Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Best possible PA setup

  • 03-06-2009 9:44am
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 75 ✭✭


    It's the old chestnut, the right and wrong way of setting up the PA. The technical guy reads the manual and follows the instructions, and the guy who's been around for longer than anyone can remember says no, no, this is how it's done. I'm of the first school, although I've been around for longer...........
    Does this topic get any feedback?


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,117 ✭✭✭Eoin Madsen


    It's a topic that lends itself to heated arguments. :pac: Microphones go into preamps, preamps go into poweramps, and poweramps go into speakers, but anything after that is debateable.

    There is no "best". A PA system can be optimised to the performance or performer being engineered and/or it can be optimised to the space it's placed in. A good venue is optimising for the space and then pitching generally towards the type of performance that's expected in the venue. You don't need 800 watt subwoofers foh for a singer/songwriter night etc. A touring band PA does the reverse - you design it to suit the band and ensure it's generally capable of suiting the type of venues you'll be in. But even so, optimising is to the ears of the person setting up the system. Lots of venues/engineers like to have bottom-heavy gain structures. I prefer to aspire towards linearity, no matter the venue or musical style, which requires a lot less power in the subwoofers. But then, I quit live engineering because it makes me crazy mad.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 75 ✭✭Exmnk


    I'm with you on that issue. The debate I'm on about is whether you boost the Master controls to "drive the amp" and then adjust your faders etc.. to suit, which I don't agree with. I follow the set the gain, adjust channel sliders, set the master controls, and finally fiddle with equalizer settings to suit the venue. In the end I'll might have to say **** off it's my PA anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 602 ✭✭✭mattfender


    ^^thats what i do also..pretty much the standard.

    There's nothing worse tho with people having the channel faders to the top and having the masters only halfway up, i prefer to leave a good bit of headroom.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,117 ✭✭✭Eoin Madsen


    If the powerstage inputs are trimmed correctly, the master fader should always rest at unity gain.


Advertisement