Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1230231233235236

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 246 ✭✭PlatformNine


    It is a bit hard to say, but realistically pre-electrification there wont be a large, if any, increase in frequency. During the morning peak there are currently 3 services between 06:00 and 07:00 and 4 between 07:00 and 08:00, however that includes 1 Dundalk service for each hour. With the BEMUs, it may be possible to see an additional depature an hour for 4tph originating from Drogheda, however I wouldn't be surprised if they can't increase past 3 services because of charging and/or siding capacity.

    However there should at least be some increase in capacity, because as the new units enter service, it should allow almost all services to use full length 8/10-car sets. Additionally the new units also can carry more passengers than the 29Ks, though with only 3-4 tph I am not sure if it would be a noticeable increase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,335 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The plan

    Initial entry into service, this releases a few 29k's to strengthen any 4 car operations e.g. Docklands and ICR's used on Maynooth and Drogheda services released to intercity operations

    Standardising on 29K sets will help greatly with timetable performance as the ICR's suck on dwell times and having a spare set of two will help ensure no short formations

    Cork is the logical destination for the 29000 as the 2600's are 1994 builds and they are struggling with demand

    Until the physical upgrade works are completed, turn back at Malahide, 4th platform at Drogheda there isn't scope for services



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭Montys return


    Thanks all. So likely the biggest beneficiaries in the short term in terms of capacity would be those travelling on the M3-Parkway to Docklands route as a result of BEMUs freeing up the 29000s?

    It was more a question of whether the BEMU trains could carry more passengers than existing services, as I understood from the website that service frequency itself wouldn't increase for now.

    Seems like there will be massive strain on the network there in the decade to come, as it would seem from the timelines that is how long it will take to get the northern line electrified. There is a phenomenal amount of building going on in North County Dublin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Couple of recent pics of when they finally got it moving. 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,976 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    The railway order for DART+ North is due to be decided on Monday (a bank holiday). So given that nothing has happened to day and no communication on the matter, it's safe to say that the 6 month duration is pure fiction/comedy. 2 years is the minimum time for a railway order, some recently have taken 4 years. Metrolink is coming up on 2.5 years, a total sh1tshow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,436 ✭✭✭highdef


    Is it just the angle of the photo or does the new train look quite narrow compared to the 22000 class beside it? I think the 22000's are 2.84m (9' 4") wide, but may be that narrow because of their length. But the new train looks even narrower than it, or at least no wider, which surprised me as I expected them to be wider than existing stock (maybe 10' wide or a slightly more) due to each car being so short in length.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,869 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Service frequency might not increase, but with more 29000's available might they have longer trains?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,399 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    The peak Docklands services really need to be 8 car 29s at this stage, so hopefully that does happen. After replacing all the floors!

    One evening peak to Maynooth is a 4x29 also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,322 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Regarding capacity, the answer is “yes”, the new stock will carry more passengers. From official figures: 1102 passengers per 10-car BEMU formation (2x 5-cars, 164 m), versus 819 in an 8-car 29000 formation (2x 4-cars, 163 m)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,335 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Test running started this week and is penciled in across Dublin for the next 10 days. Even going as far as Wicklow…



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,475 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,335 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Looks like route clearance/gauging testing, so checking platform interface, pantograph, radio coverage and so on. ETCS possibly

    The endurance testing is Inchicore Hazelhatch, 3 round trips on a single charge, with new batteries it should make it comfortably



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭Ireland trains


    Think Geoff Marshall measures the width on his video about the new fleet, fairly sure they’re wider than 9’4”.

    Edit: 9’7” apparently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,436 ✭✭✭highdef


    I saw that video when it was released and found the bit where they measured the width because the tape measure clearly showed approx 102"/2.6m and when Geoff asked the guy what 260cm is in old money, he said it's 9' 7"(ish) however 260cm is about 8' 6" so not sure where he got his figure from considering he could see the inches on the tape measure when he looked again.

    Now clearly this was the interior measurement, from the inside of one door to the inside of the other but if it's 8' 6" on the inside, I would imagine the train could not be much more than 9' wide in total. If so, this would be such a waste of the available loading gauge at our disposal.

    The new X'trapolis 2.0 trains being introduced in Melbourne are in the same family as our own, obviously with differences. The cars are a smidgin under 10' wide and they run on 1500V DC on 1600mm rails, just like here! You can clearly the spacious width in the photo below. Why IE did not specify wider cars is a bit puzzling.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,290 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    when Geoff asked the guy what 260cm is in old money, he said it's 9' 7"(ish) however 260cm is about 8' 6" so not sure where he got his figure from considering he could see the inches on the tape measure when he looked again.

    I think it was clear from the context that he didn’t know what it was in old money and just gave any answer.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Is that with the new train to Wicklow, or just finishing off the ETCS testing on the ICR?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    Another one off the boat recently.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭p_haugh




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    yeah



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,178 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    is the new spencer dock station alot closer to construction as per the article below?

    https://m.independent.ie/irish-news/council-rejects-johnny-ronans-plans-to-build-docklands-padel-courts/a107936710.html



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭Rashers72


    Would be great if anyone got a video of these out on the network…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭specialbyte


    The planning file is here if anyone else is interested:

    https://planning.agileapplications.ie/dublincity/application-details/164560

    My understanding is that NTA/Irish Rail will tender for construction the second they have an enforceable railway order. Whether that means they need to wait for the High Court to resolve the judicial review of the Ashtown underpass issue or the High Court limits the scope of that judicial review to that section of the railway order.

    Whether that is this year, next year or the year after is unclear right now. The planning application from the developer saying nothing would happen before 2030 is total nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,335 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    It wasn't out on Saturday night/Sunday morning ☹️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    It won't be out on the main road for a good while yet.

    The ETCS testing that's scheduled is on the 22000 set.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,322 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    ETCS signalling is now in place on the DART coastal line between Drogheda and Greystones, ready for the new trains.

    Alstom completes one of Europe’s largest Level 1 ETCS installation for Ireland | Alstom

    The signalling work actually extends beyond DART+ as far north as Dundalk, although I suspect that actually means as far as the NI border, ready for the new Enterprise rolling stock which is out for tender at present.

    Post edited by KrisW1001 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,335 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Goes all the way to the border, the new Enterprise fleet at tender phase currently will not have the legacy CAWS pulse code system

    It also appears to cover Connolly-Glasnevin

    The ETCS includes command balise's to trigger mode switches between 1500V DC and internal power modes

    Post edited by goingnowhere on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 227 ✭✭Bsharp


    Would there be much involved extending the ETCS to Wicklow do you know? The BEMU project would need it for the trains to run.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,335 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The high level design for the entire network has already been done and locations marked out. Fairly trivial, a few weeks at most to install and commission.

    Its not just the ETCS the DART+ and new Enterprise fleets will not have the UIC 751-3 radio system, they will be GSM-R so you need GSM-R kit from border to Wicklow as well. The Malahide/Howth-Greystones section is already live with GSM-R,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Bit of a look at the initial moving tests of the new units within Incicore



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,151 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Interesting video. Looking at the livery, I wonder how dirty the white lower carriage sides will look after a day out in the Dublin rain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,008 ✭✭✭Citizen  Six


    It's out there!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 Taisteal Éireann


    Iarnród Éireann have told Wicklow County Council that the DART will be extended to Kilcoole and Wicklow Town by the end of 2028.

    https://wicklownews.net/2025/02/rail-improvements-expected-for-greystones-kilcoole-and-wicklow-town/

    Some key points from the article include:

    • Hourly service to Kilcoole and Wicklow Town.
    • 20 minute service to Greystones.
    • Extension of Kilcoole platform by 44 metres.
    • Extension of both platforms at Wicklow Town by 40 metres.
    • DART+ Coastal South will be done in two stages (Stage 1 - Greystones to Bray; Stage 2 - Bray to Connolly) and is expected to go to public consultation in Summer 2025.
    • Double tracking "some areas" between Greystones Station and the long Bray Head Tunnel.

    Good news but still a lot of questions to be answered. 2028 doesn't seem very ambitious considering the skeleton service that already runs past Greystones. The timetable won't have a lot of room for delays with a 20 minute service too. Will be interesting to see if the services from Rosslare continue to operate to Dublin or will they terminate at Bray/Greystones/Wicklow Town? There's still paths available for them, albeit, they'll continue to crawl along from Bray to Dublin as they currently do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 72,399 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Rather than being unambitious, 2028 is likely unrealistically soon, based on how every other timeline has slipped so much.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,322 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The platform extensions require planning permission, but not a full Railway Order, so nothing on that list would need to go near the single biggest source of delay in the DART+ programme, which is ABP.

    “Double tracking” really means passing loops, and, like the platform extensions, I don’t think that these normally need ABP involvement. The Galway-Athenry passing-loop planning requests went directly to Galway Co.Co, and was granted within 5 months.

    Signalling to support the new trains is only laid as far as Greystones, but extension to Wicklow isn’t going to be a big deal, and again, no planning is needed.

    I think it’s do-able.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 orb123


    Good news in theory but they've missed every deadline they set for the coastal south consultation over the last two years… I'll believe it when I see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 430 ✭✭Ireland trains


    https://mmo.aiircdn.com/286/67c1c523b1193.pdf

    Here’s the presentation, Q4 2028 completion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23 orb123




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,976 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    There's politics at play though. The NTA done their usual, they let Irish Rail reach a point where they were ready for public consultation and then pulled it because they didn't fancy a fight with the D4 residents. But now that it's split into '2 phases' with phase 2 on the never never and simultaneously will be closing the level crossings on the Maynooth line there's grounds to rinse and repeat…and probably pull it again so as not to upset the well healed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,489 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    zero chance it'll be done by 2028 IMO. They've been promising the plans for about 2 years and now they're not being published until the summer!

    they mention in the presentation upgrading and automating the Ennis Lane crossing - this seems a bit pointless as it's essentially a pedestrian crossing other than very infrequent farm traffic (there's one field on the seaward side of the line).

    There's loads of space to the south of the crossing to put in a bridge or underpass with ramps for pedestrians, and put some sort of arrangements in place for unlocking the crossing gates for the farmer (which I assume already exist as the vehicle gates are locked currently).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,489 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    also of note - after 5+ years of planning, the upgrade plan for Bray to Pearse is basically "who knows"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,272 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It's easy to blame successive governments, NIMBY residents, ABP, whoever.

    The only constant is Iarnrod Eireann. They are utterly incompetent and I would suggest the only way forward for any of these projects is to take infrastructure delivery out of their hands and keep them focused on service.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 260 ✭✭specialbyte


    They are not the only constant. The NTA and the Department of Transport exist. The existing structure has too many cooks in the kitchen right now. The NTA can be awful nitpicky about things but Irish Rail is also spending the NTAs money, that was given to it by the Department of Transport, which got it's money from the Department of Finance. Lots of checks all along the way to make sure "we're not wasting money" that honestly might all add up to slow down progress so much that it costs us more money in construction inflation and opportunity cost.

    Irish Rail can't even go to consultation without NTA approval



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,679 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yes, a general disinterest in public transport projects by the political class is more to blame here than any other organisation. The only reason it's different this time around is that the political class has now signed up to binding reductions in emissions, which basically necessitate large scale public transport projects.

    If that pressure didn't exist, then all we'd be hearing about is how building another road will definitely solve our commuter crisis….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,976 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Actually the constant here is the NTA and Dept of Transport. Irishbrail have tried to close those crossings multiple times and have been denied permission to do so multiple times from the higher ups.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,151 ✭✭✭Economics101


    That is totally unfair to I.E. They may have their faults, but there have been many cases where they delivered projects on time and within budget. More recently with the huge number of bodies involved (DoF, FPE, NTA, DoT, ABP) its a wonder anything ever get done.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,475 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    I think this is a pretty illogical take. I believe both Irish Rail and the NTA/DoT are very much on the same page here.

    I’ve no doubt IR has no interest in ending up in court battles for years either. That is why they took the smart move of breaking up DART+ into multiple separate projects, so that if one gets blocked, it doesn’t impact the entire project. And now they are taking it a step further wisely breaking the South Coastal line into even more sub projects.

    This is all about de-risking. We have already been there with trying to close level crossings on this line, we know it is going to be a massive battle. Better to focus on the rest of the DART+ project first. Get that built and delivered and then you can start that long fight.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,378 ✭✭✭gjim


    Yes, a general disinterest in public transport projects by the political class is more to blame here than any other organisation.

    The "political class" isn't some distinct thing - politicians align their positions with those of the general public.

    Blaming "politicians" without recognizing that they are representatives of the public at large is an easy way to divert blame.

    And clearly the public hate politicians who attempt to provide "leadership" - look at what happened the Greens. The vilification of E Ryan and the bile he has and continues to be subject to - despite being the first member of cabinet since the formation of the state to prioritize transport spending on PT and active travel over spending on roads - is clear proof of this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37 Taisteal Éireann


    If anything, Greystones would/should have been the most powerful place politically in the country during the last government term, with the Taoiseach and a Minister based in the town. Yet, no progress was made on the railway line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,489 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    well they (Irish Rail) were working on a plan, and 5 years later they're still working on a plan.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement