Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Al-Qaeda 'underpants' bomber was working for CIA

  • 09-05-2012 08:27AM
    #1
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭


    This goes to prove yet again that the US is has lost its dignity as a respectable western nation and has gone down the same route as those so called "terrorist nations" that it is trying to suppress.

    So all the propaganda and fearmongering over this plot was once again over nothing this was yet another staged incident just as the first underwear bomber event was a manufactured hoax from beginning to end.

    The al-Qaeda operative tasked with carrying a high-tech new "underpants" bomb onto a US-bound jet was in fact a double agent working for the CIA and Arab intelligence agencies, it has emerged.

    The agent penetrated al-Qaeda's deadly affiliate Yemen and tracked the bomb's movement for weeks before smuggling out the device out of the country and into the hands of American authorities.

    America is now the official false flag capital of the world.

    http://www.independent.ie/world-news/middle-east/alqaeda-underpants-bomber-was-working-for-cia-3103184.html


«134567…10

Comments

  • #2
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    What's the problem exactly?


  • #3
    dmc17
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭dmc17


    MagicMarker wrote: »
    What's the problem exactly?

    He had a bomb in his underpants!


  • #4
    Lando Griffin
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,952 ✭✭✭Lando Griffin


    Well now isn't that a Y turn.


  • #5
    Wibbs
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,313 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I got a missile in mine.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • #6
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I got a missile in mine.
    I have a penis.


  • Advertisement
  • #7
    Ghandee
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,653 ✭✭✭Ghandee


    Ach, PANTS!


  • #8
    dmc17
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,826 ✭✭✭dmc17


    Wibbs wrote: »
    I got a missile in mine.

    Is it disarmed?


  • #9
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    MagicMarker wrote: »
    What's the problem exactly?
    This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" but was it ended out that he was working for the American Government.

    It was a deliberate move so that America Authorities could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.


  • #10
    helimachoptor
    Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 21,736 Mod ✭✭✭✭helimachoptor


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" butt was in fact working for the American Government.

    It was supposed to be a scam so that America could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

    I'd say it was more counter-insurgency.
    Whats the best way to know what the enemy are coming up with to kill you?
    Implant someone into their ranks


  • #11
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" but was it ended out that he was working for the American Government.

    It was a deliberate move so that America Authorities could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.
    Well if the terrorists have a new 'bomb pants' that's so technologically advanced, shouldn't they tighten up airport security measures? :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • #12
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    MagicMarker wrote: »
    Well if the terrorists have a new 'bomb pants' that's so technologically advanced, shouldn't they tighten up airport security measures? :confused:
    They can only go so far.

    I believe Alqueda is a fabricated CIA organisation in the first place and never existed.


  • #13
    lucylu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭lucylu


    This is like an episode of Homeland


  • #14
    Sir Digby Chicken Caesar
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 23,555 ✭✭✭✭Sir Digby Chicken Caesar


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    They can only go so far.

    I believe Alqueda is a fabricated CIA organisation in the first place and never existed.

    you also believe obama is the antichrist so......
    yeah


  • #15
    MagicMarker
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 32,865 ✭✭✭✭MagicMarker


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    They can only go so far.

    I believe Alqueda is a fabricated CIA organisation in the first place and never existed.
    So you're one of those people...

    *backs away slowly*


  • #16
    holystungun9
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,933 ✭✭✭holystungun9


    dmc17 wrote: »
    He had a bomb in his underpants!

    I have 'da bomb' in mine. :eek:


  • #17
    ejmaztec
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,263 ✭✭✭✭ejmaztec


    Run_to_da_hills wrote: »
    This guy was supposed to be a "terrorist" but was it ended out that he was working for the American Government.

    It was a deliberate move so that America Authorities could tighten up airport security measures but it backfired on them.

    The bum disposal guy should have cut the yellow wire.:(


  • #18
    Mr.Crinklewood
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,688 ✭✭✭✭Mr.Crinklewood


    Excellent work by the authorities.

    One threat stopped.

    A possible future discovered, as a result of which hopefully security will be changed to stop its affect.


  • #19
    humanji
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,976 ✭✭✭✭humanji


    Moved to Conspiracy Theories. Please note that the Forum Charter is different to the After Hours one.


  • #20
    the_syco
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,316 ✭✭✭✭the_syco


    Where is the article did it say that the bomber was CIA?

    /edit
    Just saw humanji's post, so you don't have to answer now, as what they don't say in articles is usually seen as the truth...


  • #21
    2 stroke
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭2 stroke


    Ok, so we ban underwear on international flights. I don't think our commandos will have any problem with that.


  • Advertisement
  • #22
    Daithi 1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    MagicMarker wrote: »
    So you're one of those people...

    *backs away slowly*


    BBC also believe it. Yet, you dont back away from your tv.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mztfFdpd1Rk


  • #23
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Daithi 1 wrote: »
    BBC also believe it. Yet, you dont back away from your tv.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mztfFdpd1Rk

    I'm confused: isn't the mainstream media a bastion of lies? Propaganda for the 'sheeple' that RTDH likes to talk about? :confused:

    :)


  • #24
    Daithi 1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    the_syco wrote: »
    Where is the article did it say that the bomber was CIA?


    The title. :rolleyes:


  • #25
    Daithi 1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    I'm confused: isn't the mainstream media a bastion of lies? Propaganda for the 'sheeple' that RTDH likes to talk about? :confused:

    :)


    They say there is some truth to every lie.


  • #26
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    I'm confused: isn't the mainstream media a bastion of lies? Propaganda for the 'sheeple' that RTDH likes to talk about? :confused:

    :)
    Certain things become too obvious that they can no longer hold back beyond floodgates. :p


  • #27
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Daithi 1 wrote: »
    They say there is some truth to every lie.
    Well I guess the truth is that the BBC is generally reliable but they have dropped the ball once or twice.

    Good documentary you linked, by the way. Although I remember hearing nearly a decade ago that the Al Qaeda 'brand' was promulgated by the Americans, and that there was no centralised organisation - it was basically bunches of local enthusiasts committing atrocities and then sticking on the brand name.

    Which - of course - makes it much harder to catch them too.


  • #28
    Daithi 1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    Well I guess the truth is that the BBC is generally reliable but they have dropped the ball once or twice.

    Good documentary you linked, by the way. Although I remember hearing nearly a decade ago that the Al Qaeda 'brand' was promulgated by the Americans, and that there was no centralised organisation - it was basically bunches of local enthusiasts committing atrocities and then sticking on the brand name.

    Which - of course - makes it much harder to catch them too.


    Obama says victory is with reach now. Just in time to get the troops home the the coming civil war. :)


  • #29
    Monty Burnz
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    Daithi 1 wrote: »
    Obama says victory is with reach now. Just in time to get the troops home the the coming civil war. :)

    That's just PR for the masses in America who are unsure where anywhere outside their immediate state is. There will be no 'victory' in the 'war on terror' (another branding exercise) any more than there has been a victory in the 'war on drugs'.

    I would assume Obama and his people know this - the trick is to get US forces out of the Middle East without it looking like a defeat to his home audience and the international audience too. Not an easy task.


  • #30
    Daithi 1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭Daithi 1


    Monty Burnz wrote: »
    That's just PR for the masses in America who are unsure where anywhere outside their immediate state is. There will be no 'victory' in the 'war on terror' (another branding exercise) any more than there has been a victory in the 'war on drugs'.

    I would assume Obama and his people know this - the trick is to get US forces out of the Middle East without it looking like a defeat to his home audience and the international audience too. Not an easy task.


    I know that dude... what the hell are you doing saying it ??

    You're supposed to be on the other team man !!. You're wrecking the game :mad:


  • Advertisement
  • #31
    Run_to_da_hills
    Closed Accounts Posts: 20,009 ✭✭✭✭Run_to_da_hills


    Daithi 1 wrote: »
    Obama says victory is with reach now. Just in time to get the troops home the the coming civil war. :)
    There will be no civil war with Obama.

    He knows at the touch of a button who his enemies are him from social media and mobile phone records. All he needs to do is track them down with his storm troopers and forward them on to Fema concentration camps.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement