Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Flashing in overtaking lane

  • 05-02-2010 11:36AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30


    In the fast lane - car sitting in front of you doing 80k with nothing in the slow lane, We've all been behind it!

    Up north or across the water its standard practice to flash the car to move over. I drove to Dublin this morning and I saw a car flashing another and the slow car just ignored him. It was dark so he definitely saw him.

    My question - Is it ok to flash a car to move over or is it seen as road rage?


«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    In the fast lane

    There is no such thing as a fast lane.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭Fink Goddie


    In the fast lane - car sitting in front of you doing 80k with nothing in the slow lane, We've all been behind it!

    Up north or across the water its standard practice to flash the car to move over. I drove to Dublin this morning and I saw a car flashing another and the slow car just ignored him. It was dark so he definitely saw him.

    My question - Is it ok to flash a car to move over or is it seen as road rage?

    I think its a bit aggressive to be honest!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭red menace


    In the fast lane - car sitting in front of you doing 80k with nothing in the slow lane, We've all been behind it!

    Up north or across the water its standard practice to flash the car to move over. I drove to Dublin this morning and I saw a car flashing another and the slow car just ignored him. It was dark so he definitely saw him.

    My question - Is it ok to flash a car to move over or is it seen as road rage?

    I think you will find thats an overtaking lane.
    So yes maybe a small friendly reminder that they are in the wrong lane is in order.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 corriganalan


    There is no such thing as a fast lane.


    Sorry should be overtaking! If theres a mod around could you please edit title before the focus goes away from the question! Thanks :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,169 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    It was dark so he definitely saw him.

    I wouldn't count on that. Some people are oblivious to the world around them. Make that comment over in the ES Forum and they will laugh at you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 corriganalan


    Berty wrote: »
    I wouldn't count on that. Some people are oblivious to the world around them. Make that comment over in the ES Forum and they will laugh at you.

    Well he dimmed the rearview when he flashed!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,157 ✭✭✭✭Alanstrainor


    Thread title changed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,721 ✭✭✭E39MSport


    In the fast lane - car sitting in front of you doing 80k with nothing in the slow lane, We've all been behind it!

    Up north or across the water its standard practice to flash the car to move over. I drove to Dublin this morning and I saw a car flashing another and the slow car just ignored him. It was dark so he definitely saw him.

    My question - Is it ok to flash a car to move over or is it seen as road rage?

    Haven't seen it that much in the past 4 years in the UK. Generally there's not much cause to flash anybody.

    Got off the ferry lsat night from the UK and it was like night and day in that regard.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,418 ✭✭✭Jip


    I'd usually sit behind a while, no action then indicate, still no action a quick flash and more often than not the driver will wake up and move over. However you often get the ignorant pricks who think they don't need to move for anyone and will stubbornly remain there, or you get the other breed who will speed off for a small bit before slowing down meaning you catch them again.

    One silly cow on the M4 one time wasn't moving so I flashed her, she moved over but as I went by she was holding her hand against her window giving me the finger, what kind of mentality do some people have ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    Flashing lights is a valid road signal. It's not aggressive.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,721 ✭✭✭E39MSport


    An Irish one ! (btw fao mod, I'm Irish)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,169 ✭✭✭✭Berty


    Well he dimmed the rearview when he flashed!

    My car, my road tax, my road! Believe it or not some people have this attitude.

    Like people on a roundabout who slice through it saying "Im on the roundabout, I have right of way".

    What you do with people like that in the overtaking lane is. Red cow for example.

    Keep them blocked into the right lane so they are forced into the city when they wanted to take the North/South exit. :D You like the lane so much you can fvcking keep it. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,591 ✭✭✭tommycahir


    I think it sort of depends on the situation and flow of traffic, I have often had somebody come up behind me in the overtaking lane and flash even though I was moving @ ~120kmph and there was no space for me to pull in to the LH lane safely.

    Some people just want to get past no matter what the scenario is and will flash to try achieve that.

    If there is sufficient space and time for the car in front to move safely to the LH lane and then a gentle reminder of a flash is no harm. It is surely a hell of a lot safer than the car behind hugging the bumpers of the car! :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 374 ✭✭STForSale


    Jip wrote: »
    I'd usually sit behind a while, no action then indicate, still no action a quick flash and more often than not the driver will wake up and move over. However you often get the ignorant pricks who think they don't need to move for anyone and will stubbornly remain there, or you get the other breed who will speed off for a small bit before slowing down meaning you catch them again.

    One silly cow on the M4 one time wasn't moving so I flashed her, she moved over but as I went by she was holding her hand against her window giving me the finger, what kind of mentality do some people have ?
    Had this on the N4 last night.
    Avensis sitting in the overtaking lane, no other cars to be seen.
    Sat behind and waited but the guy obviously likes it out here.
    Flashed and he moved but when I passed he pulled straight back into the overtaking lane and flashed several times.
    The guy was also driving with his fogs on so that was all the conformation I needed that he was a D1ck and probably got his license in the amnesty.

    ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    You'll usually get a better response if you keep a good distance and flash. It also covers you for muppets who slam on their brakes to teach you a losson and they're more likely to see your lights if you're not welded to their back bumper.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    My question - Is it ok to flash a car to move over or is it seen as road rage?

    Pesonally, I never flash in this situation. If the driver in front is dozy enough to drive 12 Km in the outside lane regardless of what's in the inside one (like that silver Mondeo yesterday evening on the M6), I'd prefer not to startle him by flashing at him. He might do something even more idiotic, or he might take offense and do something aggressive.

    If you come up behind me in the overtaking lane, flash all you like: I'll pull in exactly when I intended to no matter what you do back there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,264 ✭✭✭BlackWizard


    tommycahir wrote: »
    I think it sort of depends on the situation and flow of traffic, I have often had somebody come up behind me in the overtaking lane and flash even though I was moving @ ~120kmph and there was no space for me to pull in to the LH lane safely.

    Some people just want to get past no matter what the scenario is and will flash to try achieve that.

    If there is sufficient space and time for the car in front to move safely to the LH lane and then a gentle reminder of a flash is no harm. It is surely a hell of a lot safer than the car behind hugging the bumpers of the car! :eek:

    Yeah that annoys me a lot. I'd be sitting behind a car in the overtaking lane patiently waiting for him to overtake a huge stream of cars in the left lane. Of course if he wasn't there I'd be going a lot faster. But he is progressively overtaking the cars so I leave him be. But some a$$ always ends up on my rear bumper expecting me to bunny hop the chap on front!

    Yesterday the overtaking lane was full and so was the left lane. But some guy was on front of me flashing the car on front of him to move out of the overtaking lane. If that worked he'd be left with having to flash another 50 cars :D So I flashed him a few times but I'm not sure if he noticed :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,264 ✭✭✭BlackWizard



    If you come up behind me in the overtaking lane, flash all you like: I'll pull in exactly when I intended to no matter what you do back there.

    Lies!! We've all delayed pulling into the left lane in spite :P ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Pesonally, I never flash in this situation. If the driver in front is dozy enough to drive 12 Km in the outside lane regardless of what's in the inside one (like that silver Mondeo yesterday evening on the M6), I'd prefer not to startle him by flashing at him. He might do something even more idiotic, or he might take offense and do something aggressive.

    If you come up behind me in the overtaking lane, flash all you like: I'll pull in exactly when I intended to no matter what you do back there.



    so will you:
    A) just sit behind the offending driver all day,
    B) pull in but not overtake the driver
    C) pull in and overtake on the inside


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭red menace


    Pesonally, I never flash in this situation. If the driver in front is dozy enough to drive 12 Km in the outside lane regardless of what's in the inside one (like that silver Mondeo yesterday evening on the M6), I'd prefer not to startle him by flashing at him. He might do something even more idiotic, or he might take offense and do something aggressive.

    If you come up behind me in the overtaking lane, flash all you like: I'll pull in exactly when I intended to no matter what you do back there.

    So do you sit in the overtaking lane behind them?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,857 ✭✭✭langdang


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    C) pull in and overtake on the inside

    If they show no signs of moving as I approach. I'll always give em a wide berth tho.
    Fine on 2 lane motorway/dualcarriageway, except for the small matter of the the ROTR
    Really really dislike doing this on the middle of 3 lanes tho...


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭sesna


    I have noticed that the experts on use of the overtake lane strangely seem to have no regard for the law when it comes to the speed-limit.

    If I am driving at 120kmp/h on a motorway slowly over-taking cars at 105kmph, I inevitably always get drivers flashing at me or tail-gating me to speed up further and break the speed-limit. I always pull in to the left once I have completed my over-taking and use the over-take lane properly.

    Flashing at the driver in front for no good reason is not a good idea, as it can dazzle the driver. When I am dazzled and can not see where I am going I have no option but to slam on my brakes, as a safety precaution.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 317 ✭✭bigjohnny80


    Its justified if they are hogging the lane but it should be used as a signal rather than an aggressive act. Have no problem flashing people who shouldn't be in it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    this has been done to death, but overtaking on the inside encourages idiots to lane hog.
    sesna wrote:
    Flashing at the driver in front for no good reason is not a good idea, as it can dazzle the driver. When I am dazzled and can not see where I am going I have no option but to slam on my brakes, as a safety precaution.
    What a load of rubbish. firstly how do you get dazzled from a car behind you and secondly how is slamming on the brakes a safety precaution


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,801 ✭✭✭✭Gary ITR


    If it's dark I'll throw my indicator on, when I first started doing this I was shocked to see that it worked.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,663 ✭✭✭stealthyspeeder


    I flash the foglights,
    Then the highbeams
    Then the indicator
    Then undertake

    Unless I have a preconcieved, jugemental and predujudiced view that the driver is a prick in which case I jump straight to stage 4.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,686 ✭✭✭✭Zubeneschamali


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    so will you:
    A) just sit behind the offending driver all day,
    B) pull in but not overtake the driver
    C) pull in and overtake on the inside


    We're talking about idiots who are driving in the overtaking lane even though there's no traffic in the driving lane. If you come up behind such a driver, you're an idiot too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,277 ✭✭✭evolutionqy7


    well by the rules once u take over the car u move and gtfo out of the way...i hate when people stay in the overtaking lane forever. Times happen when i had to overtake in the normal driving lane the car that was in the overtaking cause it was doing around 80 and didnt move...now thats retarded drivers...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    We're talking about idiots who are driving in the overtaking lane even though there's no traffic in the driving lane. If you come up behind such a driver, you're an idiot too.

    So you're talking about a completely empty road. in most cases there will be gaps in the traffic.

    If there is traffic behind me, I'll never hold them up, if I'm travelling faster than a car in front of me, I'll assume position on the outside lane.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭red menace


    car sitting in front of you doing 80k with nothing in the slow lane


    The OP was talking about slow drivers in the overtaking lane


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,857 ✭✭✭langdang


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    this has been done to death, but overtaking on the inside encourages idiots to lane hog.
    And allowing them to live and roam free encourages them to procreate... :(
    As you can tell I really have no time for time. None. God knows how many years of life and school have failed to educate them on how not to be a waste of space, I'm not wasting my time trying to educate them, sitting behind them when I've better places to be..


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,686 ✭✭✭JHMEG


    sesna wrote: »
    Flashing at the driver in front for no good reason is not a good idea, as it can dazzle the driver. When I am dazzled and can not see where I am going I have no option but to slam on my brakes, as a safety precaution.
    How do you manage at night?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,277 ✭✭✭evolutionqy7


    sesna wrote: »
    I have noticed that the experts on use of the overtake lane strangely seem to have no regard for the law when it comes to the speed-limit.

    If I am driving at 120kmp/h on a motorway slowly over-taking cars at 105kmph, I inevitably always get drivers flashing at me or tail-gating me to speed up further and break the speed-limit. I always pull in to the left once I have completed my over-taking and use the over-take lane properly.

    Flashing at the driver in front for no good reason is not a good idea, as it can dazzle the driver. When I am dazzled and can not see where I am going I have no option but to slam on my brakes, as a safety precaution.

    thats why its usualy the motorway...if u want to driver slow go around the motorways!!! slow drivers should be banned...their the No.1 cause of accidents!!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    langdang wrote: »
    And allowing them to live and roam free encourages them to procreate... :(
    As you can tell I really have no time for time. None. God knows how many years of life and school have failed to educate them on how not to be a waste of space, I'm not wasting my time trying to educate them, sitting behind them when I've better places to be..


    Nah, I reckon if they're in their own little world, if I flash them and they pull over, they'll probably potter along in that lane for a good while and not inconvenience other drivers (i.e you)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30 corriganalan


    Onkle wrote: »
    If it's dark I'll throw my indicator on, when I first started doing this I was shocked to see that it worked.

    Must try that next time i encounter it!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭Martron


    sesna wrote: »
    I have noticed that the experts on use of the overtake lane strangely seem to have no regard for the law when it comes to the speed-limit.

    If I am driving at 120kmp/h on a motorway slowly over-taking cars at 105kmph, I inevitably always get drivers flashing at me or tail-gating me to speed up further and break the speed-limit. I always pull in to the left once I have completed my over-taking and use the over-take lane properly.

    Flashing at the driver in front for no good reason is not a good idea, as it can dazzle the driver. When I am dazzled and can not see where I am going I have no option but to slam on my brakes, as a safety precaution.

    are you crazy? when have you been blinded by a car coming from behind unless you were staring at your rearview mirror for longer than a second? if that is the case you were not looking at the road in the first place. and slamming on your brakes on a motorway is mental.

    saftey precaution!!!!!!! i think its this attitude that cause accidents.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,900 ✭✭✭✭Riskymove


    JHMEG wrote: »
    Flashing lights is a valid road signal. It's not aggressive.

    that's true but rarely is it the full story

    I have often seen something more like flying up until a few feet behind the car, flashing a lot and gesticulating frantically!!:pac:


    Nah, I reckon if they're in their own little world, if I flash them and they pull over, they'll probably potter along in that lane for a good while and not inconvenience other drivers (i.e you)

    thats the important thing, it might wake them up to what they are doing....might!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭Occam


    sesna wrote: »
    If I am driving at 120kmp/h on a motorway slowly over-taking cars at 105kmph,

    Not sure how you can slowly overtake traffic that is moving so much more slowly than you. Perhaps you are overtaking a string of cars in one maneuver, which is usually a bad idea.
    sesna wrote: »
    Flashing at the driver in front for no good reason is not a good idea, as it can dazzle the driver. When I am dazzled and can not see where I am going I have no option but to slam on my brakes, as a safety precaution.

    If you are dazzled so easily perhaps you should not be driving at all, or at the very least consult an optician to determine why you are suffering from this.

    If you slam on the brakes when you are dazzled you really should get some training to improve your standard of driving. Sudden braking is extremely dangerous to both yourself and other road users, especially if it is not an evasive maneuver in an emergency situation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,462 ✭✭✭red menace


    Occam wrote: »
    Not sure how you can slowly overtake traffic that is moving so much more slowly than you. Perhaps you are overtaking a string of cars in one maneuver, which is usually a bad idea.



    If you are dazzled so easily perhaps you should not be driving at all, or at the very least consult an optician to determine why you are suffering from this.

    If you slam on the brakes when you are dazzled you really should get some training to improve your standard of driving. Sudden braking is extremely dangerous to both yourself and other road users, especially if it is not an evasive maneuver in an emergency situation.

    Is it better than the guys who feels the need to pull in after overtaking every single car even if there is no-one trying to overtake them?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭sesna


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    this has been done to death, but overtaking on the inside encourages idiots to lane hog.


    What a load of rubbish. firstly how do you get dazzled from a car behind you and secondly how is slamming on the brakes a safety precaution

    Firstly, have you heard of a device called a rear view mirror which has the capacity to reflect light?

    Secondly, dont be such a predictable puppet


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,718 ✭✭✭.Longshanks.


    I flash the foglights,
    Then the highbeams
    Then the indicator
    Then undertake

    Unless I have a preconcieved, jugemental and predujudiced view that the driver is a prick in which case I jump straight to stage 4.

    Yep, same here. I've been driving long enough & covered enough KM's to come to the opinion that 90% of people who drive on the motorways simply do not have a clue how to use the proper lanes.
    On the road this morning I twice came up behing a car hogging the overtaking lane on a empty section of motorway (I was in the normal driving lane). When I was about 50-100m behind him I pulled out to overtaking lane and kept my indicator on. He pulled in & I passed. I then returned to normal driving lane and the muppet pulled back out to overtaking lane

    This happened again about 5km's further up the road

    ....on a bloody emepty motorway :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,714 ✭✭✭no1beemerfan


    I HATE it when people hog the wrong lane.

    A year or so ago I was behind an Xsara in the overtaking lane passing out a truck on the M7. Xsara was doing about 60 mph.

    Anyways....passes truck and stays in overtaking lane even though both lanes totally free....a mile down the road I get annoyed and flash the light....see the fe€ker look in the rear view mirror....does nothing....flash again a few mins later....still nothing....my blood is boiling at this stage so undertake him.....look in his passenger window....and wtf does he do.....gives me the middle finger....well by jaysus I could've drove him off the road.....to this day I wish I had! :mad:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,857 ✭✭✭langdang


    colm_mcm wrote: »
    Nah, I reckon if they're in their own little world, if I flash them and they pull over, they'll probably potter along in that lane for a good while and not inconvenience other drivers (i.e you)
    Fair play, but too many times I've seen the gimps pull straight back into the wrong lane, with full beams on throughout in many cases.
    Gave up on them after a few of those episodes!

    I reckon a baboon or a labrador in a suitably modified car would make a better job of it...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,546 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    sesna wrote: »
    Firstly, have you heard of a device called a rear view mirror which has the capacity to reflect light?

    Secondly, dont be such a predictable puppet

    I'm familiar enough with mirrors yeah. I've never been dazzled by them though.

    Dunno about the "predictable puppet" bit. I'm not claiming to be a christian motorist or anything, I drive both slow and fast cars fast but never inconvenience anyone on the road as I actively drive - as in I'm watching everything as I drive. I can't remember the last time I've had to slam on the brakes or had someone flash their lights at me or blow their horn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,522 ✭✭✭neilthefunkeone


    In the fast lane - car sitting in front of you doing 80k with nothing in the slow lane

    Undertake them.. and give a hard stare followed by a disappointed shake of the head as you pass..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,930 ✭✭✭Martron


    sesna wrote: »
    Firstly, have you heard of a device called a rear view mirror which has the capacity to reflect light?

    Secondly, dont be such a predictable puppet

    that mirror also has the capability to reflect light away from your eyes to! ever think of flicking it up if you are getting "dazzled"

    secondly its better than being a predictable puppet than an unpredictable muppet ..... slamming on your brakes ..... crazy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 181 ✭✭Occam


    red menace wrote: »
    Is it better than the guys who feels the need to pull in after overtaking every single car even if there is no-one trying to overtake them?

    Doesn't matter if someone is trying to overtake you or not.

    Keep left on all roads including motorways.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,819 ✭✭✭✭peasant


    just as a point of interest:

    In Autobahn country (Germany), both actions (driving in the overtaking lane without moving over as well as flashing your lights and driving too close behind) can be seen as "Nötigung" (= coercion)

    Depending on the severity of the actions the punishment can reach from a fine to loss of licence and up to 5 years imprisonement.

    "Nötigung" is a criminal offence and not just a minor misdemeanor.

    Additionally, "undertaking" could also buy you a spell in prison and a criminal record.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,150 ✭✭✭✭Malari


    I don't understand why people drive in the overtaking lane all the time - every time we get in the car we bitch about the woeful standard of driving on dual carriageways and motorways.

    WHY do they stay in the lane when they don't need to be there? I've decided it's:
    A. They think you can drive in whatever lane you like
    B. They are so scared of each lane manoeuvre that they just stay where they are and just make one lane-change when it's absolutely needed
    C. They are lazy, ignorant gits and couldn't be bothered using the lanes correctly

    I just realised a friend of mine falls into the last category when she told me she drove the whole way from Dublin to Cork in the overtaking lane because "I tried going in and out of the lanes all the time before but it didn't save me any time" :eek:

    When you are up against this kind of logic what do you say? Think how much time you'd save if you just drove through red lights and stop signs too? :mad:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,229 ✭✭✭sesna


    peasant wrote: »
    just as a point of interest:

    In Autobahn country (Germany), both actions (driving in the overtaking lane without moving over as well as flashing your lights and driving too close behind) can be seen as "Nötigung" (= coercion)

    Depending on the severity of the actions the punishment can reach from a fine to loss of licence and up to 5 years imprisonement.

    "Nötigung" is a criminal offence and not just a minor misdemeanor.

    Additionally, "undertaking" could also buy you a spell in prison and a criminal record.

    5 years imprisonment for flashing your lights? I see the good ole Germans are guilty of over-compensating now.


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement