Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Forming the next Irish Government - policies and personalities

  • 04-12-2024 2:44pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭


    The elections are done and dusted, this thread is for the coalition negotiations which are about to begin.

    Although some version of FF/FG+ will be the inevitable result, these negotiations will probably last until Christmas i.e. the new Dáil may fail to elect a Taoiseach at its first sitting on 18 December.

    SF are going through the motions. It's hard to believe power seemed theirs for the taking just a year ago. Labour and SDs would love to play hard to get but I think the penny has dropped that they are not wanted by FG and they will only be used by FF as bargaining chips to show FG that there are other options. All those warnings about the price which smaller parties (the Greens, Labour, PDs) paid for involvement in Government are just hot air - FF and FG will be only too glad to leave the small parties outside.

    There are ample options among the Independents who will cooperate pragmatically with FF/FG. My guess is that a half-dozen or more Independents will eventually help elect Micheál as the next Taoiseach with a respectable majority.

    FF and FG ran on different election manifestos and insist on their distinct political identities but, bizarrely, the issue of a rotating Taoiseach - a concept which was ridiculed until 2020 - may be the main sticking point.

    https://x.com/irishdailymail/status/1864214304569929741?s=61



«13456737

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,802 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    FF+FG+INDs will be the most probable outcome. Any others are less likely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Best thing Labour & Soc Dems can do now is go into opposition and leave FF & FG at it. Any small left-wing party propping up a FF/FG government gets eviscerated at the next election. More fool them if they haven't learned that lesson by now.

    Plenty of independents to choose from and there are so many of them available that FF & FG can keep all the ministries for themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 981 ✭✭✭z80CPU
    Darth Randomer


    Unfortunately from now on for the electorate the Personality of the government will be a major component and how dominant and authoritative the main governing party exercises it's relationship with the junior partners.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 51,325 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i don't think SD or labour need to worry about the prospect of whether or not to go into government - there are probably enough independent 'gene pool' TDs for FG and FF to court to establish a majority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Caquas


    Any policy differences between FF and FG can be negotiated away but the rotating Taoiseach issue may be a zero sum game - a proxy for the tussle for dominance between FF and FG.

    The Blueshirts don’t want a junior role but they only have one fifth of Dáil seats, while FF have a quarter of them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,654 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Irish times with a breakdown of all the independents. It's pay walled but people should be able to find it online.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    This guy is a former FF speechwriter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Caquas


    How does a sensible-sounding person end up making a daft proposal?

    He sees the fundamental difference in democratic terms between FF and FG after the election, he highlights the arithmetic difference in seats, he explains that "parity of esteem" does not mean "equal shares" and, on that basis, he says "there is no argument for a rotating Taoiseach".

    But then he says that "politically MM would find it very difficult to deny FG a rotating Taoiseach"! This makes no sense and I can only hope he's right when he concludes that "What I'm saying today won't be listened to."

    The rotating Taoiseach has no basis in our constitution or in our political traditions (until 2020) or in the traditions of any democratic country we might look to as a model. We have a Constitutional office perfectly suited to the leader of the second party in a coalition. The Office of Tánaiste has been strengthened over the years precisely for that purpose.

    In 2020, the rotating Taoiseach was necessary to break a four month deadlock in government formation talks when FF and FG had an equal claim to the office, but it serves no purpose now other than political horse-trading. It worked reasonably but that is no argument for repeating the dose when it is not needed. It introduces an element of uncertainty and confusion at the highest level of our government which could be really damaging in difficult times.

    It is risky in domestic terms and it damaging internationally. What if there is a major crisis in Europe during the handover? Taoiseach No.1 turns up at the big Summit meeting to explain that he won't be around next time but that Taoiseach No. 2 is really the same, even though his party is different but the two parties have agreed a programme although it doesn't deal with whatever crisis has arisen but the world should know that the new face is really the old face and the switcheroo was just a peculiar Irish way of satisfying various egos…..blah, blah… 😩

    Of course, there is ample scope for negotiations to balance the representation of FF and FG at the Cabinet. Key portfolios will be balanced. Someone has to swallow the poison pill (Health) but Daragh O'Brien proved that Housing is not always a death sentence (Eoghan Murphy RIP).

    And let's not forget that the Taoiseach is not The Boss, even if there is an Energizer Bunny who grabs the limelight. We have a collective Government which must work together. That is the test of any coalition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,025 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    Just watching the 6,01 news, Michael Martin was interviewed. It looks like it's a donedeal with FF/FG and like minded independents.

    I get the feeling it will be done quickly now, before the new Dail meets for the first time.

    I think Michael will want to be voted straight in and not face the ignominy of being rejected as taoiseach and seen to be scrambling for power!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Caquas


    The IT says there will be a rotating Taoiseach again.

    There is growing acceptance that a rotating taoiseach’s position will be part of a Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael deal, although sources in the former said this was down to party leader Micheál Martin’s desire for stability rather than an eagerness to secure Fine Gael’s participation.

    How did this nonsense take hold? Hard to believe that the argument for this weird arrangement is “a desire for stability “. If the next government has a rotating Taoiseach then every future government will too (because all will be coalitions involving at least two large parties). We can be certain that someday when the country faces a crisis needing steady leadership, the government will be forced to engage in a political high-wire act asking the Dáil to vote for this switcheroo.

    Surely FG does not imagine that we gave a mandate to Simon Harris to lead the country?

    Why can’t we have a real Taoiseach who will serve for as long as they have the support of the Dáil. Not some seat-warmer with the clock ticking down. And please, please! not another Leo who just walks off when he gets tired of the job.

    What benefit does rotating Taoiseach bring? None, except to sooth the egos of the smaller party.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2024/12/05/election-2024-fianna-fails-policing-agenda-set-to-trigger-coalition-spat-over-justice-portfolio/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,802 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    As someone who voted FF+FG I'd prefer a non rotating taoiseach. It's not close in the seat count. If SF were any form of credible party they could negotiate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Caquas


    If FF concede to FG's demand for a rotating Taoiseach now, we are guaranteed an SF Taoiseach in any future coalition, even if SF are not the largest party 😥

    And we will get a part-term Ceann Comhairle - what fun if he steps down just as the Taoiseach/Tánaiste switcheroo is underway!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,802 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    It's shambolic really. There's nothing wrong with the role of tanaiste. If I were the FG negotiators I'd pretend to want rotating taoiseach and then "grudgingly accept" a more than necessary share of ministerial posts in return for giving up the top job. Maybe its a negotiation tactic.

    I'd prefer to see the darn greens as the largest party in government before the shinners. And I hate the greens!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    What's the magic number where a rotating Taoiseach would be untenable? Nobody knows. It's only been done once before but also all of the other coalition governments had larger gaps between the two largest parties than 10 seats.

    I reckon 1948 was the next closest when the gap was 17 seats and in that case the largest party ended up nominating someone who wasn't even their party leader for Taoiseach in an effort to appease their coalition partners.

    At the end of the day FG can play hard ball because FF have already ruled out coalition with FF so they've nowhere else to go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Caquas


     FF have already ruled out coalition with FF 

    Talk about being conflicted! But I assume you mean FF has ruled out SF.

    The rotating Taoiseach was brought in to break a four-month deadlock in 2020 between two parties with equal claim to the office. Now it seems we are about to establish a principle which is unknown anywhere in the history of constitutional democracy - that the office of Prime Minister will be apportioned among coalition partners in accordance with their relative size. Admittedly, FG are bigger than the junior parties in earlier coalitions but that just means they should get close to half the Cabinet jobs and the Tánaiste should be more of a partner for the Taoiseach.

    Inevitably, rotating the top job will involve a period of uncertainty and confusion during the switcheroo, especially for our international partners, and it could prove damaging if it coincides with a crisis. Imagine the contempt Trump would have for a temporary Taoiseach who arrives bearing another bowl of shamrock while the next guy is waiting to fill his shoes because neither of them won enough support at the last election? Coalitions are the norm in Europe but not alternating Prime Ministers, at least not by design.

    Eventually, this would end in tears when the Dáil decides not to play ball.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Yup, my bad. Silly typo.

    Honestly I don't think the rest of the world is going to care that much. Quite a lot of them will just be glad that we don't have some extremist as our leader. As for the changeover - the parties are aligned with an agreed program for government so there's not going to be any radical change in direction and it also happens pretty quickly. Contrast that with the American handover where it's nearly 3 months and a radical change in personnel and policy.

    It's not entirely unprecedented either. It looks like Israel successfully executed it once and the current Romanian government has successfully executed a switch for the first time. Plenty of examples on that referenced page where this was attempted but failed for one reason or another as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,654 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The faux disgust about the rotating Taoiseach is funny

    People suddenly concocting rules about how many TD's the gap needs to be to make it okay.

    It's almost up there with Shinners crying about the 2 biggest parties power sharing in the south.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,783 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I would have thought the 'number' would be based on respect for the mandate given by the people under our system.
    The electorate made FG the 3rd biggest party of choice in the election, yet will see the leader as Taoiseach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,668 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    i actually like the rotating Taoiseach, it creates a change in dynamics within government, as governments can become stale over time, as does decision making



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Relative position doesn't matter now. Neither does first preference vote share. Those are just for bragging rights.

    The only thing that matters is number of seats AND being able to form a working majority.

    Between FF/FG the seat share is 48-38 (or 56%-44%) AND they both need each other to form that majority having both ruled out SF.

    That pushes them both into finding a mutually beneficial agreement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,783 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    That pushes them both into finding a mutually beneficial agreement.

    That disrespects the mandates given. If you accept the electorate voted for FF and FG in government you also have to accept the clearly said they don't want Harris as Taoiseach by relegating them to 3rd biggest.

    Simon Harris was preaching yesterday about how FG respects all mandates, if they did they wouldn't be looking for rotating Taoiseach to begin with.

    But hey ho, it's all part of the shifting dynamic I suppose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,668 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    voting day is pretty much all the power the electorate have in forming governments, after that its up to elected officials, all parties, including the opposition, would take advantage of this privilege



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,783 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I agree on the first point. I do however believe that in 'normal' democratic time mandates would be respected. But we arn't in normal times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,654 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The only thing that matters is whatever the Shinners have decided to tell their supporters to regurgitate online.

    The new rules are FG came 3rd and can't rule because "something something mandates something something"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,783 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Jesus.

    Who said anything about 'can't rule'.

    Will you away up the yard with altering what is said.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    Voters don't vote for Taoiseach. That's not how it works. We only get to vote for a T.D.

    Irish elections are a 2 step process. The first step happened last Friday. Now it's up to the elected representatives to come to an agreement to govern.

    In 1948 FF got 41.9% pf FPVs and 68 seats. However the Taoiseach came from a party that had only gotten 19.8% FPVs and 31 seats. Eamon De Valera didn't get to be Taoiseach though because he couldn't get a majority of TDs to vote for him. Instead John A. Costello, who didn't even lead his party during the election campaign became the Taoiseach. He went on to declare the Republic.

    Was he an illegitimate Taoiseach? After all he didn't even present himself as a potential Taoiseach before the electorate voted. No of course he wasn't - because the only electorate that matters when it comes to the Taoiseach's office are the members of the Dail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Caquas


    A Cabinet reshuffle is a good idea on occasion but, constitutionally, that is the prerogative of the Taoiseach (subject to agreement of coalition party leaders if he wants to move their party colleagues.)

    A rotating Taoiseach means a whole new government in mid-term. The experience of the past four years suggests that, paradoxically, there is less Ministerial change except for the mid-term switcheroo (and the occasional scandal that requires their dismissal - Barry Cowen, Calleary - or, now, a Ministerial pregnancy).

    Of course the policies of the next Government are more important than the personalities but we know the policies of FF/FG. And we can vote for new policies at the next election but we will be stuck indefinitely with this rotating foolishness if it is agreed now.

    Post edited by Caquas on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,654 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    "we will be stuck indefinitely with this rotating foolishness if it is agreed now"

    No we won't.

    And that answer requires no need for elaboration. It's a very simple no we won't be stuck with anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,783 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Voters don't vote for Taoiseach. 

    I didn't say they did.
    The voters give mandates.
    They clearly gave FF the largest one by 10 seats.

    SH says he respects all mandates - as soon as he demands rotating Taoiseach he gives the lie to that statement.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,654 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,783 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    So TD's who say they have been given a mandate by the electorate are wrong?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Caquas


    We would be stuck with it for the foreseeable future i.e. until some party wins so many seats it doesn't need another large party in the coalition.

    Of course, no party will ever again win an overall majority - even if FF/FG merge and hell freezes over.

    And I dread that day when we get a government with a plethora of small parties. They won't all get a spin on the Taoiseach merry-go-round and they won't all be "nice" parties like the Greens and the SDs.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,803 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    If a coalition is formed, it is on the basis of agreement and compromise by all participants. No one participant has an outright mandate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,783 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    I'm talking about demands made before a coalition agreement and FG are out making them already.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 41,803 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    They can all make whatever demands they want but I suspect its for the media because none of them are stupid enough to think they can stamp their feet and get everything they want.

    However, large portions of the electorate seem to think what is promised before an election is guaranteed to follow. You still hear this nonsense from people about Lab when they were last part of a government.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,253 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Many former Taoiseach are probably rotating in their graves at the very state the nation - the nation is awash with money, with high immigration, and no end of projects needing that very same money - but none of it going where it is needed. 50 Years waiting for a Metro in Dublin, and finally expected (originally) to open next year (or will that be the next decade or so?).

    Everything is held up by planning, or by the courts, or by lack of manpower where it is needed - despite the highest population since the famine.

    Then there is the wondrous children's hospital - no lets leave that. I doubt many can remember when that was due, or what it was to cost, or its link to the Lotto.

    Why is the housing in such short supply? why are rents soaring? evictions going ahead despite no need for them except greedy landlords? Why are A&E departments awash with very ill patients on trolleys for days awaiting a bed - or dying to see a doctor? People camping in the street? No, it was not always thus.

    Yet the sitting Gov gets returned to office.

    Spinning they are - spinning.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,025 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    Not really a good argument you've Been spouting on this one is it.

    Firstly all party's and TDs elected have a mandate naturally, that's not in anyones realm to argue. Simon Harris and FG have been given a mandate and its only right for them to try to gain as much from that mandate as possible.

    Your argument on MMs mandate is true, but MMs mandate allows for him to decide and agree to a rotating agreement on taoiseach.

    SF have been given a mandate and will I'm sure do their best to achieve as much as possible from their mandate too. It looks like they will continue to be in opposition and continue to oppose as is the role of opposition, including spouting about government and Taoiseach appointments, as your example on here!

    I'm just wondering if SF formed a coalition with FF and MM agreed a rotating taoiseach with Mary lou would this argument be taking place as much?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,783 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    😁 If the Shinners were 10 seats behind do you think they'd get it? They got the largest mandate in 2020 and the other two sulk in the corner and wouldn't even talk.

    This rotating nonsense demand disrespects the electorate and devalues the office. It isn't at all surprising given the arrogance and entitlement we have seen from FG and the abject lack of self respect among FFers and the incompetence of MM in giving them the stick to beat him with. If you don't believe they are 'beating' him with it, look at the amount of FGers out of the traps threatening it is a redline as soon as the counts finished.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,025 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    I wouldn't be arguing the points you make in that post as such. Just the point you put across as to whether there's a mandate for it. I believe all elected have been given a mandate and if SH and FG want that as an issue they have a mandate to seek it, and MM and FF have a mandate to agree and implement it, or not.

    It could be any arrangement imo, like FF/SF, even the unimaginable SF/FG.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭Aurelian


    Part of me thinks FG should walk away and let FF and SF form a coalition.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,783 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    MM. by his own incompetence has no choice you mean. FG are taking advantage here. That's the realpolitik.

    Let them at it.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,253 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    I think FF and FG want to form a Gov that will last for more than four years. I would not think FF and SF could form a Gov at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭Aurelian


    I'm sure you are right but it would be interesting to see how long an FF/SF/Left government would last IF they could form one.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 20,253 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Why would anyone create a Gov that is doomed to split in jig time?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭Caquas


    That's it in a nutshell but Gerard Howlin now claims FF/FG already have a majority

    assuming the casting vote of the ceann comhairle, Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have a bare majority

    I thought 87 is the minimum for a majority if all TDs vote, even with the CC casting vote (174 -CC - 86 = 87).

    The secret ballot gives TDs a free vote on electing the CC, the first order of business in a new Dáil. O Fearghail said he wouldn't go again after serving since 2016 but he was quick to organize his own nomination this time which would have pis*ed off Micheál no end because Opposition TDs will back O Fearghail (secretly) to reduce the numbers on the Government side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭Aurelian




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,283 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    imagine trying to split cabinet positions between FF, FG, LP and SD, or even just one of LP and SD, its not about mercs and percs, cabinet positions/full ministerial positions matter to control and get things done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,025 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    The SDs aren't interested in governing, they are really an idealist party at present, just gaining traction and hoping for a bright future.

    I'd say they'd actually love to see Labour in govt and hope to see a near wipeout of them again in the next election. That would suit them fine as they'd be hoping to pick up that left vote.

    They are already trying to show they're not like labour, how'd that go in govt formation talks.

    https://www.rte.ie/news/election-24/2024/1206/1484990-election-labour-social-democrats/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,542 ✭✭✭pureza


    I see your FG taking advantage and raise you todays Independent front page..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,654 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It's obvious both sides are hoping the other will go in and get "Greened". It'll be both or neither so I'de say definitely neither at this stage.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement