Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1146014611463146514661510

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,397 ✭✭✭almostover


    I doubt it, more likely that neither will go unless called up due to injury.

    I think the Lions will bring the 2 Finns, Russell and Smith, plus Marcus Smith and Blair Kinghorn as 10/15 utility players.

    Fin Smith has probably been the best outhalf across the 4 nations so far and yet he's hardly a world beater. Most likely Russell will be the 1st choice despite a poor 6N. If I was Jack Crowley I'd be fuming. Crowley looked the better outhalf of the 2 in the Munster v Northampton game in January and now he's way off Lions selection whereas Fin Smith is in pole position to go on tour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,839 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I don't think Farrell is ruthless enough to cut sling with poor coaches. POC should've been fired after the WC, our lineiyt contributed significantly to our loss imo. Likewise Goodman has shown nothing to suggest he's worth retaining. I was very critical of Catt after his first season, and obviously we came good, but I don't have confidence that Goodman will deliver. Leinster were poor under him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Lots more conspiracy theories today. How about a more prosaic explanation, the intention was to give Crowley a decent amount of time at ten off the bench during the 6N and, other than one game, injuries and cards made that impractical so they are giving him a start against Italy. The idea is to develop two viable tens and they've been using last season, this seasons and probably next season to do that. Steady as she goes, the plan is working. Performances have been so so though, which has had very little to do with ten. We are copping nearly a card per game, down from a card every 9 games. Our 22 entries are not scoring points at anything like the rate they were and by almost every measure our performances have declined significantly from where we were at 2 years ago. There are big problems with the team but managing our two developing tens are not in the to 5 of those problems. Storm in a teacup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,467 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Absolutely. If we had two players of similar quality and age as Crowley and Prendergast in every position, things would be very rosy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,829 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    They should for this year, have rotated Prendergast and Crowley. If P was starting some games, C would start others. Then when knowing the challenge defensively France would pose, C would be the starting choice for that match.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,839 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I think they took the right approach in starting Prendergast, he was playing better, and he's done well overall. What screwed things up was insisting on a 6-2 split. It practically committed Crowley to having to play out of position



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,488 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    We didn't lose the French game cause of SP's defence though. It was, to all intents and purposes, entirely lost up front.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,397 ✭✭✭almostover


    That's rubbish. Crowley has only played 20 mins at 10 in the tournament so far as a sub against England.

    Crowley came on for Nash against Scotland for 15mins and played at 15 with Keenan moving to the wing. He came on for Mack Hansen with 7 minutes left against Wales, again playing 15. In both of those games we had a centre (Ringrose & Aki) in the 23 shirt meaning Crowley was selected as utility sub. Crowley got 24 mins against France at 12, as a replacement for Aki. Again, we chose a 6-2 split and Crowley was never going to play 10 as a result. In those 3 games Prendergast played 80 mins. Given the bench selection for the 23 shirt it doesn't appear if Crowley was selected as replacement no.10 for any of those games. He was picked as utility cover.

    His selection at 10 this weekend smacks of desperation to keep him placated. And again we have persisted with picking a single position player in the 23 shirt. This time to Jamie Osborne's detriment.

    The selection calls have been very poor. It's hard to argue with facts.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,006 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This explanation also makes no real sense. They wanted to give Crowley decent game time off the bench? Why off the bench? Surely they know, as everyone here knows, planning to give game time based on sitting on the bench is a total lottery.

    Especially when we do things like picking 6 forwards on the bench, or picking players who can ONLY play centre at 23. They wanted to give Crowley game time but then made decisions that would make it difficult to give Crowley game time? Not sure I can buy that.

    If Ireland really wanted Crowley exposed to game time this 6N he would have started one of the previous 4 games. There are too many mental gymnastics required to suggest otherwise.

    The problems are not mutually exclusive. We are playing poorly but this doesn't mean that Crowley suddenly starting when we're out of contention isn't a bit weird.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Missing our two wingers and Ringrose, along with Furlong, mean that if France were firing on all cylinders we were in big trouble. Joe Mc brain fart didn't helped but it was further evidence that the cards we are getting are coming from pressure, stress and fatigue that we are not handling as well as we did up until recently. Ten had very little to do with it. France played their best game of the tournament against us and their earlier performances were quality too. That is the situation Ireland are now in, every top team is going to be absolutely on point against us and it's killing us in the biggest games.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,488 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    One thing we should all remember, is that we have always rotated against Italy. That element of things is not remotely unique.

    That being said, I agree things have been handled poorly. I don't know what exactly we are looking to try to do with our subs. I think the 6-2 was a giant waste of time, I think holding onto backs on the bench "just in case" is an exercise in timidity. I don't think there is anything wrong with Crowley being viewed as utility cover mind you, it's not a bad place to be in a squad.

    I don't remotely understand the 23 selection, Osborne is an infinitely better selection than Aki. Ireland have been obsessed with having a centre in that jersey for years though, and I have never understood it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,839 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Osborne is arguably a better center anyway, ridiculous decision imo



  • Administrators Posts: 55,006 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The Aki / Henshaw / Ringrose rotation is nonsensical to me, especially this week. There's a lad in the squad who plays 3 positions in the backs and was trusted to start last week against the best team in the tournament, yet he can't get past a guy who, as good as he is, plays only one position.

    We'd rather reshuffle our entire backline in the case of injury than play Osborne again. I do not understand it.

    I wasn't impressed with Osborne on the wing but I'd take Osborne on the wing any day over Ringrose ffs. If anything, last week showed that Ireland cannot afford to lose Ringrose from the centre.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,467 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    The 6-2 against France was very possibly a reflection of the injury that Doris was carrying and maybe also the 7-1 that we knew France were going with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭ersatz


    Maybe the coaches want two tens who can play at the top level all the time, like other top teams have? I am amazed that people who play close attention to the game and to Ireland are crying about a situation where Crowley got all the games in the last 6N and Predergast got a serious run this year, its EXACTLY what people on here have been asking the coaches to do for YEARS. Of course there's a risk that Crowley won't get to play much ten off the bench because its subject to injury and cards, luckily he can play 15 so he can bench as the 23 rather than having to have a dedicated ten sub, which is one of the few weaknesses with Predergast currently (beyond him needing to improve as a player and organiser). Crowley got a full 6N run last year, he is developing really, really well but, like Prendergast there are things he can improve. We now have 2 tens who I'd be happy with going to the WC with in 2 years time, and they will be even more experienced when the time comes. We are in a position to play one all the time with the other as a backup or to rotate as needs must. Crowley can also play 15 to a high level, I really don't see where the problem is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,713 ✭✭✭Ardillaun




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,467 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    When Crowley starts on Saturday, he’ll increase his number of starts in the 6N by 20%.

    He’s still a young and developing OH and I think that’s been lost in these discussions. He needs games. The idea that there’s nothing to be gained by playing him against a very decent Italy team is a bit odd to be honest.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,006 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    So if he needs games, you must think it utterly bizarre that he is only getting game time now?

    There'd a lot more to be gained by playing him in other games, particularly France given Prendergast's very average performance against Wales?

    What I mean to say is, you can't really flip flop between backing Prendergast in the previous games to now backing a total pivot away from that. Well, I guess you can do it, but it's hard to take it seriously.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,109 ✭✭✭TomsOnTheRoof


    We don't often agree but I'm with you on O'Connell. I think he's been given far too much leeway and Goodman looks like a serious downgrade from Catt but it was evident from his time at Leinster that he wasn't up to it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,467 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    What I mean to say is, you can't really flip flop between backing Prendergast in the previous games to now backing a total pivot away from that

    Let me stop you there.

    Go back to any of my posts since the start of the 6N and count how many times I've said I would be happy to see either Crowley or Prendergast starting, how it's a great problem to have, how a case could be made for either of them etc.

    You had no problem going back to some fictional bullshit from 2013 to have a pop at me earlier, let's see if you have the balls to go back a couple of weeks, see what I've actually said, and then admit you were wrong. I doubt you do.

    The coaches obviously thought Prendergast was the right man to lead the charge for the 6N championship. We are extremely unlikely to win (not because of Prendergast) so now maybe the question is, what can we get from the last match?

    Giving a young OH only his sixth start in the 6N (and 13th ever) especially when he's had limited game time up to now? That doesn't sound like a bad idea to me, and it definitely doesn't sound bizarre. I’d go so far as to say it might just even be a good idea.

    Hey, it might even give a few of you a reason to cheer for Ireland on Saturday. Who knows, you might even find you like it.

    Well, I guess you can do it, but it's hard to take it seriously.

    I'm really, really OK with that.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,992 ✭✭✭ersatz


    People giving out about how Crowley has been 'treated' now giving out because he gets a start.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,006 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I haven’t given out about Crowley at all. I 100% agreed with backing Prendergast. My issue here is that Prendergast is not starting.

    Changing tactics now looks more than a little odd, it looks like they’re giving Crowley a go now cause it no longer matters.

    Which is to say, it doesn’t make sense to me to give 4 starts to 1 guy and give the other guy the most inconsequential match. Either back your man or share the games in a more meaningful way that will be of more benefit to everyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 369 ✭✭roverjoyce


    Are they going to let Murray and POM walk out first again maybe with Healy as Mascot



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 Sportsmad5


    You are being very harsh on Crowley.

    Just take a step back and look at what happened him since November.

    Started v NZ, replaced after 57 mins by Frawley, it was 13-10, Ireland failed to score after this + lost 23-13.

    Started v Argentina, replaced by Sam P after 61 mins, scored try, 3 cons + dg, it was 22-19 when he went off and that's how it finished.

    Left out of the squad for the next game v Fiji.

    Prendergast handed the start for the next game v Australia, Crowley came on after 65 mins with Ireland 19-15 down, Ireland won 22-19.

    Prendergast started v England, Crowley came on after 58 mins when it was 13-10, Ireland won 27-22.

    So since the Argentina game he has got 37 mins at 10 out of the following 480 mins. (Prendergast played 443)

    With rotations, injury + suspension, only 4 players will have started the 5 games.

    JPG - has played all bar 32 mins, Casey was his reserve and he is injured.

    Porter has played an average of 70 mins per game, he needs a break

    Beirne- the only mins he has missed was a few mins for a HIA.

    Van D F. Has played all bar 5 mins, along with Porter & Beirne, they could do with a break before the Champions Cup

    It's not Prendergast that has been punished.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,397 ✭✭✭almostover


    If he's a young and developing OH, then why not continue to develop him by giving more game time in the OH position in the tournament to date? You know full well your argument is rubbish.

    He's developing yes, but in that time he's spent developing, he guided his province to an unlikely URC title, kicking a winning DG in the semi, and guided his country to a 6N championship in his first season as a starter. Seems like he has a very high ceiling to me, one that he's already proving he can reach andnoerhaps go beyond.

    But no, we chose to stunt his development in favour of a younger prospect who there's a perception about that he could be even better even though he has very limited senior experience with his club. Granted he has shown in this 6N that he has many positive attributes and skills, but also some glaring weaknesses in his game.

    So now we end up in a situation where we've stunted the development of our primary OH prospect, to the point where he hasn't even signed the 2 year contract offered to him by the IRFU all to learn that a promising player in his first senior season isn't ready to be an international level starter yet. This situation could have been handled so much better.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,381 ✭✭✭JanuarySnowstor


    Fully agree the outhalf position has been handled diabolically where we now have both players with zero confidence. Prendegast because he has been dropped and Crowley because he's been treated shamefully and entirely overlooked for the No 10. To compound matters they brought him on out of position, barring the England game. By the way he excelled in this game, a point that's lost on many here!!

    The current mgmt, excluding Farrell, should hang their heads in shame on how the 6N has gone. What has Sexton contributed???

    I really do hope Munster and Leinster meet again this season and Prendegast plays. Munster are hurting now so bad it wouldn't surprise me if they go on to win the Champions Cup



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,828 ✭✭✭✭phog


    Hey, it might even give a few of you a reason to cheer for Ireland on Saturday.

    Is there really need to continue with this shite, the one positive is you've moved on, hopefully not a temporary step away from fans hating Ireland and or Farrell.

    Being a fan of Ireland doesn't mean you have to have a unconditional love for everything they do.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,021 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    We only conceded 6 penalties against France compared to their 14 ( I think) and still got battered.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,397 ✭✭✭almostover


    Easy now, I know we agree on the no.10 selection issue but to claim Munster will win the CC is a bit left field. I'm a Munster fan and we've about a 10% chance of beating La Rochelle never mind winning the competition!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,381 ✭✭✭JanuarySnowstor


    Why should we fear a team that lost 6/7 in a row? Munster are weaker this year but the pschye should always be that we fear nobody. I know the fans will get their hands on tickets and the support could well be 50 50 by match day

    Anyways off topic, back to Ireland



Advertisement