", cold weather or not.

    This is what I am saying.



  • Registered Users Posts: 58 ✭✭Mannesmann


    No DNA of another person was found, bloodstains were, apparently, all Sophie's. Probably the killer left the stain as her body was found a distance away. Implies that the killer wore gloves or did some kind of clean up afterwards?



  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭bjsc


    Could you tell me where this was quoted as I have not seen it before.



  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭bjsc


    I too think the wine bottle may well be significant and am currently researching its origin. As regards the blood stain on the door it is possible that it was left by the murderer however I also wonder whether perhaps Alfie or Shirley approached Sophie more closely than they have ever admitted to.



  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭bjsc


    I do not dispute that the block was on the dressing gown however it was only on the edge of it. As regards the injuries, the second post mortem, carried out in France, came to the conclusion that some of her injuries were caused when her head came into contact with the block rather than the other way round. In other words her head was either resting on the block when she was struck with the rock or she was violently pushed or thrown against it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭bjsc


    It would also appear, from their statements, that none of the officers who were first on scene approached Sophie or attempted in any way to establish whether she was still alive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭bjsc


    I believe that the large flat stone was, in all likelihood, the actual weapon. The uneven edges appear to closely resemble the damage caused to Sophie's skull.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭bjsc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    Dr Harbison reported,

    " I was able to look at the ground when the body had been moved to note that there was a slight depression with blood on it where the head had lain. This indicated to me that the body bad been in that position when the blows were struck."

    That sounds to me like the blows to the head while on the ground caused the depression in the ground.



  • Registered Users Posts: 88 ✭✭PolicemanFox


    Take a look at these photos. The gown is halfway under the block. This could not have happened by accident or by mere shoving of the block when the gown was beside it. This block was very heavy 23kg or 50lbs and we can see where the folds of the fabric are pulled down by the weight.

    These photos, together with the testimony of Harbison, Gilligan and Joy show that the block was more than "on the edge" of the gown, it was very clearly on top of it.

    If you don't believe this, just take a 9 inch cavity block, or even one half its weight, place it on a flat lawn and see if you can push it onto a towel. It's not possible.

    The second post mortem was conducted by the French in 2008 and worked with an exhumed body which was skeletonized, so they could not make a reliable conclusion of that nature. Could you supply a quote from it?

    If you look closely at these photos (and others) you can see blood stains in the orifices of the block. I can only conclude these are blood transfer marks from where it was lifted, and if it was lifted, it was used.

    We also have Harbison's testimony:

    "I was able to look at the ground when the body had been moved to note that there was a slight depression with blood on it where the head had lain. This indicated to me that the body bad been in that position when the blows were struck." 

    So her head was not resting on the block, her head was on the ground when it was struck.



  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭bjsc


    This is interesting as these are not photos that are in the French file. Can you tell me where they are from.



  • Registered Users Posts: 305 ✭✭bjsc


    Apologies. They are in the file. However they do not change my opinion. And the fact that Sophie's body was skeletonised at the time of the French postmortem actually makes it easier rather than harder to see the damage caused.

    If you look closely at these photos you will see an area immediately adjacent to the block where the grass is a brighter green. This area is clearly delineated and has blood around the margins but none in the centre. This appears to be the original position of the block before it ended up on the dressing gown. 0



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭chooseusername


    There's blood on the 3 long sides of the block, so probably also on the 4th hidden side. To me it looks like the block was dropped closer to the head and rolled, maybe a half or quarter turn, down the blood soaked slope and came to a stop against the briars and on top of the blue gown. In your first photo the briar has been cut, this is a different briar to the one you linked to in reddit earlier. My guess would be the briars were either cut to allow the tarpaulin to cover the area, or cut by Dr Harbison to allow access to the body. If the briars were cut before the body was discovered surely that crucial piece of evidence would have been mentioned by the Gardaí or Harbison?

    eta,

    Of course the obvious reason for cutting the briars would be forensics, but they would have surely cut them off lower down instead of leaving a foot or two behind?



  • Registered Users Posts: 867 ✭✭✭Gussie Scrotch




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭jesuisjuste


    This is great context, thanks for posting. Was Sophie wearing the gown in the pictures when she was found, or it was found as it is in the picture away from her body?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 207 ✭✭jesuisjuste


    Based on the square shaped blood-free zone, it would seem to give credence to the block being in situ for the majority of the attack, but then the finishing blow being the block to the head, and it being in an unstable position, it then rolling off onto the edge of the gown.



Advertisement