Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2025 Irish Presidential candidates

1246

Comments

  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,444 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    I don't think you realise just how few votes he would get, be probably does! People's criteria for president is very different and Gerry lacks the basics for most people to even take his run seriously.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Indeed. He has a firm knowledge of economics and is good in interviews at dealing with facts and not getting involved in nonsense. I think Moore would make a decent President; certainly much better than his younger brother!



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,444 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Retired Vice Admiral Dr. Mark Mellett DSM, might be a compromise candidate for FG/FF as he is well like in both parties, a long career in leadership roles. no question as to his integer or willingness to do what is necessary in the service of the country. And he has become political active in recent times as a member of some low government bodies and initives. But who knows, we'll just have to wait and see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,348 ✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


     is good in interviews at dealing with facts and not getting involved in nonsense.

    His frequent frothing screeds against public transport would suggest otherwise.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Has anyone ever come out and said that they wanted to run for President but the restrictive nomination system prevented them from doing so?

    Yes, most notably when McAleese was gifted a second term unopposed. Which is something of a democratic farce.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl




  • Registered Users Posts: 11,974 ✭✭✭✭PopePalpatine


    Oh boy, I can't wait to see him refer the bill that finally gets Metrolink underway to the Supreme Court.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    My post was (I thought) humourosly saying how economist Moore McDowell would be a much better president (and is good in interviews and dealing in facts) than his younger brother Michael (who someone else said would be good in the role)



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Who was prevented from standing by the "restrictive nomination system"?

    Why should someone be allowed to stand if they can't meet basic criteria?

    Or are you just annoyed that McAleese was able to stand unopposed because for some reason you dislike her?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    If Martin intends to run I wonder how that will be managed. If we take it that FF and FG will be forming another government after the GE and Harris gets the first turn in the taoiseach's chair then presumably MM quits as FF leader shortly after the election. So will he declare his intentions ahead of the GE? Surely he can't get away with stonewalling questions on this until after the election…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,678 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,475 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I suppose the issue with the nomination process is that because you need to be nominated by either oireachtas members or by multiple local authorities, the parties can essentially block candidates.

    All other elected representatives can be nominated by a number of registered voters rather than needing party backing.



  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 10,444 Mod ✭✭✭✭Jim2007


    Shush, don't upset the narrative, some people love coming up with their own definition of democracy and then get all up set when it does not work that way! In Ireland and Switzerland those rules, the constitution, is enacted by the people and can only be changed by the people. And that makes for a very strong form of democracy and you are just wasting time trying to explain this to some people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,860 ✭✭✭✭Beechwoodspark


    I heard that too - TT is very popular nationally - I like him a lot - but I dunno, not sure if the presidency is a good fit for him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,085 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    If you listen to the Yates/Cooper podcast, they discussed MM and were of the view that his focus is on being in Government as Taoiseach after the next GE. It wouldn't make a lot of sense for a person of his age and who is still at the top tier of national politics to decide to opt out of that in favour of the presidency, where he could influence and decide very little.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    That's what I'd be thinking myself but he is bookies' favourite and hasn't ruled it out so I was wondering how things would play out if he did make a run for the Aras. You'd be thinking he'd have to declare his hand before the election, otherwise the speculation would totally overshadow FF's campaign but if he did that would he not be coming across like one of those European election candidates like Peadar Toibin who openly declare their intention to hand over the seat to a locum and return to national politics if they win? Don't think it would play well with the voters…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,348 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Didn't MM state publicly that his focus is entirely on being taoiseach after the next general election? Is Enda Kenny still a possible?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,490 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    • Tommy Tiernan: I think quiet introspective Tommy who is such a great interviewer would have a good shot at it. That's only one side of the coin though. I think he has a lot of skeletons in his closet and it could well turn out like it did for David Norris with him being hauled over the coals in a vicious campaign
    • Michael McDowell: The President has to win 50% of the popular vote after transfers. No way would McDowell get anywhere near that. This seems like the last kick of the dying hope of people who thought that, after the referendum failures from earlier in the year (but before the local & euro election results), that a new era of reactionary populism was about to begin.

    I think whoever gets the FG nomination will probably get it, since they have a few candidates who could definitely win it. FF's only hope would be MM. SF are too divisive to reach that 50% threshold. The left-wing parties might need to resort to a celebrity candidate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,475 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    FG have never held the presidency and would really want it. I expect they'll end up doing their usual and pick a bad candidate and somebody else will swoop in.

    In my view, with the exception of Micheál Martin, I don't think any current or recent TD would get elected as President. I think full time politics like that ends up with too much baggage out there in the public's eye to get elected. So I think it'll need to come from the other politicians, the likes of the senators or MEPs. I could see a Sean Kelly or Mairead McGuinness candidacy going well.

    I wouldn't be surprised at all if it's someone from civic society who gets the backing of a party though that becomes the main runner. No idea who that would be, just a feeling.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I have no issue with her, i think she was an excellent president. I have an issue with the system that allows the elected head of state have no mandate whatsoever from the people they are ostensibly at the head of. It was an affront to democracy.

    There are no "basic criteria" to meet. The political parties and councils they run simply decided they were grand with McAleese and didn't nominate anyone else.

    Also no candidate who had the slightest chance of winning was stopped but that's not really the point.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    So they should have nominated someone that they didn't really want (and knew that the public didn't want) just because?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Well we don't "know" the public didn't want them though I certainly don't think there was much risk of the likes of Dana getting anywhere. However I believe the oireachtas and polotical parties in general should have taken their role seriously and ensured there was a legitimate alternate candidate.

    As far as I'm concerned her second term had no democratic legitimacy. She was nothing but an appointed head of state because the political cabal got together and decided they couldn't be bothered with an election. Hopefully we don't see it ever happen again.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23 Anthony A


    Don't kid yourself it will be another establishment crony, the system is set up to ensure this. It's a fairly meaningless position now anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 23 Anthony A


    It will be Bertie or Micheal or Enda or Mairead etc

    Basically whoever the establishment and state media decide. And the people will follow along and vote them in.

    I think anyone who expected things to change here has given up now, left the country or has been forced out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,293 ✭✭✭paul71


    I have always wondered why Dick Spring never attempted a run. I think he has been to long away now for a run but why not 15 - 20 years ago?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭xlogo


    Frances Fitzgerald would get my vote



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    "the establishment" are out to get us 🙄

    Maybe you would like to tell us who you think would be a good fit for this "fairly meaningless position"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    More meaningless 'now' than it was say 50 years ago?



  • Registered Users Posts: 23 Anthony A


    It doesn't matter what I think, Paddy will vote for whatever FFFG/Lab crony that RTE tell them to.

    It's as meaningless as it's mostly ceremonial and has no real power. But again we'll listen to candidates tell lies about what they'll do in the position when it isn't even possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,842 ✭✭✭Allinall


    Are you not "Paddy", or are you just talking about other Paddies?



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    So am I correct in that you don't want to participate in the discussion about who might be a worthy candidate and would just prefer to throw insults at both those who do stand and those who might vote for them?

    As for your "paddy" slurs - consider this a final warning on this!
    Read the charter before posting in the Politics forum again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 23 Anthony A


    Ah yes threats and censorship, when you and your cronies don't get what they want as I refuse to entertain this charade. The FF/FG way



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,425 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Not a threat.
    Anthony A now banned from Politics

    Now, let's get back on topic



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    It's as meaningless as it's mostly ceremonial and has no real power. 

    Yes because that's how it's set out in the constitution. If you want a different model of presidency you'll need to change how the office is defined in the constitution…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,490 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I know that that particular poster has been banned so I'm not referring to him specifically but the tactics used by him in those few posts are very common. A similar one is when a poster criticises "the mainstream media". When I see a poster do that I always try and ask them, respectfully, what media do they instead recommend. They never give you an answer.

    You see it's easy to play the cynic but it's not as fun being earnest because then you are vulnerable to other people's cynicism…..and there's nothing a cynic hates more than being vulnerable.

    Anyway, to get back on topic LOL at the chances of Bertie getting elected. I would love to see him get nominated though just to see him get thick repeatedly when anyone brought up the Crash or his dodgy financial history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,607 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    That's exactly what they did do - taking their role very seriously, they agreed that the best candidate was the incumbent.

    Saying they should have nominated some no-hoper or nutcase just to force a vote is ridiculous. No credible candidate would have put themselves forward as a guaranteed loser, and no political party would have wasted their resources campaigning for them either. With the possible exception of SF but IIRC they would have needed other parties to support them getting a nomination at that time.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,607 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    If you think it's a meaningless position, what is it you are complaining about exactly?

    and what does "now" mean? The role of the President has not changed in any way and we'd need to amend the Constitution to change that role.

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 977 ✭✭✭Jellybaby_1


    It's Mairead McGuinness for me from the list above. Regarding Frank Finlay, a thousand times NO!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,883 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 977 ✭✭✭Jellybaby_1


    Hah! You got me there. I thought I had changed it to Fergus! Obviously I tripped up!



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,383 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I'd rather they put up viable candidates. I can't remember at the time but if SF were willing to put up a candidate that absolutely should have been enabled.

    Anyway, I won't drag the thread further off topic. If people are ok with an unelected and appointed President then fair enough, but I find the idea quite distasteful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,612 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    SF had 5 Dáil seats (and no senators) at the time; it would have required a hell of a lot of enabling. They would have needed almost every single TD and Senator to come in for them; or a deal with another party - none of which would have countenanced it.

    Only FG, FF and Labour had the numbers to nominate a candidate via the Oireachtas. Greens had 6 TDs/0 Senators and PDs 8 TDs/4 Senators



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,490 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Had there been an election in 2004 it would have ended up pretty much like the actual election in 2018. The incumbent President was extremely popular and it would have been a procession - likely versus some opponents only in it for self promotion or delusion.

    If our President was the most powerful person in the country (as for example they are in the USA) then I would certainly say that an election should be mandatory but since it's a ceremonial position then I'm not too fussed about skipping elections.

    Now that the precedent has been set though I suspect that there will be no more skips.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,391 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Article 12.1.2.1 of the Constitution of Ireland

    The President shall be elected by direct vote of the people.

    Its not up for discussion.

    As for runners and riders; I would have preferred if Fergus Finlay had been nominated by Labour in 2011 over Michael D, but the former is 74 now, and thats too old.

    There are a few enthusiastic FGers who want a run, namely Mairead McGuinness and Sean Kelly MEP. Enda Kenny is being mentioned too, but he's 73, so I think not. Likewise Frances Fitzgerald. McGuinness will probably get the nod ultimately, in exchange for having cleared the EU Commissioner road for Michael McGrath without a fuss.

    Hard to know who FF will go for. It won't be Bertie, and it won't be Micheál Martin as he intends to be Taoiseach again. They could back a party outsider as they did with Mary McAleese. Perhaps someone like Emily O'Reilly, or Jarlath Burns.

    Or it may be that the next FG/FF/Indys coalition will nominate an agreed candidate to share the cost and get a large heft of backing behind.

    If I could have my fantasy list of nominees, they would include:

    Mairead McGuinness

    Catherine Day

    Emily O'Reilly

    David O'Sullivan

    Emily Logan

    Frances Black

    Simon Coveney

    Frank Clarke

    Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh

    Dr. Mike J Ryan

    Professor John Crown

    Brendan Gleeson

    And no doubt a few more I'll think of.

    My criteria is for a person or substance, of keen intelligence, deeply immersed in representing the Country and the People in an important field, and who will advocate for the people and have the character to fight tooth and nail to protect the integrity of the State and the Constitution in every way.

    And if I hear any more mentions next year of Kevin Sharkey types or any c**t off of f**king Dragon's Den, I will lose my reason. Take your ego trips elsewhere lads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭mikep


    I wonder would Labour go with someone like Noeline Blackwell, former head of the rape crisis centre who has been on the radio and TV frequently for years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,612 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Labour would need quite a good election result to be able to nominate without assistance from another party, or multiple parties - 11 Oireachtas reps elected in 2020; need 20. Even the Soc Dems 6 would not be enough if the election results were repeated exactly - lets ignore that there's a lot more seats so both should probably gain at least one if the share of the vote was identical; even both gaining one would leave them one short!

    That was the case in 1990 (Workers Party) and 1997 (Democratic Left) too of course. The 1997 funding arrangements arguably caused the party merger - DL owed Labour a six figure sum by the end of it.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement