Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

3 New Navy Vessels for Irish Naval Service

1142143144145147

Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,861 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    When they talked about increasing the fleet size recently, did they mean tugs?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Nah

    Think the have a few battlecruisers and an aircraft carrier in mind 🤪



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,368 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No, just a few auld fenders and used tyres. Probably cost about 100 million.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,861 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,368 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    That definitely should be the next Navy seamanship training vessel.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Any opinions on the rumour of the MRV getting more shooty?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 298 ✭✭mupper2


    If it's accurate great, but I want to see pen put to paper on all these RUMINT procurements.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,211 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Its hard to know whats true. The French were trying to offer a version of the Freem as apart of the over deal and the biggest rumour going round is the poles have somehow jumped ahead of everyone with some version of the arrowhead which apperently caught the UK by supprise as they were getting ready to offer it as well.

    We will know probably by the summer as the order will need to go in soon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42


    the FREMM? The FDI I could kind of see but the FREMM? Very ambitious by the French if they were going for that, interesting to see if true the Poles jumping the U.K., but let’s be honest the U.K. just doesn’t have capacity to build anything for the rest of the decade, hence the suggestion that if they win the Norwegian order they will have to give up one of their current build 26s.


    At this stage though the scale of rumours must be pretty unique for us with all three services seemingly getting shopping lists in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,211 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Id also say what has happened is the state has made known what we as nation need and all the Euro arms dealers are pitching what ever they can to get sales. Also the new flagship transation from LPV to MRV to possabile Multi purpose Frigate has not happened over night



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Nope, 20 years of a procurement hell, its got to be up there as one of our worst/most dragged out projects even for us. Either way, apart from needing to get orders in, we also need the Civil works needs to be taken in hand for the base infrastructure as well. As for the Euro Arms companies, I think they would have had a better idea than the state for a while now, all they need to know is how big is the Credit Card.

    It will be interesting if we end up "shotgunning" our purchases across the EU, though not sure would we be better just picking one national focus (ie France or Italy) and locking into them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Them Italian jobbies from Fincantieri look pretty handy to me!



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,881 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Granted the MRV is presumably going to be a bit bigger than an OPV, but is it possible that different sized slipways may allow for the MRV to be built in parallels with whatever is going in the Norweigian/Type26 construction way battle?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42


    not really, I mean if you look at what they have building it’s a complete refresh of the Frigates and Solid Stores ships. So Scotstoun is tied into the Type 26 for at least a decade more if they don’t win the Norwegian contract, even longer if they do, and they are already using other U.K. yards for building modules for the frigates as well (clips today on UKDJ of lower blocks for the fourth one arriving for example), meanwhile Rosyth is building the 31s with current timelines later than 2028 before they are finished the first five, now after that who knows? Does the U.K. order more 31s to keep the line open? Or the 32? H&W is needed for the RFA hulls, not too mention the fact that U.K. shipbuilding personnel is at max as well.


    Either way the RN needs frigates as fast as possible given the material state of the Type 23s so I can’t see them opening up a slot for us (a NATO ally that is looking for at least five billion pound ships is different to a 1 off), so late 2020s/2030s would be more likely from a U.K. yard. Also there’s the Brexit factor at play reportedly, with a G2G EU deal the least “headache inducing”, which seems to be the approach for everything.

    But really, this is still all just “who the hell knows for sure” at this stage, like all the other floated capital projects, I could end up totally wrong of course.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,211 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    The H&W works for the RFAs could end up been a lot smaller than 1st taught with all major work carried out in Navantia yard in spain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42


    while that is likely to be true for the first hull, not sure it is for the others, not too mention that H&W has to basically regenerate their ship building capacity, not sure I would want us to be the first through their build. No if this is to happen it should be on an existing production line with a labour force that knows the design.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,368 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    They are FREMMs. FREMM was co-developed by France and Italy. 18 are in service between them.

    lnterestingly though, the new Constellation-Class (FFG-X) Guided Missile Frigate of the US Navy is also a licenced FREMM derivative.

    I wonder if the USN will be cut off from the programme? I know Italy won't under Meloni, but you wouldn't know what an increasingly hawkish Macron might do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The USN has made so many changes that the Constellations are FREMMs in name only for all intents at this stage, hence why they are behind schedule and blowing out the budgets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,211 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Could we see a former oil support ship been bought in the next 12 months?

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2025/0321/1503209-new-maritime-security-unit/



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,861 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFA_Proteus is a good benchmark, as is https://www.skipsrevyen.no/vi-besoker-kv-bison/734061

    They can even be time chartered so no need to purchase outright.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42


    I doubt it, if this is anything more than a can kicker then it will be the upgrade for the 60s that’s been talked about.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,368 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I don't think we need to overcomplicate the solution to this problem.

    We already have three very capable ocean going survey and logistics vessels in the ownership of the State. As the article suggests from the work of other nations, it wouldn't take an impossible level of innovation to fit these vessels with suitable gear. RV Tom Crean already operates an RSV

    RV Tom Crean, Marine Institute of Ireland

    RV Celtic Explorer, MI, not pictured

    ILV Granuaile, Commissioners of Irish Lights



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,872 ✭✭✭thomil


    I'm going to have to disagree here. I do believe that the Irish Navy is going to need an "in-house" seabed surveillance asset. For starters, those three ships have a pretty full operational schedule already, so I doubt they'd be able to squeeze in a DoD tasking at short notice. Secondly, because these are civilian owned ships, they are an inherent security risk, both with regards to their crews and with regards to the lack of any secure communications or planning facilities. Such a ship might have to act on intelligence that Ireland got from sources that are best left unexposed, and having a civilian crew just provides too many risks for accidental leaks. Also, the Tom Crean or Celtic Explorer suddenly going dark on AIS would inevitably raise suspicion, whilst the same would just be par for the course for a naval vessel. Finally, there could very well be the need for said surveillance asset to take a more active role with regards to threats to underwater infrastructure or general "surprises" found on the seabed, and for that you just need a navy asset.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,861 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    I'd have to agree, they have fairly busy schedules and at least one has non Irish crew members, so there's that.

    However, Granuaile is coming up for sale in the next few years. "One careful owner, never raced or rallied…"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,368 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I'm not saying that the Navy shouldn't get suitable undersea surveillance vessels. In fact they should get several, if we had people to operate them.

    But that solution would be years away. We have a problem, quite literally, today. These Russian ships are stretching the Air Corps ability to track them and are also drawing in NATO surface and subsurface assets.

    The threat to the undersea infrastructure is clear and present. In my opinion, all other considerations should be secondary and those State ships ought to be re-tasked immediately to counter that threat. Any non-Irish crew who don't pass security, should be removed.

    And consideration should be made to refitting Granuaile rather than selling her. She should be modernised and commissioned into the Navy as a surveillance and support ship. At 80 metres and 2,600 tonnes, she is designed for heavy seas operations and specifically for tasks like surveying and offshore data collection. She is also helicopter capable, one operation lacking in all other Naval ships at present. She would do ably as an undersea cable protection asset until purpose built vessels can be built.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,059 ✭✭✭blindsider


    Without straying off topic, do we know if there are concrete plans to replace ILV Granuaile? Has a contract been awarded, or even a tender issued?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Looks like design work for her replacement should be underway, but nothing out to tender yet, they had planned for her replacement around 2028 it seems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 755 ✭✭✭Mr321


    Who does Ireland buy the military ships etc from?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,353 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Mostly the UK up until now, with the ships either being Ex RN (the Corvette's, the Minesweeers, the Peacocks), or built in the UK, (P50/P60s), then there were the home built ones (P20's P31) and now the couple of Kiwi boats.



Advertisement