Truth about the Russian Meteor strike

Hootanany · 19-02-2013 10:51PM #1

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=4utRB0v-Ud8&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D4utRB0v-Ud8

Missile or Aliens

Rastadoyle · 19-02-2013 10:54PM

what video am i supposing to be watching?

Torakx · 19-02-2013 11:50PM

Might be alien life forms on the meteor :P

Hootanany · 20-02-2013 12:23AM

The one with the triangle:cool:

garancafan · 20-02-2013 12:42AM

Is there any information on the direction of the origin of the phenomenon?

Hootanany · 20-02-2013 12:55AM

No just that video it must have been some missile to take out the Meteor.

zenno · 20-02-2013 01:03AM

Hootanany wrote: »

http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=4utRB0v-Ud8&desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D4utRB0v-Ud8

Missile or Aliens

I believe a stray minor rock was pulled away from the main asteroid as it got close to earth & sun of which hit russia. Like this...of which broke away.... maybe a few rocks were close and were stuck with gravity to the main one, but not this many in the picture.

Zaph · 20-02-2013 01:08AM

Or, you know, it was a meteor. Or is that just too far fetched an idea?

Torakx · 20-02-2013 01:09AM

Hootanany wrote: »

No just that video it must have been some missile to take out the Meteor.

Funny that is exactly what I said to a friend the other day when he brought it up.
I thought it seems quite low to seperate and maybe it was hit by a defense system thinking it was an atack from either space weapons or a long range attack.

keelanj69 · 20-02-2013 01:10AM

Aquarius you know about alien life forms coming to our planet. Is this how you got here?

the_syco · 20-02-2013 01:14AM

Rastadoyle wrote: »

what video am i supposing to be watching?

Click on "desktop".

zenno · 20-02-2013 01:30AM

The video and sound that showed the booms and windows blasted in are A typical of an object traveling supersonic speeds at a low altitude so it was either a breakaway tiny rock asteroid from the main one that passed over-head in russia or it was a coincidental meteor fragment at the same time as this main asteroid was passing. It sounds a bit coincidental for my liking but who really knows ?.

Cookie_Monster · 20-02-2013 03:23AM

Zaph wrote: »

Or, you know, it was a meteor. Or is that just too far fetched an idea?

Indeed, does every minor news story these days require a conspiracy in some form? There really is no scope for conspiracy here, it was a natural event that occurred completely outside the human scope of influence and ended over Russia.

Actually... maybe it was the Nazi's secret moon base tractor beam that pulled part of the asteroid off course to try and finally defeat the Russians

Hootanany · 20-02-2013 09:40AM

But what was it that came out of the asteroid.

Myrddin · 20-02-2013 09:43AM

Hootanany wrote: »

But what was it that came out of the asteroid.

Things break up when the friction with the atmosphere heats them up. Look at the shuttle Columbia, that broke apart didn't it? This thing was apparently going at over Mach 20+ for a time, that'd make it get a little bit warm. It broke up due to atmospheric friction, end of story.

hooradiation · 20-02-2013 10:27AM

Hootanany wrote: »

But what was it that came out of the asteroid.

Smaller chunks of rock - caused when the rock shattered while entering our atmosphere.
Why did it shatter? Because Putin turned his baleful gaze skywards and willed it to be so.

True story.

Jonny7 · 20-02-2013 10:53AM

zenno wrote: »

The video and sound that showed the booms and windows blasted in are A typical of an object traveling supersonic speeds at a low altitude so it was either a breakaway tiny rock asteroid from the main one that passed over-head in russia or it was a coincidental meteor fragment at the same time as this main asteroid was passing. It sounds a bit coincidental for my liking but who really knows ?.

It was cosmic coincidence, they came from diff directions

Hootanany · 20-02-2013 01:03PM

Nah has to be a missile

old hippy · 20-02-2013 01:07PM

It was a meteor. Earth has had a lot of them over the last few billion years. It only makes the news and discussion forums because we're new additions to the cosmos.

Myrddin · 20-02-2013 01:13PM

Hootanany wrote: »

Nah has to be a missile

Your wrong. You can clearly see the missile being shot out of the sky by a UFO, which looks like it fired a laser beam that bounced off someones tin foil hat on the ground & then destroyed the missile. Why would a UFO destroy a missile that was about to destroy a meteor? Well, isn't it obvious? It wasn't a meteor at all...it was a prototype nuclear powered craft which was in contravention of the accords our shadow governments signed with the aliens who owned the UFO.

That still leaves the question of who fired the missile...again, also obvious. It was clearly shot from a rival nation, more than likely North Korea who had they succeeded in destroying the 'meteor', would have instigated a war here on Earth between themselves & the US who owned the 'meteor'. Had this have happened, the aliens in the ufo would have had to intervene & they can't do that until the dawning of the age of Aquarius. It all makes perfect sense if you think about it

Agent Mug · 20-02-2013 08:42PM

EnterNow wrote: »

Your wrong. You can clearly see the missile being shot out of the sky by a UFO, which looks like it fired a laser beam that bounced off someones tin foil hat on the ground & then destroyed the missile. Why would a UFO destroy a missile that was about to destroy a meteor? Well, isn't it obvious? It wasn't a meteor at all...it was a prototype nuclear powered craft which was in contravention of the accords our shadow governments signed with the aliens who owned the UFO.

That still leaves the question of who fired the missile...again, also obvious. It was clearly shot from a rival nation, more than likely North Korea who had they succeeded in destroying the 'meteor', would have instigated a war here on Earth between themselves & the US who owned the 'meteor'. Had this have happened, the aliens in the ufo would have had to intervene & they can't do that until the dawning of the age of Aquarius. It all makes perfect sense if you think about it

You had me up until you mention Aquarius.

Sh1t man.

weisses · 20-02-2013 08:51PM

Zaph wrote: »

Or, you know, it was a meteor. Or is that just too far fetched an idea?

that depends on the forum its posted in

andy_g · 20-02-2013 09:09PM

Zaph wrote: »

Or, you know, it was a meteor. Or is that just too far fetched an idea?

The sky is falling, THE SKY IS FALLING!!!!!!!!!! *runs*

Nwm2 · 20-02-2013 09:33PM

Well the Mods are out in force to crush this one.

THEY MUST KNOW SOMETHING!

Hootanany · 20-02-2013 09:36PM

EnterNow wrote: »

Your wrong. You can clearly see the missile being shot out of the sky by a UFO, which looks like it fired a laser beam that bounced off someones tin foil hat on the ground & then destroyed the missile. Why would a UFO destroy a missile that was about to destroy a meteor? Well, isn't it obvious? It wasn't a meteor at all...it was a prototype nuclear powered craft which was in contravention of the accords our shadow governments signed with the aliens who owned the UFO.

That still leaves the question of who fired the missile...again, also obvious. It was clearly shot from a rival nation, more than likely North Korea who had they succeeded in destroying the 'meteor', would have instigated a war here on Earth between themselves & the US who owned the 'meteor'. Had this have happened, the aliens in the ufo would have had to intervene & they can't do that until the dawning of the age of Aquarius. It all makes perfect sense if you think about it

Wrong on so many levels

keelanj69 · 20-02-2013 09:47PM

Nwm2 wrote: »

Well the Mods are out in force to crush this one.

THEY MUST KNOW SOMETHING!

Mods, fess up! You summoned it here didnt you? Tell me, are you in league with our lizard overlords?

Hootanany · 20-02-2013 09:52PM

Its hard to dispel.

Cookie_Monster · 20-02-2013 11:58PM

Hootanany wrote: »

Its hard to dispel.

what is?

Hootanany · 21-02-2013 11:18AM

The missile's

Jonny7 · 21-02-2013 12:17PM

Hootanany wrote: »

The missile's

What missiles?

old hippy · 21-02-2013 12:41PM

No missiles. Just a chunk of rock.

Hootanany · 21-02-2013 02:34PM

Have a look again at the video, clearly something comes from behind and strikes it.

maximoose · 21-02-2013 02:36PM

Hootanany wrote: »

The missile's

The missile's what?

Tzar Chasm · 21-02-2013 03:19PM

shooting at it from that angle wouldn't make any sense tho.

there is a fairly straightforward physics explanation for this phenomenon,

as the meteorire entered the earths atmosphere it began to experience resistance,
this resistance caused a few things to happen to the meteorite
1) it began to compress a layer of atmosphere in front of it which created the fireball you see in the video
2) it began to slow down
3) it began disintegration

the main meteorite, having the larger surface area, had the lowest terminal velocity
small pieces, such as the one in the video then caught up to it, the impact of the smaller pieces carried enough kinetic energy to punch through the larger meteorite.

Remember
Ek = 1/2MV^2

so although the was a large difference in the masses of the objects the difference in velocity is squared, and there is a very obvious difference in velocity.

old hippy · 21-02-2013 05:04PM

Hootanany wrote: »

Have a look again at the video, clearly something comes from behind and strikes it.

Your video almost buggered up my pc, so no thanks. But I reckon I can safely say, without viewing it, that nothing missile like struck the meteor.

Duiske · 21-02-2013 07:11PM

old hippy wrote: »

Your video almost buggered up my pc, so no thanks. But I reckon I can safely say, without viewing it, that nothing missile like struck the meteor.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4utRB0v-Ud8

Thats it, but yes, no missile. Think Tzar's explanation would be pretty accurate.

Hootanany wrote:

The missile's

Hootanany, do you think that it may have been the missile explosion that caused the meteor to disintegrate and also caused the shockwave ?

Hootanany · 21-02-2013 07:32PM

Duiske wrote: »

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4utRB0v-Ud8

Thats it, but yes, no missile. Think Tzar's explanation would be pretty accurate.

Hootanany, do you think that it may have been the missile explosion that caused the meteor to disintegrate and also caused the shockwave ?

Yes to much of coninsedance for it not to be

3DataModem · 21-02-2013 07:36PM

EnterNow wrote: »

Things break up when the friction with the atmosphere heats them up. Look at the shuttle Columbia, that broke apart didn't it? This thing was apparently going at over Mach 20+ for a time, that'd make it get a little bit warm. It broke up due to atmospheric friction, end of story.

Not friction. Ram compression.

shedweller · 21-02-2013 07:52PM

Tzar Chasm wrote: »

shooting at it from that angle wouldn't make any sense tho.

there is a fairly straightforward physics explanation for this phenomenon,

as the meteorire entered the earths atmosphere it began to experience resistance,
this resistance caused a few things to happen to the meteorite
1) it began to compress a layer of atmosphere in front of it which created the fireball you see in the video
2) it began to slow down
3) it began disintegration

the main meteorite, having the larger surface area, had the lowest terminal velocity
small pieces, such as the one in the video then caught up to it, the impact of the smaller pieces carried enough kinetic energy to punch through the larger meteorite.

Remember
Ek = 1/2MV^2

so although the was a large difference in the masses of the objects the difference in velocity is squared, and there is a very obvious difference in velocity.

I've never heard of this happening. I always thought that as bits broke off they deccelerated more and arced away from the main trajectory.
But i see what you mean there. That'll be a few hrs researching tonight! Ta!

Tzar Chasm · 21-02-2013 08:29PM

closer to the ground yeah, that's what usually happens, but at the initial stages of atmospheric entry the angles and numbers are quite interesting.

Cookie_Monster · 21-02-2013 09:39PM

Hootanany wrote: »

The missile's

What missiles, all I see in the vid is smaller fragments both behind and infront of the main body, as would be completly expected.

Just look at the tajectory, the supposed missile would have to have been launched from orbit to come in at the angle, it's clearly quite small so could not have been an ICBM capable of such angles of intercept.

Torakx · 22-02-2013 12:22AM

Cookie_Monster wrote: »

What missiles, all I see in the vid is smaller fragments both behind and infront of the main body, as would be completly expected.

Just look at the tajectory, the supposed missile would have to have been launched from orbit to come in at the angle, it's clearly quite small so could not have been an ICBM capable of such angles of intercept.

AHA! Did I hear mention of space missiles?!
Sometimes i wonder what they have been shipping up there lol

Allan Blandford · 22-02-2013 11:02AM

It was actually a hologram .
They make up the news to increase their advertising profits .
They would make up anything to get you to watch the mainstream media news .
using their holographic technology

keelanj69 · 22-02-2013 05:36PM

Allan Blandford wrote: »

It was actually a hologram .
They make up the news to increase their advertising profits .
They would make up anything to get you to watch the mainstream media news .
using their holographic technology

Seems a fairly boring story to use holographic technology for. I mean its not like we were glued to our seats. Id use that technology to make up a country ending in -stan and claim its suffering a zombie outbreak..

But yes... Holographic meteorites. The msm know what gets us hard.

Truth about the Russian Meteor strike

Comments