Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

steorn 'free energy' - breakthrough or snake oil?

  • 18-08-2006 03:10PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 2,046 ✭✭✭


    Rte News has a story about Steorn, an Irish company who have advertised in the Economist issuing a challenge to the scientific community to test and report on their 'free energy' technology based on rotation and magnetic fields.

    From their website it seems they have no products for sale, free energy or otherwise. Even if that's not a red light it's a lack of a green light for track record. The big red light is their free energy claim. It's one thing to say you can't identify the source of over unity output, but it's quite another to take a leap of faith and assert it is being created.

    While they say they need their technology publicly validated before they can proceed I'm sceptical. You only need to convince investors who can get independant scientific analysis done. But this publicity will no doubt catch the attention of many investors, and some may clamour to 'get in on the ground floor'. So it could be a dirty big fraud. Against that, fraudsters tend to be more publicity shy, but maybe that's what we're supposed to think.

    Will be a very interesting one to follow in any event.


Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 144 ✭✭gonk


    When I heard their CEO talking on RTE radio today about "creating" energy, it made me think he doesn't have a clue about basic physics.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 196 ✭✭kurisu


    excuse this but it is a double post and i posted it also in another thread on the same topic:


    i suggest we remain open minded about this but if it is just a publicity stunt by steorn i believe we should be united in a boycott of steorn , there idea may be outlandish and hard to believe but its no different than claiming to have a cure for cancer or aids , there company deserves nothing less than anihilation if they are lying!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,046 ✭✭✭democrates


    kurisu wrote:
    i suggest we remain open minded about this but if it is just a publicity stunt by steorn i believe we should be united in a boycott of steorn , there idea may be outlandish and hard to believe but its no different than claiming to have a cure for cancer or aids , there company deserves nothing less than anihilation if they are lying!
    It is possible the coefficient of performance of the device itself is in fact over-unity, just like a heat pump drawing heat energy from the air, or a solar panel absorbing solar radiation. They infer that they have found no cooling of the surroundings in their experiments, and if that's true it's not drawing heat energy. The panel of physicists should determine that easily.

    But if the panel finds the device is in fact operating over unity, how do they explain it. It is then most plausible that it is drawing some other kind of energy from the surroundings, say cosmic radiation which can penetrate lead one metre thick.

    I think they've set themselves up for some loss of face in calling the first law of thermodynamics into question. That may be a clever ruse to attract publicity however, even if the panel reports that the conservation of energy law has not been disproven, but also reports that the device operates over unity and how it does so remains a puzzle, a lot of publicity will have been generated. At least we can say that their PR device is over-unity.:D

    If in the end it's all a sham, good luck to them in their future careers, and if investors are defrauded, good luck staying free. I don't see how they can benefit if this is a fraud. Since they've no products, what's there to boycott? I reckon they'll get what they deserve, whatever that is.

    PS, can you give a link to the other thread?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭rooferPete


    Hi,

    I saw the interview and the C.E.O. said the product was against all the rules of physics, he is I understand a Scientist.

    The first report I heard was on the radio, I thought they had advertised offering jobs to the scientists to prove them wrong about the product.

    Apparantly they didn't set out to develop the system it was a by-product of another system they were working on.

    Maybe they have something, I hope they do even if it can break the rules of perpetual motion in a small way look at all the energy they could save in small appliances.

    .


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭Sarsfield


    rooferPete wrote:
    I hope they do even if it can break the rules of perpetual motion in a small way

    I don't think it's possible to change one of the most fundamental rules of science in a small way :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭rooferPete


    Hi Sarsfield,

    Agreed ;) by a small way I meant if the system could power something simple like a walkman or other battery powered appliances it would be positive.

    Perhaps they have not broken the mould just discovered another way of utilising the end product.

    Obviously I'm no Scientist and certainly have very little knowledge of physics but I would like to think at least one item appeared that had us thinking in "The glass is half full mode" ;)

    .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,277 ✭✭✭SeanW


    not very hopeful here but I'm prepared to keep an open mind.

    https://u24.gov.ua/
    Join NAFO today:

    Help us in helping Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭enda1


    Oh my sweet Jesus people. Get this through your heads....

    THIS IS TOTAL BOLLOX!!!

    Over unity cnat happen. It is not like a cure for aids or cancer which are both theoretically opssible, this is not. You cannot get more than you put in. Can not. Never.

    These fools obviously forgot to carry the one.....

    Maybe they stumbled on some weird form of energy conversion, conversion being the important word, whereby they have yet to find where they are taking the energy from. But even more likely is they will be publicly disgraced and not be able reproduce their results like those cold fusion dudes years ago.

    I cant believe people pay fools like this attention.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 964 ✭✭✭Boggle


    Looked to me like a cheap ploy to advertise their turbines... And maybe to get som investors interested.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,074 ✭✭✭BendiBus


    enda1 wrote:
    ...which are both theoretically opssible, this is not.

    True. This is theoretically impossible ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭enda1


    Nothing can ever be proved impossible. it is up to people making claims to prove something can happen. As Richard Dawkin(s?) says in one of his books, and I'm paraphrasing here...

    It is not possible to prove that there is not a teapot orbiting the sun on its own. However if it someone claims it to be there show it to me!

    Anyways these guys are plain wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,046 ✭✭✭democrates


    I've posted about the possibility of an over-unity device, eg a geothermal heat-pump is over-unity, eg 1kWh in, 2kWh out, because it's drawing heat from the ground. That's not the same thing as perpetual motion fantasies about free energy, I don't believe we can create something from nothing.

    For clarity I'll stick to 'over-unity co-efficient of performance', or >1COP. The steorn guys may have stumbled upon a new source of environmental energy with their device, I entertain that notion until I hear different. Even if they have, hurdle 2 would be health concerns, we can depend on the carbon industry to fuel fears: 'could be like having a phone-mast in your mouth'. But yes, could be Pons and Fleischman all over again. On the other hand, look at the amount of pure science that was funded by greedy people with spare wealth in response, not a thouroughly bad result.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,359 ✭✭✭Sarsfield


    Interview with the CEO of Steorn

    http://www.radioireland.ie/lastword/2182006-18.wmv

    About 16 minutes in.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 109 ✭✭GreenDoor


    What do scientists really know? Only the tip of the iceberg IMO. Long ago you'd be hung for saying the world was round and not flat.

    Todays scientists claim there is such a thing as dark energy/matter etc. They don't know what even gravity is only it's results.

    So, why do scientists dismiss this when they know little. The rules of the universe are being rewritten all the time.

    If this invention is real it will be one of the greatest inventions of all time and the company will probably make microsoft look poor!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,046 ✭✭✭democrates


    Sarsfield wrote:
    Interview with the CEO of Steorn

    http://www.radioireland.ie/lastword/2182006-18.wmv

    About 16 minutes in.
    Nice one sarsfield.

    He used a lot of the exact phrases as appear on their web site.

    I find it interesting that they again get the spoke in for potential uses of such a technology, we can all deduce that and it adds nothing to the 'does it work' question. The lack of clarity on the basic questions like does it need a starter? how long has a prototype run for? why not show it operating in a video? is not encouraging.

    If they're telling the truth that scientists have so far confirmed it has a >1COP yet wouldn't go public, and given the geopolitical implications of such a technology, maybe it's conceivable that they're banking on max public attention to avoid it from being buried.

    The story of looking for a power source for atm security cameras is dubious. ATM's have power already, and if they can't use that hidden cameras with batteries are nothing new, though maybe they were looking for a longer lasting independant power source. Still a stretch, why weren't they looking at fuel cells or something mainstream.

    Anyway as I understand it magnets lose their magnetism faster if the flux is repeatedly stressed, so even absenting cosmic radiation or what not the claim that nothing is used up surely falls right there, and conservation stands.

    One for conspiracy theorists he threw in is their history of doing internet security for international agencies. Oh well obviously they got hold of hush hush material when they had access to scully and mulders server, probably originating from Roswell. (hey mods, any chance of an alien smiley with Elvis quiff and sideburns?).

    I've looked at a lot of sites claiming motors powered purely by permanent magnets (I was actually looking for diy turbine research, honest) and any day now they'll all have a public demonstration, and if not, men in dark suits intervened and they've gone underground. My street self says they're a bunch of crackpots, dreamers, and charlitains. I can easily imagine this being based on a view that the energy crisis is yielding another dot-com cash splash, just say you have a breakthrough energy technology, then live like a king off the proceeds in the Cayman Islands. Maybe I should form Rondomagno.

    On the other hand, there's Tesla, whom the steorn ceo mentioned, as have others (strap yourself in...). Despite the latching loonies, it's fair to say he was a genius. Given how Edison and Morgan shafted and blacklisted him stopping his work at Wardenclyfe, and how the US government grabbed his papers when he died, I'm inclined to keep an open mind on what discoveries of his may remain unexploited. But not free energy in contravention of the laws of physics, it's a myth that he claimed that as a man of science, rather he meant it in the same sense that we don't get a monthly bill from the sun for our solar panels.

    I find the device hard to imagine as I think of magnetism in terms of springs, but maybe I'm way off. If magnetic energy streams between the poles of magnets is it not conceivable that this energy can be harnessed? In the nuclear age we have no problem accepting the vast power locked up in atoms or in cosmic rays. Whatever the truth in this case, I'm generally in favour of trying new things.

    But it also has a smell of a viral marketing demo for an emerging internet ad company, "see how smart we are, how easily we drum up worldwide attention, how we can get people to think outside the box!". If that's the case it smacks of the 'I can make my head explode' gimmick, hard to see how they could capitalise again, and any anthropological research on public reaction is free to anyone on the net.

    http://www.steornwatch.com/ offers a new wrinkle. The bottom of their page has a disclaimer:
    Steorn Watch is an independent non-commercial community critically tracking the 'free energy' claims of Steorn Ltd UK.
    STEORN WATCH IS IN NO WAY CONNECTED WITH STEORN LTD., CITIGATE D.R., THEIR BACKERS OR AFFILIATES.
    But that does not refer to Steorn the Irish company. Further suspicion is aroused by steornwatch being registered through http://www.domainsbyproxy.com/ so that the owners identity is kept secret. But it 'seems' to be designed by http://www.headsetoptions.org, and the html has links to http://sonspring.com/, so it could be a completely indpendant thing.

    In any event I'm grateful as Lost is off the air and this makes for an interesting substitute diversion, like thousands of others, I don't mind devoting a little free time energy to this...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,166 ✭✭✭enda1


    democrates wrote:
    If they're telling the truth that scientists have so far confirmed it has a >1COP yet wouldn't go public.

    Your regular heat pump has a COP of greater than one, up at the 3-4 area. This is not about COP! Sure a wind turbine has an infinite COP as it cost you nothing to run (in terms of energy).

    Their claim is that it is over unity. ie that energy in is less than energy out. Thats the claim they have to back up.
    democrates wrote:
    If magnetic energy streams between the poles of magnets is it not conceivable that this energy can be harnessed?

    em, this energy can and is harnessed. Ever heard of a motor? When harnessing the enegy you deplete the magnet of its magnetism. A "permanent magert" is only "permanent" if it is stored correctly and its magnetism is not allowed to leak.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,473 ✭✭✭RE*AC*TOR


    Internet Marketing Company Steorn - creates perpetual motion device.


    Oh yeah - that's totally believable. I hear KFC just invented a new microprocessor too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Jaden


    http://www.steorn.net/en/coverage.html

    Have a look at their coverage page.
    Now look at the date of the press release:

    Steorn Announce "Free Energy" Technology

    Irish company Steorn have announced a revoloutionary free energy technology. More
    The Guardian | 1 April 2006

    End of story.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭HashSlinging


    HTTP 404 - File not found

    HTTP 404 - File not found

    HTTP 404 - File not found

    HTTP 404 - File not found

    erm...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,393 ✭✭✭Jaden


    I have captured the site in a .jpg, see attached.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 731 ✭✭✭jman0


    In 2001 Steorn were apparently playing some other game:
    http://web.archive.org/web/20010303074205/http://www.steorn.com/index.html


Advertisement