Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2024-25 Carabao Cup

1678911

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭New Scottman


    Well done Newcastle. Best not to win any more trophies for another while. The red clubs don't like it - even if you have history of winning stuff in the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 392 ✭✭Krazy gang


    Ha ha. If that's what it takes. I can barely remember a Liverpool player winning a tackle yesterday. It's the joelintons and tonalis who were getting stuck in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,986 ✭✭✭ronjo


    I would say the vas majority of "red club" (nonsense name) were cheering for Newcastle yesterday



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 392 ✭✭Krazy gang


    You care because you thought Liverpool would win. Now you're throwing out the oul sportswahing line.

    People are happy for Eddie Howe, the newcastle players and especially their long suffering fans. Not their dodgy owners. Not like they've spent billions like Chelsea and man utd either. Dan burn came from obscurity for example.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭New Scottman


    Like they were when Man City won the FA Cup in 2011, breaking a 35 year wait. But as soon they gained momentum, things changed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,577 ✭✭✭✭LuckyLloyd


    He’s just the Joe Hart of this stage / phase of the project. It takes time



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭JohnySwan


    Well that's not true, I'm not a Liverpool supporter. What's happening at Newcastle is no different to Chelsea, Man City, PSG et al. Give it time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    Dan Burn who has played in the EPL for Fulham & Brighton and who Newcastle signed for £13m isn't coming from obscurity FFS. Also not sure why people being happy for Eddie Howe should matter. IMO it's incredibly difficult to separate the club, the management, the players and the fans, 95% of whom have embraced their KSA owners, and be happy for them at any level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,727 ✭✭✭WishUWereHere




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,986 ✭✭✭ronjo


    Ah good man. Change the point after being called out 👍️



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 151 ✭✭New Scottman


    The same point is being made; just gave you another example. Most people (particularly red club fans i.e. Liverpool, Arsenal, Manchester United) won’t begrudge a sleeping club winning a trophy after a long absence. But if they threaten the established order & win MORE, they’ll soon change their tune. My first post said “best not to win ANY MORE trophies”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,794 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    Chelsea fans are notoriously happy for other clubs to win trophies ahead of them



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 440 ✭✭IAmTitleist




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,560 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 440 ✭✭IAmTitleist




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭Lauras Law


    Let’s be honest, the vast majority of football fans don’t care where the money comes from at their club when their team is winning. These sportswashing comments are just another element of tribalism, used as a stick to beat rival fans with—until the same situation benefits their own club. Funny how no Liverpool fans were complaining when their club was doing transfer deals with KSA, getting 50 - 60 million to rebuild their midfield. Morals only seem to matter when its someone else's club cashing in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,297 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Yes, Saudi were doing Liverpool a favour. Of course. That’s what the Saudi pro league is for. I’m sorry to have forgotten that.

    Post edited by doc_17 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 392 ✭✭Krazy gang


    He played in the lower leagues that's my point. When the owners came first people were talking about newcastle spending 80/90.million on players and that they'd be like man city in a few years. Well it hasn't happened yet anyway.

    Do you think most newcastle supporters yesterday care about the owners? It's about the club and getting a bit of reward for following them for however long.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭Lauras Law


    This seems like a very deflective response. Do you not think KSA actively seeks to do business with big clubs to gain credibility and ‘clean’ their image? And if a club with Liverpool’s reputation and influence is happy to do business with them, doesn’t that only reinforce the legitimacy they’re after?

    I’m curious, where exactly would you draw the line at benefiting from Saudi Arabia’s dirty money?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭POKERKING


    Thats a fantastic question, genuinely keen to hear a response to it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,560 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    I mean, it's all fckin filthy. The whole footballing world took a big step down a bad road when first Chelsea (heavy Russian state influence), and then more directly Man City, PSG, and Newcastle ownerships (actual barefaced politically motivated state ownerships) were allowed. It puts the footballing ecosystem in a terrible position — the powers that be 'took the soup', leaving clubs in the impossible position of either effectively folding in order to not deal with a fundamentally corrupted system, or just hold their noses and try to enact mitigating processes (like PSR etc) where possible.

    It's all stuff that makes the whole thing feel a lot less emotionally engaging and important, and makes ya feel just a bit sick and disillusioned if ya think about it for more than a few minutes. And I say that with my team on the cusp of winning the bloody league. The kid in me will still be delighted in ways for sure, especially in those short term moments of experiencing it all, but also a huge part of me is now just always a bit heartbroken by the whole bloody ever-increasing farce and cynicism of top tier football.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,297 ✭✭✭doc_17


    It’s very simple - if they buy Liverpool, I won’t be supporting them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,751 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    100%, got dicey a couple of years back with Qatar government apparently circling. Liverpool look like a good investment right now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 249 ✭✭Lauras Law


    It’s easy to say that now when a Saudi takeover of Liverpool is highly unlikely in the foreseeable future.

    But the fact remains—I’ve given real examples of Liverpool doing business with KSA as part of Saudi Arabia’s sportswashing agenda through the Saudi Pro League. While it’s nowhere close to being on the same scale as what’s happening at Newcastle or Man City, Liverpool have still taken millions in dirty Saudi money, and their fans haven’t raised a single concern. Even now, you’re continuing to bury your head in the sand rather than acknowledge these facts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,751 ✭✭✭✭8-10


    In fairness, Liverpool fans were very critical of both Steven Gerrard and Jordan Henderson moving there, they directed anger at those players rather than the club or the foreign player they sold there (Fabinho)

    I don't think it was burying head in the sand, moreso that criticism was focused on the players themselves.

    Fabinho was £40m, sold to his old manager Nuno Espirito Santo (who everybody now thinks is great at Forest and don't care about his Saudi days) and Henderson was £12m, sold to his old teammate Gerrard. That's what the Sauid's did, installed the managers first and then had them attract the players they used to work with. Those managers aren't without blame either.

    I honestly hadn't thought before about the morality of the club taking that money for those 2 players but I certainly remember criticising their personal decisions. I don't think it was completely ignored, just didn't occur at the time to focus criticism of the club.

    I think the prevailing thinking was that you'd expect better of the likes of Gerrard and Henderson, particularly the latter who was such a vocal supporter of LGBT rights and the rainbow laces campaign as captain. Fabinho less criticism because it wasn't obvious that the same hypocrisy was present, but I definitely take your point well made that we should have also criticised the club for selling him there. I do wonder though if it's a bit of a LIV golf scenario where the player and the agent wanted the bag and would have rejected staying in Europe but that's speculation, the whole thing is messy and abhorrent regardless.

    Then Henderson leaves after a year which opened him up to even more criticism from Liverpool fans, many think he's completely tarnished his legacy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,644 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    Nobody cared when City won league title in 2012. In fact many here celebrated it. To some sportswashing only began around 2014 onwards.

    If my mother tongue is shaking the foundations of your state, it probably means you built your state on my land.

    EVENFLOW



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,297 ✭✭✭doc_17


    Here are the facts, my wife and daughter would be 2nd class citizens in that country. I don’t care if Liverpool sell them players. The fact you are holding that up as some sort of equivalency is nonsense. Liverpool don’t have to welcome these people to the stadium, go on training camps there, wear green and white kits, promote a regime that murders journalists, and be used to give them a veil of legitimacy. So what, they sell them players. There a world of difference between that and being owned by a country that trampled on human rights.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 440 ✭✭IAmTitleist


    Very easy thing to say when your club has won every trophy going in the past 5 years. And multiple, multiple times over in the past 40 years.

    I doubt for any of the Newcastle fans that just won their first trophy in 70 years that football now is "a lot less emotionally engaging and important"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,928 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Yeah Newcastle fans made it very clear they were on board to be the tool of a sports washing machine so long as their team became good.

    Their choice obviously but you can't start crying then when nobody respects the achievements.

    It like there are 2 bowlers side by side - one has the gutter guards up and one doesn't. First bowler is throwing a strop when nobody congratulates him for out scoring the guy with the guards down.

    And can't wrap their heads around why people are more impressed when the 2nd guy scores well and wins

    1742302019289488724900345430348.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,560 ✭✭✭✭~Rebel~


    I feel how I feel, and I can tell you with absolute certainty that I would feel the same way regardless how much or little was won (and I have said all these same things right on here for a very long time, including before we finally won the league for the first time in decades, and when state interest was circling and it looked a real potential outcome).

    You're entirely entitled to feel how you feel yourself, but I'd appreciate you not projecting your feelings onto me to justify your own. Just own it.



Advertisement