Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Vice President Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump 2024

1181182184186187250

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,462 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Most, so called, "markets" are nothing but a sham.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,462 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It wasn't always that way though. The era of aggressive takeovers, becoming the largest fish in an empty pond and completely wiping out competition is a relatively new (largely American led) phenomenon of post war capitalism.

    There's also the problem involved with a lot of companies and how they're set up in the first place. Often you'll have some guy/gal start a company, but they have in mind is not to grow the company in an organic way, but to flip it to the bigger company and make a personal fortune as soon as they can.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,296 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Thats what freedom is about. You see an opportunity, you take it, you work hard, then you do exactly what you want with the gains.

    But for every one of those stories, there are a million failures. Thats also freedom, people don't have to buy what your offering them. Thats the risk.

    Earlier someone said Microsoft and Google and others were a monopoly. which is patent nonsense, because if Microsoft were a monopoly, Google and others could never have existed in the first place. The strong survive, the inflexible do not.

    Ask Kodak.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 811 ✭✭✭thatsdaft




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,656 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Well the finding against Microsoft shows where the problem is, where they have used a lot of money to lever other companies their software as the default. Capitalism needs regulation, otherwise those billionares who favour Trump will continue to inflate their profits at the expense of the ordinary worker/consumer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,627 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    But but but tampons in schools...

    Every accusation is projection / admission.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,575 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    She is the one that highlighted "price gauging" or gouging i think she meant, surely its just that they had lots of inflation for the last few years , seems an obvious one

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,126 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,028 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Jaysis....

    Trump really knows how to pump them dry.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,656 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Yes there is. As he says to Rodney….'bullsh1t'😁



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,143 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I'm not sure I see the problem with tackling price gouging. There's a pretty clear difference between a retailer who is raising their prices because inflation has made everything dearer, including wholesale and manufacture and every other bit of the supply chain, and price gouging, which is where you raise your prices over the odds because of simple greed. I think we can all agree that the latter practice should be discouraged.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,028 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,330 ✭✭✭ceadaoin.


    Is there any evidence that grocery chains are price gouging and it's not just because the price of everything has gone up? I thought it was generally agreed that price controls on food are a bad thing and lead to shortages? Pushing this as one of her main policies so far is a bizarre choice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,627 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Is there any evidence that "price controls" are in the scope of the proposals?

    None so far. In fact they are expressly not in the scope declared so far.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,167 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    quarterly earnings reports are publicly available you know

    https://investors.generalmills.com/press-releases/press-release-details/2024/General-Mills-Reports-Fiscal-2024-Third-quarter-Results/default.aspx#:~:text=General%20Mills%20repurchased%20approximately%2023.5,3%20percent%20to%20582%20million.

    Walmart stock buybacks - the Waltons are the majority shareholders:

    https://ycharts.com/companies/WMT/stock_buyback

    Kroger only halted buybacks this quarter because it wants to merge with Albertsons:

    https://www.businessinsider.com/kroger-closed-grocery-stores-worker-raises-stock-buyback-2021-7?amp

    https://www.investopedia.com/kroger-posts-revenue-beat-halts-stock-buybacks-as-it-seeks-approval-of-albertsons-deal-8666410

    Ingles, board approves stock buyback:

    https://www.asheville.com/news/ingles0310.html

    Etc.

    Stock buybacks used to be illegal, until Reagan legalized it in 1982. That’s about the same period wages stopped keeping pace with economic productivity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,066 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    A lot of comic highlights in Trump's latest online rant :



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,008 ✭✭✭blackcard


    Trump calls all his opponents communists and Marxists. Strangely, he doesn't call Putin a communist



  • Registered Users Posts: 42 PixelCrafter


    it reads like something Eric Cartman might say.

    Post edited by PixelCrafter on


  • Registered Users Posts: 845 ✭✭✭Norrie Rugger Head


    I mean Commie Kamala is right there

    Dump is unhinged at this stage

    ⛥ ̸̱̼̞͛̀̓̈́͘#C̶̼̭͕̎̿͝R̶̦̮̜̃̓͌O̶̬͙̓͝W̸̜̥͈̐̾͐Ṋ̵̲͔̫̽̎̚͠ͅT̸͓͒͐H̵͔͠È̶̖̳̘͍͓̂W̴̢̋̈͒͛̋I̶͕͑͠T̵̻͈̜͂̇Č̵̤̟̑̾̂̽H̸̰̺̏̓ ̴̜̗̝̱̹͛́̊̒͝⛥



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,711 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    As has been pointed out price fixing is not being proposed..

    But as you are so against any notion of government interference in the market I wonder what your stance is on Trump promising to reduce energy prices by 50% within 12 months?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,066 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    He seems very bitter that Biden withdrew from the race : keeps bringing it up at every opportunity, claims that it was a 'coup' and that Biden supposedly now hates Kamala.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,000 ✭✭✭KilOit


    I feel like Trump will implode any day now



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Regional East Moderators, Regional Midlands Moderators, Regional Midwest Moderators, Regional Abroad Moderators, Regional North Mods, Regional West Moderators, Regional South East Moderators, Regional North East Moderators, Regional North West Moderators, Regional South Moderators Posts: 9,298 CMod ✭✭✭✭Fathom


    Chuck Todd in a Washington Week with the Atlantic panel discussion made a couple observations of interest.

    First, Trump had been for months working towards a chance to defeat Biden. Then all of a sudden Biden walks away, leaving Trump without an opportunity to offset his 2020 defeat by Biden. This has been a source of frustration for Trump. Consequently, Trump continues to attack Biden, as if trying to compensate.

    By analogy, this reminds me of a card player who sits down and wins the first pot, collects his winnings then walks off, with (Trump) calling after him, Hey! Come back here and give us a chance to get even!

    Second, Todd observed that there’s something similar between the 2016 and 2024 presidential elections. In 2016 Hillary Clinton was identified as old school having been Secretary of State, Senator, and First Lady, while Trump appeared as someone new, and in a close Electoral College race, his non-old school celebrity shiny newness may have contributed in some way to his win.

    Now in 2024 all the focus for a couple of years was on the Biden vs Trump campaign, and typical of most Vice Presidents who are somewhat hidden in the shadow of their President, Harris nationally was unknown by voters.

    Jimmy Kimmel did a skit where, on the sidewalk outside his studio, asked passersby the name of the current Vice President. Most did not answer Harris. Surprisingly, Kimmel’s studio was in California, where Harris had been the Attorney General for 2 terms, and recently the state’s US Senator.

    Whereas the election denial battle had been going on for about 4 years between 2 old guys, one a former president and the other the current one, when Biden stepped aside his removed shadow revealed Harris, and on the national scene someone appearing new. And with the historically rapid consolidation of the Democratic Party about Harris, different and shiny too. Unlike the 2 old school-like fighting old men. So will the voters act somewhat like the shiny newness of Trump in 2016 and vote Harris 2024?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭Babyreignbow


    well he's right about one thing, shít is going to go down on the 5th November

    Use your mighty arms to slay the fierce enemy that is selfish desire




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,462 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    And MAGA nuts get upset when they're called weird?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,462 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Whatever Putin is, it's very far from being a Communist.

    In any case, Trump's ridiculous accusations against his opponents as being either "Socialist", "Marxist" or "Communist" is one of the most laughable aspects of his whole schtick. It's so transparently ludicrous. Outside of historical discussions, I haven't heard that trio of words mentioned so much in modern day discourse as I have in the last few years.

    Utterly farcical.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,885 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Can someone generate an image with AI with a person in a MAGA cap, wearing a nappy, a giant bandage on their ear, chugging down a cup of Vance cum? Weird is a generous term for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,143 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Oh, yeah.

    Which reminds me, it might be worth looking at what Trump is likely to try if he loses at the ballot.

    Of the six or seven swing states, which would be the easiest for Trump to flip via the state legislature, state governor, supreme court, election certification officials and so on?

    It is up to the states how they return electors, and that is a point the US Supreme Court would likely confirm, so any swing states states with a Republican majority and a couple of MAGA election certification officials are in serious danger of going for Trump even if their popular vote says otherwise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭Babyreignbow


    I'm in absolutely no doubt that they already have this all tied up. Far too many billionaires have too much at stake to lose this election.

    Use your mighty arms to slay the fierce enemy that is selfish desire




  • Advertisement
Advertisement