Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Vice President Kamala Harris vs Donald Trump 2024

1196197199201202250

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,488 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    By 'no excuse' he means, I believe, that no-one can say it was just a choice between 2 old men and we picked the slightly less doddery one. Or we only voted for Trump because that Hilary wan has a lot of baggage and is fundamentally unlikable.

    KH is a younger vibrant candidate without any prior political baggage (not to say she doesn't have flaws). She is what many of the undecideds apparently wanted. A win for Trump this time clearly means that America prefers Trump. No excuses, on either side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,711 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Surely the attempted coup, the sexual assault finding, and the 34 fraud cases are throwing this away.

    When, at any point, has Trump ever been laser-focused on issues? People are looking at Trump now and saying 'if only he would do this.." when he has never done anything remotely like that. He has no policies, and anything he does say is clearly nothing more than a sound bite.

    He beat HC because she was so disliked and the US were looking for something different that HC didn't offer. While she may well have been the power behind Bill Clinton, he had the charisma and ability.

    Biden beat Trump in 2020 because the US had figured out that while they still want change, Trump is either incapable or uninterested in delivering it. His complete failure in handling Covid proved to many that while he may be fun, and generate funny memes, when the tyre hit the road he failed the country.

    The latest polls seem to be being taken as a falloff in his real support and that by changing his approach he will get support back. I read them differently. He was doing better due to Biden. People, well before the disastrous debate, didn't see him as lasting the next 4 years and thus were reluctantly opting for Trump.

    That is all changed now. Trump is now the old man. And all his faults and shortcomings are back to the forefront. Maybe changing from who he is, who we all know him to be, might help him regain some support, but he can't keep that up and he will continue to offer example after example of how unsuitable he is for the job.

    Its a two horse race, so never say never, and there are sure to be many voting issues that could have a big impact, but thinking Trump has the ability to change is a very odd position to take.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,121 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    It's a trendline! The only figures in the chart are 2019 annual figure and 2020 annual figure.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,055 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Apologies, lack of a figure description is annoying, but it was trending down pre covid. This said, it is of no use without other data, and it is hard to tell if the predicted baseline takes into account Covid or not but in one year he was 1/4 billion more than predicted, and the same again the next year so 1/2 a billion down before any hint of Covid. The CBO do annual monthly reports and regular predictions. A quick look shows them predicting an increase of their earlier prediction of debt increase of 8 billion more of a deficit in 2020 than previously predicted before Covid was on the scene.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,121 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yeah, it's not a great graph.

    Republicans always explode the deficit and then become budget hawks when the Democrats are in power. It's farcical.

    Post edited by Podge_irl on


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    But they explode the deficits by cutting taxes for Corporations and the wealthy.

    It's not like they are blowing the budgets by doing populist giveaways as we see here and elsewhere.

    Their entire function is to cut taxes for the rich and cut funding for everything the Government does (except the military) to create voids that the "for profit" industry can look to fill.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,669 ✭✭✭Field east


    what’s this about HC being very disliked when Trump beat her ? Did she not win the popular vote at the time. ? On that basis one could say that she was LESS DISLIKED THAN DT at the time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 548 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    i agree with this. Hard to argue that HC was too disliked or too unpopular when she won the popular vote by almost 3m. She lost because of the arcane electoral college. She would have won by the standards of any other normal western democracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,363 ✭✭✭✭rossie1977


    US is in a situation where the corporate media along with a number of special interest groups and individuals have controlled the narrative since at least the 1990s but probably more correctly since Nixon was ousted. If you were to end or even reduce the power these groups hold over the country it would massively deal with many of the issues the country currently faces.

    Saying its more fractured than its ever been is far from the truth. The political situation in the US in 1968 was far far far more dangerous than it is today. We aren't close to a civil war either like back in 1850s.

    Actually on any scale the US is thriving. Crime is at 50 year lows, unemployment is low, GDP last summer was highest in decades. The US are still #1 economy on planet by a distance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,711 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    She was disliked by enough people that they were willing to overlook Trump's clear unsuitability for the job. He was excused (Access Hollywood tape etc) for many things that would have sunk any other candidate on the basis that while voters didn't agree they just couldn't vote for HC.

    She won the popular vote despite her failings. Had Obama been running, or Biden or many others then Trump would have lost. But just as Trumps lead was, IMO, down to the issues many voters saw with Biden, so his win in 2016 was down to the issues with HC (not helped by Comey reopening an investigation a few weeks before the vote!).

    Harris doesn't have that baggage. She might be seen as uninspiring by some, that is a far cry from the hatred HC carried into the election. Thus I think that the latest polls reflect a reality of where Trump can get to, not some sort of fall off in his level.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,057 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Hillary also lost because there was a huge bang of entitlement off her. She came across as someone who just felt entitled to both the Democratic nomination (which the Dems helped her get rather than the likes of Sanders) and then entitled to the Presidency, especially since she was running against Trump who wasn't a political figure. It just helped her come across as deeply unlikeable, and she wasn't all that likeable to many Dem voters to begin with anyway.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,690 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    But did the centre ground 10% who decide US elections really dislike HC to that extent? Surely that vast majority with a strong personal animus against her would be overwhelmingly committed Republicans (and let's be honest men) anyway…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,057 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    It wasn't just people voting against her, but also people just deciding not to vote. It wouldn't have to be a strong personal animus against her, but just apathy in general.



  • Registered Users Posts: 16,690 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    But isn't that the kind of inevitable flipside of running a safe, centrist establishment candidate against a charismatic but somewhat wild insurgent, that a lot of people are going to find them a bit dull and uninspiring. Surely their broad preferability to the centre ground should more than outweigh the somewhat meh quality of their candidacy. In theory anyway…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,627 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    HC brought baggage with her, I think in the swing states that counted against her in a negative way.

    Look at what say PJ O'Rourke has written about reluctantly backing 'smug' Hilary Clinton, someone who was well known for backing Republicans.
    Not every swing state voter overcome that reluctance.

    "I am endorsing Hillary, and all her lies and all her empty promises," O'Rourke continued. "It's the second-worst thing that can happen to this country, but she's way behind in second place. She's wrong about absolutely everything, but she's wrong within normal parameters… Hillary, I endorse you although you don’t belong in power—you picture of self-satisfaction out of doors."

    https://www.thedailybeast.com/pj-orourke-im-endorsing-hillary-clinton-the-devil-we-know

    This section is perceptive:

    Yes, Hillary sent twenty-some top-secret State Department documents to her personal email server. But this shows that she can keep a secret, even if she doesn’t know where to put it and it ends up decorating her Pinterest site. Trump would have sold the top-secret documents on eBay. Also, at least the CIA and NSA and so forth tell Hillary secrets. Would you tell a secret to Donald Trump?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    No question that Trump got a lot of "what's the worst that could happen" votes along with votes from people that were sick of "the establishment" in general.

    He gets neither of those type of votes this time (or in 2020).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,033 ✭✭✭Flaneur OBrien


    Catching up on some of the speeches last night, and Stephanie Grisham's was pretty good.

    I do wonder if this could be the death of a thousand papercuts to take out Trump? I am aware that a lot of the Republican party would be "The MAGA Faithful" but is it a massive overwhelming majority? Can he survive the Non-MAGA heads if they hold their nose and vote the other way?

    I'm thinking that there is still a lot of sensible Republicans, and maybe this very steady drip, drip of people that are Republican, coming out and speaking publicly against Trump will eventually flip some, if not all.

    I have no hope for the fervent MAGA crowd. They are a lost cause and all I can see is a split in the party happening within 10-20 years, much like whats happened to The Tories in England. Great for Democrats, bad for democracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,944 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    And thats why I think he'll lose.

    In 2016 the US had 36 years of Bush's and Clinton's. If people were still poor or pissed off with life after all that then why not Trump? Option B was another Clinton.

    Not this time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,143 ✭✭✭✭briany


    @Leroy42

    Surely the attempted coup, the sexual assault finding, and the 34 fraud cases are throwing this away.

    Not really. I mean, you'd think so alright, but Trump had successfully normalised the sea of shtt around him and his appeal to his base was so visceral that they were willing to forgive or dismiss every criticism.

    All that stuff was already included in the electoral calculus. If he stayed on message, even Kamala probably wouldn't be clawing the numbers back in the way she appears to have. His VP pick has also been disastrous.

    Hubris is a dangerous thing and Trump's campaign has been making poor choices on the basis that they thought they were cruising to victory. Hillary had 'basket of deplorables' to pit voters against her. Trump and co have had questioning Kamala's ethnic identity at a black journalism conference, JD Vance slagging off single women and chief architect of Project 2025, Kevin Roberts, bragging on TV that the US was about to undergo a second revolution which would be as bloodless as the left allowed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭Derkaiser93


    Did he not get more votes in 2020 to 2016 though ? Something like 62m in 2016 and 74 in 2020. And going by the polls now his support looks as high even not higher than 2020.

    He may have hit his ceiling now but Kamala is gonna have to mobilise a base bigger than even 2020 I think. She can do that but she's gonna need to offer some economic hope and policies of substance to the working class feeling the pinch of inflation, especially the blue collar workers in the rust belt and Pennsylvania like Biden did so well



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,167 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Yup, that was his pitch that swung the vote in 2016, eg.

    Except he's no longer "something new" he's tired and old and Americans know exactly what they will get under Trump - especially. Black. Americans.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The "More votes in 2020" is another of those nonsense stats that Trump throws out to lie about how the election was stolen.

    Trump got a lower % share of the vote in 2020 than he did in 2016 , which is why he lost.

    A lot more people were eligible to vote in 2020 compared to 2016 and a lot more people actually voted in 2020 as well.

    There are more eligible voters today than 2020 as well.

    All other things being equal every election has more votes cast than the one before.

    The biggest risk for the Democrats in this cycle was apathy and disinterest because Biden was seen as old/stale etc.

    Harris isn't necessarily more popular than Biden , but she removes a lot of those "Why should I bother" barriers that some people felt regarding Biden.

    The more people that vote , the worse it is for the GOP - That has always been true , even more so today.

    Harris' biggest weapon will be driving Turn-out and the more Trump spews nonsense and the more they can make the Abortion issue and Project 2025 stick to him the better it will be for turn-out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,711 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    All of that is true, but Trumps/Vance complaint that Harris hasn't done an interview has merit and it betrays, IMO, the fear they have.

    The gains that Harris has made is not because of anything she has done. Rather it is the removal of the obstacle of Biden and the new energy showing up the paucity of Trump that is the issue. How can Trump counter that? And that is why I am of the opinion that it isn't down to a lack of focus or a need to stick to policies. These would help but Trump has never done that so expecting him to chance now seems odd.

    IMO, the race has fundamentally shifted because the drag of Bidens age, must like the drag of HC unlikeability was in 2016, has now been removed. There is really nothing to persuade any undecided voters to vote for Trump



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,865 ✭✭✭Shoog


    It's working for Harris, strategy which has seen gains of between 6-8% is a winning formula so if you are her why would you change tack.

    As has been pointed out before - the fabled interview is of interest to political wonks and no one else. The strategy is to get out on the road and deliver her message, energised the base, take the bump from the convention, destroy Trump in the debate and only then start to look for interviews to consolidate her position.

    The lack of interviews enragesTrump because it frankly all he has left to improve his profile and every time he tries it backfires. Let him shoot himself in the foot as many times as he likes - it's grist to Harris' mill.



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭Derkaiser93


    I hate Trump as much as you but you're not good with numbers. He got a higher share in 2020. 46.8 compared to 46.1 in 2016. Small increase granted.

    And regardless so share the fact is more people went out and cast their ballot for him than in 2016. A lot more and the increase in registered voters doesn't account for that. He mobilised more voters . And the polls now, hopefully they're off, have him with higher support than he did in either of those election. This is worrying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,701 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    I think Kamala Harris has got off to a very good start, but honestly I think a lot of the enthusiasm is relief that there is a possibility of defeating Trump.

    The tedious, bitter, gloom and despondency that is Trump's campaign and the potential for his 'minders and advisors' to do real damage in the White House - once he is in he will have no interest in actually doing anything that requires attention or concentration - is very real; Kamala only has to do no damage for the country to be in a better state than it would be under Trump's reign.

    I'm not entirely convinced that she would be a great president, she is on a wild wave of enthusiasm at the moment, but I sincerely hope she gets in, the rest of the world will forgive a multitude of minor sins just to not have to cope with Trump. At least they will be able to trust her with international intelligence material.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 84,167 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    supercut of RNC vs DNC roll calls

    Pretty glaring, you could hear a pin drop at the RNC while Mrs. Foghorn called the delegates

    https://www.mediaite.com/tv/a-tale-of-two-roll-calls-morning-joe-opens-with-supercut-contrasting-rnc-with-dnc-party/

    They had all the energy of a wake, and that was before Harris entered the race.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 15,853 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    There were ~11M more registered voters in 2020 vs 2016 - The total vote count was always going to be higher so talking about how he got X million more votes is meaningless and disingenuous.

    Every election cycle going back years shows an increase of between 8-10M registered voters - oddly it dips in the mid-term cycle by Presidential to Presidential and mid-term to mid-term it increases by that amount.

    The presence of a remotely valid 3rd party impacted 2016 which is what pulled the top line numbers down , but the irrelevance of the "I got more votes" argument from Trump doesn't change.



  • Registered Users Posts: 196 ✭✭Derkaiser93


    11m more eligible voters shared between trump and Biden but at the same time 12m more People voted for trump than they did in 2016...you're not making sense.

    Trump lost cause more people voted for Biden in the key swing states. And in General overall. But the point remains that Trump had more support in 2020 whichever way you look at it. Whether it's share of the population or raw number of votes.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement