Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2024 F1 General Discussion Thread

1474850525357

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭niallm77


    Paid more than all but 3 drivers. Mad when you think about it. Stroll flinging money around.

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,752 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Isn't it that the top 3 paid staff members don't count towards the cap? Which I assume was meant to cover the 2 drivers and team principal. How much do team principals earn I wonder?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,145 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Its race week. Streets of Baku up next.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,286 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    I thought it was 5 salaries that don’t count towards the cap. 2 Drivers, Team Principal, Chief Technical officer and then 1 more. I could be wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,894 ✭✭✭Jacovs


    Yeah its the 2 drivers AND the 3 highest paid employees.

    https://www.globalsportsadvocates.com/blog/understanding-the-f1-cost-cap.cfm

    Several significant expenses are exempt from the cost cap, including:

    • Driver salaries
    • Compensation for the three highest-paid staff members
    • Travel expenses
    • Marketing expenditures
    • Property and legal costs
    • Entry and license fees
    • Activities unrelated to F1 or road cars
    • Parental and sick leave payments
    • Employee bonuses and staff medical benefits



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,752 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Does anyone listen to the race f1 podcast, and did anyone hear today's? They had Will Buxton on and he was advocating for McLaren to ensure that Norris is favoured for the rest of the season. His argument is that because there is a chance Norris can win, McLaren should enforce team orders from here on out so that if Piastri is ahead of Norris he let's him by, and if Piastri is behind Norris he acts as rear gunner and doesn't attack.

    Not a fan if Buxton at all, and couldn't disagree with him more. If Norris was dominating Piastri it would make sense. If Norris was super close to Verstappen it would make sense. But currently Norris is doing nothing to make it an obvious choice to favour him.

    Am I alone in thinking this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,708 ✭✭✭quokula


    The way I see it is that Norris proved that he is not a team player in Hungary and damaged the team's trust in him. This doesn't just impact the drivers but all of the engineers on the other side of the garage, all of the people back at the factory who poured blood sweat and tears into getting upgrade packages ready, when they see Lando throwing their hard work back in their faces out of selfishness it can really dampen morale and have a long term impact.

    Oscar on the other hand has been very straightforward to work with, he complied with team orders without complaint in Australia for example, and on top of that he's rapidly improving from a place of inexperience and increasingly looking like the future of the team - he's the highest points scorer on the grid over the last 8 races, ahead of both Lando and Max.

    So they could throw their full weight behind Norris, someone who's shown he can't be trusted when the favour needs to be returned, on the very slim chance he manages to catch Max and doesn't continue to keep throwing away good results with poor first lap performances, or they can let them race leaving a healthier atmosphere in the team. Ultimately this is the bigger picture they need to look at. Sometimes a few extra points here and there isn't worth creating a toxic atmosphere going forward into next season when they will surely have a very strong chance at fighting for the championship from the start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,634 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Sounds like disobeying team orders is a terrible thing to do to the team. Max must be a similarly dreadful character for the Red Bull team for refusing team orders too...

    But I bet you have a rationale for why it's totally different when Max does it. It might even be a nobel act when Max does it and might even boost team morale...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    Not saying you're alone in thinking it, but you've already said you prefer Piastri to Norris so I can understand why you're saying it

    Norris is 44 points ahead of Piastri in the Drivers championship, so I can see why they're saying he should be prioritised. I can't see anyone other than Max winning the drivers championship given the reliability the Red Bull has shown. They're definitely in the running for the Constructors championship, though, especially if Perez keeps up his current form.

    Unsure how Norris has showed he's 'not a team player' and 'damaged the teams trust in him' or 'shown he can't be trusted when the favour needs to be returned' when he let Oscar through? Yes, he took longer than the team would've liked and yes he did moan about it on the team radio, but he's a racing driver, he wants to win as I'm sure every other driver on the grid do. The two seem to get on very well so it doesn't seem to have damaged their relationship either.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    Lando obeyed the teams orders, though, he just took his time in doing it, but yet somehow showed he can't be trusted and isn't a team player



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,122 ✭✭✭bren2001


    It’s like you didn’t watch it unfold and just saw the result that they switched places. Lando most certainly undermined the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,617 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    So lando was told to obey orders cause he'll need his team mate.

    But in future races there will be no concession by his team mate to help him in a slim chance he has at the title.

    Cool.

    Its bizarre imo. Yes norris isn't miles ahead of Piastri, but only one if the has any chance at the title, though the might have been too damaged by the points mclaren didn't force his way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭niallm77


    WOnder if Mark Webber has a clause in Piastri's contract about this. Seems odd to not push Lando now as he does see. The more likely one to catch Max

    I think McLaren will win the constructors title



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,576 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Lando is currently doing enough to catch max based on last couple of races, so to say he has only an outside chance of the title is not really fair.

    If we consider Hungary and the last outing, 17 points have been thrown away in the fight to max. That would have put him right in the middle of it.

    Its madness by Mclaren, absolute madness. I can only think he might have pissed on someone's cornflakes for them to be taking the stance they currently are.

    Piastri should 100 percent be supporting him at this stage. Its not about no 1 or 2 driver, its about who gets into championship contention and the other then supporting that. This should always be the case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭Schorpio


    If Lando wants to win a championship, he has to deserve it.

    He didn't deserve to win Hungary, and he didn't deserve to be in front in Monza. Simple as that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,617 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Uh huh. No championship winner has ever got more points than they 'deserve' due to their team mate moving aside. It's just not how f1 teams have ever worked. Uh huh.

    Also, if Piastri hadn't been his team mate in Hungary he'd have won the race. He was ahead and widening the gap.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,122 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Lando would deserve it. He’s scored more points than Piastri this season and put himself in a position to challenge for the title. Piastri didn’t. F1 is a team game and isn’t purely individual. Max didn’t beat Lewis the first time without Perez.

    What’s the point of a teammate if they don’t help you at this stage of the championship???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,576 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Such a nonsense argument.

    I guess we should class half the world championships results over the years null and void so where team mates helped the lead car.

    Lando needs to be out of there with the way he is being treated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,033 ✭✭✭thefa


    Thought Straw and the other guy made it a good debate. Buxton added little nuance beyond what he had said in the post race interview plus a few references to F1 history to tie in with his book.

    Agreed with the conclusion though. Despite Norris not having done enough this season to have earned it, he is in the better position mathematically. Give him priority for the next couple of races (potentially incentivize Piastri & make it known Norris has priority). If Norris blows more chances, go back to how it was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,272 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Lando made a balls of Hungary, tried to publicly force the teams hand instead of giving the place back immediately and passing Piastri on track, which he had the pace to do that day.

    Lando does not have a good enough chance at this point to start putting team orders in. Needs to earn a couple more race wins, make it a more realistic chance and make it very unlikely that Oscar could catch him before that becomes a possibility.

    8 races to go, and I think it would look ridiculous if they are continually having to ask Piastri to slow down or let Lando pass with that many races left.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,905 ✭✭✭Trampas


    We are all assuming that the message to lando in Hungary was Oscar would move over for him but it was he’ll help you. Didn’t he let him take the first pit stop each time which is helping him. Lando is one dnf to be out of championship. How many points has lando lost due to his terrible starts

    British media will be unbearable this weekend like the soccer last weekend about someone singing the national anthem. Crofty and Buxton have lost the run of themselves



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,272 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Apples and oranges. Checo was nowhere near Max in the standings, so of course at that point the focus should be on helping wherever he can. And he was helping mostly by holding up opponents by going on a longer tire stint and giving max a better window to come out. In race pace, Max never needed Checo to slow down to pass him.

    Piastri is not that far back from Norris and it’s not inconceivable for him to catch him. And McLaren would potentially be asking Piastri to give up race wins to assist his teammate. It’s too much imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭Schorpio


    Piastri was the lead car in the race, so Piastri should have had the option to box before Lando. Yet both times Lando was boxed first. That is Piastri being the team player. Without that, not only is Lando not winning the race, he's probably finishing behind Hamilton. (The undercut is massive at Hungary.)

    Also, if the lead car wasn't a McLaren, Lando still wouldn't have won. That car would have pitted before Lando to cover him off.

    The argument isn't black and white. Team-mates can help (and Piastri did), but that doesn't mean Lando deserved it.



  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 5,350 Mod ✭✭✭✭Irish Aris


    On the whole McLaren situation, I wonder if the medium-to-long term strategy is Piastri and Bortoletto? The Brazilian is McLaren academy, he has come up the ranks fairly quickly and he seems fairly fast and composed in F2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,752 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    If Piastri was to help Norris out by not attacking and/or gifting him positions for the rest of the season it's likely to have a direct impact in maybe half the races? Assuming that in the rest it's not possible (eg they are not racing alongside each other, other drivers are too close). Is 4 races (or possibly more) of 1 driver handing a position to another too many for that other driver to be deemed the world champion?

    I know other drivers have had direct help (Schumacher had it in his contract sure) but direct assistance like the media has been going on about being the difference between winning and losing the championship is different. If it happens in 1 or 2 races it's understandable, but is there a ceiling before it becomes wrong?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,122 ✭✭✭bren2001


    Its not apples and oranges when someones opinion is:

    If Lando wants to win a championship, he has to deserve it.

    By that logic, Max didn't deserve it because Perez handed max positions. Even Gasly turned off his DRS and let Max overtake in one race.

    Its a bananas argument.

    And McLaren would potentially be asking Piastri to give up race wins to assist his teammate. It’s too much imo.

    They're teammates. Thats how teams work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    Newey (unsurprisingly) joins Aston Martin as 'Managing Technical Partner'

    Link



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 10,576 Mod ✭✭✭✭Andrew76


    In other news, Newey joining Aston Martin is official now, BBC Sport and the-race have articles up about it. Up to 30 mil a year salary with a shareholding in the team too.

    https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/adrian-newey-joins-aston-martin-f1-team-what-you-need-to-know/

    https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/articles/c3rdgl74z5eo

    So along with Newey in a 'Managing Technical Partner' role, AM will have

    Andy Cowell (ex Merc) - Chief Executive Officer
    Enrico Cardile (ex Ferrari) - Chief Technical Officer
    Dan Fallows (ex Red Bull) - Technical Director

    in the list of folks poached from other teams. Will be interesting to see how they all gel together over the next few years and presumably Alonso will stick around for as long as possible now. Would be nice if Stroll junior buggered off though, what an almighty waste of space he is when you look at the investment his dad is putting into that team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,272 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Well I think you can argue that Max deserved to have Red Bull prioritise his races ahead of Checo as he got himself into a great position for the championship and was guaranteed to beat his teammate in the final standings. And not once did that mean taking a race win away from Perez.

    Lando, IMO, hasn’t done that. Ability wise there is very little between himself and Piastri, they could both conceivably win multiple races before the end of the season, and I think it’s a massive thing to ask a driver to give up a race win for a teammate. Race wins are so rare for most drivers. Potentially giving up more than one so that your teammate might win a wdc is a huge ask.

    Also, he hasn’t shown enough consistency to make his case that they should risk the team dynamic going all in on him. His starts are dreadful and he needs to show he can take maximum points regularly to be worth the risk at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,286 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    You have no idea what the team dynamic even is. Lando has stuck with McLaren for 5 years through thick and thin with sh!te cars and poor strategy. Signed a long contract even though the team didn’t even look promising at the time because he was loyal. Now that he has a realistic shot at the championship the team need to pay him his dues and start issuing team orders. Piastri has no shot at the championship. The team don’t owe him anything other than a salary, he’s a rookie in his second year. If I was Lando I’d be talking to other teams.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,286 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Interesting that he’s a partner. I wonder did old man Stroll give him shares in AM as part of the deal? But it wasn’t about money according to Eddie Jordan….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,272 ✭✭✭McFly85


    Lando signed a long term deal with a team that was at worst a midfield team for a couple of years, no doubt helped by the fact that he saw the investment in new facilities they had planned over the next few years.

    And really, there was no other top team that he could have gone to where he’d be considered the number 1 driver. That’s probably still the case - look at the trouble Sainz had getting a seat.

    They’ve given him stability in F1, loads of money and now a brilliant car, he’s not owed anything else. If he can’t win the championship with that unless the team ask Piastri to let him win a couple of times, he probably doesn’t deserve it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,286 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Whether you think he deserves it is irrelevant. If the team want to maximise their results this season they need to start issuing team orders. If they aren’t interested in maximising their results then why even bother competing in the first place. Nonsense phrases like “papaya rules” just makes them a laughing stock.

    Post edited by MadYaker on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46,617 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    My end point on the Lando/Piastri team orders is that: by not enforcing team orders to maximize Lando's points at this stage, they are effectively reducing their chances of winning the championship to 0. They have a SLIM chance with Lando, they have no chance with Piastri, they have no chance if Lando has to race a very good driver in an excellent car for every single point as well.

    You can argue the merits of deserving it or not, but the end result will be neither driver wins the title because they will 'cost' each other so many points. Early in the season, when you are establishing the championship i think it wrong to enforce a number 1. Half way through the season? When RB look to be faltering and there is a small chance you could pip them for both the Contructors and the Drivers? I think it is MADNESS to effectively give up on the drivers champ.

    I could see more of an argument for Piastri not giving up a win to Lando in second, but I really don't understand why you wouldn't ask Piastri and Lando to swap any other positions if they are driving in sequence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,122 ✭✭✭bren2001


    I think you're making very different points to the original poster. If Piastri handed Lando the win and Lando went on to win the WDC, he would have earned the title and deserved it. You're going off on a completely different point (one I disagree with but outside the scope of what I replied too and what I've said).

    Lando, IMO, hasn’t done that. Ability wise there is very little between himself and Piastri

    44 points in the difference. Same car.

    Also, he hasn’t shown enough consistency to make his case that they should risk the team dynamic going all in on him.

    What team dynamic? There is none. There is no team. They've made that clear. There's 8 races left, of course you pick the guy who has a credible chance of winning the WDC and not say "we've two equal drivers". They don't. One has the potential to win. The other doesn't.

    Neither do with their current strategy which is stupid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    Dream team, or too many cooks? Time will tell I guess.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,286 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Dream team imo. Stroll catches a lot of flack but you couldn’t say he isn’t putting his money where his mouth is. I’d imagine Newey will be as much creative freedom as he wants. It will be interesting to see what Alonso does now. I think he will be gone after 2025



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,243 ✭✭✭bennyx_o


    Yeah, he's become a shareholder in Aston Martin too according to various articles, whether that's just the F1 team or the whole AM brand, who knows



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,286 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    They are separate. There’s Aston Martin F1 and Aston Martin Lagonda that builds the road cars. Shares in AML are not exactly a hot commodity at the moment so I’m guessing Newey got a slice of the F1 team.

    It’s almost like Lawrence Stroll read Newey’s book and did the opposite of what Frank Williams did.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭niallm77


    Wonder how much Eddie J is making out of this



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,634 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Stroll is obviously sticking his oar in and choosing the driver. Otherwise Lance would be out if there. It's reasonable to assume he's interfering in ways that are best for him personally, but not best for the team. How far he's willing to go to interfere is the question.

    If he's willing to interfere with car design, then he's a gobshyte.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,576 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    So Newey and Co build a good car for 2026 but not quite there. Alonso retires after end of 2026.

    Stroll puts a youngster in the 2nd car for 2027 beside lance. The car is a masterpiece for 2027 and lance wins the championship as no 1 driver with help from team mate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,634 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    It's possible but they'd need such a dominant car for that to happen.

    Perez finished second in one of the last 3 years, when Red Bull was dominant. Perez is a decent average driver. Stroll is below average. He'd probably need a car as dominant as the mclaren 1998 or Mercedes mid-2010s. It's possible, but unlikely.

    They'd need a car so dominant that most other drivers would win the championship handily, before Stroll could compete.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,286 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    I don’t think there’s much to choose between Stroll and Perez. Stroll could be a capable second driver in a dominant car imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,964 ✭✭✭✭klose


    It will be interesting to see who stroll replaces Alonso with when he eventually calls it a day, will he go big for Norris or piastri for example?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,093 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    Have you forgotten that they were team mates for two years? There was plenty to choose between them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,340 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Verstappen? He's got the Honda, he's got Newey, why not complete the set.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,424 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Worth noting that Mclaren don't necessarily care about the WDC, the aim for the constructor is the constructors championship. If "papaya rules" is "free to race but dont crash into each other", then it maximises constructors points for the team.

    They have a small chance of winning the WDC with lando, none with Piastri, but they have a large shot at the constructors.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,576 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Constructors is a certainty surely.

    It was interesting to hear Newey say yesterday that some of the critical design features on the redbull for the last 3 years are not yet understood by the other teams.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,527 ✭✭✭NinjaTruncs


    I wonder is red bull one of those teams?

    4.3kWp South facing PV System. South Dublin



  • Advertisement
Advertisement