Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

(Site is a graveyard - How can boards save itself?) Any update?

1121315171842

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,625 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Quite peculiar indeed. I'm sure the person who has a superior sense of knowing when a pile on is happening, has now found one thing they could be constructive to offer this thread. They could advise the owners/management/admin on how they would prevent users from replying to posts made by certain posters.

    I would suggest only using pictures to reply to them, but I think I would be accused of being flippant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    As long as you don't wake up in the morning and get out on the Wrong side ?! ;)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,509 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Those posters are no longer on the site.

    Apples and oranges comparison.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    I respectfully and wholeheartedly agree to disagree .

    Goodnight .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,625 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    What do you want the site to be?

    Do you think there should be limits to what people can discuss?

    I laid out what I think should be off limits for discussion, and I asked you which would you allow, but you chose to ignore that, which is your right. So I'm asking you now,

    What do you want boards to be?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    What posts on there are problematic? I may not agree with them all but bar one poster who was abjectly trolling on Saturday people are either agreeing or disagreeing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Really ? I don't think so .

    Thought you said

    "I cannot think of a single user on this site who has anything approaching Nazi ideology or defends Nazi ideology."

    That was why I replied .

    How do you know they are gone if they were never here ?

    You are denying the undeniable again nullzero .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,625 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    The zero tolerance thread is one of the few threads just angers me too much. I know it's not good for my mental health to see the hatred, fear and vitriol directed towards innocent people fleeing a desperate situation.

    I tip my hat to those who stand up to the racists and xenophobes in that thread. You're far stronger than me. I'd be thread banned in a heartbeat.

    Its racism and xenophobia that's often just on the cusp of the border of acceptability. I've seen it justified as acceptable because many people have that outlook. That's never an argument I'll agree with. Many people thought (and still think) homosexuality is against nature, that never made that right. Or that white people are the pinnacle of the human race. We all hopefully recognise how odious that belief is.

    I'll keep it bringing it back to the rules. If they were clarified and cleared up, the site could be better and more welcoming.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,394 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    When a poster is receiving a new reply every minute or so. 

    It's not possible to respond to all that, and it keeps happening on this very thread. 

    Bull. If you want to you can take as much time as you want to reply to as many as you want, replies are not on a deadline, ones personal anxiety about making timely replies to multiple responses their posts illicit is a personal issue. Can even take the time and wait to reply, and thereby, slow down, the conversation back and forth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,394 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    specific accounts might not be, can’t say the users behind the keyboards have moved on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Goldilocks was awoken by the heat and is currently firmly ensconced in the middle of the bed. 2 things have stuck out:

    @Goldengirl, you posted this:

    I asked for help on a left wing thread a while back for the small few centre left and left posters posting on the immigration and asylum threads , trying to combat racist misinformation etc on the immigration thread, and getting a bit overwhelmed , to be told by a senior poster on left side of the debate that those threads were a cesspit and they would not go there

    How did you ask like-minded posters for help? Was it on thread or did you PM other posters to argue with you?

    @suvigirl, you posted this:

    Beasty has just confirmed on another thread that there is an issue with reported posts not showing up. So any posts that remain in thread, when they obviously shouldn't, are not being reported to mods even when multiple posters report them

    That reads like you're aware that other posters have reported posts on this thread, and that you have. Are you PMing each other to report posts?

    If this is true that is indeed the dreaded pile up, and a very underhanded method of engagement. I may well be wrong but that's how I interpret these posts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Wha?

    Go back to sleep you are raving ! 😂

    I asked them to engage with the thread in a post on the other thread . Still there if you care to look ! Nothing about reporting , ffs

    Don't know how or why you are asking me about the last half as I was / am not involved in that discussion ?

    2+2 =75 ?

    Now go back to sleep and make sure you don't wake up on the wrong side again!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    You are quick to accuse others of piling up on you and have done so on previous Feedback threads, you've confirmed you were the poster who made the comment about others being ran off a thread. In fact, you once accused me of running another poster off a thread.

    Do these events only happen to you or others you agree with? Here we had one poster feel they were being piled up on and you just dismiss it. Do you think it might be possible that he/she feels the same way you did when you accused others of the very same thing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87,782 ✭✭✭✭JP Liz V1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    I don't care to look, I just asked a question. Surely you can see how that might have been interpreted when I'm not familiar with the threads in question?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    No I don't see how you read that and am not happy about it .

    That's an unfair accusation and now I am wondering all sorts .

    Have you been pming someone who asked you to say this ?

    Goodnight .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    You've edited your post, I addressed Suvigirl in my post too, not just you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yes I continued writing .

    So did I read your post wrong then ?

    What exactly are you accusing ME of ??



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    It was a question, I acknowledged in the post that I may have been wrong and I've accepted your answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Yeah right . When was that ?

    . So now answer my question ?

    And I might accept your apology ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    At the end @Goldengirl.

    If this is true that is indeed the dreaded pile up, and a very underhanded method of engagement. I may well be wrong but that's how I interpret these posts.

    And this is me asking a question, not accusing you.

    How did you ask like-minded posters for help? Was it on thread or did you PM other posters to argue with you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    So it wasn't . I am not going to produce the post for you but it was on the dangers or the Gript thread, no pms no requests for pile ons .

    If I have something to say I come out and say it to your face . And if I report someone I can do it all by myself .

    Now I am upset by this and request that you and JP Liz just go and play whatever games you want with someone else .

    This is classic and why this site is becoming such a nightmare .

    Why would someone decent behave like this to anyone unless they are trolling ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    There's no game, liz and I have played Werewolf together here and on Forum of Games. Her comment was a joke about my posting style and nothing to do with you or your posts.

    I read you comment where you said you were struggling in a thread so you asked like-minded, left leaning posters for help. I simply asked how you asked for help. I also come straight out and ask things which I why I asked you directly whilst acknowledging I may be wrong. I've accepted your answer and haven't asked for proof.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    It's unfair to accuse me of trolling, I've engaged openly on this thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,349 ✭✭✭suvigirl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,349 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    I never suggested any posts in this thread. I thought this was a feedback thread about Boards?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,349 ✭✭✭suvigirl


    Seriously? Leggy! More sleep is needed. I have not suggested any posts on this thread be removed, in fact, it is the posts with personal abuse, or hateful racist,sexist, xenophobic stuff that I feel should be deleted. Nothing to do with this thread.

    I posted a response beasty made on another thread in feedback, no conspiracy here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Awake still ...thanks for that !

    Bit of a funny one that " when I only asked you a question "too.

    Nothing open engagement about out the blue accusing two posters of pm-ing and organising pile ups !

    You say you did not mean it like that but that is what you said / how you wrote that .

    So really you should acknowledge that and apologise or else I can take it that you don't accept my reply .

    Either somebody got under your skin or is dripping poison in your ear because I can't understand how you thought any of that was ok and why you are somehow affronted when no apology appears to be forthcoming from you about this ?

    We have never had cross words before and I certainly haven't been reporting you or anyone giving feedback here

    I want to draw a line under this now before it ends up closing the thread ( is that the aim of this carryon? )

    Btw Lz's interjection wasn't very helpful because it made it seem as if you two were in cahoots , of which I am sure you are well aware .

    Edited two spelling mistakes only

    Post edited by Goldengirl on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭OscarMIlde


    Disingeuous targeted posting in an attempt to shut down or stymie discussion frustrates moderate posters who want to discuss issues or learn about topics and drives them away.

    I lurk on the Russian thread, but all too often the threads devolve into fights about motivations rather than actually discussing the minutiae of the conflict. Same with Irish politics threads which immediately become FG/FF vs SF rather than actually discussing policies.

    Agenda driven posters arguing for and against a side at any cost are ruining it for everyone else and only moderation asking people to cop on can stop it. We all know it happens, we even have a poster on this thread admitting to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Irish Aris


    I'm sure Mike will be very happy with all the "constructive" feedback provided here... 😒🙄



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,313 ✭✭✭Vote4Squirrels


    I generally have nothing but support for the moderators but when they apply warnings based on their beliefs and not the rules, then it is becoming a problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,625 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Deleted.

    Ironically, offering nothing constructive myself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,001 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    I thought with seeing a few pages that their might have been an interesting development.

    The last few pages are basically what most threads descend into, posters bickering at each other and ruining a thread.

    Juvenile behaviour that must drive mods insane.

    If you want to have a pop at posters take it to pm and if you feel aggrieved then pm a mod.

    The annoying part is all that happens is threads get shut down over this behaviour, where dealing with the handful of people ruining threads would be the best thing.

    To add, I have been guilty of such behavior and would have no problem being reprimanded if I do so in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,009 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Yeah, but it's subjective when they're doing that.

    That is the issue, one person claiming it, or even 1 side of the discussion doesn't make it so. It absolutely should be avoided, but it needs a good Dispute Resolution Process to either identify that that was the case, or to clear the Mod involved and carry on.

    I've spoken a lot on these 2 feedback threads about my issues with moderation. And I've said that one of the things that really showed me that there's an issue is precisely that the Dispute Resolution Process failed to operate at all in a particular case for me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,625 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    What rules? Where are they? Hard to know if rules are being broken if you can't find them.

    All mod actions are subject to appeal. If you appeal and a cmod does nothing, it was within the rules and not just a mods beliefs.

    If a mod actions is appealed and the appeals are often overturned, the modship is removed.

    This process is very clear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,625 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    If you want to have a pop at posters take it to pm and if you feel aggrieved then pm a mod.

    New nomination for worst piece of advice on this thread.

    Do not take any complaints about me to pm.

    I will report you for unsolicited PM's, and possible abusive behaviour. Best out in the open where admin, mods and the community can see for themselves.



  • Registered Users Posts: 759 ✭✭✭Slightly Kwackers


    I see this is typical of a thread on this medium where the subject matter is adhered to firmly and never morphs in any interesting way, just goes on and on eventually regurgitating the same stuff with the same users.

    We used to have killfiles in Usenet and dynamic threads that would keep going over years with little bearing on the original subject line, the users were perhaps entrenched in their views, but they would at least get sick of batting the same ball to and fro and change the game to suit the trajectory.

    As far as this thread title goes, we used to have a "DNR" order in the UK health service.

    It was often the kindest approach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,582 ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    I interpreted your posts as possible collusion and asked for clarification. I did state that I may be wrong. Turns out I was and I've accepted the response from you and Suvigirl.

    I'm not in collusion with anyone, I am capable of thinking and posting for myself.

    We have crossed swords before on a Covid thread where you were adamant that employers would forevermore insist that employees stay at home if they have a cold or flu.

    There was no malice on my part, I just wanted to understand your posts.

    I'm not affronted, but I think it's clear I'm not a troll. I have repeatedly responded openly to others on this thread regardless of whether we agree or disagree.

    I'm drawing a line under this now because it's ruining the thread and, no, it is not my intention to have it closed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,001 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Yes not ideal, I was going to suggest people act like adults but that's unlikely.

    I couldn't think of any other way people could continue arguing without everyone else having to scroll through the drama.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    What do you mean by the 'same side of the debate as you are on'? What side am I on?

    For the record, the only party I was ever a member of are the Greens and my vote would generally go to Green/ Labour/ like minded independents. I'm the very definition of left of centre and generally liberal views. That doesn't mean though that I am not greatly concerned about the rapid changes in Irish society nor am I going to swallow every woke agenda that pops up. And I speak up on these issues as a concerned citizen.

    Someone of my ilk, a centrist should be able to debate points of view on an Irish site like boards, without having to continually think 'will this align with moderator xyz's views on the matter'? That's the issue with parts of this site, it's far too censorious. I wouldn't be a great fan of Musk but his broad instincts on these matters is correct. Let the people speak and if that means you or others or I have to read a few uncomfortable viewpoints, well you or I or others don't have to ascribe to them.



  • Administrators Posts: 54,136 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Nobody is stopping you debating anything Furze, your problem is you don't actually debate, you just soapbox. This is why you keep ending up in bother.

    It's not censorious to nip your soapboxing in the bud, the moderators have to clamp down on it as it ruins threads for all other posters who are actually debating a subject on merit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Irish Aris


    On the subject of moderation:

    I had considered for a while to volunteer as a mod in the site. The fora that I follow are the less contagious ones: Films, gaming (both have very good mods in place) and music which I think it doesn't have active mods and it could worth a try as for the most part people behave well and genuinely share music. (I also follow soccer, which is a bit more difficult but also has good mods and people behave for the most part).

    Two main reasons that make me reluctant to go ahead with it:

    1.Written words are not always easy to interpret. Obviously there are clear cut cases where you could tell when a poster takes the piss. There are also posts that are more difficult to interpret and one can easily misunderstand what another person means, what's the context. We saw it earlier in this thread. That's a general observation, applies not just to boards but to most of the Internet.

    2.Specific to Boards: it's not clear what's allowed and what's not. I think Flaneur's suggestion about a full review of the charters in the site is one of the few (if not the only) suggestions that can be actioned here and now. Not to say that there weren't other good suggestions, but the luck of resources would make them rather unrealistic. I can't say what the charter should look like - in broad terms I agree with many of the points that Flaneur made, but thankfully it's not for me to decide.

    Two more general observations:

    -I always find that these feedback threads are almost exclusively for Current Affairs. I'll admit that I'm not using CA almost at all: I might go in a thread if the title catches my attention and scan the first 4-5 posts for any link that may give me some info on the topic (I only follow the Enoch Burke thread, initially because the topic interested me, later because it became entertaining). Rather common that the bickering and digs start straight away. I'm sure moderation isn't perfect there. I can only express admiration and respect to the mods of CA. Because my opinion is: who in their right mind would want to mod CA.

    -Posters argued about balanced debate and freedom of speech and that it's a community and these are all fair points. Posters also need to remember that this is aa privately owned company. And the owners can wake up one morning and decide "f**k this" and change the rule book completely on what's allowed and what's not. People will obviously disagree and bring the points in the beginning of this paragraph, bottom line though: their company, their rules. I think it would be good that we all remember that and decide if there is anything we can do in our daily interactions here.

    Post edited by Irish Aris on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,951 ✭✭✭✭Dial Hard


    Jesus christ, gang, some of you really need to get out more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,844 ✭✭✭RobbieTheRobber


    I stopped posting on boards and funnily enough I don't get annoyed by posters responding to my posts anymore that way.

    Might be helpful to those who feel "piled on" for other users responding to their public posts on a public forum.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,707 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    This is absolute nonsense. I've seen you go well out of your way to ruin threads on more than one occasion. It's one of the core jobs of any mod to shut this down sharpish.

    Some people just see any form of disagreement with ideology (usually whatever right wing crap they've imported from the USA) as all out attack and then start complaining about being assaulted because they can't engage meaningfully.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,048 ✭✭✭Oscar_Madison


    It’s not bad advice I have to say. I’ve had issues with abusive posts last month - I think it’s sorted in the main now- but what I noticed were certain posters with some major degrees of paranoia - every poster nearly they saw as a potential “threat” to them - they were posting regularly in certain CA topic threads and collectively decided that certain views or posts were trolling- but instead of reporting, they attacked the poster.

    It was extraordinary behaviour to watch - a collective group think approach. Taking a break from such threads even for just a few days certainly does bring down tension - so yeah, “get out more” is not bad advice at all- too much posting just leads to a bunch of “know it alls” who don’t tolerate any posting style or viewpoint other than their own



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Wow thats some recall . No context though .

    But I did not start this ..that was you .

    Good of you " to accept the responses "from me and the other poster you accused ! How condescending of you .

    I accept your acceptance , but note very importantly , that you did not say you were sorry for ill placed and ill informed accusations and the resulting upset last night / early morning . To me anyhow .Maybe you don't give a ...

    The fact that you do not apologise for what you said says it all as far as I am concerned .

    I will leave it there .

    Edit .I do see though you admit you were wrong

    Post edited by Goldengirl on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,274 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    This. Thank you .

    I didn't start this . And it would have been over straight away if the poster had withdrawn it last night . But no way do I want somebody fighting with me on pm in the middle of the night no matter how rational they think they are !

    At the end of the day posters are allowed to defend themselves and other posters should have the decency to allow that especially given the thread that we are on .



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement