French man accused of drugging his wife and inviting men to rape her

random checkpoints are not what that post is discussing at all

have you ever read a newspaper or history book? peak? this guy and the others are going to jail

In the past they would have gotten a pack on the back

Prison is too good for anyone involved in this.

is there the same research on say computer programmers

imagine even being on that medication for so long, youd be melted from it

you’re free to look, the world is your oyster. That’s not my burden.

bit of self education no harm from time to time, take a break from the posting

go on then discuss the case, in particular demonstrate what if anything I said is untrue as you are claiming.

You're right. We should question every man because this guy was able to present himself as a decent upstanding human. Every man is a potential rapist and should be treated as such.

Is this what you want everyone to say?

God help you if you spoke about any man in my life like that.

This thread would have been zapped if you had been speaking about anyone except men. The type of misandry you are typing is why people dislike radical feminists.

It is possible to be outraged and discuss this vile situation without resorting to shrill, man-hating nonsense.

 If this man hadn't been caught for a "minor" transgression in public, or if the local cops had been what seems to be your average misogynistic copper, going by what's coming out of various English police forces, this would be ongoing.

Love it: 'even when a men stop a rapist, men are still just pigs.'

Utterly toxic agenda there.

Yes, you have indeed already been misreading the press.

The NYT report clearly indicates the abuses went on for some 9 years beginning in Paris which contradicts your claim these men were all local to the woman's current residence.

do you only have a subscription to the New York times. 

Droll to attack me for citing the article the OP used in the Original Post to base their screed on.

That doesn't contradict the NYT report. It also just coincides with what I stated much earlier in the thread:
"

"it also says the victim worked in the paris area for 20 years before they moved to avignon at her retirement, she would have been about 62 when she retired (france retirement age pre 2023) and the police put the timeline of abuses at beginning about 2011, she's 71 now. So, that would put her retirement in about/around 9 years ago, ~2013 so the abuses would have begun in the paris area seemingly, if we are to extrapolate off the reporting in front of us and knowledge of french retirement ages.

"smallish" area, Avignon being down near Montpellier. Based on the reporting I don't think there are 70 rapists living within a brisk walk of the victim or something as the OP is trying to make it out as."

And the NYT report makes it clear several of the accused have occupations that would take them afar from the immediate local area of the crime, they wouldn't have to live nearby to have opportunity to be part of the scheme and could do so while 'passing through,' Avignon being a major arterial junction between Montpellier, Lyon and Marseille.

The accused men represent a kaleidoscope of working-class and middle-class French society: truck drivers, soldiers, carpenters and trade workers, a prison guard, a nurse, an I.T. expert working for a bank, a local journalist.

its a hilarious dig at your american obsession

the op isn't making out anything like this

its certainly most came from the locality. This is a fair point, at least one from the neighbourhood

a lot of interest from just one town versus the husband having to work on getting people from across france the world, which dilutes the problem

its madness that this didn't come to light sooner given the number of people involved

None of the men in the case are victims.

I've seen no credible references to 'evil women?'

Where the men are from is central to the OP's sweeping statements to accuse men the world over of harboring rapists as part of 'bro culture' and such. Seems important to get factual clarification on where the accused all hail from exactly, so.

. Every man is a potential rapist and should be treated as such.

Is this what you want everyone to say?

The original point of this thread per the initial thread title was that because no Irish men had created a thread condemning this case , we were in fact condoning it and would do the same if we had the chance. The OP expressly said the only thing stopping us from committing rape is the threat of violence from husbands.

It’s absolutely astonishing and I’ve said it over and over but the exact same thread about immigrants, travellers, Muslims or pretty much any other group would have been shut down immediately, but not only is it apparently ok to say these things about men, if you disagree you’re enabling violence against women.

The thread title has been changed by the mods but the overall thrust of the OP’s argument has not changed one iota, even after it’s been shown that she grossly misrepresented basic facts to make it seem like a much higher proportion of men were involved.

All that has changed is the OP is just digging in more and more that “men in general” are the problem here and anyone who disagrees is a rapist or at best a rape apologist.

Absolute clusterf**k from beginning to end, and it certainly was never anything to do with the case in France.

Jesus, he had also taken pictures of his daughters-in-law when they were in the shower or naked in the bathroom.

I suppose that was nothing to him after what he did to his own daughter and wife.