Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Amazon WFH Policy

2456710

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,338 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    if you find it that difficult to build relationships with work colleagues and enjoy your work life then i feel for you. Working at home in isolation full time is not healthy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,808 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 98 ✭✭HurlingBoy


    That's not the point I am trying to make. I am saying that the lazy worker will have the reputation of calling in sick when not sick, working from home when not working etc. Companies that do not have proper review systems allow worker get away with this. Managers want to coast along avoiding having the difficult conversations with people, no real recognition for performance, low morale because some of the team want to progress with their careers but other happy to take the pay cheque. This is down to company culture. Company then has to use the stick rather the carrot to control people and WFH is removed for everyone.



  • Registered Users Posts: 218 ✭✭Soc_Alt




  • Registered Users Posts: 218 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    Most people working in large multinationals will be returning to office soon

    In 2025 you will see many companies going from 3 day to a full 5 days.



  • Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭vival20062


    Its funny how some people are so against people working from home.

    I say that as someone who has done it since before covid etc.

    Plenty of people wfh in a healthy manner and are very successful in their professions.



  • Registered Users Posts: 218 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    It's funnier how people who worked in the office before Covid believe it's their fundamental right not to have to return to the office now.

    In case they haven't noticed. There are extremely limited wfh roles advertised now.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,221 ✭✭✭riddles


    they’ll be happy if they lose people in mid and high cost locations and where replacements are needed they’ll go to low cost countries. If you claim your job can be done fully remote then it’s on the slate for low cost countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,338 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    it often does, and most of the real zealots are working alone in my experience.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,338 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    im not really against it, a hybrid set up is good as it gives a bit of flexibility, but its a benefit imo and i would generally support the majority of time being office based.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,842 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    They just have to show the process was followed.

    There was a recent case in the WRC that pretty much showed this. (They went in favour of the employer as they had followed the process to the letter)

    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2024/0808/1464076-wrc-tiktok-worker-remote-working-case/



  • Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭vival20062


    I'm yet to meet some claim that fundamental right.



  • Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭vival20062


    Sure if that's your preference, you do you as they say.

    I prefer the opposite and it works very well for me and my team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,842 ✭✭✭✭kippy


    As someone who has had WFH/Remote work on and off for 2 decades I don't have a problem with it. Current role is full time in the office. Thats the deal. If others aspects of the role done make up for lack of WFH then I look at moving.

    I am not surprised Amazon are doing this, no matter what the actual reason is, it doesn't looks like WFH will be available within the organisation going forward which may or may not cause them issues.

    Many companies are rowing back on WFH, some aren't.



  • Registered Users Posts: 218 ✭✭Soc_Alt


    Good, then they should have no objections following to returning to office policies .:)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭vival20062


    I'm not even sure who you are talking about tbh.



  • Registered Users Posts: 218 ✭✭Soc_Alt




  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭Qaanaaq


    Nobody is suggesting full time WFH here at all. It's hybrid working which is the norm now. Only people who are workaholics seem to have a problem with this.

    Parents with young families getting up at 4am 5 days a week to commute to Dublin was very stressful for mental health and poor quality of life.

    • Less childcare costs
    • Less traffic/emissions/petrol costs
    • Less reliance of people having to move or commute to Dublin to get a job.
    • Less need for double accommodation for some. Family at home plus rent in city.
    • Better quality of life for families. More hours for family/ genuine friends to socialise
    • Better health, less stress, lower blood pressure, better sleep/rest, better nutrition
    • Less office space required per employee for employers. Shared spaces/desks
    • More balanced regional development for the country as a whole
    • Better communications infrastructure across the country



  • Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭vival20062




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,616 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    I am always amused by those who try to argue that employers are forcing employees to come back into offices out of some kind of faux concern for workplace morale, isolation, and the mental health of their employees in general.

    I can state with some authority that my employer did not give a toss about any of the above, pre-pandemic, and I don't expect that to have reversed - certainly not to the point where they now "care" enough to manage people's mental health for them, by making them come back to offices "for their own good". Give me a break.

    Ultimately, there will always be people who live to work, whose whole lives and social interactions revolve around their jobs. They are the people who will be more than happy to spend 5 days a week in an office, and would love to see everyone else dragged back into them too. So they have someone to talk to.

    Then there are people who work to live. Who have lives outside of their jobs, and don't depend on their workplace for social interactions. I now fall firmly into the second category.

    Post edited by Ezeoul on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,813 ✭✭✭Rezident


    There are some Managers who love bossing people around e.g. those who seek power to control others, and I'd say they hate WFH because there they are getting bossed around by their wives. They want everyone back in the office for their own little ego trip in their random job that means the world to them but is just-a-job to most people with outside interests.

    The office is better for new people, some training and some young people who are living 4-14 a house as the Irish property market is broke AF but even the kids don't want to go in FIVE days a week, it's three max.

    Once you get some decent experience, I would not work for a dinosaur company that requires presenteeism five days a week, it's backwards, especially if you do any coding whatsoever. I'm surprised at Amazon (not surprised at all by Goldman) but will not be surprised when they lose loads more good staff to their more flexible rivals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,388 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio


    Haven't seen anyone here who is against WFH. I'm in favour, but I'm not surprised company's are mandating people return to the office.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,042 ✭✭✭antimatterx


    Went back today for the first time in 6 months. Absolute hell. Makes me appreciate being 99% WFH.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,528 ✭✭✭Sono


    absolutely no chance of this happening, it’s an employees market out there and companies know they’ll lose good staff if they start ruffling feathers. Yes they could accelerate retirements for sure but losing good staff in an already difficult market for hiring is a very very risky approach. The outlier in any industry which the majority adopts that approach of office 5 days a week will be the one who benefits most.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,528 ✭✭✭Sono




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,042 ✭✭✭antimatterx


    Oh yeah, my company closed an office this year. I'm mainly remote but meet my team and wider company for social events as I think it's important. Today was a team lunch.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,653 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    Some people have brought this on themselves. A lot of people just didn't turn up to the office with the two or three days in-office hybrid policies, despite firms asking again and again.

    Firms were willing to compromise but staff weren't and as a result firms are getting a little fed up in some cases. I think if people played ball more on the two or three days as a compromise position it might have bed in better as a permanent solution but we'll have to see.



  • Registered Users Posts: 60 ✭✭vival20062


    Yeah I'm far from surprised amazon are doing it tbf



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,616 ✭✭✭Ezeoul


    I have to say, the staff in my workplace have been super compliant with the level of attendance that is required of them. I haven't heard of a single case yet of someone messing.

    That's not to say it doesn't happened elsewhere. But I still think it is poor management if the solution is to punish all for the few.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,653 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    You only need to look at the TikTok case. Required back in the office three days per week and the person hadn't attended at all whatsoever for months. Not coming back at all when you're asked when they've given plenty of notice and are meeting people halfway. Either leave and find a job with a pattern that works for you as you are perfectly free to do or follow the policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,145 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    Apparently I am.

    All because I had the audacity to suggest that while WFH has plus sides, it also has some issues.

    For the record, I believe it's some individuals who have ruined WFH for everyone. It only takes one or two per company.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,295 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    I 100% agree, and depending on the institution, it can be easy or difficult to broach these issues. Sometimes it is impossible A friend managed a team in the DoF, took 50 sick days, no GP slips but even halting their increment, let along looking at a PIP, was impossible. My place now, they hammer you for it, HR in the door straight away if you are f*cking around, but also a PS place. My prior company, private, if the job was done, you were golden, if it wasn't you were managed out quickly and effectively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,653 ✭✭✭caviardreams


    nail on the head. But this is 100% dependent on HR and not the manager - if managers go on a solo run to manage performance they will be thrown under the bus. It only works if HR will back it up. People blame weak / lazy managers but really it is a weak culture and weak HR. It's very frustrating as a manager when your hands are tied



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 56,778 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    This is exactly what it’s all about. Control!! And of course, having control over your employees is vital.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,110 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Fully onboard with this.

    Some people really put a lot into their work, and assign it to their worth as an individual. With my own experience, I often remind myself that I am basically a number to pretty much every employer, no matter how hard I work, or how often I go to the office. If the company ran into financial issues, none of that would matter at all, you'd be laid off.

    As for the return to some offices, any company that say it is for culture, productivity, mental health, they are talking out of their arse. My last place had a mandatory 1 day in the office per week, everyone had their earphones on, taking calls with remote workers, no one talking or engaging, nothing. The free lunches were not bad…but a 1 hour commute for that? If that is the culture, best to reflect on what you value as part of your career.

    Amazon will set the trend for more companies, I do see this becoming the norm for a lot more as time goes on. I prefer the hybrid model myself, with more of a preference to WFH most of the time, I personally get more time to work, no distractions like an office or side of desk tasks. But that is me.

    I'd expect to see big tech follow suit with the return to the office, and with that we will see folks "quiet quitting" or going to smaller firms that offer WFH or hybrid models.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭digiman


    I don’t think the job market for folks in Amazon is all that great, sure you might get easily a job elsewhere but you will probably be taking at least a 50% pay cut unless you can land a job in the other large US companies like Google, Meta, Microsoft etc. and these companies have had a lot of layoffs in the last 18months and are not hiring that much at the moment. I’d also expect that another one of these will follow suit at 5days/week also.

    In the end money talks and not that many will take the big pay cut to have flexible work elsewhere.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,475 ✭✭✭RedXIV


    I don't know, I think you'd be surprised how much people value their freedom/flexibility. I took a hit in money specifically to get that flexibility. I think this could actually be a good thing in the long run for a lot of local companies. Irish companies finally have a way to compete with multinationals. Sure you're gonna have folks who are very money focused, but this tends to be early in careers, as people get more senior, they'll command higher salaries and they may prioritise flexibility over the MNC salaries and that's something Irish companies can offer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,110 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    some of the companies you mentioned are hiring lots lately, wages are lower than before but there is a noticeable uptake in the market now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭digiman


    Would you take a 50% hit though? I definitely would take less for a better work life balance, but at the moment 50% would be too much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,242 ✭✭✭digiman


    It’s a lot better than it was 12 months ago, but not noticing a huge change to be honest, definitely not where it was at 18+ months ago



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,572 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    There is a huge societal issue here when you consider the cost of housing, child care, and terrible public transport. Basically who would want to do an essential service in Ireland, where you can't work from home regularly?

    The contrast between the life a couple with long commutes and kids who can work from home regularly vs those who can't is brutal. It is an incredibly huge non taxable benefit health wise and financially.

    Should essential workers without this benefit get some kind of wealth transfer from those with this benefit, via taxation, to encourage more people to do essential services ?

    Post edited by SuperBowserWorld on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭boardsdotie44


    100% agree with Dublinflyers post above, the only reason that Irish employee got the 500k was due to Irish law, in the US you'd be on the kerb! Still doesnt stop US managers of Irish employees trying these tactics out, which can cause alot of stress..

    Have you worked for American companies? I have worked for 4, never again. I have 20 years experience in them…

    Figures and stats can be manipulated to portray anything you want, a thing American companies are adept at!! :)

    Now people who will do anything for money is another matter. But long term exposure to the so called 'best working conditions' will do your mental and physical health no good.

    Can you outline the best working conditions that are meant? I failed to see any other than wages..

    Seriously you see nothing wrong with the way that individual was treated in the article, all you see is the money! Pity all the other employees who now have to give up their life if they wish to remain working for that t**t!

    It would be a representation of alot of tech US companies, maybe an extreme example but nonetheless they generally treat staff as numbers..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,338 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    how are you saving money on child care costs if you are working?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,076 ✭✭✭✭event


    Lads its not lockdown. These people can go outside and interact with people outside of working time.

    If there are people who have lost social skills due to WFH, I would bet my life these are the people who before WFH, went to work, interacted with no one anyway, went home and stayed inside.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭Fabio


    Agreed - in other news, we now have things called computers so you don't need your old stacks of paper folders folks.

    Moving with the times. Flexible WFH policies are very important for most employees and only dinosaurs believe otherwise. The whole point of the flexibility is that, if you want to be in the office all of the time, you can be! No one is stopping you! Mirroring that, if you need to be at home for some reason, you also can be!

    The caveat being…make sure the work is getting done. Simple.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,475 ✭✭✭RedXIV


    you're right in that I wouldn't take a 50% cut but I took a 20% cut and still believe I came out on top. I was very worried initially, but a few months in, I've realised it was by far the best career decision I've made. There are local companies here who I think could get up to that 75% mark of salary for some of the MNCs, possibly not the ridiculous salaries you see dropped once in a while, but this just feels like an easy win for local companies to attract the talent they've been bemoaning for years saying that MNCs poach away from them.

    Not having to drop kids to "breakfast clubs" at 7am to make a commute is a saving. Similarly, picking the kids up from school so they can relax at home, means no afterschool club either. That saving alone is significant, and if I was commuting, I'd have to suck it up

    this I do agree with. My wife is a nurse and to this day, I honestly believe she does two or three times the work I do. They definitely deserve something for continuing to work on-site when there is such a big move for others to work from home



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73 ✭✭boardsdotie44


    Its so straight forward isnt it :) Hard to believe ppl are discussing this.. (Im agreeing with you you, NOT being sarcastic, just in case)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,234 ✭✭✭nachouser


    We have offshore teams in India, some of whom moved out of the main tech cities during lockdown. So now they're flying back in to stay in hostels for X days in a row to meet their quota for the month. Which seems insane to me. But hey, rules are rules:-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,528 ✭✭✭Sono


    I work from home 4 days a week and my children still go to after school, I am working!! How can you juggle children and work at the same time, it is impossible unless the worker is at nothing of course….



  • Advertisement
Advertisement