Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

€9 million to be spent on “electronic pouches for schools”

24567

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,664 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Mobile phones are not a problem for teachers. This is a moral panic from adults who didn’t grow up with smart phones. I'm baffled this is even an issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,664 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    This policy won't see the light of day. Children have and use smart phones. Time to move on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,664 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Kurooi


    The purpose is understandable, the price is not.

    I got to check out one of those in person, they're just a fabric sack with a mechanism similar to what supermarkets put around the necks of alcohol, you slot them against a magnet and they unlock.

    This crap shouldn't be worth more than €1 to produce. Corruption again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,642 ✭✭✭✭mariaalice


    Personally, I think any parent giving a child under 12 a smartphone or unsupervised access to a smartphone should be seen as a form of abuse similar to a parent allowing a child access to porn or extremely violent content.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,664 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Most parents in Ireland are abusing their children so if that's what you think.



  • Registered Users Posts: 133 ✭✭_BAA_RAM_EWE


    wait till you see the mess they'll make of putting solar panels on the schools. 100s of millions to be wasted there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,642 ✭✭✭✭mariaalice


    There are parents and it's growing all the time who won't let their child have a smartphone until secondary school parents have to support each other in this till it becomes the norm.

    In secondary school, parents do not need to contact a child unless it is an emergency it might be good for both the child and parents not to be in constant contact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,664 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    But they're not in constant contact. Teenage boys don't contact their mother. A child having a phone is now a normal thing. Schools and teachers once again trying to suppress change.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,642 ✭✭✭✭mariaalice


    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/jun/03/much-easier-to-say-no-irish-town-unites-in-smartphone-ban-for-young-children



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,698 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    Wouldn't it be cheaper to fine every parent who let's their kid bring a phone to school?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,261 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    I shouldn’t laugh as I can sense the frustration, but it’s just so unbelievably silly, that I’m more bemused by the whole thing than being at all bothered by it.

    Nobody’s getting any contract or brown envelopes, the funds to purchase whatever solution the school identifies as necessary is going directly to the school:

    “So we have provided €9m for that, for the purchase of things like pouches or whatever types of solutions that might be identified by the school, and schools will verify what those solutions might be.

    I’m guessing the sort of pouches they’re thinking of that would cost €20 are not the sort of pouches that can be purchased on AliBaba or wherever for less than 50 cents a piece.

    Or, maybe they are and this is just another pie in the sky colossal waste of public funds on yet another hairbrained scheme that in reality simply requires the enforcement of existing rules in schools around the use of mobile devices in the classroom.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,944 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    I wonder how many of these kids have phones and their told not to tell x.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,944 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    When I went to secondary it was basically leave them at home. No lunch times/etc.

    However because of kids walking to and from school people will say they need their phones for security.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,642 ✭✭✭✭mariaalice


    of course, that happens but it turns the situation around it is the child with the smartphone who will be left out not the child without as the parent will discourage their child from hanging around a child who has a smartphone, as we are talking about children under 12 the parent will outright ban their child from having anything to do a child that has a smartphone.

    That is how social pressure works and in this situation, it's a good thing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,223 ✭✭✭Andrewf20


    I fully support this and im pretty sure Jonathan Haidt would also. Just look at anxiety and depression statistics with young people over the last 20 years. This is a step in the right direction, whether its the best way to spend 9 million - who knows but something needs to get done.

    I cant believe people actually have an issue with it. It could be one of the best investments the country makes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,432 ✭✭✭KaneToad


    Signal blockers are illegal, I think. Cinemas wanted to introduce them years ago, they couldn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,642 ✭✭✭✭mariaalice


    After school, the child can do what they like with their phone it's only between 9 and 4 that they won't have their phone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,664 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Would you recommend a ban completely on smart phones for those under 18 given these apparent anxiety figures which you mention.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,477 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    The f**K

    A circular to request that phones can't be in schools costs nothing.

    This is money for a connected individual. Nothing else



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,944 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    Ya, I think they'd just be groups with phones and groups without them in that area.

    Just in my experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,223 ✭✭✭Andrewf20


    I disagree. Just because children use smart phones doesnt make it a good thing in light of the mental health stats over the last 20 years. Have a look at the research by Jonathan Haidt. Some parts of the US are starting to catch on to this idea of phone lockers due to worsening anxiety and depression in young people. I think its great to see it getting traction here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,642 ✭✭✭✭mariaalice


    That is completely impractical the proposal is that secondary schools use Yonder or something similar when the pupils are in the school.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,698 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    I walked to and from school and never needed them for security? Heck, they're less safe as theyd get distracted by shiny screens rather than traffic, dogs, idiots trying to abuct them etc. Plus, it's one less thing to be robbed from them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,223 ✭✭✭Andrewf20


    In schools, yes. Maybe there are specialized circumstances where one may be needed but otherwise I cant see a need for them in school generally.

    Outside of the school, the tipping point seems to be around the age of 16. Kids younger than this are much more likely to be negatively affected by social media. So for under 16's id recommend a basic non smart phone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,944 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    Times change unfortunately tough.

    I never said it needed to be a smart phone tough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,944 ✭✭✭✭freshpopcorn


    Personally I think all adults who want to use social media should be over 16/18.

    They'd also need to upload ID to join.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,664 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Whatever the US does it is normally the wrong thing.

    With regard to the 16 year old, this is pie in the sky. The ship has sailed. This is a debate from 20 years ago.

    Children under 16 have and use phones. Most of them are fine. Some children will get obsessed with their phone just like some adults are obsessed with their phone. Most children won't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,490 ✭✭✭blackbox


    Let's assume that the school doesn't allow mobile phones to avoid distraction etc.

    Some parents may decide their children should leave their phones at home - no problem.

    Other parents may want their children to have phones so that they can keep in contact on the way to and from school.

    No problem - these parents can pay for the device to store them during school hours. It would only be a small fraction of the cost of the phone.

    No reason for any government spending.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,664 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    Children just keep their phones in their bags on silent where schools have "banned" them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,720 ✭✭✭Montage of Feck


    The modern phone is a communication/entertainment device, we don't allow comic books, radios or Gameboys so not exactly unreasonable to expect phones to be likewise banned. Back in the day distractions were just put in the teachers desk or a cardboard box, which cost the exchequer nada.

    🙈🙉🙊



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭thereiver


    the problem is kids are distracted by using tik tok or social media during school hours , maybe someone could invent an app that disables all other apps from 9 am til 3.30pm monday to friday and only a teacher or parents have the password.ie they can still txt or use the phone in case of emergencys . i don,t know if 9 million is a reasonable amount as teachers will have to be trained pouches setup in 100s of schools around the country

    Post edited by thereiver on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,223 ✭✭✭Andrewf20


    Jonathan Haidt is based in the USA but the data correlates across other parts of the developed world, not just the USA.

    Its not a debate from 20 years ago because the data wasn't there 20 years ago. The tipping point for the mental health decline was from around 2012.

    By what measure are they fine? You dont provide any links or information for your claim.

    Heres some information with numerous graphs that goes against your argument and I have more links if needed:

    https://www.afterbabel.com/p/international-mental-illness-part-one

    Theres too much on the line to be complacent on this topic imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,664 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    The child will just say he or she doesn't own a phone and keep it in their bag.

    This policy is so completely ridiculous and intelligent people seem to think it's a good idea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,223 ✭✭✭Andrewf20


    That's certainly possible but the school could enact disciplinary action for kids caught using a phone - detention, phone confiscation etc.

    I haven't seen why its ridiculous in light of the information provided in my previous post. Have you other proposals to help with the decline in youth mental health?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭thereiver


    I don't think kids should have smartphones before the age of 14 , as apps like TikTok and YouTube are addictive . I don't think there's proof that smartphones are negative or bad for teens over the age of 16 if there's proper parental supervision of what apps they use Instagram now has a teen mode with parental control .schools can send a form to parents does your child have a smartphone. Or a old style mobile phone with no apps



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,520 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    Well excuse my ignorance that this current government would even think of under the table deals or shady dealings. Its not as if every headline for the last few weeks has shown them to be a shady bunch of clowns.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,085 ✭✭✭Rubberchikken


    I know I can be as thick as a plank but why not a plastic box in a class and phones placed in as kids enter. Most kids and even some adults will recognise their own phone.

    Or even a roll of sticky labels and write name on before putting in box.

    GrGranted it might only be 10 grand per school as per a previous post but that could go a fair way towards supplying craft stuff or even food or sports gear etc.

    This is just another example of politicians with no cop on whatsoever and seemingly not answerable to anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,261 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    You’re not wrong, they’re still a shady bunch of clowns at least, and when there was a discussion on here a few weeks ago about this topic and Norma’s overall performance, I was of the opinion that she was performing well.

    This latest initiative proves I may have jumped the gun in my earlier assessment, cos this is just pure stupidity and much like most of these sorts of initiatives - money will be spent on equipment that will never be used 😒

    What’s wrong with their schoolbag ffs? I’ve seen tiny lockers provided for the purposes of students storing their phones and it just amounts to performative nonsense that makes no difference whatsoever to students being distracted in the classroom, and even more determined to find more creative solutions to get around the issue of having to indulge in a silly performance of putting one phone in a locker, while keeping another phone on their person.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85 ✭✭Dr Robert


    Poor wee Johnny can't have a phone for 7hours during the day. How will he cope?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    Bingo.

    Put all the phones in a box and lock them away during class time.

    Instead, this Government will conjure up a way to give a connected Gombeen millions of Euro of Taxpayers money for a useless solution that is not needed.

    Nanny Statism and Gombeenism. What a heady mix.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,265 ✭✭✭HalloweenJack


    Teaching is hard enough without kids having the added distraction of their phone. Just shrugging and saying 'that's what it is' doesn't help. There's only so far you can go as a teacher to enforce discipline and that's before you get to the hysterical parents who insist their child needs a phone or the apathetic ones who don't back up classroom discipline. An all-out ban is the way to go.

    FWIW, I understood from that article that €9m was being allocated for solutions and phone pouches were one of the examples Foley was giving; NOT that all that money was going to be spent directly on phone pouches. But that's not going to get as many clicks now, is it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭Mike Murdock


    Put all the phones in a box at the beginning of class and lock them away.

    Have the school send out an email to all parents saying that this is the new policy that will be strictly enforced. No exceptions.

    Is it really that difficult to do?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,670 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    There is Clár funding available for schools to use for solar panels but the department and patron bodies won't allow schools apply



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,977 ✭✭✭Andrea B.


    Knee jerk waste of money.

    Iodine pills comes to mind.

    No pilot project or test run.

    Teachers (rightly) do not want to manage, what will become snot covered pouches.

    Will be interesting to see how many of these pouches are being used and/or function by next June.

    I will type it to full resolution. €9,000,000.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,977 ✭✭✭Andrea B.


    And have parents sign policy agreement on day1.

    Phone use =Suspension.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,846 ✭✭✭Quantum Erasure


    the school could enact disciplinary action for kids caught using a phone - detention, phone confiscation etc.

    So why not do this the first day, and there's no need for special magnetic pouches, etc.

    On the mental health question, i'd presume it's the hours spent on phones outside of school time that would predominantly affect that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,977 ✭✭✭Andrea B.


    I reckon the first tiktok video solutions will be out before the pouches.

    "Everyone was amazed at this simple pouch lock hack!".

    Followed by TEMU ads for:

    "Pack of 10 dummy fones for $2.97"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,904 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    If they're caught on any mobile phone it's taken off them for a week. Parents to collect phone. So doesn't matter if they've a second phone. Works very well in our school. No harm for the phone to be out of their hands for a while.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,692 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    The Headline is misleading the 9 million is for "solutions". Phone socks been touted as one of them.

    The individual schools have to come up with the solutions and verify they work.

    A load of vague bollíx being pushed back onto the schools.

    It's basically Norma saying she has identified a "problem" here is 9 million it's up to ye to fix it.

    The Indo should really write an article about that instead of rattling jimmies with rage bait articles.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement