Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Cork - Light Rail [route options idenfication and initial design underway]

11819202123

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,442 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    A handful is going there - 5 spaces looking at the maps. The bulk of it is proposed to go onto the Blackrock Rd at Ashcroft.

    1000052473.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    Correct, parking spaces are being provided, slightly uphill, but still on the same section of Churchyard Lane. The new spots are also in a proper bay, off the road, unlike the current situation where cars park against the front walls of the houses, occupying most of the downhill road lane:

    image.png

    Also, an additional 16 spaces are to be provided at Ashcroft, here:

    image.png

    So that’s 21 new spaces, all off-street. I think that’s an improvement overall, but there will always be that one person who “needs” to have their car parked right outside their gate, even if it’s a hazard to other traffic. They can avail of the FRO process if they feel that way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,520 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    It's frustrating isn't it, I appreciate that people need parking spaces but there seems to be a real abdication of personal responsibility. Buying a car or house aren't some kind of impulse purchase, it's not reasonable to expect to be able to park indefinitely on the roadway outside your house in a city.

    Where I live is after getting a lot worse in the last 5 years with cars dumped all over the public space. I find it irritating that someone would object to a project like this (one of major public benefit) because of their misplaced sense of entitlement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,456 ✭✭✭bikeman1


    The point that is lost on many is, with improved public transport in a city, the requirement to own one, two or three cars per household is greatly reduced. Many living in cities maintain a driving licence but use the car sharing schemes for the times the need a car. So more space for those who must drive everywhere.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,603 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    For those who don't know the area, where these cars are parked is particularly insane. The cars are literally parked on the road! So much so that cars can't pass one another, instead they have to wait and take turns, with cars driving down the wrong side of the road!

    There is also no footpath outside the pub and the footpath on the other side is tiny. However people often just walk on the road beside the pub, lucky no one has been killed.

    Even without the Luas, this onstreet parking should have been removed years ago. To be honest, if I lived in one of these houses, I'd be delighted to have an off street parking spot. It would be much safer then where they are currently parked and only about 20 meters away.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    I've only been to Cork city a few times so don't claim to have any great knowledge and open to correction from those with more knowledge, but...

    Would it make sense to have the east-bound track turn north after MTU and then use MFR instead of going south and along Curraheen Road? The routes would join again at Dennehy's Cross. That should allow for greater segregation from general traffic and possibly negate pushback due to landtake and general disruption along Curraheen and Wilton Road (the flip side of that is that you get some pushback along MFR but probably less). It also allows more homes and businesses to be served.

    You could also have some trams go round the loop and back to the city (i.e. Wilton Road > Curraheen Road > Melbourn Road > MFR), increasing frequency on the central section. I know there are drawbacks to using separate routes in each direction but the level of shared running looks so bad to me, coupled with the level of objections which will come, make me think it is worth considering here. Maybe it has been considered and rejected, I haven't looked at any reports.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 709 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    The issue then I think is that it doesn't serve CUH as well as it would on Bishopstown Road



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,935 ✭✭✭thomil


    Model Farm Road is a major commuter route into the city and by consequence also a major choke point. The section between MTU and Dennehy’s Cross hosts several major employers in the local IDA technology park, as well as two major schools, all of which generate massive amounts of traffic during commuting hours, not to mention massive obstructions by parents stopping their wankpanzers wherever they want just to drop off their kids. A tram following that road would simply add more traffic to a road that is already over capacity.

    And that’s before we even get to the issue of local resistance. The section along the IDA technology park is pretty doable, but once you get beyond that and closer to the city, the street narrows considerably, and properties are built right up to the street. The outcry when the BusConnect plans were announced was blood-curdling, and a light rail line, even a unidirectional and single track line, would fare no better.

    Personally speaking, avoiding Model Farm Road completely is probably one of the smarter decisions of the route planners. It will not only increase speed on the actual light rail line, it will probably also speed up the delivery of the line by removing one area of heavy resistance against the project. That still leaves Wilton Road, all of Ballincollig, Ballintemple/The Venue Bar and Skehard Road as areas that’ll likely see massive resistance…

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,520 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Controversial opinion here, but I'd consider leaving Ballincollig completely out of the initial phase. Ballincollig brings resistance, doesn't bring huge ridership (density) and Dell/EMC isn't included. Worst of all, because of high probability of local resistance, they've opted for a loop system.

    It's borderline in my opinion! I'd be of the opinion that it's better to roll out an initial phase to MTU and wait until Ballincollig residents start campaigning FOR it. I just don't think fighting with the "save our wankpanzer privilege" crew is worth it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,442 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    I'd agree. "Save our right hand turns" and "save our roundabouts" crew should be left to it. Remember this one from a few years ago? It's like something from a comedy sketch.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,902 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Rather than dropping it, split it into two seperate Railway orders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,520 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yeah for sure that seems like a route forward. There's a hardcore group in Ballincollig that need to come around to understanding that there's more to city transport than just the car. Trying to "win people over" to give them such an expensive gift seems like madness to me.

    I remember that bike lane one well. There were arguments to the tune of "having to slow down our cars is dangerous" and "cycle infrastructure is inappropriate here because nobody cycles". If someone was proposing cycle infrastructure or footpaths or mass transit in my area I'd be asking "how quickly can you do it and what can I do to help"!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,442 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980


    Already seeing the beginnings of resistance in Ballincollig on social media. The Main Street will be one way to facilitate the tram. I can see the "save our two way street" posters already. Best to just dump Ballincollig early I think.

    1000052605.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,094 ✭✭✭✭Zebra3


    Having to slow down is dangerous. 🤣🤣🤣

    Just when you think you’ve heard it all……



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,520 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yeah, someone could crash into the back of you if you need to stop for pedestrian crossings. Similarly: roundabouts are safer than traffic lights because you don't need to stop, you can just blaze on through. And traffic going more slowly means drivers lose concentration and crash, and obviously there's more pollution. Thus the "save our roundabout" campaign was not just born, but successful.

    To add insult to injury, at least one elected representative let it be known that the QUANTITY of public responses would inform his decision on whether to vote for or against the scheme. There was a subsequent scramble to try and get more positive than negative submissions in. I don't know how the council design teams put up with it tbh

    Watching that all play out genuinely annoyed me. Ballincollig can be wiped off the transport map, for all I care now. If they slow down the delivery of Luas Cork just cut them loose. Keep your two way street lads, you're grand.

    A "cut them luas" campaign might be in order.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 349 ✭✭GusherING


    Where will the terminals for storing trams etc be located? In Kent?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,442 ✭✭✭✭namloc1980




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,065 ✭✭✭irishfeen


    Looking at the mess with Dublin Airport and its non public transport rail link to the city I think a relatively short extension to their current plan is very manageable. I am currently working on a submission for the public consultation. I will upload details once it’s ready for comments but would involve a new branch heading from the CUH stop, up Doughcloyne and up to Spur Hill to meet a new non light rail line directly to the airport (2km). Gradient from Spur Hill to the airport is the issue which would have to be overcome but there are literally green fields the entire route up to the terminal in Cork airport.

    I think it’s vital for the CUH station to be future proofed if an extension leg wouldn’t be part of the initial construction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,520 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I don't mean to shoot down your suggestion, and all ideas are welcome, but I would have preferred that what was proposed already would be the East-West corridor, and that a new North-South corridor would serve the airport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    I think Carrigaline and Douglas are a higher priority than the airport and it would be essentially impossible to include all 3 in a single line.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,520 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I had written a more lengthy post saying something similar. You could do a 2-way "loop" line using N27, Airport, Carrigaline, Ringaskiddy, Douglas, Town, but I'm not sure it would be a good idea. More likely 2 lines, one directly South to the airport and another to the South-East. And very hard to justify one or deliver the other.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 709 ✭✭✭DylanQuestion


    Another option for the airport and Douglas is the R851, which is pretty wide from Kinsale Road to Donnybrook Hill



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭Captainsatnav


    I think the airport is a non runner . A frequent, dedicated service from city centre (via park and ride), Douglas, CUH/Wilton and Mahon Point would work fine. See Edinburgh, Liverpool as examples I can think off top of my head.

    Bloody Bus Connects though, 7 years after announcement, not even started work. 💀🙃



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,902 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    Hopefully this is the first of several LUAS lines for Cork. Covering all the major trip generators in the first 2/3 should be the priority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 349 ✭✭GusherING


    Sinn Fein TDs in Cork are calling for a north south luas in Cork.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 501 ✭✭✭BagofWeed


    The solution that will keep everyone happy will be the solution that will result in there being no Luas for Cork. They'll bicker and argue and want amendments to the plans and they'll be objections and hysteria from business owners and residents groups.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,398 ✭✭✭Consonata


    I have to say, having such expense for such a low ceiling for capacity seems very poor.

    I'm pro having a Luas in Cork, but at that point a half decent bus service along the corridor would yield like 60% of the capacity at a fraction of the cost.

    They really should be carving out a proper alignment that has scope for a much higher capacity/frequency as necessary



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,773 ✭✭✭snotboogie


    I think people are making unfair comparisons in their head to Dublin which acts more as a proto subway system than a light rail network. 16 million per year is pretty standard for a regional light rail network; most around Europe have between 10 and 20 million per year. The entire Bus Eireann network in Cork city had 16 million passengers last year. There is no way you are getting 10 million on a corridor and that's before you consider the complete mess made of Bus Connects, which has been stripped back again and again in endless public consultations where now there isn't anything close to a contiguous bus lane planned anywhere in the entire network. Without the infrastructure, you won't get reliability, without reliability you wont get people out of their cars. I think the usage will go considerably above 16 million after 5 years or so when the system beds in and frequency inevitable increases but even at 16 million it completely changes public transport in Cork.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 23,603 Mod ✭✭✭✭bk


    But it doesn't have a low ceiling for capacity! As far as I can tell, it is being built to the same capacity standard as the Red line in Dublin, which is the busiest transport line in the country!

    Of course it won't start off with that level of frequency as the Red line, simply because Cork really doesn't need that much capacity, but it has plenty of room to grow as the city grows.

    Post edited by bk on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    In terms of the airport, it would be very easy to run the Luas down the South Link Road, leaving one lane in each direction. Airport to Kent is relatively straightforward but to make Luas viable, it would probably have to go further north. Ideally to Apple but getting there would be difficult if not impossible. Anyway, a north/south route is a different matter entirely and needs to be looked at separately to east/west.



Advertisement