Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Changes in the GAA - super thread

15960616264

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,965 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Yeah, and it seems like the correct amount to give for those type of points from play. three of them would be the same as two goals which seems about right to me.

    And as far as I see it people seem to want to see more long range shooting in football (judging by comments online) and people's reaction to them being scored at games.

    Plus you would think it would be fairly easy to ref just have a clear two point marking on the ground at the defined area (s) on both side of the pitch. Maybe dye in the grass or something as well as a line?

    Amazed it has not been tried the more I think as you think it would be a fairly obvious thing to do.

    It would not change the game radically slowing it (like the advanced mark has - which backfired) 2 points for a long range point seems like just enough of tweak to make teams less constantly defensive. The team without the ball should be forced to engage more.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,203 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    It wouldnt devalue scoring points though we may see more goal attempts but that isnt a bad thing. How many goal attempts are even successful now. It wont change too much if they tried this.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,590 ✭✭✭Finty Lemon


    5 points for a goal is as dumb an idea as there is on this. So dumb it will probably be adopted.

    2 points from outside 45 would be much better.

    Plus a ban on all points scored with the handpass, or palmed goals set up with a crossed handpass.

    A simple highly beneficial change would be to make technical fouls an indirect free kick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,411 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    It will devalue points.

    You value something relative to something else, if 1 goal means you have to score 5 individual points to cancel the goal out then it means points are worth less than they were before as you have to get more of them to cancel out the goal.

    In Aussie Rules behinds aren't considered much of a big deal because they are worth 1/6 of a goal, same would happen to football if a point suddenly became worth of 1/5 of a goal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,965 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    I am filled with hope that Jim Gavin will get rid of that "Advanced Mark" with Jarlath Burns on the football review committee.


    Because back in April 2021 Gavin said of the Advanced Mark:

    "I think that was the wrong step"

    He went further worried that if more Aussie Rule type changes were made Gaelic Football basically would be Aussie Rules in all but name.

    "We’re only one rule away from the game becoming Australian Rules on a rectangular pitch.

    "If we introduce tackling, as in a rugby tackle, what difference is there from Aussie Rules? You can call a mark from a kick-out, call a mark both offensively and defensively once it’s kicked into the scoring zone. You introduce an Aussie rules tackle, what's the difference?"

    Post edited by gormdubhgorm on

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,460 ✭✭✭legendary.xix


    Provincial finalists have a weekend off before the All-Ireland series. Should the GAA allow a week off after the National Football League finals?

    Possibly a more straightforward solution is to play the provincial championships over 5 weekends:

    1) Leinster and Ulster Round 1. Connacht and Munster quarter-finals.

    2) Leinster and Ulster quarter-finals.

    3) Connacht and Munster semi-finals.

    4) Leinster and Ulster semi-finals.

    5) All Provincial finals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,965 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Football

    Div 1 league all star team

    Div 2 league all star team

    Div 3 league all star team

    Div 4 league all star team

    ---

    Then all four "teams" play each other in a knock out open draw competition abroad or in Ireland, televise it and jazz it up. I’m Would be a great pre season competition to have in New York or somewhere like that.

    Watching the likes of Sam Mulroy for Louth play superbly (as usual) in a div 2 league game v Kildare annoys me. Knowing full well what a good player he is having seen him basically take on the Dubs on his own. But he will never get within an asses roar of an all star.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 39,112 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    So the GAA would rather get money from 'Man city vs Man United in the ford cup or some bollocks' in August than go back to having the big championship games in August ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,203 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    They also want club players, ie 99%, to be playing more big games in summer so whats wrong with that?

    How would you structure entire year club and county then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,731 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I am not a fan of the advanced mark as it hasn't worked out as planned. There was one completely farcical mark in the Dublin/Tyrone game, where the ball was barely kicked forward but thankfully the Tyrone man missed it. Out of the 5 or 6 marks, there was only one that merited a mark - a long ball into Con and he rose to catch it when seriously challenged. I can see from that what the lawmakers intended, but it isn't what has come out in the vast majority of marks.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,460 ✭✭✭legendary.xix


    There is a reasonable argument for having the provincial championships before the league. If provincial winners only qualified, teams would have a clear picture of the league places that would offer a route to the All-Ireland.

    11 league qualifiers, 4 provincial winners from the spring and 1 Tailteann winner should make up the All-Ireland 16. As an incentive for winning provincial championships and each respective division, the 4 provincial winners and the 4 winners of each division should be rewarded with an extra home game in the group stage of the All-Ireland and/or Tailteann. There can only be two teams per group with an extra home game. For groups with vacant extra home game spots, luck of the draw can be used.

    Both the All-Ireland and Tailteann should be a straightforward matter of seeding teams based on league placing. League after provincial championships and before All-Ireland/Tailteann group stage shouldn't need league finals. If Division 4 counties want access to Croke Park, the conversation should be around establishing a Tier 3 championship. Ideally the Tailteann final and a Tier 3 final would both be curtain raisers to All-Ireland semi-finals. Both running in parallel with the All-Ireland series but with only half the teams each, finishing up at the All-Ireland semi-final stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,143 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    This is the same GAA that destroyed the once popular Leinster championship. They don't actually know what's best for the game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,732 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    It would be mental putting 15 div 4 ayers against 15 div 1 players. Better off having each county nominate their best 2 players, then conducting a draft pick with 4 managers to pick 4 different squads. Would be a decent mix of players across all 4 divisions in each teams and should be competitive

    There would be zero appetite or time in the calendar for this though I'd say



  • Registered Users Posts: 59 ✭✭heftie


    Refs are afraid to have a mind of their own.Ref McAlister had a great gameat the Tipp /Galway camogie last week end ,kept the whistle to a minimum and made for a very enjoyable game

    Get rid of the advantage rule in hurling , bring it back to where it was.Between too much whistling and Messers Fitz, McGrath and Cusack ruining our game we have ended up with a tippy tappy farce akin to soccer .Time to call time on this erosion of hurling values ,hurling is fast becoming the new football and that's not good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,460 ✭✭✭legendary.xix


    Jarlath Burns is suggesting All-Ireland finals could return to September. Basic template would be intercounty from end of March to end of September. Club from October to emd of March. Basically moving the current timeframe to two months later.

    ALTERNATIVE CROSSOVER:

    County leagues are played during intercounty championship. Intercounty leagues could be run during the provincial club championships and All-Ireland club championships in February and March.

    Provincial championships can remain as they are in April and the beginning of May.

    There should be a reasonably spaced All-Ireland championship then from the end of May to September. Any format that suits the majority with promotion and relegation. Basic suggested split is 12:10:10.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,965 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Simple idea -

    A designated ref/umpire each match to watch out for "steps" (both codes) it would stop a lot of the blatant stuff at least.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,465 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Pretty pointless trialing some of these in non competitive games, especially the 2 and 4 point rules.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,820 ✭✭✭Eoinbmw


    Deleted



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,203 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Why?

    What competitions should they trial them in then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,919 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    They've used College Freshers League previously



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Because you cant replicate actual competitive game conditions in these trials. Fine for trying out technical adjustments to rules but what are we going to learn from having 4 points for a goal or 2 points for a long distance point in games like these??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,203 ✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Buy they should be used as a start and then move onto competitions then. It's a closed trial for a reason so if not these games then what should be used?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    I specifically am just talking about the 4 pt goals and the 2pt long distance kick, what are meaningless games going to show in thsi regard with players playing treating it as a trianing match?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,919 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Exactly. There has to be SOME competitiveness in trying them out. Hence the use of Freshers League etc. before instead of these stupid thrown together matches.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,143 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Talk of a 3rd tier brought in for football. It should be easy to implement and it's a great idea. It would remove the one big negative with the Tailteann cup. Half the teams (div 4 sides) don't realistically have a chance of making the final.

    I believe the Tailteann cup is 4 groups of 4 where the top 2 go into quarter finals?

    Simultaneously the bottom two should go into quarter finals for the 3rd tier. They can play their final before the other senior semi final which would be a great day for say Leitrim Vs Carlow or whatever the combo.

    The GAA in early stages of this change but I hope it happens. 3 tiers is perfect you'll never need a 4th.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    If I was in a position to make changes to the game, I'd adjust the weight (or size) of the ball to make it easier to score from distance - it's easily implemented at all levels (once you spend time designing the new ball correctly) and would force teams to push out thereby creating extra space inside



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,975 ✭✭✭WesternZulu


    In doing so you would only make it more difficult to score if there is any sort of wind as the ball would be more susceptible to cross-breezes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    Dunno how you can say that without knowing what changes would be made to the ball? As I said, it would need to be designed properly - maybe the ball would need to be "bouncier" rather than lighter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,465 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Well the championship format is not going to change for 2025 but there is a proposal to be put to Congress in Feb 2025 to change to a knockout championship in 2026 involving the provincial finalists, the highest 7 remaining league teams and the TC winner.

    There is also a proposal to bring provincial finals to replays instead of going to penalties after ET of the first game.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,919 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    I just can’t see the GAA reducing the amount of matches unless it’s a case that they’re actually losing money on some



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,965 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    List of proposed rule changes -

    https://www.rte.ie/sport/football/2024/1009/1474500-running-the-rule-proposed-changes-to-gaelic-football/

    First reaction the likes of Armagh are f**ked if they become rules, good job for them they won Sam last year.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    Had a look at that and it's a good summary. Some look good, others are probably more of a wait and see. The 2 points for a 45 was one that stood out as a load of sh*te to me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,965 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Jayus that was one of my favourite ones encouraging fellas like Fenton to have a cut. Was my first thought.
    Was a bit disappointed the advanced mark was not scrapped all together.

    Two players contesting throw in was something I never considered, seemed clever solution to slowing of game

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    Fenton from a placed ball 45?

    I don't mind seeing how the 2 points from outside the arc works but 2 points for a normal 45 isn't great imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,965 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    That is only an arbitrary line though, they had to draw it somewhere. It will at least encourage more shots. personally I think most of the 2 point shots taken will be a bit further out than an actual 45m, as player's play for it and practice it.

    Keepers will be practicing it as well.

    Completely discourages teams funnelling back/not engaging oppostiion, also makes opposition more careful not giving silly 45's away.

    Maybe a compromise would be a 2 point from play beyond the arc, and 1 point from a free?

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,084 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    How many counties currently have a consistent out field longer free taker at the moment. A lot of teams bring up their goalkeeper hence the lack of practice from out field players over the last number of years. The good long range free taker was an art back in the day but with the introduction of 2 points for those frees now might mean it's an art that will be brought back again?

    I'm very much a wait and see on a lot of those new rules, be interesting to see how the return of the Railway cup plays outs next weekend. With no pre-season games for 2025 the NFL will be mainly used as the trial run to get teams up to speed on the new rules before the championship.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,417 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Im all for the 4-2-1 scoring but I can't wait for the first day some team win with a 2 pointer that is right on/over the line.

    The place will over the top lose it's collective mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 221 ✭✭Charlo30


    It absolutely will happen. And I haven't seen anything about how a contentious 2 pointer could or would be checked. Imagine in an All Ireland Final if a team scores a 2 pointer where the player is slightly over the arc and they end up winning by a point.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,417 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It will be no different to the million other times a team wins because of human error.

    But because it's a new rule the outrage will be turned up to 11.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,919 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    is it a visible arc? Basketball is works, not sure why it can’t work for football. However, basketball have a review system. GAA don’t



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 221 ✭✭Charlo30


    Yes. As far as I'm aware its a visible arc. But we'll find out on Friday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    Running the rule - Players on which change excites (rte.ie)

    it’ll be like in soccer when you’re looking to win a corner, you’d near be looking to win a 45 because it’s worth two points.

    You could be coming in across the end-line saying: 'I hope this doesn’t get fisted over the bar.’ You’d prefer it to hit a man’s knee, go out for a 45, and Seánie O’Shea comes up and taps it over.

    Does it change the one-on-one defending because a defender could be thinking ‘I’m actually OK if he scores a point’ because the penalty for flicking the ball away for a 45 as his opponent solos will be even worse.

    I think outside the arc should be from play only.

    I fully agree with this piece - 2 points for scoring a 45 is too much of an advantage for nothing IMO.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,686 ✭✭✭sheroman01


    I particularly dislike the new advanced mark rule. It's messy, and I don't like how forwards are given a second chance to score. It just ruins the game for me. I think it's such a forced rule to try get as many scores in the game as possible, but it's ugly.

    I think we're trying to add too many rules. It's just gonna ruin the game and make it more complicated. The All-Ireland was competitive pretty much every decade up until around 2010. How many rule changes were there up until then? I really think the problem is a certain cohort of teams dominating and other teams trying to complete with that. Changing the rules of the game to counteract that is absolute madness in my eyes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,417 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    No it's not about dominance it's about teams figuring out that possession and 15 men behind the ball is the best tactic. It's about a professional level of fitness.

    I don't think we need loads of new rules but definitely ones to combat "parking the bus". I know football hasn't officially gone professional but it is facing many of the same problems both rugby union and league had and they changed many rules to counteract.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭Durnan


    It's amazing it took them so long to come up with the ridiculous changes they want to make.

    Here's how to fix Gaelic football in two seconds: a maximum of 1 handpass allowed and all 6 defenders have to stay in their own half and all 6 forwards have to stay in the opposition half.

    Took me two seconds to come up with that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,264 ✭✭✭✭km79


    we would never have seen the likes of Jack McCaffrey and Lee Keegan bombing up the pitch kicking big scores in all Ireland finals of this was the case

    So

    No



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭Durnan


    Most people could live without that if it meant ending the horror that is the blanket defence. What I have suggested would mean no more blanket defence. And no more handpassing from side to side for an eternity either.

    And the keeper should have to play as a keeper and not be allowed to play as an outfield player.

    Three simple rules to save Gaelic football, which is the worst sport in the world at present, unfortunately. It's unwatchable.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement