Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M28 - Cork to Ringaskiddy [advance works ongoing; 2025 start; 2028 completion]

12930313234

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Little update from Coffey's

    https://www.facebook.com/share/BbJQE2Ss3atUwQBr/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭kub


    August update from Dronehawk :

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4E-ben9rYA



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭cantalach


    Interesting that such extensive earthworks have been done in the advance works contract. Is that normal? It was clear from earlier videos that the embankment at the quarry was being done, but this latest video shows a huge embankment just south of the proposed Carr’s Hill interchange too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭kub


    I was wondering was that extent of works normal alright. I wonder is this to prevent the contractor who actually gets the tender, from going back looking for extras?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,190 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Shows again that describing this as “pre-construction” and arguing that it’s not the same as actual construction is really just academic. The scheme is to all intents and purposes under construction already.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,155 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    That doesn't make sense. If they just prescribed these works in the main contract, as they have done in the enabling works, it wouldn't then be an extra anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Nah I'd say its just getting as much work done on the "easier" pre-contracts rather than the main tender.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭kub


    I cannot see the logic at all so if it is case of getting a section of land ready for road construction.

    What is the point in the approach can anyone please point out, if it is not to prevent unexpected costs by the company that wins the tender ?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,190 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Maybe TII are just eager to get pretty much anything built in this country at this stage?



  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭highwaymaniac


    In the case of the M28 there is a fairly significant balance of fill material required to be imported. Sourcing and hauling that volume of material takes time and I suspect the council are getting it for free if not being paid to take it as they are a lot of sites around the city hinterland with surplus material to dispose of. It has to be a significant time saving on the overall main Contract programme.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 153 ✭✭Corkladddd!!


    Does it not aid significantly in terms of program too? As in we know where is going, we know the holes to be filled and the land to be excavated, we'll get it 50% of the way there while you're finishing the details and by the time you've them finished and the tender awarded you can roll straight into taking it from 50% to 100% and add the more delicate touchs!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,384 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty


    My sister lives in Mount Ovel and is worried about the impact of these roadworks on getting to work. Would anyone know how it will affect traffic at busy times? For example, 9.00 and 5.00.



  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭highwaymaniac


    Yes absolutely, that's the key point saving time whilst the tendering and funding approval process is trundling along slowly!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭Hibernicis


    Very early days to be making predictions, but given the extent of the works, the likely impact that construction will have on a number of key commuter routes in the area, the fact that a number of these routes are currently operating at or over capacity at the times you mention and the failure of the Council to undertake and complete the long planned improvements on Clarke Hill & Coach Hill and their junctions with the Rochestown Road in a timely manner some disruption is inevitable. Key pressure points will be invasive works such as the demolition and reconstruction of Maryborough Hill overbridge (which will impact not just Maryborough Hill but the displaced traffic will further overload other routes/junctions in the area), the online works between the N40 and Carrs Hill and work in the Shannon Park area.

    As against this, good communications, good sequencing of the various closures and openings and clever temporary routing could make a huge difference, as we saw during the works in Dunkettle where traffic continued to flow through the construction site throughout. I know it wasn’t perfect, but in the overall scheme of things the DKI project team did a very good job.

    Unfortunately, to date, those responsible for the M28 project over the last decade would score a 1/10 for their communication skills. We live in hope that this will improve drastically.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,384 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty




  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41463547.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,561 ✭✭✭kub


    Just goes to prove what happens when the Minister for Transport despises roads.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    https://www.echolive.ie/corknews/arid-41464471.html

    Fianna Fail TD for East Cork (who is a member of the Oireachtas Transport Committee) correctly diagnoses the problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Not withstanding the fact that these projects should be funded, is it not just a case of pre budget games, where various department heads court the media so they make sure they get their cut of the pie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,518 ✭✭✭cjpm


    Except for the fact that the Minister for Transport wants roads to get less of the pie than what they are entitled to. Not more.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,160 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Is this going to be built to motorway standard?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,698 ✭✭✭Hibernicis


    Predominantly yes. The section from Rochestown to the proposed Barnahely roundabout will be motorway. The remaining section from the proposed Barnahely roundabout to Loughbeg and then on to the proposed port entrance and HGV service area will be single carriageway protected road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    They quote a lack of space bring the reason for the end of the scheme being single carriageway. Looking on overhead maps, I don’t see where the lack of space is at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 620 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Would the single carriageway section still be M28, or N28?



  • Registered Users Posts: 81 ✭✭joeymcg




  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    N28 but will be under Protected Road classification from the end of the M28 to the Port.

    Safe from development then



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    There'll have to be some elements of N28 northbound between the Rochestown junction and the N40 itself. Only a short bit, but I doubt that'll be under motorway restrictions as the destination, the N40, isn't motorway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    The M8 technically begins 400m north of the old Dunkettle Interchange roundabout. It’s obviously not signposted that way though.

    I’d expect the same for the M28.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,856 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Here’s the final design. I’ve stitched together a couple of sheets and marked out where the N28 scheme begins (this is not necessarily where the N28 road itself nominally begins!).

    If you follow the various side-roads, you’ll see that it’s only at 800 m that the road is free of local access traffic. That’s the point where you’ll see the first M28 confirmation signs and the start-of-motorway/end-of-motorway signage. I’ve coloured that blue.

    But, you won’t see any mention of “N28” in the non-motorway part of this road, because drivers on that section either want another route (nortbound traffic) or the motorway/local access (southbound). From a driver’s point of view, the motorway “interchange” starts/ends at the +0.8 km point I’ve marked, and the signage will reflect that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 620 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    I wonder if it will be at Carr's Hill where the M28 signs end? Otherwise, traffic coming from Maryborough Hill and Carrigaline Road will only be able to go onto a motorway. City Centre/N40 bound traffic from Maryborough Hill that can't use motorways (such as learners) won't be able to use the road to get to the N40 like they would now.

    Same with City Centre/Mahon/N40 bound traffic coming from the Rochestown Road who previously would have used Bloomfield



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Yeah, from that it looks like motorway restrictions will only begin 800m southbound and that seems to be the Irish way of doing things (look at Dunkettle). Openstreetmap seems to be the authority on what is a motorway and what isn't (based on a road being inescapable, or that every road inexcorably leading to a motorway being a motorway) so I reckon they'll have a field day with the M28 and the knot of slip roads floating around.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,856 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Don’t get hung up on trying to assign a route number to every link road in an interchange: it just doesn’t work like that. Unlike UK practice, the Irish road-numbering system prohibits one stretch of road from carrying two different route numbers. From that, you can reason out that in an interchange with shared links, the shared link roads cannot belong to any route.

    OpenSteetMap is not in any way “authoritative” - its route-colouring algorithm just colours links red if they can lead only to a motorway, but those slip roads are actually not under motorway restrictions. The “start-of-motorway” sign is placed at the point where motorway restrictions begin - before that point, you are not on a motorway.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Post on SkyscraperCity that the eastern phase of the M28, the 1.5km of single carriageway from Barnahely to the port, will commence in late October

    Main contract remains on track to start in early 2025

    EDIT: From Seamus McGrath's FB page as below

    • Works commencing in mid October 2024 for a duration of 20 months
    • Sorensen Civil Engineering Ltd are the main contractors
    • 1.5km of single carriageway Protected Road from the R613 at Barnhely to the east of Ringaskiddy village, incorporating two terminal roundabouts and an intermediate roundabout at Loughbeg Road. Also includes a shared ped/cyclist underpass at Old Post Office Road.

    Post edited by marno21 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭Mr.CoolGuy


    Yep, Seamus McGrath has a more detailed update on his Facebook. That section expected to take 20 months



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    having had to drive to Carrigaline yesterday on the old N28 I am now doubling down on the single interchange with Carrigaline being the huge Achilles heel of this scheme.

    Even with the current N28 delivering single lane traffic flow to Carrigaline, the R611 cannot handle the traffic flow at peak times with traffic backing out onto the Shannon Park roundabout and blocking traffic flow.

    The M28 will concentrate peak time traffic entering Carrigaline even more so. I suspect it will result in huge traffic queues backing onto the M28 travelling southbound each and every evening. Not sure what can or will be done about this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Agreed. This scheme should really have snuck in a proper western bypass of Carrigaline into it to distribute traffic around the city. That one junction is going to be very bad and there really is nothing that can be done about it save proper public transport, which we just can't seem to do.

    There should be a tram going to the airport and across to Carrigaline.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,267 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Your last sentence is what I was thinking as I read your post. I'm not sure what can be done.

    I've heard people say it's officially the most car-dependent town in the country, it seems like they need to pour money into other modes. As much as I love cycling, that greenway's not a realistic proposition for a lot of Carrigaline commuters. I believe it's also the only town in the country above 16k people that won't have rail? NTA really need to get involved properly now, because their N28 investment will quickly be overrun.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 620 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    The R609 is about to become a very dense corridor, and I assume the current N28 will be renamed as the R609. The R609 has a huge opportunity to add cycle lanes, even a tram line to Douglas and onto the City Centre. Hopefully they don’t mess it up..



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,497 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    If there's nothing moving on a tram connecting Ballincollig, the two colleges, CUH, the city centre, the Docklands and Mahon, there's absolute zero chance of a Luas anywhere near Carrigaline. It's just not going to happen.

    Busses and cycling, big time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,652 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    Not to derail but a tram to Carrigaline got a one line mention in the all Island Strategic Rail Review:

    It's the largest town in Ireland without a rail line planned, the topography and presence of the N28 means that it's far easier to connect (at least to Douglas) than the Airport. In the current climate it seems far fetched but if we ever do get serious about public transport, some version of Carrigaline-Douglas-City Center would be one of the most logical next up light rail routes in the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    I dread to thing what the "longer" term actually is when the current Cork Luas is in the "long" term and seems to be not moving at all.

    Anyway, back to the M28. Looking forward to seeing it starting; but dreading what the inevitable 60kmh limit on the N40 will do around the merge point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,033 ✭✭✭blindsider


    Coffey's are clearing this site for a compound - looks big enough….this is at the eastern end of Ringaskiddy on the southern side of the road

    Aerial view



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 808 ✭✭✭mydiscworld


    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2024/1016/1475678-lidl-plans-new-200m-regional-distribution-centre-in-cork/

    The company is to seek planning permission for the new facility at Wallingstown in Little Island.

    This certainly won't help the East Cork traffic if granted



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    An accident of some sort has closed the N28 today, chaos across the south of Cork. Currently jammed from the Kinsale Road roundabout back to the tunnel. And its not even rush hour yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,033 ✭✭✭blindsider


    Carr's Hill northbound was closed at 4:30pm. Douglas was not great as a result….:(



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭Mr.CoolGuy


    Does anyone know what current election hopefuls were involved in the M28 Steering Group? I know Jerry Buttimer was a member of it and quite vocal in supporting them. I think Micheál Martin attended meetings but I'm not sure if he was necessarily supportive of them. (For what it's worth I have no problem with politicians attending events/meetings like this because they should be aware of all concerns)

    But I'll have a few words for those who outright supported them, like Buttimer, when they call to my door.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,012 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Its reopened now, so was closed from about 11am through to about 830pm. One of the worst days for traffic in Corks history I think. Imagine if it had happened yesterday with that rain thrown in.

    I am so sick of commuting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭cantalach


    You have to wonder about how long it takes in these kinds of incidents for Gardaí to gather whatever evidence they need and then get the affected road reopened asap. It sure as Hell doesn’t take 9.5 hours to reopen major arteries in other countries after a 2-vehicle collision! I hope that doesn’t seem unsympathetic to those directly involved in the collision, but the chaos today probably affected 10-20,000 people and there clearly wasn’t enough urgency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,564 ✭✭✭AugustusMinimus


    https://www.irishexaminer.com/property/commercial/arid-41321884.html


    “The wider Moneygourney area is where MO’S just this week revealed plans for a 580-unit development, to be accessed from Carr’s Hill/Carrigaline Road via a new bridge as the M28 route unfurls.”


    Anyone know what this new bridge is and how it aligns with the M28? Does it somehow link the current N28 with the Maryborough Hill?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,984 ✭✭✭cantalach


    Given where Moneygurney is, it certainly sounds like the site falls between the existing N28 and Maryborough Hill. But it’s difficult to know what the bridge might be because there’s nothing to bridge over.


    Edit: I didn’t notice at first that the story was from Feb. That 580-unit scheme was granted permission last month and they’re already started construction. The site lies to the west of the M28 and the existing N28. The bridge goes over a stream/watercourse.

    http://planning.corkcity.ie/AppFileRefDetails/2442632/0



  • Advertisement
Advertisement