Harris Vs Trump 2024 US Presidential election

You dont see Trump winning because you and a lot in here tend to focus on one side of the media. You do not see the full picture so it catches you by surprise to know that Kamala is really poor at answering questions. To know that Biden was past it long before his debate mis-step. These are things that you all seemed shocked about. But nobody who sees the other side of the news reports was shocked.

Kamala got a marginal boost after a debate where she had the questions ffs. A debate where ABC have been called out as biased. Why anyone would think that Trump would agree to more cheating is insane. Its no coincidence who Donna Brazile now works for. Im sure you lot dont even know who she is though.

Kamala is poor at answering question but Trump is somehow good 😂

The cognitive dissonance is strong in this one. And then the batsh*t conspiracy sh*te kicks in. MAGA cult in two paragraphs

You didnt quote the media. I never said you did. I insinuated that your view on Trumps chances, stem form your lack of media awareness.

Sure you can claim that you called out Biden 6 months ago. But that proves that most in here were surprised by this. I mean if you called it out and it was seen as true in here (because god forbid you have an opinion that isnt passed by the majority first) then you wouldnt have received a warning.

As for the fixed debate. I have addressed that in my last post if you want to read it. How many fact checks were done on Kamala?

Finally with Harris' style. I agree. She was very well prepared. She played her tactics really well. She evaded questions. She baited him into ignoring her evasions and she had really well rehearsed answers. Trump on the other hand probably did listen to the advice but the advice came form the wrong person. Loomer is fine but she is not a good tactician. His closing, he asked why she hasnt done it already. Pointing out that all the things she is saying, she could literally do right now. Of course we know that she is limited in her current role and the current state of the houses etc. But that was the tactic. That was how he should have played the WHOLE debate. A question given to her followed by him replying "why are you not doing it now?". But he didnt and thats why he lost.

But while he lost, it doesnt ignore the fact that she didnt answer any question and she wasnt called out on it.

Donald Trump is a story teller. He answers questions through stories. Kamala tells you what the words of the question mean.

At the debate she was asked how she would fix the border. She invited everyone to attend a Trump rally to see how boring it was. The mods allowed Trump to respond. Then the mods allowed Kamala to respond. They never asked her to answer the question…………………………….

At the debate Kamala said Trump called white supremacists good people. I shared the video in this thread yesterday of Trump specifically saying "I am not talking about the white supremacists and Neo Nazis". He called those people out. The lie was debunked multiple times and was not Fact checked.

The whistleblower released the affidavit BEFORE the debate happened. Then we saw a debate where a usually stuttering Kamala answers questions like she knew what the question was. She wasnt thinking on her feet, she knew how to Segway from "how do you fix the border" to "I invite you to attend one of Trumps rallies". Add that to the fact checking stats and it adds up.

Once again, citing something that isn't remotely verified. Can you point to any news outlet confirming there's an actual whistleblower? Also worth noting that the questions in the debate were incredibly predictable and basic, they weren't shocking or unexpected.

https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2024/09/presidential-debate-abc-whistleblower-car-crash/

Here's me thinking that Trump is famously generous, and known far and wide for his many charitable donations and how he selflessly dedicates many hours of his personal time to promote good causes that do not provide any benefit to him

https://apnews.com/general-news-united-states-government-7b8d0f5ce9cb4cadad948c2c414afd57

I could. But your request is likely in bad faith.

My genuine response is to look at various media sources. Youtube is actually a great source for political commentators these days. People who are not on normal news networks have shows online. Ignore the conspiracy nuts. Stick to the light heared ones.

John Oliver, Bill Maher, Jesse Dollemore and Stephen Colbert are easy enough to watch for the Dems side of things. Even though Maher seems to be disillusioned with the Dems these days.

Ben Shapiro, Matt Walsh, Megyn Kelly and Piers Morgan are all more Republican even though Piers claims not to be.

The idea is that lets say I watched only Matt Walsh. I would only see it from his pov. I would believe that vaccines are bad and Hamas is the only evil one. But if I also watch John Oliver I get his side of the view also. Now I see both sides so my opinion can be more balanced.

There are way more serious commentators but the above is more light hearted and easier to watch. The other stuff is way more technical and can be great for insomnia.

But if you do try to watch any of it, TAKE IT ALL WITH A PINCH OF SALT. Just remember it is all their opinion form their side. Joe Rogan is a perfect example. He always says that people shouldnt get their opinions and views from him. He is a conspiracy nut. He has interesting topics but if you are easily influenced, stay away.

There really is no limit to the amount of utter drivel that Trump worshippers will spout.

SMH.

Am I in contact with the whistleblower?

Surely you dont think that is even remotely possible.

How can I have proof of the fact there is a whistleblower? They are a whistleblower and they are anonymous becaus ethey are a whistleblower.

They provided the affidavit BEFORE the debate. So either theya re really good at guessing. Or they are form the future. OR it was true

Things claimed in the affidavit apart form the questions, BEFORE the debate even happened

Private negotiations with Kamala Harris’ campaign

Kamala would have a special look on stage, from the podium to the split screen situation

The mods wouldn’t ask about Tony West, about her tenure as AG, about President Biden’s mental fitness and her role in covering it up

Donna Brazile DID do this is the past and she lost her job because of it. She is now working for ABC

Of course its a tactic. But it is the job of the moderator to push the candidate to answering the question. As they did with Trump. Thats the point. Both were not treated the same

She had the questions? 😂😂😂 It's amazing how far removed from reality Trumpists are when someone preparing for a debate for questions likely to come up must have cheated somehow. When people prepare for interviews, are they cheating too? 😂

Trump could have prepared too if anyone could have convinced him that he needed more than his usual stream of babble to actually make a coherent point in the debate. It's always someone else's fault or some conspiracy to blame. Never the god king.

It's pretty standard for a whistleblower to have their credentials verified by the press. In this case, you're claiming it was created before the debate but it only got released on Sunday. There's no indication that it's a remotely legit affidavit. Care to provide verification that it was created on the 9th as claimed on the document? You don't have any and this is why it can be considered bullshit. No verification of any kind, I could write up a document with different claims and say it was an affidavit, would you accept it at face value?