Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Limerick - Nenagh - Ballybrophy railway

1101112131416»

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 135 ✭✭OisinCooke


    Very late to the party but still couldn’t agree more, the Waterford-Limerick line, Galway-Limerick line and ofc the Nenagh branch all need the same kinds of investment. A passing loop at a halfway point to facilitate a pre-09:00 arrival and a post-17:30 departure at both ends of the lines is a must as well as better middle-of-the-day frequency to serve leisure and business commuters. There is really no excuse not to do this, and in all 3 lines’ cases there is very much a possibility to upgrade line speeds a little without too much work. I can never understand why aside from two services crossing in the morning and evening peak, the same single unit can’t just shuttle back and forth throughout the day. And I also think that there is not necessarily a need for a direct Dublin service or a direct curve serving Portlaoise, just more frequency and better more competitive linespeeds



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭Paddico


    Is there any discussion about increasing the train speed on this line in the future

    Still incredible slow even after the relatively recent upgrade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 128 ✭✭scrabtom


    I couldn't agree more. These lines could be so much more useful if there was any kind of sensible timetable put in place, and say 120km/h line speeds.

    It's very difficult for instance to travel from Galway to Waterford using public transport, with the best possible time that can be ever achieved being 4 hours, and that is only when you get lucky with services lining up perfectly so you can transfer straight from a Waterford - Dublin train to a Dublin Galway train in Kildare. Usually it takes 5 hours.

    Surely if there were decent line speeds and a synchronised timetable you could cut this down to 3 hours using the Western Rail Corridor. I know there'd be plenty of students going up and down from college that would avail of it, even just going from Waterford to Limerick.

    The same could definitely be said of students travelling up to Limerick or Galway from Nenagh or Roscrea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,320 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    The main problem is the gate keeper crossings. They need to be automated and then it will be much easier to make changes to the timetable. Introducing additional services, more than one train on Sundays, public holidays etc. The manned gates are the main obstacle to positive changes now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,968 ✭✭✭Economics101


    But there are loads of 30 mph restrictions on user-worked farm crossings. On other lines trains can do up to 3 times that speed at similar crossings. Why?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,212 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    Poor sightlines or other safety issues. Every crossing on the network is assessed individually from a safety perspective and an appropriate speed limit set.

    The user worked crossings need to be eliminated, and the rest of the crossings automated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Personally it feels like Irish Rail don't see the point making any changes to this line until the gate keeper obstacle is removed and all of these manned gates have been automated. It feels like managing gate keepers has been such a headache for them it discourages any attempt to look at the line. And until the NTA instruct them to add an extra service they absolutely won't be advocating for it.

    There is also a section between Nenagh and Birdhill along the Kilmastulla river that will always have a restricted speed limit. There are I think 4 unmanned crossings on public roads along here. Sight lines are poor etc etc. It's not a long stretch just an section not much could ever be done to increase speeds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Additional problem is how do you go about getting ring fenced funding to automate these manned gates. How many million euros would it be to automate 12 gate keeper crossings? You could get a lot of bike sheds for that scratch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,262 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    You are at 1million+ each if you go for automated 4 barrier CCTV with ongoing costs to maintain. Bridge over/under is cheaper if possible.

    Any such upgrade will be likely tied to a signalling upgrade as any crossing near a station would need to be tied into the signalling system



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    There are 13 gate keeper crossings on the line. 10 of them are between Birdhill and Killonan Junction and I think the elevation around there would preclude a bridge as an option. 2 of the 10 have some degree of automation in place already as far as I know but for whatever reason gate keepers are still required at both of these gates. So it's a lot of gate keepers along a relatively short section of the line that is the biggest obstacle to any real improvements for the timetable on this line. The other 3 gate keepers are 1 shortly after Cloughjordan(this one could possibly be closed with a new section of road. One just after Roscrea could be automated and one near Borris in Ossory. Automation the obvious solution here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    I don't think anyone is expecting the NTA to announce that all level crossing will be automated asap. But a project to begin the process of automation. 2 or 3 per year and the line would start to look much more appealing before the end of the decade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,932 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    1 million euro to install one of these LC?

    1 million………………..!!!!

    I can't see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 734 ✭✭✭ricimaki


    This estimate from 2012 shows €1.2M to €1.5M… Curiously the breakdowns are all redacted….

    Cost of provision of full automated barriers and CCTV control of the Level Crossing is estimated at €1.2-1.5m based on current experiences.

    Given the very tight curves along this line, even if every level crossing was removed, it probably wouldn't improve line speed much - at least between Annacotty and where the line crosses under the M7 north of Ballinahinch anyway.

    Re-aligning the line - even just slightly to ease some of the curves - is also very difficult in this stretch, as the worst bits are either passing through built-up areas (relatively speaking), or in a valley beside a river with difficult elevation to work with.

    It is typically Irish that we never upgraded the line or realigned a significant portion of it alongside the M7 when that was newly built relatively recently. At least they left provision for twin tack on the underpasses, whenever that makes sense to implement…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,154 ✭✭✭Paddico


    No, that doesn't surprise me at all. The tech n equipment prob costs a couple of hundred thousand alone. Then there's specialists required for installation, additional labour, materials, H&S, traffic management and testing.

    It all adds up.

    That wouldn't even include timetable changing afterwards. That's a big expensive task.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Would that have been practial with the locations of Castleconnell and Birdhill Railway stations? They are both quite a distance from the M7.

    Agree though on the point re speed along this section. Automating the gate keeper crossings is for other reasons than speed. It makes the management of the line much more straightforward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,968 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Curvature is not a problem for most of the line, especially between Ballybrophy and Nenagh. Up to the 1970s the line speed was 70 mph, and the sectional running times for passenger trains between Ballybrophy and Nenagh were close to 60 mph average. The vast majority of the present 30mph restrictions on this section are for user-operated and farm crossings. The visibility problems should not be too great if the line is not tightly curved.

    Other jurisdictions manage with less expensive crossings than the full-Monty 4-barrier CCTV fully signalled variety. For example there are AHB crossings on the main Belfast line south of Lisburn. Such crossings are good for 80 mph.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,283 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    It would seem like the logical thing to do but they are never going to go for anything other than 4 barrier cctv.



Advertisement