Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Couple Ordered to Demolish House - any update?

1181920212224»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,270 ✭✭✭Shoog


    Show some evidence for properties which were built with mortgage finance and no prior PP. Sorry but I am unwilling to take your word for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,511 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    The relevance of the mortgage is directly related to the couples claim of hard times on them, and yes at first glance may seem like a moot point.

    As this house was built off the books (I think we can agree that's a fact), is is likely (not verified) there is no mortgage. But the main point goes beyond this.

    It is also likely as a plumber, building off the books, it was done as part of a group of builders in different areas (bricky, Sparky, plasterer, carpenter etc.) all supporting each other. Is this a fact no, is it a problem if it was done like this, No, I have no problem with builders helping each other, in their spare time, if that's what they want to do.

    Its also worth remembering that the average size house in Ireland is 220m2 and this was build is over 500m2.

    So it's not a reasonable sized house by any means, and they probably avoided paying huge amounts of interest, due to low build costs, and low if any interest payments on any loans, like the rest of us.

    They also intentionally and willingly bloke the law in doing all this.

    So my main point, however they funded the house, is claiming hard times doesn't cut it for me, we've all had hard times, but have had to struggle through with it and get on with it.

    If you rob a bank, you can't suddenly claim hard times as some sort of get out clause not to be responsible for your illegal actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,410 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    Fella's speculating and arguing about a mortgage without even knowing what a mortgage is and one fella even doubling down to say that he sold mortgages for a major bank. Lol.

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,270 ✭✭✭Shoog


    We all know what mortgage is - a loan with an asset with collateral as surety.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 522 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You know this for a fact? How.

    Just to be clear, both Nationwide and Anglo were handing out loans at the time for property, with less than rigorous due diligence, to both property speculators and builders. So I’m not sure how you can be factual sure about how it was paid for, or why that is even relevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,410 ✭✭✭Rows Grower


    You claimed to have put me on ignore at 11.46pm last night.

    You're a bluffer sunshine, off with you.

    "Very soon we are going to Mars. You wouldn't have been going to Mars if my opponent won, that I can tell you. You wouldn't even be thinking about it."

    Donald Trump, March 13th 2018.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,795 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    It's clear that this story (and indeed other stories) show all the problems ABP has.

    ABP has made a fool of itself and shown to everyone that it and the council have no meaningful power. Structure is neatly 20 years old. I'm sure there are rules that if a structure is standing X amount of years without planning that it's automatically granted retention.

    There's a stack of people before the courts in Dublin over renovations/extensions that were completed without planning permission. Courts are saying put it back the way it was, but nothing ever happens. The courts grant permission for the council to put things back the way they were but they don't have staff to do that, and any subcontractor would be mad to take on a job like that.

    ABP's inability to change to a rules based system and inherent corruption in the organization is core contributing factor to the mess we currently have in the construction sector.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 522 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith




  • Registered Users Posts: 134 ✭✭byrne249


    They might have brought a few of them with them when they relocated from Galway to RathCairn, only a short hop skip for the slugs across to Bohermeen



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There is a certain time factor, however the LA started enforcement proceedings within that time frame and that nullifies the ability to retain the structure.

    By the way you do not automatically get retention. What happens is the LA cannot force you to demolish. However if you applied planning for anything else on the site they would force you to apply for retention. It tends to be more of an issue for commercial than housing.

    Slava Ukrainii



Advertisement