Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1814815816818820

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,712 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    If it is as you say, nonsense, why are so many developments over the last 10 yrs forward funded by investors while Irish developers struggled to obtain finance?

    The demand is obvious, the source of finance, less so.

    How did we manage before now? Banks like Anglo handed out huge loans to developers which helped to almost break our banking system. Now we have a huge population increase, higher numbers of higher income earners, and banks that were less willing to lend to developers. All the conditions for investors looking to profit by providing finance to developers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭Villa05


    A medical device research facility in Limerick cant get sufficient engineers domestically and are bringing them in from abroad with the carrot if 1 months stay in local hotel.

    After the month is up they are coming back to HR as they can't get accommodation



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Because the room is too hot, the solution is to turn off the heating, now the room is too cold.

    The banks were saved to ensure the finance was there to fund the infrastructure the country needed. If they are not allowed reasnobly to lend, what was the point of saving them. Adjust the heating to the room temperature, not turn it off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,712 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    The banks were saved to prevent a catastrophic collapse in our financial system/day to day banking, not just to fund future construction projects for private developers.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,952 ✭✭✭PeadarCo


    Because any modern economy needs a functioning banking system. That's why they were saved. Take it away we wouldn't have a housing crisis because we would have mass emigration.

    As a result of the crash the ECB and Irish Central bank(ICB) have learnt their lesson. Outside finance is required because if the ECB and ICB do their job Irish banks will never be allowed to be as exposed to the Irish property market again. The fact investors from outside the state are required isn't news and has been obvious for a number of years. It's also not a bad thing. It spreads the risk outside the state and means if things do go bad we don't end up having to bail out the banks again. We also had a huge hole in the government finances due to an over reliance on property related taxes. Remember that hole in the government finances ended up costing more than the bank bail out.

    Remember property can be a very illiquid asset when things go wrong. Check out 2008-2012 for an idea of how illiquid it can be. It's naturally a risky asset to invest in at least compared to other investment types that are more liquid. Any half decent regulator and government needs to factor that in. The Irish banking crisis is a lesson when the government and regulator don't heed basic financial facts.

    All you are advocating is for Irish banks and state to repeat the mistakes of the early 2000's. The current housing crisis is partly a legacy of those mistakes. There wasn't the money in the private economy to build houses and it would have been political suicide to build houses in an era of ghost estates. Go back a decade plus on this forum and you will see the sentiment at the time. As a result subsequent governments have been playing catch up.

    Now that's not to say things couldn't be done to free up banking capital to lend but the main one would be politically very unpopular. That is making it a lot easier to repossess houses of people who default on their mortgages. Do that and you reduce the risk premium associated with Irish mortgages. That would reduce the amount of capital reserves required from domestic Irish banks and would encourage foreign banks to enter the Irish mortgage market. This would increase the amount of money available to build houses. However making it easier to evict people who don't pay their mortgages is unlikely to happen any time soon.

    Building houses isn't all about money, you need skilled workers, improve the speed at which developments get planning permission etc etc. If you don't have enough workers and the other elements sorted more money will just mean higher prices at least in the short term.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,791 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    I suspect Ireland's very low payroll taxation thresholds also come as a shock for a lot of them. Dublin is simply not worth moving to for anything less than €100k.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,031 ✭✭✭Jonnyc135


    What type of septic tank treatment unit is he going with?, 5000 grand seems good value, there must be great soakage there.

    Not the best drainage around where I am in the NW and the councils requesting seriously expensive treatment units with peat modules, all in all costs could run close to 15,000+.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    There may be delays on building those houses :

    CONSTRUCTION sites will be hit by strikes next week after talks between employers and a union representing plumbers, fitters, welders and apprentices over a travel allowance broke down this morning.

    Living the life



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭herbalplants


    I did notice the other day jobs in financial services advertised in Valentia Spain. Recruiter looking to recruit here with relocation package on offer. Wonder if this is due to the fact that there is no shortage of accommodation in Spain, good solid spacious too.

    Living the life



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,072 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Indeed. And don't forget that in this market with incredible demand the buyers of the product need subsidies too.

    So you've got the financiers, the producers and the buyers of this product for which there is incredible demand and scarce supply all requiring incentives to participate in the market.

    And if anybody suggests that something seems a bit odd about that, the response is that they don't understand basic economics!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,712 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    Which part are you struggling with?

    Incentives in markets are nothing new or odd.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,277 ✭✭✭The Student


    If we extend your premise of basic economics then you will also accept the impact of supernormal profits and how they attract other suppliers.

    You will also agree that the sales price is a combination of input costs and a margin.

    Logic would suggest suppliers would supply before price falls either as a result of interest rises, recession, job lossess etc.

    Remember lands value is dictated by the value it holds aspart of the finished product.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Possibly correct. However, without those same institutions and investors, would the need for those fields to be anything other than empty even exist?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,712 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    And where would you put all the people who live in those properties? Tents in the fields?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Without the need to perpetuate growth, the immigration that has caused the population on the island to jump so swiftly would not have happened. Thus, the people would not be here.

    I'm aware that this is a sensitive topic, but it's not one that can really be ignored anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,712 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    If institutional investors were not investing in our property market, we wouldn’t need as many properties, does seem like an oxymoron. But I kinda get the point you are making, though I don’t wish to follow you down that rabbit hole on emigration. If you are happy to stay in 2012 with high unemployment and even though houses were cheap, people still couldn’t buy them, then that’s your prerogative, but if I am taking you up right and you are talking about MNC investment, and saying if it wasn’t there, we wouldn’t have so many workers, and need to many houses, then you are obviously too young to remember the last recession, or indeed the period up to the late 90’s, when unemployment was higher and the Irish had no choice but to emigrate for work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Did someone here have data on what proportion of developments started because of investment funds providing the funding for building

    Most of the news stories are of them buying existing developments that had already been funded



  • Registered Users Posts: 283 ✭✭engineerws


    Wouldn't have bothered me one way or another back then as I'd no money 😅. The banks were saved to save wealthy people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    I remember the last recession only too well; I can assure you. I think there's a balance to be struck between having a reasonably healthy economy with good levels of employment and what we have now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    Most of those investors and institutions will not even be resident in Ireland or have any staff in Ireland… Before GFC banks provided finance for developers using a lot of the same investors money that they had deposited in the banks…All that has happened is that this all moved out of the banking industry and into the funds industry.

    It should also be noted this wasn’t something that Ireland implemented on its own but was international and majority of countries fully adopted with the exception of USA and their regional banks which came back to bite them last year when they started fail which wouldn’t have happened if they fully adopted like the EU.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    Yes this is true. It's not a uniquely Irish problem at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,054 ✭✭✭Blut2


    On that exact note, the lead story in today's Irish Times: "Figures for year to April 2024 show more than 100,000 people immigrated to the State in three successive years".

    We're taking in 100k+ immigrants a year, every year, now it seems. And only building circa 35,000 homes a year - not even enough to house the new arrivals, nevermind replace existing stock, or make any dent in the housing crisis.

    The housing crisis is only going to get much worse while our population is growing at this rate. All the arguments at the margins of incentives, social housing vs private sector etc, pale in comparison to the runaway population growth one now.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2024/08/27/immigration-to-ireland-hits-17-year-high-as-emigration-also-rises/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Thanks for clarifying that these institutional investors can avail of all the taxpayer spending required to ensure these apartments/homes exist without contributing anything in return

    Waiver from development levies, water connection, waste water

    Up to 130k grant per apartment built

    Transport infrastructure and maintainence.

    Education of the workers that can achieve the salaries required for the rent demanded

    Social welfare for the renters that can't afford rents charged

    This model of housing provision truly is the way forward for Ireland and beyond. How come noboby had been able to formulate such a genius solution in the past. It must be the proliferation of our best and brightest and wealthiest having governments in there pockets.

    We can all feel better now, go out and work confident that half our salary taken by the government is spent wisely for the greater good

    Well done all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,752 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    This. I think everyone knew this all along, but the immigration factor has finally broken through the taboo of discussing it. With such enormous numbers entering the country yearly, there is no way for building to meet demand. Even if it could, the environmental cost cannot be ignored.

    Of course, this is a problem not unique to Ireland. We need only look to the UK to see much the same story.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,712 ✭✭✭✭Dav010


    They are providing the finance, without which the projects they invest in would be considerably more difficult to finance, and therefore build.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,667 ✭✭✭✭kippy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Please provide proof as to what extent your statement is accurate.

    How many units commenced directly as a result of investment funds providing finance for the project. The vast majority of what we are hearing are projects already started, built or 2nd hand, therefore funding pre existed

    Give us numbers please



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭Timing belt


    where do you think any developer gets finance to build houses?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,072 ✭✭✭hometruths


    I don't believe developers providing new build housing are running on margins so thin they need the government to prop up demand.

    So I think the government should call their bluff, withdraw all the supports, and instead enforce a heavy tax on undeveloped zoned land and land with active planning permission.

    That will prompt much wailing and gnashing of teeth, but as far as I can see it's all scaremongering.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,838 ✭✭✭BlueSkyDreams


    We need to take emigration into account also. 69k people left the state in the 12 months to April 2024.

    All things considered, it looks like 100k population increase in 12 months for the State.

    I am not sure if IPAs are included in these stats. There are mixed answers to that question.



Advertisement