Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Forum Discussion

  • 21-01-2008 01:36PM
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 237 ✭✭


    Sadly no. I wouldn't have much faith in them to be able to show you much.

    Rubbish-Colm you have a terrible attitude to fitness, any qualified trainer knows there is no right or wrong way and variety is the key but you just harp on about your way of training(your business interest) canned programs,

    These days should be gone and individuals should be treated as individuals, any decent trainer can teach a squat, its the lads who skip been taught that do it with poor technique-Colm{my way is the only way} o reilly.

    ps, your not exactly in the best shape yourself. maybe you do nt practise what you preach.


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭Colm_OReilly


    any qualified trainer knows there is no right or wrong way

    Proper movement is based on antropometry and biomechanics.
    variety is the key but you just harp on about your way of training(your business interest) canned programs

    I was asked for a beginner program. I don't receive any monetary compensation when someone does SS or simplefit.
    any decent trainer can teach a squat

    True. I'm going on my observations of trainers in the gyms I've seen and those I've seen from other courses. Just my observations.
    its the lads who skip been taught that do it with poor technique-Colm{my way is the only way} o reilly

    I'll presume this is a personal attack. So I won't respond directly.
    ps, your not exactly in the best shape yourself. maybe you do nt practise what you preach.

    This is a personal attack. However I will respond. I do workout, as I "preach", my times are recorded, my flaws and failings are not hidden.

    Lots of love,
    Colm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 165 ✭✭The FitnessDock


    mickoo wrote: »
    Any qualified trainer knows there is no right or wrong way

    If there is no right or wrong way, how could a qualified trainer show you what's "right"? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,819 ✭✭✭✭g'em


    Attack the post and not the poster please. And if you have any personal grievances against a member of the board, keep it off the board.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    If there is no right or wrong way, how could a qualified trainer show you what's "right"? :confused:

    How pedantic...

    He said the above quoted in reference to how to squat, not on training systems. While there will be variation in how people squat due to limb lengths and other fancy words, there basically is a RIGHT, that is to say "safe" way to squat (I'm not bothered using words like biomechanics since I don't see the need to try and impress my knowledge by way of verbal jousting...).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 237 ✭✭mickoo


    Proper movement is based on antropometry and biomechanics.
    Colm

    You misquoted me, i did not say right or wrong way of doing the squat, i meant right or wrong system of training-meaning crossfit is not the be all and end all of exercise as you seem to make out.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 165 ✭✭The FitnessDock


    Hanley wrote: »
    How pedantic...He said the above quoted in reference to how to squat, not on training systems.


    Hanley - he was talking about training systems.

    Mickoo - Colm was giving very helpful advice to How Strange, going into a lot of detail in his recommendations. Obviously, he believes in Crossfit and the advice he gives is influenced by their teachings. If you disagree with the advice he gives, why not explain why you disagree and give your own personal suggestions? That'd be a lot more constructive than making personal attacks.

    If I remember correctly, you're a qualified personal trainer yourself so I'm sure you have a lot to offer in terms of useful advice on exercise and nutrition.

    PAUL


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,931 ✭✭✭Jimmy Bottlehead


    Hanley wrote: »
    How pedantic...

    ... since I don't see the need to try and impress my knowledge by way of verbal jousting...)

    I'm sorry, I just found that funny :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 237 ✭✭mickoo


    why not explain why you disagree and give your own personal suggestions? That'd be a lot more constructive than making personal attacks.

    If I remember correctly, you're a qualified personal trainer yourself so I'm sure you have a lot to offer in terms of useful advice on exercise and nutrition.

    PAUL
    Thats the whole point,
    my problem is not with crossfit but with people who make out that everyone needs to do crossfit and the rest of the fitness world is not needed, colm just goes on and on about crossfit and knocks other systems just because its in his business interest to promote it.
    i dont tell everyone that personal training is for them, its great for some and unnecessary for others-try crossfit but also try loads of other systems and some good will come out of all them, plus you'll have a better understanding what works for you..


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    mickoo wrote: »
    Thats the whole point,
    my problem is not with crossfit but with people who make out that everyone needs to do crossfit and the rest of the fitness world is not needed, colm just goes on and on about crossfit and knocks other systems just because its in his business interest to promote it.
    i dont tell everyone that personal training is for them, its great for some and unnecessary for others-try crossfit but also try loads of other systems and some good will come out of all them, plus you'll have a better understanding what works for you..

    And don't forget how steady state cardio is worthless and intervals on a C2 is the way to go. Sure what would those bodybuilders whose job it is to lose fat and make muscle know about dieting...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 237 ✭✭mickoo


    Hanley wrote: »
    And don't forget how steady state cardio is worthless and intervals on a C2 is the way to go. Sure what would those bodybuilders whose job it is to lose fat and make muscle know about dieting...

    What?? i dont know if your agreeing or disagreeing here!! im saying that there is many ways of getting in shape, i reccommend a balance of everything-weights, cardio and good diet..


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    mickoo wrote: »
    What?? i dont know if your agreeing or disagreeing here!! im saying that there is many ways of getting in shape, i reccommend a balance of everything-weights, cardio and good diet..

    I'm agreeing... Alot of posts on this board would have you believe that HIIT is the only effective way to do cardio for fat loss and anything else will throw you into a catabolic state that you might never recover from...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 237 ✭✭mickoo


    Cool-and just to let you know where i stand-i believe bodybuilders brought the fitness industry into the future and should be credited for this-but as always, variety is the key..


  • Moderators, Arts Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 9,666 Mod ✭✭✭✭BossArky


    Hanley wrote: »
    ...anything else will throw you into a catabolic state that you might never recover from...

    lol!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    mickoo wrote: »
    Cool-and just to let you know where i stand-i believe bodybuilders brought the fitness industry into the future and should be credited for this-but as always, variety is the key..

    Yeah, but the problem with bodybuilding is that alll of their stuff works, but it isn't neccesarily backed up by science. And it's not all that "fun". So like it's worthless. Obviously.

    It constantly amazes me when people are dismissive of bodybuilders for being "unfunctional" when they're probably 50-100% stronger than the average guy on the street, evidently it counts for nothing when it comes to "function". They'd be screwed if they had to climb walls and scale ropes to avoid wild animals 'n' sh!t.

    FWIW, if you're looking to build muscle and lose bodyfat then a bodybuilding inspired routine should be one of your first ports of call, since it what those guys dedicate their lives to doing.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 165 ✭✭The FitnessDock


    Hanley wrote: »
    FWIW, if you're looking to build muscle and lose bodyfat then a bodybuilding inspired routine should be one of your first ports of call, since it what those guys dedicate their lives to doing.

    I'd actually recommend a powerlifting program ahead of a bodybuilding routine for building muscle. I see so many beginners get so bogged down in creating the "ideal program" (always talking more about what split they're doing than actually training!) that they lose focus.

    Concentraining on getting stronger in the basic lifts (bench, squat and deadlift) would focus their attention and they'd soon forget about getting a "good pump"!

    Nearly all of the bodybuilding mags consist of 6 days a week split routines ghost-written by journalists and endorsed by huge bodybuilders who take "supplements" which you're unlikely to find in any shop. Not useful for a drug-free novice IMHO.

    I always recommend "Brawn" by Stuart McRobert as a great place to start.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,602 ✭✭✭celestial


    mickoo wrote: »
    Thats the whole point,
    my problem is not with crossfit but with people who make out that everyone needs to do crossfit and the rest of the fitness world is not needed, colm just goes on and on about crossfit and knocks other systems just because its in his business interest to promote it.
    i dont tell everyone that personal training is for them, its great for some and unnecessary for others-try crossfit but also try loads of other systems and some good will come out of all them, plus you'll have a better understanding what works for you..

    Great point in bringing some balance to this forum, I do notice that moderate or low intensity appears to be getting run into the ground on all counts over the past while - the more I learn about fitness the more I am feeling that everyone is different and you just have to experiment with different approaches to find out what works best for you..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,234 ✭✭✭Edwardius


    mickoo wrote: »
    Thats the whole point,
    my problem is not with crossfit but with people who make out that everyone needs to do crossfit and the rest of the fitness world is not needed, colm just goes on and on about crossfit and knocks other systems just because its in his business interest to promote it.

    Just a quick word on "promoting" crossfit. It should be mentioned that it's possible to do a lot of the workouts with negligible equipment, demo videos for exercises are available (for free) on the main website and to this day crossfit hasn't made a cent off of me, apart from cost of a t-shirt! You can crossfit in a college gym, or a crunch gym, in your garage or back garden. All of this can be done with a barbell, a set of rings and somewhere to do pull ups. How would Crossfit or Colm profit from that, especially given that you can try the system for free, with one on one assistance on the open days? Now you might not like the system or disagree with it, but maybe it'd be more constructive for all if you were to present a critique of crossfit and express in detail why you feel it's not suitable rather than whining at somebody that's trying to offer constructive advice to someone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 165 ✭✭The FitnessDock


    Dead Ed wrote: »
    Now you might not like the system or disagree with it, but maybe it'd be more constructive for all if you were to present a critique of crossfit and express in detail why you feel it's not suitable rather than whining at somebody that's trying to offer constructive advice to someone.

    Good point - some constructive debate would be great. There are many knowledgeable forum members, who train in different ways so it's great to hear what they've learned from their experiences over the years. For example, I have no background in powerlifting so I'm always keen to hear what Hanley has to say on the matter.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,415 ✭✭✭Racing Flat


    Dead Ed wrote: »
    Just a quick word on "promoting" crossfit.

    Something I've wondered about...new to the boards so not too familiar with all rules, but there are often posts here where someone is asking about an injury. And occasionally some therapist replies - 'we deal with this in my clinic, pm me for details' and they get banned, presumably for free advertising/soliciting business. But when someone posts that they want to get fit or start some exercise and someone replies 'pop in to my gym and we'll have a look' it gets ignored. Surely this is the same thing?

    While I don't agree with the manner in which Colm was attacked on page 3 of this thread (particularly commenting on his own state of fitness - have you not heard 'do as I say, not as I do'?), I'm not too surprised it happened, he has been very quick (and you might say insulting) to rubbish anybody's view if it involves aerobic exercise. The argument put forward usually is that you use more energy doing high intensity exercise rather than aerobic, but the counter to that is that you can only do the high intensity for short time periods. So aerobic exercise has its place...

    IMO this forum can get frustrating - someone can post in looking for advice on losing weight, getting fit, putting on muscle, running a race, body building, weight lifting and the replies are often the same in each case - do Cross Fit and eat protein. The idea of doing aerobic work or eating carbohydrates is usually met with derision. Beware the exercise/diet fad I say.

    Fianlly I liked Hanley's point on not caring for words like biomechanics. I've no problem with people using such words if it's done appropriately. For someone to say something along the lines of 'Squats involve knowledge of anthropometrics and biomechanics' doesn't tell us anything. If this was followed by 'And I have trained extensively in this area' or 'CrossFit is based on these principles' a point supporting an argument may be made. But on this forum people seem to use these words to win an argument. If it sounds scientific it must be true.....BS in most of these cases the exercises are merely based on theory. Anyone can have a theory. This is not evidence. And while I don't expect all exercises to be evidence-based - these things take time, in the meantime personal experience may vouch for these exercises, hence the value of these boards. But without the evidence you can only put forwrad your theory and respect other theories. You can't rubbish anyone else's theory till you have the evidence...

    My two cents.
    Off for a run and some carbs now :D.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 113 ✭✭Scottty2Hottty


    'I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing.' Socrates ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,388 ✭✭✭✭rubadub


    celestial wrote: »
    Great point in bringing some balance to this forum, I do notice that moderate or low intensity appears to be getting run into the ground on all counts over the past while
    I see it as people just blue in the teeth dispelling myths and misunderstood/misinterperated facts, so it might come across as abrupt since many dont bother to search for info, there are often threads with detailed answers on the same page a few days old, and someone else will come along and ask the exact same thing, "bloke in the pub told me about ideal fat burning zone" , "how do I tone" etc. I enjoy some posters styles, Hanleys comments on the guy toning at 13+reps etc were funny, esp. when he came back for more, oblivious. I like his eat, lift, sleep- "get lifting and stop talking about it" mentality.

    Colm has great advice and patience for beginners, and some experienced lifters might get put off, yet he is not advising them, and probably would so differently (e.g. the whole "dont bother with bicep curls" thing.) Many seem ready to pounce on any advice, ignoring who it was for originally, and wanting to object rather than add or give alternatives with good reason.
    everyone is different and you just have to experiment with different approaches to find out what works best for you..
    That is it. I have said before I do not eat anything I do not like, as I would not keep it up. People should not do exercise they do not like, they should find something that suits them and they will keep up for the rest of their days.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 21,981 ✭✭✭✭Hanley


    'I am the wisest man alive, for I know one thing, and that is that I know nothing.' Socrates ;)

    Very nice choice there.
    Something I've wondered about...new to the boards so not too familiar with all rules, but there are often posts here where someone is asking about an injury. And occasionally some therapist replies - 'we deal with this in my clinic, pm me for details' and they get banned, presumably for free advertising/soliciting business. But when someone posts that they want to get fit or start some exercise and someone replies 'pop in to my gym and we'll have a look' it gets ignored. Surely this is the same thing?

    While I don't agree with the manner in which Colm was attacked on page 3 of this thread (particularly commenting on his own state of fitness - have you not heard 'do as I say, not as I do'?), I'm not too surprised it happened, he has been very quick (and you might say insulting) to rubbish anybody's view if it involves aerobic exercise. The argument put forward usually is that you use more energy doing high intensity exercise rather than aerobic, but the counter to that is that you can only do the high intensity for short time periods. So aerobic exercise has its place...

    IMO this forum can get frustrating - someone can post in looking for advice on losing weight, getting fit, putting on muscle, running a race, body building, weight lifting and the replies are often the same in each case - do Cross Fit and eat protein. The idea of doing aerobic work or eating carbohydrates is usually met with derision. Beware the exercise/diet fad I say.

    Fianlly I liked Hanley's point on not caring for words like biomechanics. I've no problem with people using such words if it's done appropriately. For someone to say something along the lines of 'Squats involve knowledge of anthropometrics and biomechanics' doesn't tell us anything. If this was followed by 'And I have trained extensively in this area' or 'CrossFit is based on these principles' a point supporting an argument may be made. But on this forum people seem to use these words to win an argument. If it sounds scientific it must be true.....BS in most of these cases the exercises are merely based on theory. Anyone can have a theory. This is not evidence. And while I don't expect all exercises to be evidence-based - these things take time, in the meantime personal experience may vouch for these exercises, hence the value of these boards. But without the evidence you can only put forwrad your theory and respect other theories. You can't rubbish anyone else's theory till you have the evidence...

    My two cents.
    Off for a run and some carbs now :D.

    In fairness to Colm, he doesn't just say "pay me for crossfit", he does give advice and free links. BUT a skeptic could say ad revenue and such is earned from it, as is the chance of some possible new recruits. Good thing I'm not a skeptic so!!

    I've said it time and time again, HIIT is not the only answer. Sure it's something that could work, but I don't know if anyone's tried to do HIIT with bad DOMS. Suffice to say, it's not very nice. And tbh, basing this off nothing more than my own personal feelings, the chance of injury is probably higher than with steady state too. Also, telling a newb to do HIIT may or may not be a good idea. Like I wouldn't suggest someone with a few weeks of training starts working with 3 rep maxes, so why should they do it with "cardio" (or is it metcon these days?).

    I laughed my a$$ off at the bolded part above, it's one of my major grievances here too. The typical reply would seem to be read the stickies, lift some weights, do some crossfit and avoid supplements at all costs. Half the time it's regardless of a persons goals. That being said, they are steps that will probably help. The thing that I see happening more and more is that people see more experienced posters giving advice and just parrot the same stuff on other threads when they might have been asking the very same question 3 months ago. It really develops into a case of the blind leading the blind. I've gotten into a lot of arguments here because I post on what I've done and what has worked for me. And also those I train with. The problem is it's not what's in vogue on t-nation, or it doesn't have studies to support it, so alot of the time it's treated with contempt. That's an argument for another day tho.

    But yeah.... I'm just rambling at this stage. It's funny tho that someone like Racing Flat who is only new to the forum, but is more knowledgable than many here has spotted the culture already, and recently we've seen the return of Mairt who citied similar problems for not posting here in the past (and I don't know if anyone has seen pictures of, but if they have youd agree he knows his stuff).

    James
    -Theory and whatnot is good, but I'd rather do something that I know will give results.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,415 ✭✭✭Racing Flat


    What's the saying (in relation to medical interventions I've heard it)?
    'Practice without theory is potentially dangerous, theory without practice is a waste of time'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,415 ✭✭✭Racing Flat


    Hanley wrote: »
    The typical reply would seem to be read the stickies, lift some weights, do some crossfit and avoid supplements at all costs. Half the time it's regardless of a persons goals.

    What gets my goat is when someone posts advice and they are asked - 'What are your goals' but I wonder why bother asking them that if the answer is the same for everyone anyway. I expect the advice to be individually tailored based on the individual goals, but the advice is more often than not the same regardless of goals, so I repeat, Why bother asking them their goals if there's only one way to do things anyway? In the medical world it's known as 'recipe' treatment.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,819 ✭✭✭✭g'em


    “He has a right to criticize, who has a heart to help.” - Abraham Lincoln.

    This topic of the state of the board arises time after time after time, and the fact that it does proves to me what a succesful forum this is. The ability for posters to engage in discourse and healthy debate and constantly challenge what we think means that we haven't lost the ability to look forward. It would be a very, very dull place altogether if we just accepted everything on sight.

    Racing Flat - we have a number of people on the board who offer a variety of services to the members. Techinically, yes, it can be validly argued that there is free advertisement involved and Dragan and myself have had lengthy discussions about this very recently with the Admins and other Mods about whether or not these posters should be allowed "tout" their wares, be it exercise assistance or supplements or various physiological treaments. Each "advertiser" is allowed to post on a case-by-case basis. Those people who sign up and whose first 5 posts are pure shills or blatant adverts get banned. Those who sign up with the primary purpose of engaging in the forum's discussions and introduce a product/ service as an addition to their contribution (perhaps as a Sig Link for example) will generally be given some leeway. While supplements/ PTs/ treatments/ classes are not an inextricable part of Fitness, they are an important addition to it, and we believe that the fairest way to offer the full spectrum of health and exercise advice to posters is to give them option to explore information from people who are "in the business" as it were.

    Medical advice is just a pure no-no though - a legal nightmare as far as we're concerned. This is a privately owned board after all, and the notion of "Freedom of Speech" doesn't actually exist.

    There are a lot of ego's on this board, some bigger, more obnoxious and more stubborn than others. I'm sure that not everyone agrees with what I say all the time, just as I know I don't agree with everything else that's said. But so what? There's room for everyone. If someone has issues with CrossFit, suggest an alternative. In all fairness to Colm, while I don't think that CrossFit is the be-all and end-all of Fitness, he's one poster who absolutely goes out of his way to answer queries. Criticise to your hearts content (just don't get personal and keep it civil) but why not make it productive and suggest an alternative? Some of the most important things I've learnt have been when people challenge the doctrines I believe in and I'm forced to question them myself - sometimes it turns out I was right all along, other times I make modifications and see what happens.

    So, Hanley, much like you I tend to post about experiences that I've been through and lessons I've learned - I guess we all do. That doesn't make them right or wrong, simply that they've worked for me. My opinions on certain things have changed dramatically over the years but I don't see anything wrong with that, it's a natural progression. And if other posters choose to parrot what you or I or Dragan or Roper Or Boru. or Colm or t-ha or rubadub or wasabi or Vegeta or amazingemmet or hunnymonster or hardtrainer or Transform or tribulus advise then so the hell what? All of these people are speaking from experience - powerlifting, bodybuilding, acrobatic, marathon-running, personal-training experience. And at the end of the day when it comes down to it, we're all singing from the same hymn sheet - eat well, get moving, enjoy exercise i.e. we really do keep it simple. Arguing and debating over the 10% that's different from person to person is what keeps the forum alive.

    We can only tell someone so much - it's up to them to read a bit more and put a plan into action. Of course there are the people who come, ask questions, leech the forum dry with those questions and disappear into oblivion never to be heard of again, but there are also the people who stick around and decide to learn a bit more. I've noticed too that the "next generation" of Fitness posters have begun to echo the addvice they were given three months ago, but again so what? they, too, will begin to ask questions of their own and challenege their doctrines.
    Hanley wrote:
    The typical reply would seem to be read the stickies, lift some weights, do some crossfit and avoid supplements at all costs. Half the time it's regardless of a persons goals.
    What gets my goat is when someone posts advice and they are asked - 'What are your goals' but I wonder why bother asking them that if the answer is the same for everyone anyway. I expect the advice to be individually tailored based on the individual goals, but the advice is more often than not the same regardless of goals, so I repeat, Why bother asking them their goals if there's only one way to do things anyway? In the medical world it's known as 'recipe' treatment.
    Is it not fair to say that the vast majority of people who come here to ask questions fall under the same broad categories: they want to 'tone up', lose fat and get fit, or in other words they all have the same goals? While there are "typical replies" for sure, doing crossfit and avoiding supplements is only something that has cropped up recently. CrossFit crops up primarily because, as I said before, very often Colm is the only person to reply to a poster. And avoiding supplements? I'd argue that there's a 50:50 opinion on that one, both sidees making great arguments.

    Individual, tailored porgrams are by and large not necessary for the average poster. Merely getting off their arse, moving more and eating less sugar will go a long way towards improving their situation. For the more advanced lifter or for someone who wants very, very specific questions answered they'll probably go to a specialised forum or source of information. Hanely would you come to this forum to find out information about how solve a problem you were having with your bench shirt? Or would a National-level athelete come here to find out how to knock another half a second off their 200m sprint time? God no, becuase the pool of people on this board who are capable of answering those kinds of questions with good knowledge are far and few between, even if they exist at all.

    But what we do have is (in my very humble opinion) a very friendly, welcoming and warm environment where people af all levels can shoot the sh!t a little bit and talk about Fitness strategies. And if you don't like the way the forum is, make changes otherwise - if the posters like it, they'll make it known, if not they'll make it known even louder. That certainly isn't a call for the Mods to make - all we do is keep things tidy and safe. And if you don't want to make good changes... then frankly go away - complaining and whining without doing anything about it is just annoying.

    Gill
    - really can't understand why people do this thing under their name


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,448 ✭✭✭Roper


    That's some good posting folks. At the end of the bull****:
    This topic of the state of the board arises time after time after time, and the fact that it does proves to me what a succesful forum this is. The ability for posters to engage in discourse and healthy debate and constantly challenge what we think means that we haven't lost the ability to look forward. It would be a very, very dull place altogether if we just accepted everything on sight.

    I'd write more but my son tore off my spacebar on my laptop while "fixing the computer" so this is taking ages to type so I'll be brief.

    Mickoo,
    I see where you're coming from with your constructive posts (the ones after the personal attack) but why not post your concerns about Crossfit on the thread where myself, Hanley and Racingflat were asking Colm about the basis of Crossfit and our legitimate queries? Why wait until a thread where he was dispensing advice?

    Hanley,
    I agree with you. Some people dispense advice here and they're just passing on what they heard a few weeks before. That can be dangerous but it's very public so other more experienced posters can keep them on the right track I think.

    Lastly, I'm in the "stay away from supplements brigade" alledgedly, except I'm not. Anyone who actually reads my posts instead of glancing at the bits that irritate them will know I'm pro- supplements for athletic use. I'm also probably lumped in with the "no-carbs" brigade but the truth is I'm not in that one. Wasabi saw me complain about my love handles the other day she'll testify! (I'm bulking at the mo!)

    Anyway, Peace, love, Debate.All good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭Colm_OReilly


    I really shouldn't reply to this at all, but g-chat has been disabled so I've to find another way to reduce productivity.

    Fristly, this isn't a thread about CF, it's very much about me and my zealous promotion of CF as a system (and by extension, CF Ireland) as evidenced by Roper pointing to the actual discussion on CF.

    Now, to begin the process of clearing up which will no doubt lead to further arguments.

    This spin off came about as a result of How Strange asking if someone in a Corpo gym could show her "these movements", (she was referring to deads and squats et al at the time). Note how she asked about the movements, not the programming. Given my experience of trainers in most gyms, I don't believe she would get decent instruction, so I said no. Mickoo then said this:
    Rubbish-Colm you have a terrible attitude to fitness, any qualified trainer knows there is no right or wrong way and variety is the key but you just harp on about your way of training(your business interest) canned programs

    Which is why I responded using words like "biomechanics" and "anthropometry". My response was in relationtion to the movement of the squat, which isn't based on opinion. Mickoo claimed I misquoted him on this, as evidenced here.
    You misquoted me, i did not say right or wrong way of doing the squat, i meant right or wrong system of training-meaning crossfit is not the be all and end all of exercise as you seem to make out.

    So it was the case of misinterpretation and misinterpretation.

    As regards my "rubbishing" of steady state cardio. if a person posts on this board looking for the most effective and efficient means I can't recommend steady state running, so I recommend more intense work.

    As an interesting observation, this debate (in a larger context) which I'll bluntly express as "Why is it all about CF!!!???" is almost a direct parallel of what happened 4 years ago on the SD/MA board, when I was one of the first to talk about MMA, and it's methodologies. (Essentially skill vs technique/movement, timing, resistence as a means of training). I've found that the arguments for CF put forth by Glassman and those for Aliveness put forth by Thornton almost directly transferrable (i.e. speaking to measurable, observable, repeatable data).

    G'em, taglines are a phenomena explained in a bebo blog post of mine. My bebo page is little more than a tabloid rag, so if you want to look at it, go ahead but prepare to be upset/offended by some postings/comments.

    Hopefully I've answered any question put forth since Mickoo's first post.

    But then again, this isn't about CF, it's about me.

    Lots of love,
    Colm


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,819 ✭✭✭✭g'em


    new thread made...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭wasabi


    Roper wrote: »
    Lastly, I'm in the "stay away from supplements brigade" alledgedly, except I'm not. Anyone who actually reads my posts instead of glancing at the bits that irritate them will know I'm pro- supplements for athletic use. I'm also probably lumped in with the "no-carbs" brigade but the truth is I'm not in that one. Wasabi saw me complain about my love handles the other day she'll testify! (I'm bulking at the mo!)

    Yeah I did, and I saw you eating Jaffa Cakes while training the week before as well. Do Jaffa Cakes count as a supplement? :D

    And since I'm here I may as well chuck in my two cents on the rest of the discussion. For my sins I have one of the commoner gym instructor certifications that are knocking around. When I did that course, did I learn how to squat and deadlift properly? Definitely not (the resistance training instructor was usually hanging and so lateral raises and curls were the order of the day).

    I learned how to squat and deadlift from reading Starting Strength by Mark Rippetoe, getting into the gym, and getting people to criticise my form. If you find a trainer in an average gym that can teach you to squat and deadlift properly, you've done well.

    As for people (Colm) recommending XFit a lot here, well as g'em says 90% of the posters here are after the same thing - better general fitness and better body composition. Simplefit or appropriately scaled XFit is indeed a good and efficient way of getting there. I did it myself.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,577 ✭✭✭Colm_OReilly


    Yeah I did, and I saw you eating Jaffa Cakes while training the week before as well. Do Jaffa Cakes count as a supplement?

    You should ask him about his weight cutting and muffins, now there's a skill I've yet to master!


Advertisement