Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Why wont die hard GAA fans admit football these days is muck?

1202122232426»

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,917 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Surely all they need is a fella with a stop watch and hooter - as the timekeeper fella just for that job. Not expensive tech needed.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52,475 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Yes and the defending was all over the place. Wasn't it 3-20 to 1-20 or something like that. Some great forward play but both defences wide open.



  • Registered Users Posts: 198 ✭✭Charlo30


    There are Junior and Intermediate matches were they struggle to get people to do Umpiring. Good luck getting some to do the shot clock



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,672 ✭✭✭elefant




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,124 ✭✭✭windy shepard henderson


    impossible to do at club level , we are lucky to have umpires at intermediate or junior level let alone someone to look after the time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,424 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    I don't know if I be in minority but one rule I would change is let players pick it off the ground. It causes too much controversy in games even in AI Armagh were punished and it was not picked off ground.

    I think it would make game faster at times as player could fist it away to team mate etc. To me it slows game down a little too.

    The game only needs a few changes for me. I hate for it turn into a complete different game. The game is still good just needs few adjustments not 10 or 20.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The most important thing is not to ignore the elephant in the room….. the amount of hand passing in the current way the game is played and coached.

    Most of the 'fallout' stems from that in my opinion, and the trundling of players back and forward condensing the play

    into the last third of the pitch with the consequent congestion has made the game a poor watch.

    Sort that stuff out and we could have at least a start to pull the game out of the doldrums.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,489 ✭✭✭pgj2015




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,917 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    After each "play" when a team is in the opponents half as the yanks say. Once they are in the opponents half the 45 second stopwatch starts. Up to a team to take a shot within that time. If they lose the ball/take a shot the stopwatch watch is reset.

    Stopwatches are not expensive to buy.

    No more difficult than clicking a stopwatch when a runner does a lap etc. Obviously in Croke Park and the bigger grounds could have a 45 second countdown.

    I think it would be alright, as it should not take a team more than 45 seconds to break down the field from one side of the pitch to the other. Or when in the opponents half a team should have no excuses for working a scoring chance within that time. Especially if 13 a side.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,287 ✭✭✭jj880


    Im from North Donegal. Just to test the waters a while ago I mentioned to an uncle of mine that I found the hurling much more entertaining to watch in recent years. He looked at me like Id just shat in Jim McGuinness's porridge. The football has gone to shyite. Over and back outside the 45 until a gap appears then some wee lad darts in for a score. Then up the other end for more of it. Jaysus. Just look at the 2 All Ireland finals. Night and day. The hurling final was one of the best spectacles Ive ever watched.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,448 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    I suggested the picking off the ground as a rule change earlier in the thread. Along with making it 8 or 10 steps instead of 4. Both would just be recognising what happens anyway. A player running at near the speed of a 100 metre sprinter in the Olympics, should not be expected to execute a solo in the time it takes to run 4 steps.

    All this other stuff is just asking teams to surrender possession to the opponents for no good reason. Not going to work, because possession of the ball is what creates scores. The field is there for all the players to set up whatever way they want. Nothing stopping them going back to defenders, midfielders and forwards staying in their positions. And the keeper choosing to send every kickout into midfield. Teams simply don't want to do that any more, because it is not an efficient way to win matches.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,672 ✭✭✭elefant


    You would likely end up with 20+ frees given every game for the clock running out, and from teams intentionally running into the corner at the end of the time and not taking a shot because a turnover from a stupid shot is more dangerous than giving away a free and slowing down it being taken. And that's not even accounting for how much more effective a shot clock would make getting 15 players behind the ball.

    Rule change ideas are interesting to discuss, but totally unworkable suggestions thrown out as simple solutions - like a shot clock or, incredibly in this thread, full on banning handpassing (!) - just demonstrate how far removed some of these theoretical discussions are from the reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,917 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    There wouldn't be 15 players in my idea though there would be 13 a side - much harder for 11 outfield players to crowd an area and defend, on wide Gaelic football pitches. There would be more space to exploit.

    I think teams will learn and adapt if you don't want to start giving frees away take shot with the 45 seconds when within an opponents half simple.

    Plus I think what would eventually happen a team would have a specialised long range shooter like a scrum half in rugby.

    Plenty of possibilities.

    If a shot clock can work in basketball why not Gaelic football? It is scores people the OP want to see fast play and movement/shots on goal.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,424 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Ya the steps is good move too. Most players seem take 6 or 7 at times anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,448 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Lots of long range shooting in the games I see. Must drive the "clipboard" people who do the stats on percentage shooting mad. Sometimes they get a point, more often they go wide or into the keepers hands. Putting players on a clock is not going to improve the outcomes.

    "Recent studies have identified shot efficiency as a key performance indicator (KPI) in Gaelic football; however, there has been little research into the impact of shot location on shot efficiency. The current study aims to establish a methodology to calculate shot distance and angle reliably and consistently in Gaelic football. Through application of this methodology to the 2019 inter-county championship the impact of distance and angle on shot success was assessed. There was evidence of reliability in the proposed methodology for calculating shot distance and angle. As a result, this study determined average shot distance at 30.9 m (±11.4 m) and average shot angle at 31.3° (±18.6°). While shot success peaked at 20 m, shots from closer to goal had a higher points per shot value given many from closer range were successful goal attempts, thus having greater scoreboard impact. This study can conclude that the scoring zone in Gaelic football lies within a 32 m arc of the goal, and within a 60° angle from the midline of the pitch. Moreover, this study presents the first validated methodology to calculate shot distance and angle in Gaelic football using commercially available software."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,672 ✭✭✭elefant


    Where to start on the differences?

    Two big ones:

    1. The clock has a simple reset mechanism - when the ball touches the ring of the basket.

    2. It's far, far easier to score in basketball. You can engineer a good opportunity at any stage of a shot clock. What do you do if you're under pressure outside the 45 with 2 second to go and the other team have 15 behind the ball? You can guarantee teams will quickly be kicking the ball out over the sideline as close to the opposition goal as possible. Some spectacle that would be! What they absolutely won't be doing at inter county level, and what people seem to be imagining from a theoretical shot clock, is just kicking it randomly to the other team



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Unfortunately this is kind of rubbish that the very top brass of the GAA can see is killing the game as entertainment value.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,448 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It's entertainment if people use their brains to understand what it going on. I equally enjoy seeing a ball kicked 50 yards and two players contesting a high catch. Room for every idea when the whole field is available to every player.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-RZfvpe6xxo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Are you implying that the very top brass of the GAA ,plus the media, the social media, the pundits cannot see what is going on?🤣

    Why on earth would they assemble a very high powered committee of senior figures to examine the rules of the game with a

    view to making it more attractive to play and watch.

    Cannot believe that post, to be honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,448 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Social media is full of mad people with mad ideas. Mainstream media pundits are competing with each other for who can be the most controversial. The GAA top brass are going through the motions. They know that teams will continue to play the possession game, with little regard to the traditional set up abandoned around 25 years ago. No matter if they bring in shot clocks, or make goalkeepers hang around their goals.

    They could put their minds to making tickets €200 for next year's final, given the demand that exists for a so called unattractive game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 587 ✭✭✭Treble double


    Agree, no matter what changes are brought in, you will never see a team in this era kick away possession, whatever changes are made will see new methods coached to retain possession. Get rid of the hand pass and it will be replaced by nifty 5 yard footpasses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,489 ✭✭✭pgj2015


    There may be demand for tickets for the all Ireland final FOR NOW, but the attendances in all the other games will suffer. The amount of people who told me the last week how boring the final was a lot to be honest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    You can’t run at speed through the field with “nifty 5 yard foot passes” and it would be much more difficult to keep possession.

    The overuse of the handpass is where all these issues spring from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,448 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Any rule which will make a maximum or minimun number of players be in designated areas of the field, will be a nightmare for the officials. It's easy to do when a kickout is being taken, but not so easy in open play. And will open up referees to even more ridicule from the pundits. They will use their freeze frames to show a player had his foot over some line, and express amazement at how the ref missed that.

    An easy one to implement would be using the foam from soccer to make free takers stop stealing a few yards. The handpass ship has sailed. The players said NO to any limit.



  • Registered Users Posts: 198 ✭✭Charlo30


    I disagree. Simply give the designated players different coloured arm bands. For example Pink. Very easy for a referee to spot if they've gone beyond a designated point.

    But being honest I'd rather they trialed a 13 a side game. I think that would provide the attacking team with more space.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,448 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Arm bands would not be easy to see. I think they should carry around a helmet to put on and take off whenever they are entering or leaving a zone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Your posts are just constantly trying to derail this discussion with ridiculous inputs.

    The game is up, my friend, the top brass have seen the writing on the wall.

    The game of Gaelic Football as it’s currently being played and ‘coached’ is a ship heading for disaster, not now,

    not very soon, but eventually the outdoor basketball will die a death.


    Hopefully Jim and the lads can fix it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,395 ✭✭✭megadodge


    "Your posts are just constantly trying to derail this discussion with ridiculous inputs"

    When you're involved there's actually NO discussion.

    At least others try to have a debate and have the maturity to engage back and forth. But not you!

    You don't add anything.

    You make no suggestions.

    You simply repeat yourself ad nauseum and BORE everyone to tears.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Correct,Im discussing the big picture, the elephant in the room, I am not going to be dragged into the inevitable

    5 page arguments about "wearing a helmet " to identify ones place on the field, and shot clocks, and other stuff, the committee led by JIM Gavin will have the expertise to deal with that.

    I am concerned with how the game is now played with passages of play of 37-40 handpasses backwards and sideways followed by something similar by to opposing team. Im concerned that there are the 'clipboard merchants ' even now probably planning how to make the game even more possession based which will over time lead to the demise of the game as a spectator attraction.

    Now you can roar and shout all you like but until you acknowledge the 'elephant in the room' there is a poor outlook for Gaelic football.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,395 ✭✭✭megadodge


    You're not discussing anything.

    And that's the whole point.

    When dxhound2005 in particular, counters others' suggestions with perfectly reasonable and more importantly, well-thought out reasons why they won't work, you're in like a shot with your copy and paste 'clipboard merchants', 'handpassing', 'Jim and the boys' nonsense.

    There's no actual discussion. There's just rinse and repeat.

    Do you really need attention that badly?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Correct again, I have no interest in arguing the toss here, unless the ‘elephant in the room’ is acknowledged.

    And it hasn’t .

    What these boys want is dancing on the head of pins when the real issue is plain as a pikestaff.

    I’m not stupid enough to be dragged into that never ending story , my friend.

    Got more obvious issues to spend my bandwidth on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,395 ✭✭✭megadodge


    Well that post basically says it all about you.

    You have no interest in arguing the toss - then what the hell are you making so many posts for?

    You're not stupid enough to be dragged in… yet you've more posts on this thread than anybody else.

    You've got more obvious issues to spend your bandwith on… it sure doesn't look that way. You've been all over this thread like a poisonous rash.

    It would be a very good thing for this thread if you simply didn't post again. Then people who have valid opinions from both sides and are capable of debating in an adult manner can get on with disussing their reasoning one way or another.



  • Registered Users Posts: 198 ✭✭Charlo30


    Looks like they are going to trial the proposed rule changes in a Railway Cup style competition in Croke Park in October.

    I like the idea. I think it will generate a lot of interest and could get a decent crowd. People will be interested in seeing these rules in action and how they impact the game.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/sport/gaa/arid-41440513.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Realistically minded people will be interested Cee, however the clipboard merchants and the blind to reality coterie will stay in King Canute mode trying to ignore the elephant in the room.

    I would be hopeful that Jim and his team can bring entertainment back into our game rather that the product we have right now where teams shunt back and forward at slow pace in a ‘game ‘ akin to outdoor basketball.

    I’m sure common sense and reality will overcome turgidity and sluggishness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,287 ✭✭✭jj880


    A big problem with this is if you live in a parish like mine every GAA football bum licker is hanging out the clubhouse cat flaps trying to curry favour. Whos going to be the first to say the football milk has gone bad? Forget it. Anything more than a whisper and its excommunication by sun down.



  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    Sorry to hear that you are a member of a club where your opinion is dismissed and used as a way to disrespect you. I cannot understand this and in my expedience within my club all views and opinions are listened to, discussed debated and taken on board according to their merits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,287 ✭✭✭jj880


    Ive no idea how you got all that from my post.

    within my club all views and opinions are listened to, discussed debated and taken on board according to their merits.

    🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Luckily enough JJ we have a President in Jarlath who has definitively said 'football milk has gone sour' and taken steps to try to rectify it.

    The clipboard merchants and the basketball coaches of course will fight for their lives to keep the status quo and of course by default, their own status.

    Gaelic football has been circling the drain for some time now and luckily we got a lad who can see what's happening now and could extrapolate on what way the game could end up.

    A bit hyperbolic I know, but the image of lads drinking cups of coffee on the pitch while their team handpasses the ball around the midfield area while the opposition run in circles 20 metres away from them is hard to dismiss.



  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    well are you a a paid up member of your local GAA football club or not . Because if you are then you are entitled to attend the AGM and address any of the issues that are affecting you. And if you are not then you are just another hurler on the ditch spouting bovine excrement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,287 ✭✭✭jj880


    Yeah yeah. It was obvious thats where you were going. You're off on your own tangent about personal issues, AGMs and memberships. Try again with something related to the thread subject.



  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    Can I ask you again a question which you have failed to answer Are you a member of your local GAA club ?. If you are then you are in a position to influence strategy within the organisation. Otherwise you are as I have stated already a “ hurler on the ditch “



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Donegal Football semis over the weekend

    Eunans 8 pts. Gweedore 7pts

    Dungloe 9pts. St Michaels 7 pts


    Uhmmmmmm’…………………



  • Registered Users Posts: 715 ✭✭✭blackvalley


    In an effort to make the game more entertaining what would be the implication of banning the back pass. Every pass must be “ flat “ or forward. A direct opposite rule to the one in rugby.
    No skin in the game but just curious as to what a rule like that might bring about.Or how the game would evolve to cope with that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    There would be too many problems with it. It would be impossible for refs to implement it properly as they won't be able to see across the line. And what happens when a player gets the ball close to the opposition's endline. Can they not pass the ball backwards. Rule changes need to be thought through in huge detail - so cover all scenarios that may happen and just as importantly to see if they can be enforced - not just at senior level in Croke Park, but also at junior B level in a shltty auld pitch out in Mucknacross being reffed by a 20 stone dude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    You are correct in the assertion that rule changes have to be thought through in great detail, hopefully Jim Gavin and his team will do that.

    I was observing a training session at our club recently under 12s football. 80% of the session was on hand passing 'off the shoulder' .Not a good scenario in my opinion. We need to get the basketball element removed from our game.

    I also noted that good clean delivery of the ball via the foot was well below par.

    Expecting huge rule changes would be foolish…. do it over time is the way to go.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭17togo


    I had a similar experience recently at my son's training. They had a mini-match and were hand passing the ball all the way up the field and then had to hand pass the ball over the bar. No kicking points allowed. One kid scored a really good kicked point and was told that wasn't allowed. They're u-10s....🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    You guys obviously don't mentor kids. The hand-passing only drill has been a regular feature of training for decades. We used to do the same when I was a young lad (which is not today or yesterday!!!). It has it's benefits. For underage, say under 10s - there is often one or 2 kids who are much better than everyone else. If the game was open play, they would just solo up the pitch on their own and score everything. A hand passing only game coupled with one hop or one solo, is there to get other kids involved in the game.

    For many kids at that age, the default position on getting the ball is often to just kick it aimlessly. The hand passing only game is to try to get them to get composure on the ball. Don't just lash it. Have a look and see if any teammates in, say the surrounding 3 yards to handpass it to.

    I do mentoring. We would generally have a game at the end of the session, where we start off by having a hand-pass only game with one solo-hop. Then have handpassing and kicking, but still have only one solo/hop. And then for the last third of the game have no restrictions. It does work, as opposed to just a free for all for a half hour.



  • Registered Users Posts: 249 ✭✭17togo


    That's fair enough, but if it wasn't for the way the adults play the game now I'd go with your judgement completely. I did mentoring for a couple of years but that's when he was younger and hadn't advanced to this level of play yet.

    What I've taken from watching the young fellas training and matches is that the hand pass is the core skill being taught now. If they were told they could only solo once and then had to kick or hand pass it afterwards I could see the benefit, they have to learn to assess which is the best option under pressure. It looks like to me its being taught because this is the way the game is played now. The 'aimless kicking' up the field at that age should be nearly encouraged to develop their kicking skills and trying to win the ball from their opponent. The hand pass is the easiest skill in the game, kicking isn't. More time should be spent on that, but kicking is being coached out of them, well at that age it doesn't seem to be coached into them.

    If in 2 or 3 years time they're playing an expansive kicking game I'll happily admit I was wrong, but I have my doubts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Indeed you are correct, good judgement shown there.

    There is a lot of, quite frankly ,bull being talked about “kicking aimlessly” on these threads.

    Kicking is one of the core skills of the game as is catching and fielding the ball.

    As you pointed out these core skills are being coached out of kids in favour of the easier handpass and

    as a result we have the 47 handpasses in a row type games which will eventually kill the game.

    The public will turn away from it as the top brass in the organisation have noticed.

    We will get more and more of the type of scoring as seen up in lovely Donegal, unless the clipboard merchants are curbed and the game made more exciting for the paying spectator.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,765 ✭✭✭flasher0030


    Oh I agree with you. I'm all for mixing it up. We make sure the kids have plenty of coaching in kicking as well - short kick passes, long passes, shooting etc. We're trying to get in to them how to make the best choice of action when under pressure - is there a team mate to pass to that I can kick to? If not, is there a shot on (they need to be able to judge if they are within scoring range i.e. able to reach the goal with a kick). Or if neither of these are on, then instead of just kicking it in hope, that a handpass is another option. It's one of the hardest things to teach a kid is composure. To calm down, take a solo and be able to look around the pitch to see what options are available and what it the best option. We are all for them kicking and shooting and have stressed to the kids that nobody will say a bad word to them if something doesn't work out. They are only kids and it's all about experimenting and learning for them.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement