Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia-Ukraine War (Threadbanned in op)

1126127129131132168

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It would also be a sort of tacit admission by Putin that his forces couldn't get it done, conventionally, vs the AFU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,494 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Don’t we all, but I also don’t like being threatened.


    Who’s threatening to Nuke people at the moment by the way?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,652 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    the Kursk submarine accident was 24 years ago today.

    So Russia have lost 2 Kursk’s in 24 years…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭rogber


    The Kursk submarine accident was a horrible tragedy and one of the early occasions on which Putin clearly showed how cold and indifferent he is to the loss of human life, including lives he is supposed to protect, and that all that matters to him is saving face. The signs were all there looking back



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭rogber


    An admission we'd all rather avoid though. Any kind of nuclear weapon would be beyond awful. I don't think we'll come to it, but would not be surprised if they are used as threats again if Kursk situation isn't solved quickly by the Russians



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,494 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    So more threats? Every day they threaten us with Nukes.

    They already said any incursion would be met with Nukes.

    All Russia do is threaten the world with Nukes.


    What’s your point?????




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,984 ✭✭✭Rawr


    The more this goes on, the more I'm wondering if I was correct in my theory that the Russian (Soviet) Nuke arsenal has long rusted to pieces and can't actually be used.

    • Nukes if the West armed Ukraine → No nuke attack
    • Nukes if the anyone attacked fake Russia (the bits they annexed) → No nuke attack
    • Nukes if the anyone attacked actual Russia → No nuke attack

    They either don't any servicable weapons or dare never use them. It's one thing to rattle a sabre, but if you can't actually sword-fight then it's not going to end well for you.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,818 ✭✭✭zv2


    I can easily imagine a fleet of plutonium infected drones heading for Moscow.

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.” — Voltaire



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The use of nuclear weapons is such a potentially existential matter that it's likely Russia would only use them if the country were literally about to fall.

    He can call Ukraine's latest move a provocation as much as he likes, but he knows as well as everyone else does that Ukraine are as entitled as one can be to push into Russia since his forces have pushed into Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    Calm down.

    Putin couldn’t even come to call this for what it was “an invasion of Russia itself” (which itself would be admitting that annexed regions are not Russia and telling the Russian people he failed at the one job he has)

    And called it a “counter terrorism” operations with the military now removed and FSB put in charge as per yesterday’s ISW report



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,134 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The question which needs to be asked is the makeup of that 50,000. If it was primarily convicts, ethnics and foreign mercs, then Putin couldn't give a fcuk. He'll throw that at the front line all day.

    It also seems that punishing, numbers-based attrition warfare is sort of worshipped in Russian culture, given how central the sacrifices of WW2 are in their history. Maybe it plays into the whole 'Russia is big' mythos, despite having a population of 140 million. Lot of people, but far from inexhaustible and doubly so when you consider that only some of this number can go to war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,873 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    The benefit is not so much in "getting people to actually do something" as creating a viable alternative narrative that either paralyses the decision makers - who are going to get phone calls from families wanting their guys returned - or pushes them in the wrong direction.

    Right now, we're seeing the effect of that in respect of Kursk. On the one hand, you have a bunch of Russian bloggers in a blind panic because they saw a single Ukrainian tank half a kilometre down the road; on the other, you have the hard-core Kremling butt-suckers talking about how a gigantic horde of "hohols" were vaporised by the mighty Red Army.

    In the middle, you have local politicians traipsing from house to house trying to get pensioners to evacuate "to safety" because they know they can't count on the Kremlin to protect them (might even bomb their own because … ya know, Kremlin) … and at the same time, you have Ukrainian forces cruising down the undefended highways, with enough time (and confidence) to stop and ask a couple of babushkas if they need help carrying their shopping.

    With each passing day, this does indeed look like a "Prigozhin-2.0" challenge to the All-Seeing-Eye-of-Putin - only this time, the cavalcade is backed up with serious anti-Kremlin firepower and (subject to confirmation!) a determination to hold whatever ground they take.

    From a political strategy point of view, Ukraine doesn't need to take any major cities in the Kursk or Belgorod regions: their mere presence in a huge swathe of territory along the "wrong" side of the border is an almight poke in the eye for Putin, especially if the local residents decide that life is no different (or even better) under the new regime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Even this lad isn't denying Ukraine's presence in certain areas.

    What's interesting is the direction of travel (coming from Belaya). Very close to the Kursk/Belgorod border at that stage. And from a doom merchant poster on twitter to a more (perhaps overly) optimistic one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,202 ✭✭✭rogber


    If comments were only allowed that provide new insight this thread would be a lot slower than it is. You're just being petty and belligerent with your pointless sniping for the sake of it. I won't waste any more time discussing it with you



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    It turns out that BTR was captured by the Russians so they're well in control of the area around giri.

    I've read another report that Russians are finally in control of Sudzha which I hope is true this time. I think Ukraine will dig in here and it'll become the frontline.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Why do you want the Russians in control of Sudzha?

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    As RoyalCelt said. There's another vid that appears to show this is a captured piece of kit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,790 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    Putin must be so frustrated. He took Crimea so easily, he must have felt Ukraine would be defeated within weeks, that the West would huff and puff, but sanctions would pass relatively quickly. Now he finds himself an international pariah, under massive pressure.

    He could have lived a very content life, but he just bit off more than he could chew and Russia has actually been invaded now. It's a hellish vision for him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Ukrainians 😂

    But yeah I seen that BTR initially reported as Ukrainian from pro Ukraine telegram sources but later confirmed as Russian captured as a closer video was taken. Who knows it could be Ukrainian soldier's dressed as Russians but I doubt it.

    Just read this however.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,179 ✭✭✭riddles


    I read somewhere the war was costing Russia 300m€ a day. Given the impact of sanction, damage to oil refineries and gas has this figured increased. Add in interest rates of 18% and chronic inflation surely that figures jumped by a lot?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,652 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    And even rumours alone about the AFU being spotted here/there will be enough to sow even more panic amongst the locals as well as the defending RU forces… make them suspicious of everyone… There were rumours spreading last week that the AFU were disguising themselves as priests..

    AFU special forces even covertly painting a few triangles on Russian equipment could be enough to start RU on RU attacks amid the total confusion & incompetence in which they seem to operate

    You'd like to think they have a long term plan here, to maybe try and hold onto some of the Kursk oblast for a few weeks/months, let the Russians expend untold amounts of men/equipment to slowly claw it back, and when it looks like Russia finally have it back, pull out while simultaneously opening a new front somewhere else on the border…. all the while easing some of the pressure on the frontlines in Eastern Ukraine.

    Probably better for all concerned for Russians to just die in Russia as opposed to dying in Ukraine… probably spares a bit of paperwork too..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,643 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    Are these troop movements being hit/targeted at all? Haven't seen anything about it or the AFU trying to move in on the remaining troops



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,502 ✭✭✭Dubh Geannain


    Long article but a decent read -

    Russia Has the Resources for a Long War in Ukraine - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

    The Russian authorities are extremely unlikely to choose to cut military spending in order to maintain previous levels of domestic consumption. The economy is destined to become more and more militarized, even if that results in stagnating or falling real incomes. Still, this is unlikely to cause real problems for the regime. Firstly, standards of living would still remain relatively high: certainly, they have a long way to fall until they reach what they were in the Soviet period, not to mention the destitution of the early 1990s. Secondly, growing repression, the embrace of an avowedly militant and nationalistic state ideology, and attacks on free speech have helped the authorities keep a lid on dissent at home. In an extreme case, they can easily crush any public expressions of opposition. The only real risk is if the salary levels of employees of the security apparatus and military personnel fall below current levels—but the authorities have resources to ensure that this does not happen.

    In other words, Russia will be able to maintain military spending for a relatively long time, just like other pariah countries. This is bad news for Ukraine, ordinary Russian citizens, people living in neighboring countries, and the overall global security environment.

    This is why when Ukraine started hitting Russian product capacity collective Western voices started piping up. Cheap oil is still a desirable goal for Western economies.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    Guaranteed… like clockwork… "I'm just wondering…"



  • Registered Users Posts: 207 ✭✭Avatar in the Post


    Source, Russian Fossil tracker.

    Any source within the ballpark of credibility?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 754 ✭✭✭thatsdaft


    The figures don’t look right, vast majority of Russian gas exports were by pipelines to Europe with not much in eastern direction due to distances involved

    their LNG was always a small fraction, literally lacking much in way of LNG facilities and only this week a second “shadow” lng ship was acquired by them

    Trying to find that German site which keeps up to date gas volumes on all pipelines coming into Europe

    Edit; here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,997 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    And the cost will go up with the frontline expanding into Russia.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,790 ✭✭✭Sunny Disposition


    There's still no upside to Putin in using nuclear weapons, so I think it's still very unlikely.

    He must be hugely frustrated though, the whole thing has been an epic miscalculation.



Advertisement