Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Animated Vs. Filmed

  • 10-11-2008 1:59am
    #1
    Dirty Frank
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 75 ✭✭


    Dunno if this should go in this forum or the film production one but here tis anyway!

    I think that the animated genre has been really overlooked in recent years, I think the Harry Potter films for example, should've been animated, it would have given far more freedom as concerns special effects and I don't like whats his face that plays harry at all, I think he sucks to be blunt. Daniel Radcliffe, thats his name.

    Anyway, I was just wondering what everyone else's opinion was on this. Should more films be animated or do you prefer the special effects of these big budget things?


Comments

  • #2
    lostexpectation
    Closed Accounts Posts: 9,082 ✭✭✭lostexpectation


    are there no harry potter animations?


  • #3
    BlitzKrieg
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,698 ✭✭✭✭BlitzKrieg


    doesnt it take much longer to make a quality animated film?

    I know Pixar/disney deliver one every year, but they start the production of them years in advance.

    So while Wall-E hit this year, it started production back around 2004-2005 right?


Advertisement