Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

The case against average speed cameras

12467

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,130 ✭✭✭✭Esel
    Not Your Ornery Onager




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,188 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    M50 is often at snails space. You could merge at walking space.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,465 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Every single car I've driven has had the speedo show a faster speed than what you're doing, usually around 4-5kph of a difference. So for motorway driving I usually stick the cruise control at 125 and it has me zipping along at 119 or 120.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,713 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I think they get worse over time as well. When my old '98 fiesta showed 75mph on the speedo the sat nav was registering just 108km/h a full 12kmph out



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33 KeithKelly1992


    What’s wrong with a ton on a motorway in right conditions?



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,985 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    as has been done to death here - speedos are legally allowed overstate your speed, but not understate it. if you're driving a car whose speedo understates your speed, that in itself is an offence AFAIK.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,465 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    If people feel it's okay to do a chunk higher that the posted speed limit on motorways then they would also feel similarly empowered to do higher than the posted limit on national roads and regional roads and so on down.

    Laws is laws.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭con___manx1


    Iv done all that myself speeding and bullshit especially when I was younger. The right conditions has nothing to do with it. I wouldn't say that a speeding driver is even a bad driver but the problem is it leaves very little margin for error especially with the amount of absolutely shocking drivers on the road that are following the speed limit. Just drifinting into lanes and slamming on merging on the motorway at ridiculous slow speeds and so on. A couple of near misses usually slows alot of lads down but for some it can be alot worse than that.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,378 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    I've often exceeded that speed in the past and it was stupid of me.

    No matter how good a driver you think you are, you're not! You can't see the small debris on the road that could puncture a tyre.

    You've no control over so many factors. Jesus, a few posts up, people were admitting they don't know what lane to be in!

    There are places where you're welcome to hit those speeds but remember that even the best racing drivers, driving in controlled conditions, crash!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Its simple, would you remain in the right lane if you were overtaking on a single carriage way?
    If you wouldnt, then dont do it on the motorway either, move back to lane 1 and then into lane 2 if needed, people merging on to the motorway will be at motorway speeds, so you dont necessarily need to be overtaking them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,992 ✭✭✭creedp


    Ahem there's a subtle difference between driving on the right lane of a two lane road and a motorway.

    Are you being definitive when you say [all] drivers entering a motorway will be doing motorway speeds, 120kph I presume



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭kirving


    "Not tolerate lane hogging" is code for aggressively, tailgate, beep and flash other cars out of the way. Fantastic. That type of behaviour is reflected in Italy's road death statistics which last year were 50% higher than in Ireland.

    The yield sign in France, is for the cars on what would otherwise be the main carriageway. You did specifically ask this question in the below post.

    Priorite a droite is France's attempt, in certain situations, to put onus on faster cars to slow, rather than underpowered cars to speed up, and is reminiscent of right of way on a ski slope. Makes a lot of sense.

    Your original post, and the other which I have quoted below, all too commonly come from drivers who are more concerned about rigidly sticking to (and subsequently quoting) rules of the road, rather than just moving over to accommodate someone else, because "they don't have to".

    Given how roads are actually designed, it is completely unrealistic, and in some cases outright impossible, for slower traffic to be able to get up to speed and merge safely onto a motorway in under 50m, following an unsighted, 90° entry road. The only option is to stop dead on the sliproad.

    There seems to be this mistaken understanding that "keep left unless overtaking" is a command from God himself, that no other circumstance can ever override it. As an example, I posted a video to the dashcam thread a while back, and I was immediately questioned as to why I moved to the right lane.

    Eh, becuase I'd rather not kill a Garda who might trip and fall in front of me. But hey, if the RSA weren't arsed putting good practice onto paper, why should I take it upon myself to accomdate anyone else?



    https://www.boards.ie/discussion/comment/121235555/#Comment_121235555



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,669 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Keep left unless overtaking is the legal requirement while driving. You could make an argument about the left lane being obstructed by the stoppage in the hard shoulder. But it doesnt change the statutes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭kirving


    Do you really believe that drivers should keep left for example where a Garda is standing to the right side of a vehicle in the hard shoulder, or when they see another car joining from a clearly short slip road?

    Other countries, with functioning governments, have thought this through, and decided that move-over laws are valuable for everyone's safety

    Funny thing about the speeding van is that he was probably well aware of the average speed check just 10km up the road, so was going extra fast here to try and save some time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,271 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    https://www.facebook.com/reel/1547821562496621?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,992 ✭✭✭beachhead


    Speeders in Asia? Average drive zones? Which Asian countries?

    Speeders in Asia are known as killers or even sleeping or just stupid. But speed cameras,where?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    Bless you.

    There isnt actually, in both cases you are overtaking and so you move back when you are done, you dont hang around in a non driving lane just because you might be overtaking again in future.

    a) It would depend on the motorway, not all are 120

    b) people should be entering at the same speed the traffic already on the motorway is moving at, thats how you merge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,992 ✭✭✭creedp


    Seriously if you're equating driving in the rhl of a 2 lane road to that of a motorway you need to put your head in a cold bucket of water and hit the reset button.

    On Your (b) point - we're not doing the theory test here. We're dealing with the real world and real people, so what should happen is just pie in the sky. What's important is reacting to what going on outside not shaking your fist at the outside world from inside your perfect world while quoting the rotr



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,370 ✭✭✭✭GreeBo


    I'm equating the decision on when to move a back into the driving lane as the same in both scenarios. There is simply no reason to hang around on lane 2 or 3 if there is space to pull back into the driving lane.


    So your argument is that "since some people might not follow the rules, there is no point in me bothering either" Awesome attitude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,992 ✭✭✭creedp


    Forgive me father, I have sinned, in accordance with the scripture of the theoretical world. I probably will burn in RSA hell. Christ almighty ....."awesome attitude" 😇



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,511 ✭✭✭JohnC.


    People like you are a danger on the road and you don't even see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,030 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    but remember that even the best racing drivers, driving in controlled conditions, crash!

    What have racing drivers on a open/closed circuit got to do with road users?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,992 ✭✭✭creedp




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,378 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Maybe if you had properly read my post (which replied to someone suggesting being allowed to drive at 100mph on a motorway "in the right conditions") and not taken a line out of context you would not need to ask! 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,992 ✭✭✭creedp


    Love watching the videos online of lads cruising at 300kph on 2 lane autobahn. Surprising they haven't vaporised by now given the pearl clutching by some on here about doing 130/140 kph on Irish motorways



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,030 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    You can be driving at 100mph and not racing anyone, no?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,545 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    This, how is it complicated, every anpr camera, be it tolls, average cameras, squad car cameras and so on should be all linked. It would be a big but simple database, but the code for it could be knocked out to calculate for max time between cameras, even mobile ones, and then doing a simple higher or lower comparison.

    Yes it will miss speeders who go a longer route or stop somewhere but eventually with every red light camera, every till, every ANOR capable camera involved, it would eventually just become cultural to drive within the speed limit.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,181 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    What I am suggesting for, say the M7, would be to place a camera every 10 kms from Dooradoyle to the Toll at Portlaise. Any vehicle going from the first to the last of that string would pass 9 checks, with time through each one, plus NCT, Tax, Ins. So any failure missed in one would be found in one of them. Speed would be checked over each distance, or any pair of cameras if any one camera missed the vehicle.

    Having seen them in operation in the UK, vehicles tend to keep to the limit.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,545 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Id go further and go for red light cameras at every light in the country and tie in every toll camera. If someone passes the last red light on the N4 or the M50 toll then passes the M4 toll or a red light in Galway city quicker than they legally could, they get pinged. Same going through Dublin. You get from one end of the quays to the other too quick, your pinged. Hell one end of a street to another.

    Yes motorways are safe, but the lads running junctions in a town centre causing near misses are the same ones doing 160 in a Seat Ibiza on the motorway waiting for a piston to shoot through the bonnet.

    Until it stops via fear, then the next generation just learn that's the way to drive. Piecemeal enforcement doesn't work unfortunately.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,181 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    While every yet to installed enforcement camera be link to catch those errant drivers might be an aim, that has no relation to current proposals.

    I think the planners of such things are thinking of discrete stretches of about a few Kms of average speed camers to catch those who speed over that stretch. What I am suggesting is having about 10 such cameras over the whole M7 from the toll at Portlaoise to Limerick, all linked, to detect any motorist speeding, or no NCT, Ins, or Tax.

    Otherwise, they will patrol only 10% on the route.

    They can do urban roads later when they put cameras on the red lights.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,545 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    And even then, it is just a stupidity tax on that 10%, which I am also all for, if you are too stupid to read a sign, you are not smart enough to be on the roads. But yes, I agree with your point about multiple cameras, either just before every exit or at regular intervals.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,181 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Well, start with regular intervals to stop the 'There is a camera up ahead so I'll slow down and make up for it further on' attitude. You will get - 'I must keep my speed down' instead.

    A lot of motorist have caught with no ins since the Gardai started the data base. So surveillance does work. With average speed cameras widely deployed, everyone will get used to having NCT, ins, tax, and drive within the limit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,992 ✭✭✭creedp


    Ye 2 guys should get a room such is the state of frenzy ye have worked yourselves into🤣



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,545 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    Hardly a frenzy, asking nicely doesn't work, training doesn't work, education doesn't work but enforcement does, simples.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,181 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Widespread enforcement is the only way of getting drivers to behave.

    No insurance will suddenly be only committed by the stupid, or reckless, or those driving stolen cars. That is all because the Gardai now have a database of insurance kept up to date. So far this year, over 7,300 vehicles seized for no insurance detected by the new app.

    So, with Average speed cameras patrolling the motorways, placed every 10 km to 15 km, talking to each other, speeding will also become the habit of the stupid, reckless, or those driving stolen cars.

    Next - red light cameras in urban areas - also checking for ins, NCT, tax. There will be nowhere to hide for these types.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,643 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    But it does get big and complicated very quickly.

    Assuming measuring speed from A to B is different to measuring speed from B to A when you have one stretch of road there are only two pairs of cameras.

    With ten cameras there are 90 possible pairs. With 100 cameras, 990 pairs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭freddieot


    Delivery companies like An Post, Amazon or DHL use similar processes every day to track millions of parcels at a time. They can compare posting time against transport and delivery times for every single one of them.

    The only difference here is that instead if barcodes on a delivery label, cameras record car reg numbers.

    It's not as complicated as one might think. It would have been 25 years ago.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 25,545 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    It gets big not not complicated, those are small numbers, admittedly that grow exponentially. This said the data does not need to be stored anymore than 30 days and any data not involved in a crime can be deleted. This data can then also be deleted once the fine is paid. So yes, the amounts of data will grow very quickly and with every new camera in the network but it will plateau very quickly as well.

    As freddieot points out, loads of logistics companies using similar data already, hell, even google has similar data used by millions daily without issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭freddieot


    Exactly. Also remember that any system would primarily just be processing numbers, 220D1234 for example. No referring back to who actually owns a vehicle unless there is an offence, so no big GDPR or Data issues. A timer would delete reg numbers once a limit had expired (i.e. hours).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,643 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    Tracking and delivering parcels is far easier. They follow planned routes between a limited number of defined locations - van (collection) - one or more hub / distribution centres - van (out for delivery / delivered).

    A fully ineterconnected mesh of average speed cameras would need all cameras time sychronised with high accuracy, real time capture, storage, processing, sharing of images, numberplate, timestamp for each passing vehicle, searching for previous capture of same vehicle from other cameras, average speed calculation, checking against insurance, motor tax, nct /cvrt databases, forwarding data / images / evidence for any offences detected to a prosecution processing system, ageing + deleting vehicle information once it has been processed, … It's a lot more complex.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,097 ✭✭✭freddieot


    Not really, some parcels recieve hundreds of scans. What the customer sees on tracking is just a fraction of what is captured. Multiple types of scans, often in multiple countries, made by different organisations and then compiled and coordinated worldwide to give precise performance statistics for all or just one parcel.

    In contrast, managing a few million reg numbers scans per day is a doddle. Granted, one there is an offence it gets more complicated but then you're down to hundreds of transactions per day rather than millions.

    It's not child's play but in the modern context it's not complicated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,664 ✭✭✭rogue-entity


    Its almost as if Irish drivers were not allowed to drive on motorways while learning so never learned how to properly drive on motorways (and other multi-lane roads)

    Because it forces drivers to undertake on Lane 1 (which happens quite a bit) or overtake in Lane 3. It can create a dangerous situation when they are also doing 20 below the posted limit because it creates a sharp speed differential between you and the folks overtaking you (and the unnecessary queue of traffic behind you) in Lane 3 so you can't get past the rolling roadblock.

    Keep Left, it isn't rocket science

    This is by far my biggest peeve, the obsession with speed (from the RSA). The way they blather on about it you'd swear that speeding was the only cause of accidents, 100kph in a 100kph zone is just fine, but dare to do 101 and you're going to have an immediate accident and join the statistics!

    We have badly set speed limits with sharp drops (without gradation) in some places (like the sections of the N25 that drop from 100 to 60)

    We have perfectly good roads with pointlessly low limits (like the R710) and some fairly terrible roads (like the N25 in places) with much higher limits that just don't make sense

    While most of Europe has a sensible enforcement, ours is slapdash with a one-size-fits-all punishment. Get caught doing 125 in a 120 on a Motorway and face the same penalty for doing 60 in a 50 - one is very much more dangerous than the other.

    I'm all for having average cameras (and fixed cameras) across the road network, not just on motorways, I'd like if that were followed up with a revision of our penalty system

    They are never trained to do it, it's illegal while a Learner and once you pass your test you're on your own to figure it out. There's no point just having it in the Rules of the Road books you're (in theory) studying before taking your test without getting to practice it with an experienced instructor



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,188 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    "…Because it forces drivers to undertake on Lane 1 (which happens quite a bit) or overtake in Lane 3. It can create a dangerous situation when they are also doing 20 below the posted limit because it creates a sharp speed differential between you and the folks overtaking you (and the unnecessary queue of traffic behind you) in Lane 3 so you can't get past the rolling roadblock…"

    Not forced to do anything. No reason to undertake, just overtake in lane 3… it's not rocket science. Not seeing why you have an issue with overtaking traffic going slower than, you when there an overtaking lane free. Or why you'd choose to undertake when you don't have to. Kinda worrying people can't do this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,664 ✭✭✭rogue-entity


    Your choice is sit behind the slow moving middle-lane hogger, move back into Lane 1 and undertake them (assuming it's empty by that point) or risk being rear-ended as you pull out into Lane 3 with cars going 20-40kph faster than you (those gaps close pretty fast unless you floor it)

    It really isn't hard, just don't hog the middle lane, it's almost as bad as parking between two spaces "because someone might bang their door against my car"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,188 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    An overtaking lane (regardless of which lane 2,3,4+) is usually faster than than the lane its overtaking. That's overtaking 101. If you can't merge into a faster lane probably shouldn't be on a motorway.

    Inability to overtake might explain why some have such a problem with traffic in a lane ahead of them..



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,181 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    This is to misunderstand the problem.

    Say the M7 is fitted with cameras from A, B, C, up to O every 10 Km. [It is 150 Km from Naas to Birdhill]

    A car on the M7 passes a camera A, and every camera is notified of that cars earliest arrival time without penalty - that is camera B expects that car to take over 5 minutes to cover the 10 Km @ 120 Km/s. If the car passes camera B, then the later cameras are notified of new earliest arrival times.

    If the car arrives early at any camera, a penalty is issued. If the car is not detected, then the earliest arrival times at all later cameras is not updated. So if a car sneaks past a camera for any reason, but is speeding, they will still be caught.

    A decision of how to handle multiple speeding offences on the one trip is political. No ins, tax, or NCT is a straight forward offence.

    No insurance could suggest immediate AGS intervention for no insurance.

    Less than 100 cameras could cover all major motorway trips, covering speeding, tax, NCT and insurance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭kirving


    There is just 500m from J10 to J9 on the M50. In certain traffic conditions, you should not be in the left lane between these two junctions.

    At 100km/h (28m/s), you should be leaving 2s between you, the car in front, and car behind(if you're merging in front of them).

    That's 56m between each and every car. That gives room for between 8 and 9 cars to merge in and out at any given time. If 9 people drive in the left land with a 2s gap, there is no room for anyone to safely join the motorway.

    Insisting on driving in the left lane at busy (but not slow) times causes unnecessary bunching of traffic, and forces people to cut in front of others, reducing braking zones for everyone.

    Post edited by kirving on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,643 ✭✭✭FishOnABike


    The problem isn't with implementing average speed cameras throughout the motorway network. As you correctly point out information only needs to be exchanged between adjacent pairs of cameras.

    The problem is with the suggestion that it would be simple to extend this to the wider road network. This changes the interconnectity requirements from pairs to a mesh, orders of magnitude greater to implement.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,181 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Not quite the solution I suggested.

    When a vehicle passes a camera, it is noted by reg, and time. The next time it is detected by a camera, the time it has taken to travel from the previous camera is calculated to give the vehicle's average speed.

    The two cameras can be any distant apart. They can be adjacent or not - just the speed limit(s) between the two points are such that the average speed can be calculated.

    It is a simple solution that can apply to any two cameras - just the time for a vehicle obeying the speed limit travelling the distance between them can be determined.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,131 ✭✭✭kirving


    That's also used in the UK, to catch duplicated registrations. If it would impossible to travel between too cameras in a set period, then the ANPR system can direct police to both cars in real time to check out thier drivers.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement