Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Runway 16 - Dublin

  • 10-05-2011 1:55pm
    #1
    Closed Accounts Posts: 23


    The past few days these south easterly winds have been great for photo and video ops at the threshold of 16 at Dublin! Anyone else have any vids or pics they'd care to share? Heres some half decent videos of my own







    photo.php?fbid=10150234444424400&set=a.10150233423594400.368357.685509399&type=1&theater


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,947 ✭✭✭Tropheus


    I was up there on Sunday and yesterday with my 4 yr old son. The highlight of yesterday's visit was a LH A321 going around. Happened at approx. 6 p.m. Always nice to see a go around.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 701 ✭✭✭N7777G


    ksimpson wrote: »
    I was up there on Sunday and yesterday with my 4 yr old son. The highlight of yesterday's visit was a LH A321 going around. Happened at approx. 6 p.m. Always nice to see a go around.

    and here it is going around :)

    http://flic.kr/p/9GaEjL


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10 DW_ATCO


    ksimpson wrote: »
    Always nice to see a go around.



    unless its an ATC caused go-around!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭Andrew33


    I landed on 16 last Thursday on an FR flight and I couldn't get my bearings at all on approach as we came in over Ashbourne:D

    It does seem to make it very convenient for FR using pier D though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,947 ✭✭✭Tropheus


    DW_ATCO wrote: »
    unless its an ATC caused go-around!

    True, not as much drama.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 333 ✭✭alan85


    ksimpson wrote: »
    I was up there on Sunday and yesterday with my 4 yr old son. The highlight of yesterday's visit was a LH A321 going around. Happened at approx. 6 p.m. Always nice to see a go around.
    The Germans must be fair weather pilots. I saw an A320 going around few weeks ago 3 miles out and the weather wasn't even all that bad...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,857 ✭✭✭Andrew33


    alan85 wrote: »
    The Germans must be fair weather pilots. I saw an A320 going around few weeks ago 3 miles out and the weather wasn't even all that bad...

    I don't think so! mad f**kers more like:D
    http://youtu.be/aYiLaK5bIJo


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    Quality videos Shmee!

    Do you have any idea what time you recorded the Ryanair video at? I flew into Dublin on a Ryanair flight on Sunday evening and I could see people down below plane spotting as we were about to land.

    I can't remember exactly what time we landed at but it was probably between 20:20 and 20:35..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,321 ✭✭✭Foggy43


    alan85 wrote: »
    The Germans must be fair weather pilots. I saw an A320 going around few weeks ago 3 miles out and the weather wasn't even all that bad...

    The vast majority of go-arounds are due to the runway not being clear. Can be a crew not familiar with the airport and not vacating the runway in time for the aircraft behind. There is always the ocasion when a visual on the landing gear if there is an idication problem in the flight deck. A pax still in the toilet senario.
    Heathrow takes in to account there will be an average of 4 go-arounds per day. All due to congestion. You can be put in a go-around as far as 20 miles out. You will be held at 3,000ft and fly over the runway and follow a track into the lower level of the hold.

    Last week I had an aircraft (Sri Lankan A340 on finals to 27L) orderd at 6 miles to turn right (2,500ft) and go-around again. It came roaring my house. It got a little congested due to thunderstorm activity. Thunderstorms just love positioning on a 4 mile final to any landing runway.
    At about the same position on finals to 27R there was the occasion where the ATC asked AFXXX what is your speed. Reply 160 knots. ATC shouted back at him 'You were told 180 knots' (as the gap to the following KLM was now reduced to 2 miles). Even I could see the gap being a little too close. A very irrate ATC then told AF to turn left and had to go around again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    Foggy43 wrote: »
    The vast majority of go-arounds are due to the runway not being clear. Can be a crew not familiar with the airport and not vacating the runway in time for the aircraft behind. There is always the ocasion when a visual on the landing gear if there is an idication problem in the flight deck. A pax still in the toilet senario.
    Heathrow takes in to account there will be an average of 4 go-arounds per day. All due to congestion. You can be put in a go-around as far as 20 miles out. You will be held at 3,000ft and fly over the runway and follow a track into the lower level of the hold.

    Indeed. Was flying into Birmingham a few months back, we were roughly 2 mins from landing when the pilot increased thrust and the plane started climbing again. The pilot made an announcement saying there was an aircraft on the ground which took far too long to get off the runway.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    Andrew33 wrote: »
    I landed on 16 last Thursday on an FR flight and I couldn't get my bearings at all on approach as we came in over Ashbourne:D

    It does seem to make it very convenient for FR using pier D though
    .

    I have always wondered which is quicker:
    • When flying in the direction of the UK for example, taking off in an Easterly direction (longer taxi but don't have to double back in the air) versus taking off in a Westerly direction (short taxi but you do have to double back in the air).
    • Coming back from UK, landing in a Westerly direction (can fly straight in and land but long taxi back to Terminal) or landing in an Easterly direction (have to fly inland and double back to land at the airport but it's a short taxi).
    Would anyone like to venture a guess?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 67 ✭✭typera12


    I came back from manchester with ryanair on monday at around 6:00pm landed on 16 the aircraft was all over the place on finals, we hit the ground so hard that bags fell out of the overhead compartment i say he left half the gear on the rwy:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,615 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    KevR wrote: »
    I have always wondered which is quicker:
    • When flying in the direction of the UK for example, taking off in an Easterly direction (longer taxi but don't have to double back in the air) versus taking off in a Westerly direction (short taxi but you do have to double back in the air).
    • Coming back from UK, landing in a Westerly direction (can fly straight in and land but long taxi back to Terminal) or landing in an Easterly direction (have to fly inland and double back to land at the airport but it's a short taxi).
    Would anyone like to venture a guess?

    Well landing from the east and hard on the brakes for taxiway E6 is definitely the shorter arrival option!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,576 ✭✭✭lord lucan


    Andrew33 wrote: »
    I don't think so! mad f**kers more like:D
    http://youtu.be/aYiLaK5bIJo

    Sweet jesus!!:eek:

    Plenty of new pairs of jocks needed after that i'd imagine!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 122 ✭✭Milan Cobian


    KevR,
    if you take off on 28 and turn back to head towards the UK, it takes a jet about 5-6 minutes to reach abeam the airport. So that's 5-6 minutes longer than departing off 10. The extra taxiing distance to 10 is about the same time, so it makes little overall difference, all other things being equal. From the accountants point of view, these extra minutes if the air cost about 200kg* of fuel versus a saving from the shorter taxi of about 50kg. So it's cheaper to depart off 10.
    Landing on 28 with longer taxi is quicker than landing on 10. From abeam the airport, it takes about 8-10 minutes to head out west and turn around to land on 10. The taxi in is quicker than from 28, but then when you land on 28 you're not taxiing from the very end of the runway so the difference is not very great.
    The accountants would prefer 28 also, the fuel saving over 10 is about 300-400kg.

    * - A320 figures


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,279 ✭✭✭Su Campu


    But wouldn't the fuel consumption for those 8-10 minutes descent to 10 (engines almost at taxi pace for a lot of the time) be way lower than the 5-6 minutes of climb and turn out of 28, where most planes are allowed free speed?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 232 ✭✭Ratzo Rizzo


    I came back from London Heathrow on Sunday evening at about 8pm and saw a bunch of people on the perimeter road watching the planes land. I was on a bmi A319 registration G-DBCI, anyone get any pix of her landing?


Advertisement