Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Al-Jazeera footage captures 'British troops on the ground' in Libya

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 tiger55
    ✭✭✭


    [quote=Micky Dolenz]Closed over derailment, feel free to start a new thread on same subject.[/quote]

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=72507973&postcount=28

    Ok will do :p


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 Fratton Fred
    ✭✭✭✭


    How did they capture them and are they asking for a ransom?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 tiger55
    ✭✭✭


    It all started with this silly no fly zone, now its to get rid of Gaddafi, and replace him with some puppet.

    I know one thing, this was is nothing to do with protecting civilians.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 tiger55
    ✭✭✭


    How did they capture them and are they asking for a ransom?

    Did you even bother to watch the 17 sec video? Or better still read the thread title?:confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 Nodin
    ✭✭✭✭




  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,650 sensibleken
    ✭✭✭


    I cant listen to the sound. how do they know their british?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 Fratton Fred
    ✭✭✭✭


    Would this be the same Gadafi that bombed a US airliner and sent four boatloads of arms to the IRA (can you imagine the extra bloodshed this island would have seen if three of them hadn't been stopped)

    Why on earth would NATO want rid of him I wonder.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 tiger55
    ✭✭✭


    Would this be the same Gadafi that bombed a US airliner and sent four boatloads of arms to the IRA (can you imagine the extra bloodshed this island would have seen if three of them hadn't been stopped)

    Why on earth would NATO want rid of him I wonder.

    He was their friend for the last 5 years.

    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-YFuHfHmYu-k/TXID4G84WkI/AAAAAAAAAKA/Z1MXaGxTZRc/s1600/gaddafi-blair.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 mgmt
    ✭✭✭


    Yeah whats the point of the thread. There was major announcements last month that Britain, France and others sent in officers to coordinate the rebels.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 tiger55
    ✭✭✭




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 tiger55
    ✭✭✭


    Nodin wrote: »
    And..........?

    Wait till they turn their guns on civilians in Europe...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 Fratton Fred
    ✭✭✭✭


    tiger55 wrote: »

    No he wasn't, it was just a case of keeping him close. The rebellion presented a rather nice opportunity to get rid of him though.

    If you want to get all high and mighty then why not ask why the UN is not doing the same in Syria.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 636 Bucklesman
    ✭✭✭


    Those fellows could just as easily be mercenaries as SAS. Actually, scratch that, I'm fairly certain they're private military contractors.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,243 LighterGuy
    ✭✭✭


    Bucklesman wrote: »
    Those fellows could just as easily be mercenaries as SAS. Actually, scratch that, I'm fairly certain they're private military contractors.


    PMC's huh?
    Possible alright.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,023 Fukuyama
    ✭✭✭


    I'm sorry but this mission is different to Iraq and A'stan.

    NATO are slowly going in and it's not to protect their own skin.

    Unfortunately, because the US is on board (I'm not a fan of theirs I'll say) this mission will be chucked in the same category as Iraq.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,650 sensibleken
    ✭✭✭


    The whole Libya thing is rediculous anyway. The mandate was to protect civilians. The only way I can see that is a quick and decissive victory for either the rebels or for Gadaffi.

    A half assed no-fly zone and attack on heavy armour only enforces a state of stalemate, prolongs the conflict and leads to a long term threat to civilians.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,023 Fukuyama
    ✭✭✭


    The whole Libya thing is rediculous anyway. The mandate was to protect civilians. The only way I can see that is a quick and decissive victory for either the rebels or for Gadaffi.

    A half assed no-fly zone and attack on heavy armour only enforces a state of stalemate, prolongs the conflict and leads to a long term threat to civilians.

    They're ramping up the no-fly with attack helicopters. And it was never half-assed to begin with. The fact that Gadaffi is silencing journalists tells all really - he's a tyrant. I'm not saying the US or UK have clean hands either. But they're doing something good here.

    And there's western boots on the ground. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some sort of deployment (maybe a para regiment) into Misrata soon.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,725 charlemont
    ✭✭✭


    All these countries that NATO go into receive a big bill when the wars are finished. Im sure they want to destroy the system in Libya and leave these people impoverished like they done in Iraq,


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,650 sensibleken
    ✭✭✭


    Dean0088 wrote: »
    They're ramping up the no-fly with attack helicopters. And it was never half-assed to begin with. The fact that Gadaffi is silencing journalists tells all really - he's a tyrant. I'm not saying the US or UK have clean hands either. But they're doing something good here.

    And there's western boots on the ground. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some sort of deployment (maybe a para regiment) into Misrata soon.

    Thats what I mean. They are only now, months later, talking about deploying ground troops. Starting off with just the no fly, then attacking armour, then this tip toeing in is only delaying everything and causing more harm to the civilian population.

    The only way to do it is a quick victory one way or the other, although such an explicit and open war is politically difficult. As soon as Gadaffi said he would wipe out the poplulation of misrata they should have gone 'ok bud, game over now'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,941 thebigbiffo
    ✭✭✭


    this thread had not rocked my world...

    NEEEEEEXT.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 Fratton Fred
    ✭✭✭✭


    charlemont wrote: »
    All these countries that NATO go into receive a big bill when the wars are finished. Im sure they want to destroy the system in Libya and leave these people impoverished like they done in Iraq,

    NATO didn't go into Iraq, not the second time anyway.

    The US has spent billions rebuilding Iraq and is doing the same in Afghanistan.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 tiger55
    ✭✭✭


    The whole Libya thing is rediculous anyway. The mandate was to protect civilians. The only way I can see that is a quick and decissive victory for either the rebels or for Gadaffi.

    A half assed no-fly zone and attack on heavy armour only enforces a state of stalemate, prolongs the conflict and leads to a long term threat to civilians.



    US dropped cluster bombs on Misratah


    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/182310.html

    http://humanrightsinvestigations.org/2011/05/25/the-cluster-bombing-of-misrata-the-case-against-the-usa/

    wow this does surprise me, america attack civilians then try to frame Gaddafi.:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,650 sensibleken
    ✭✭✭


    NATO didn't go into Iraq, not the second time anyway.

    The US has spent billions rebuilding Iraq and is doing the same in Afghanistan.

    In fairness its the least they could fúcking do having blown it up in the first place


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 Fratton Fred
    ✭✭✭✭


    tiger55 wrote: »


    US dropped cluster bombs on Misratah


    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/182310.html

    http://humanrightsinvestigations.org/2011/05/25/the-cluster-bombing-of-misrata-the-case-against-the-usa/

    wow this does surprise me, america attack civilians then try to frame Gaddafi.:rolleyes:

    Are you expecting these links to get a better reception here than they did in Politics?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 tiger55
    ✭✭✭


    Are you expecting these links to get a better reception here than they did in Politics?

    go away idiot

    do you work for cas sunstein by any chance?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 Nodin
    ✭✭✭✭


    tiger55 wrote: »
    Wait till they turn their guns on civilians in Europe...

    Could you try to be a bit more coherent?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 Dyr
    ✭✭✭✭


    tiger55 wrote: »
    Wait till they turn their guns on civilians in Europe...

    They wouldnt have the range if they're in Libya


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 mgmt
    ✭✭✭


    tiger55 wrote: »
    [snip]

    US dropped cluster bombs on Misratah


    http://www.presstv.ir/detail/182310.html

    http://humanrightsinvestigations.org/2011/05/25/the-cluster-bombing-of-misrata-the-case-against-the-usa/

    wow this does surprise me, america attack civilians then try to frame Gaddafi.:rolleyes:

    LOL

    Did you even read the links or just the headlines?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 Fratton Fred
    ✭✭✭✭


    tiger55 wrote: »
    go away idiot

    do you work for cas sunstein by any chance?

    Look, here's how it works.

    poster puts up a whacko OP and everyone blatantly ignores it by changing the subject. You got Smileys, I believe fish is the usual route.

    Put the same OP up again, people are just going to rip the piss out of it. No need to get upset about it, that's just the way after hours roles......Dude.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,968 mike65
    ✭✭✭✭


    Wordpress blog plus Tehran TV = truth dontchaknow


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 Nodin
    ✭✭✭✭


    mike65 wrote: »
    Wordpress blog plus Tehran TV = truth dontchaknow

    I was so convinced my bowels opened unexpectedly.

    Still no idea what the signficance is supposed to be though. I've made preparations in the event the revelation has a similar effect, however.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 26,567 Fratton Fred
    ✭✭✭✭


    Nodin wrote: »
    I was so convinced my bowels opened unexpectedly.

    Still no idea what the signficance is supposed to be though. I've made preparations in the event the revelation has a similar effect, however.

    Blasting it with pish would have been sufficient tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 512 tiger55
    ✭✭✭


    mike65 wrote: »
    Wordpress blog plus Tehran TV = truth dontchaknow

    Our media lies to us you know:eek:




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 Nodin
    ✭✭✭✭


    tiger55 wrote: »
    Our media lies to us you know:eek:

    I was unaware that meant other media was automatically telling the truth. You still haven't explained the significance of your op.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,867 UglyBolloxFace
    ✭✭✭


    Al-Jazeera footage captures 'British troops on the ground' in Libya

    Anytime I hear the phrase "on the ground", Joan Burton's big face pops into my mind.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,361 mgmt
    ✭✭✭


    tiger55 wrote: »
    Our media lies to us you know:eek:

    So you get your news from anonymous blogs, anti-semites, and Iranian TV. Great.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,729 Overheal
    ✭✭✭✭




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 33 CokeyBear


    Technically they've been on the ground for months considering Special Forces members are training Rebels.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,833 Manic Moran
    Mod ✭✭✭✭


    My first response to the OP is "So?"

    My second thought is that one of the guys has a very large camera. If they're not military, they could also be a security detail for a journalist.

    NTM


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,920 Einhard
    ✭✭✭


    tiger55 wrote: »
    I know one thing, this was is nothing to do with protecting civilians.

    Well you don't know much then.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,594 nacho libre
    ✭✭✭✭




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,462 WoollyRedHat
    ✭✭✭✭


    Are the Al Jazeerans looking for ransom from the British or what?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 393 Quiet you
    ✭✭


    Are the Al Jazeerans looking for ransom from the British or what?

    I heard they're looking for several magic beans.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 partyatmygaff
    ✭✭✭✭


    mgmt wrote: »
    So you get your news from anonymous blogs, anti-semites, and Iranian TV. Great.
    They're "alternative" therefore honest.

    Good logic as always by the tin foil hat brigade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,462 WoollyRedHat
    ✭✭✭✭


    Quiet you wrote: »
    I heard they're looking for several magic beans.

    They should just give it to them tbh, even if they're not magic.. keep em happpy.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,357 Heckler
    ✭✭✭


    So what if british troops are on the ground ? Why is anybody surprised ? It was announced a while ago that british forces were there advising the rebels.


Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Advertisement