Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1486487489491492500

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,820 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I'd have no problem giving such people a tent and marching them off to the Wicklow hills. Ultimately "AntiSocial? Homeless!" is the only language certain people understand.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,517 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Like you say give the police more teeth and body cam to keep them honest (with the way things are this is needed anyway) and instead of building ghettos going forward any developer developing needs to make the 20% social housing modular homes (make this a condition of them getting planning) and they would get a lot more units built as they are smaller and this would cost the tax payer less.. Then go around every area and look for areas where modular homes can be built. This could start up in the presidents place in the phoenix park lots of room out there then the street where every sitting politician should have some put there as I say lead by example and lets see how they like it if they are brave enough to support it then there should be no issues. So if they spread them out over the country it would stop the ghettoization of areas which is what has happened in the past.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Developer Greg Kavanagh is warning of an inevitable recession, reported in the Business Post:

    “Even if interest rates went back to zero overnight, it would still take a year for that to lag into the system and recession is probably unavoidable at this point. There is no surplus income.”

    You'd think the idea of no surplus income would send tremors through house builders, and he'd be tempted to shut up shop now and sit out the downturn.

    But no, apparently not:

    “It won’t affect my business like the last one as it’s insulated this time. The demand is so great the market for housing won’t fall.”

    Ireland really is different. No surplus income and an unavoidable recession and even still house prices won't fall. The Irish market is "insulated" from such economic norms.

    Makes you wonder exactly what secret sauce Ireland has that is providing such powerful insulation.

    I suspect it is unlimited taxpayers money.

    Pretty revealing choice of words from Greg Kavanagh, and a bit of kick in the teeth if you're of the opinion that our government is throwing good money after bad and in doing so making the problem worse.

    https://www.businesspost.ie/news/greg-kavanagh-warns-dylan-mcgrath-closures-are-signal-of-dublins-economic-woes/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭Villa05


    According to the other hand podcast, the UK Labour Party are proposing implementing the equivilant of the bacon report, where the capital gain of a planning change is not automatically a gain for the land owner



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭tigger123


    My reading of that would be that, as he said, the demand insulates the market. IE, even in a recession, enough people will keep their jobs and salaries that the demand for housing will still outstrip supply, and house prices will continue to rise, or plateu.



  • Registered Users Posts: 42 Aguce


    But unemployment will increase (it's already growing), banks will have stricter landing rules, consumer sentiment will fall, everyone has last housing crash in memory- buyers will be more fearful. Less buyers in market means prices will have to go down



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,517 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Unfortunately the underlying issue of supply and demand will see no price drops for at least another decade unless there is a change or changes to the following, our housing build strategy, our emigration policy and how our welfare system prioritizes welfare over workers when it comes to housing. Not to mention currently and as long as we have the huge disparity between supply and demand it is cheaper to get a mortgage than to rent. Most people buying a house will have macro issues pusing them to buy or swaying to hold back. For example if you have a kid you will want somewhere near a school or if your paying twice in rent what a mortgage would cost your more likely to buy or if your job is at risk your most likely to not buy. Also remember not only is our domestic population interested in a house, so are companies on a global spectrum as well as individual speculators looking to earn a profit from our overly generous rent price point and our politicians decision to throw billions at these companies to house the poor and migrants. Ireland's rental rate is highly attractive for anyone looking to make money. I called this about 7/8 years ago on here as to why prices would not be dropping for a decade and if anything the situation has got a whole lot worse



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I think we need to throw away any presumptions about what another recession would do to house prices. The demand in 2008 was driven by an abundance of credit, and once that dried up, the market quickly corrected itself. Today, whilst funny-money is certainly a major factor, the demand is driven by an abundance of people and a paucity of homes. Unless a recession provokes swift and enormous emigration, prices will not drop.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Assuming a recession means a contraction in the economy, rising unemployment and lower wages it would be the first recession ever where demand didn't decrease.

    Of course if market prices are "insulated" by something to compensate for the fall in demand, then prices won't fall.

    That was my point. The insulation is the governments willingness to step in and plug the gap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,035 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    No surplus income for whom?

    Household financial assets are almost 600 billion. The higgest they have ever been.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,028 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Market prices will not be insulated. However there is a significant difference between a price correction due to a recession and a significant price crash like what happened in 2008-12.

    Generally the correction is in the order of 10-20% However it also will probably leads to a slowdown in construction especially in higher cost urban areas, which in the medium term will cause a more significant upwards correction as the recession passes.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,327 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    What about the foreign workers who came to Ireland to work for the multinationals. If they lose their job, wouldn't they return to their home country. Their work visa is tidied up with the job if I am mistaken.

    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I'd agree with you but Greg kavanagh appears to be saying the housing market won't drop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,517 ✭✭✭fliball123


    have you a figure of work visas given out over the last decade? All I know is 4 new people (the majority not kids) for every new build is the current ratio. I really thought the explosion of working form home would see a huge % of people who can do this move to say Spain/Portugal or a country with a better climate but that does not seem to be the case yet



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Developer says house prices won’t drop, in other news….

    If there is a recession and demand does drop, perhaps at that time we can ask Greg why he isn’t investing in developments which would come to the market at least a year later.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Sounds like Greg's not planning on halting any developments, his business is insulated, he'll be making hay while the sun shines in this recession.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    He is banking on the prices of his houses not dropping, if they do, he will stop developing, despite what he says.

    It should not come as any surprise to you that a man selling houses, tells the public houses will not drop in price. Whilst I agree with him, there a few enough houses and probably too many people with the spending power to buy them, even if a recession of sorts does occur, if the prices were to drop 20%, good old Greg will stop building.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I don't think we're really disagreeing about anything.

    I think if prices looked dropping 20% good old Greg would simply have to threaten to stop building because he couldn't make any money, and his friends in politics would say don't worry, we'll insulate your business.

    So this recession would mean restaurants and other such businesses closing, but everybody could still consider a 3 bed semi in Coolock affordable at the guts of €500k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭tigger123


    How would the Government insulate the house building industry?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭hometruths


    They're already insulating it from demand drops. I don't think they're likely to stop anytime soon, recession or no recession.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭tigger123




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,028 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I say if they drop by 10% construction would slow down especially on urban sites

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,524 ✭✭✭tigger123


    I'm not trying to be a d*ck, btw, I'm honestly trying to follow your point.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Developers say average new build houses are not viable to build without government supports because the average buyer cannot afford to buy them at prices attractive enough for developers to build and sell.

    Hence government offer to take a 30% equity stake in the average house for the average buyer. This is just one example on top of HTB, and a myriad of other housing market interventions, both sales and rental, cumulatively costing the taxpayer billions every year.

    Part of the reasoning behind this is because government is banjaxed if builders make good on their implicit threats and simply say, ok if there are not enough supports to boost demand, we will stop building.

    So the government will throw however many billions are necessary to make sure the developers are happy with the prices being achieved.

    And that's how you get politicians seriously trying to argue that affordable 3 bed semis built on state land in Coolock should cost the guts of €500k.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭Villa05


    You've not been paying attention

    Buyer of first/last resort



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,327 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,568 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    here is the data

    as for visa being attached to a job….i think that is changing or has changed to avoid exploitation etc…..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭RichardAnd




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,113 ✭✭✭amacca


    Yep...their incessant meddling has us where we are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭Villa05


    How the state can't get the lead out, get building and make money in such circumstances is baffling

    A SENIOR executive at telecoms firm, Verizon - which has announced a massive investment in Limerick - has warned “houses cannot keep up” with jobs being created in the city...



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,217 ✭✭✭Roberto_gas


    Just did a scan of new builds in South Dublin and the prices are mental ! 725k for 3 bed terraced. 650k for 2 bed apartments. God save the country and people chasing new builds



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Developers margins have moved from circa 15% to the 20s since all these extra supports have been brought in over the last 18 months. That's a greater than 20% increase in profits

    State needs to activate small to medium sized developers to increase supply. The big players will continue to extort when competitive conditions are absent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,327 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    Remember the shills only get paid when you react to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,028 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Really Interesting thing happened over the weekend. The lad in the small rental I have offered to paint it of I supplied the paint. So on Sunday morning when I was passing I dropped off the paint, he was working so I left myself in and dropped off the paint, rollers etc.

    Got a call yesterday evening from a women looking to rent it she was full sure your man had moved out. She hardly believed me when I said he was painting the Kitchen/sitting room for me. Just goes to show why no houses appear on daft for rent

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭hometruths


    And that's exactly why it is ridiculous to cite low levels of rental stock advertised on daft as evidence of landlords exiting the market in droves



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭Villa05


    A few pages back @Dav010 was praising the government on there record on "job creation". The reality is that that government policies and inactions are a barrier to job creation. Public infrastructure, housing and energy being a drag on continued growth

    The I. T. sector is moving to a space where energy requirements are huge and Ireland risks being left behind.

    Children's hospital budget has gone well in excess of the cost of the dome over the chernobyl nuclear reactor to contain radiation which is has a life expectancy of 100 years.

    McWilliams has a good podcast today about public infrastructure and how competent EU countries deliver consistently within budget



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Our government will never fail in misdiagnosing a problem

    5000 euro tax credit to incentivise under 25's to stay in the country. God forbid we might build a few affordable homes so that these people could live here

    Many of these investment funds are using uber like algorithms to maximise rent, guess what they'll throw out if they hear customers are getting a 5000 tax credit

    It feels like that no spending in government is considered unless it inflates house prices and rents where most of the 'wealth" in the country lies



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You are being disingenuous, what I said was that they deserve credit for the recovery in this country since emerging from deep recession (unemployment >15% in 2012) , to full employment and many high paying jobs, despite a huge population increase during that period.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,028 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Well I never cited it, certain poster were quoting daft rental numbers as there was no availability and comparing them to AirBnB availability. Many of us pointed put that this was due to word of mouth renting which is the way I rented out tge property even 3+ years ago.

    In LL leaving they were exiting last year however a bit of stability has come into the market at present. The tax relief and the unlikely hood of a SF led government has taken some of the fear away. However costs are rising and you are limited to rental.rises of 2% or less. The sector is teetering it will not take much to encourage to take there capital profit and exit.

    There is less talk of locking LL in and preventing them from selling there property than 18 months ago. Fr Liam Verry's scare mongering 12 months ago has proven unfounded.

    Few small LL will evict tenants unless they really have to. However legislation is not balanced at present. Cannot find the case but RTB fined a LL 5k over evicting tenants who were short term letting and not even living in the property

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    They're not misdiagnosing anything. They want to drive up property prices and rents, and they simply don't care about the consequences.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,733 ✭✭✭Villa05


    We need to be evolving, we can't live for ever on 2 decisions made in the 80's and 90's and have little to do with governments since the turn of the millenia synomonous with property boom and bust destroying the economy in the process

    The recovery was predominantly a product of a restoration of competitiveness following the crash coupled with those 2 decisions plus 0 interest rates



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,201 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Yep, fair enough, I didn't mean to infer you cited it.

    It was other posters citing daft.ie figures to cast doubt on the RTB figures showing increased numbers of private 'LL tenancies, which showed up the scaremongering about private Landlords fleeing the market for what it was.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    How very Trumpian.

    What has gone wrong is because of the current administration, what has gone right is despite the current administration.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,148 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    With the current "administration" poised to water down and defer the much needed residential zoned land tax (RZLT) I think Ireland Inc's success is very much in spite of their recent actions.

    Especially so when all and sundry are screaming about our infrastructural deficits and how they are driving away FDI - and their response is to water down one of the most important actions they could take to fix housing in this country.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So you are going to ignore the economic recovery of this country over the last 12 years?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,092 ✭✭✭Blut2


    We put circa €7bn a year into the reserve funds last year because it was surplus to requirements. The current budget surplus is likely going to be closer to €9bn a year and rising.

    If labour capacity was actually available / prioritized towards housing the state could build 20,000+ social housing units a year with absolutely no financial issues. The problem isn't financial, its policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,092 ✭✭✭Blut2


    I posted a specific breakdown of house building costs in 2023 that show some very obvious options.

    135k of a current 2023 460k new build house in Dublin goes on VAT, margin, finance costs and marketing combined. A state build instead of private sector removes all of that and reduces the cost by 29% by itself down to 325k. Thats the whole savings in cost accounted for with absolute zero decline in labour costs that you apparently think are so completely unavoidable.

    70k of that 325k also goes on cost of land for what its worth, which if property is built on already owned state lands (of which theres a lot) would also obviously be possible to be reduced in a lot of cases.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,751 ✭✭✭✭AdamD


    We didn't put the money away because it was surplus to requirements. We put it away because it is fiscally sensible to not include extraordinary tax intakes in your current expenditure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,805 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    Yep, and the way things are going they're gonna kill the golden goose with their policies, and then tell us how wise they were squirrelling away all those surpluses.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Of course they are right to squirrel away that money, anyone following the US elections will know that some of Trumps policies are to reduce corporation tax even further than he already has in the US to force MNCs to move their headquarters back there. There was insight last week on the effect of even one MNC moving back there, never mind the effect of multiples doing that. If tax receipts drop, there would be a few on here lambasting the Government for not having a contingency fund.



Advertisement