Al-Qaeda 'underpants' bomber was working for CIA

Run_to_da_hills · 09-05-2012 08:27AM #1

This goes to prove yet again that the US is has lost its dignity as a respectable western nation and has gone down the same route as those so called "terrorist nations" that it is trying to suppress.

So all the propaganda and fearmongering over this plot was once again over nothing this was yet another staged incident just as the first underwear bomber event was a manufactured hoax from beginning to end.

The al-Qaeda operative tasked with carrying a high-tech new "underpants" bomb onto a US-bound jet was in fact a double agent working for the CIA and Arab intelligence agencies, it has emerged.

The agent penetrated al-Qaeda's deadly affiliate Yemen and tracked the bomb's movement for weeks before smuggling out the device out of the country and into the hands of American authorities.

America is now the official false flag capital of the world.

http://www.independent.ie/world-news/middle-east/alqaeda-underpants-bomber-was-working-for-cia-3103184.html

MagicMarker · 09-05-2012 08:41AM

What's the problem exactly?

dmc17 · 09-05-2012 08:43AM

MagicMarker wrote: »

What's the problem exactly?

He had a bomb in his underpants!

Lando Griffin · 09-05-2012 08:43AM

Well now isn't that a Y turn.

Wibbs · 09-05-2012 08:43AM

I got a missile in mine.

MagicMarker · 09-05-2012 08:44AM

Wibbs wrote: »

I got a missile in mine.

I have a penis.

Ghandee · 09-05-2012 08:44AM

Ach, PANTS!

dmc17 · 09-05-2012 08:44AM

Wibbs wrote: »

I got a missile in mine.

Is it disarmed?

Run_to_da_hills · 09-05-2012 08:45AM

MagicMarker wrote: »

What's the problem exactly?

This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" but was it ended out that he was working for the American Government.

It was a deliberate move so that America Authorities could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

helimachoptor · 09-05-2012 08:47AM

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" butt was in fact working for the American Government.

It was supposed to be a scam so that America could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

I'd say it was more counter-insurgency.
Whats the best way to know what the enemy are coming up with to kill you?
Implant someone into their ranks

MagicMarker · 09-05-2012 08:47AM

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" but was it ended out that he was working for the American Government.

It was a deliberate move so that America Authorities could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

Well if the terrorists have a new 'bomb pants' that's so technologically advanced, shouldn't they tighten up airport security measures?

Run_to_da_hills · 09-05-2012 08:52AM

MagicMarker wrote: »

Well if the terrorists have a new 'bomb pants' that's so technologically advanced, shouldn't they tighten up airport security measures?

They can only go so far.

I believe Alqueda is a fabricated CIA organisation in the first place and never existed.

lucylu · 09-05-2012 08:54AM

This is like an episode of Homeland

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar · 09-05-2012 08:55AM

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

They can only go so far.

I believe Alqueda is a fabricated CIA organisation in the first place and never existed.

you also believe obama is the antichrist so......
yeah

MagicMarker · 09-05-2012 08:57AM

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

They can only go so far.

I believe Alqueda is a fabricated CIA organisation in the first place and never existed.

So you're one of those people...

*backs away slowly*

holystungun9 · 09-05-2012 08:59AM

dmc17 wrote: »

He had a bomb in his underpants!

I have 'da bomb' in mine. :eek:

ejmaztec · 09-05-2012 09:01AM

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" but was it ended out that he was working for the American Government.

It was a deliberate move so that America Authorities could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

The bum disposal guy should have cut the yellow wire.:(

Mr.Crinklewood · 09-05-2012 09:03AM

Excellent work by the authorities.

One threat stopped.

A possible future discovered, as a result of which hopefully security will be changed to stop its affect.

humanji · 09-05-2012 09:05AM

Moved to Conspiracy Theories. Please note that the Forum Charter is different to the After Hours one.

the_syco · 09-05-2012 09:06AM

Where is the article did it say that the bomber was CIA?

/edit
Just saw humanji's post, so you don't have to answer now, as what they don't say in articles is usually seen as the truth...

2 stroke · 09-05-2012 09:15AM

Ok, so we ban underwear on international flights. I don't think our commandos will have any problem with that.

Daithi 1 · 09-05-2012 09:18AM

MagicMarker wrote: »

So you're one of those people...

*backs away slowly*

BBC also believe it. Yet, you dont back away from your tv.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mztfFdpd1Rk

Monty Burnz · 09-05-2012 09:36AM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

BBC also believe it. Yet, you dont back away from your tv.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mztfFdpd1Rk

I'm confused: isn't the mainstream media a bastion of lies? Propaganda for the 'sheeple' that RTDH likes to talk about?

Daithi 1 · 09-05-2012 09:37AM

the_syco wrote: »

Where is the article did it say that the bomber was CIA?

The title. :rolleyes:

Daithi 1 · 09-05-2012 09:38AM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

I'm confused: isn't the mainstream media a bastion of lies? Propaganda for the 'sheeple' that RTDH likes to talk about?

They say there is some truth to every lie.

Run_to_da_hills · 09-05-2012 09:39AM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

I'm confused: isn't the mainstream media a bastion of lies? Propaganda for the 'sheeple' that RTDH likes to talk about?

Certain things become too obvious that they can no longer hold back beyond floodgates.

Monty Burnz · 09-05-2012 09:41AM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

They say there is some truth to every lie.

Well I guess the truth is that the BBC is generally reliable but they have dropped the ball once or twice.

Good documentary you linked, by the way. Although I remember hearing nearly a decade ago that the Al Qaeda 'brand' was promulgated by the Americans, and that there was no centralised organisation - it was basically bunches of local enthusiasts committing atrocities and then sticking on the brand name.

Which - of course - makes it much harder to catch them too.

Daithi 1 · 09-05-2012 09:43AM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

Well I guess the truth is that the BBC is generally reliable but they have dropped the ball once or twice.

Good documentary you linked, by the way. Although I remember hearing nearly a decade ago that the Al Qaeda 'brand' was promulgated by the Americans, and that there was no centralised organisation - it was basically bunches of local enthusiasts committing atrocities and then sticking on the brand name.

Which - of course - makes it much harder to catch them too.

Obama says victory is with reach now. Just in time to get the troops home the the coming civil war.

Monty Burnz · 09-05-2012 09:46AM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Obama says victory is with reach now. Just in time to get the troops home the the coming civil war.

That's just PR for the masses in America who are unsure where anywhere outside their immediate state is. There will be no 'victory' in the 'war on terror' (another branding exercise) any more than there has been a victory in the 'war on drugs'.

I would assume Obama and his people know this - the trick is to get US forces out of the Middle East without it looking like a defeat to his home audience and the international audience too. Not an easy task.

Daithi 1 · 09-05-2012 09:52AM

Monty Burnz wrote: »

That's just PR for the masses in America who are unsure where anywhere outside their immediate state is. There will be no 'victory' in the 'war on terror' (another branding exercise) any more than there has been a victory in the 'war on drugs'.

I would assume Obama and his people know this - the trick is to get US forces out of the Middle East without it looking like a defeat to his home audience and the international audience too. Not an easy task.

I know that dude... what the hell are you doing saying it ??

You're supposed to be on the other team man !!. You're wrecking the game :mad:

Run_to_da_hills · 09-05-2012 09:55AM

Daithi 1 wrote: »

Obama says victory is with reach now. Just in time to get the troops home the the coming civil war.

There will be no civil war with Obama.

He knows at the touch of a button who his enemies are him from social media and mobile phone records. All he needs to do is track them down with his storm troopers and forward them on to Fema concentration camps.

Al-Qaeda 'underpants' bomber was working for CIA

Welcome!

Comments