Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mass unmarked grave for 800 babies in Tuam

17810121392

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,697 ✭✭✭Lisha


    Where is the evidence that 800 people died, were deliberatly murdered in fact, from being withheld food in this particular institution?


    What is your explanation for numerous childrens bodies in a septic/water tank?

    What is your explanation for the written evidence of inspectors that the children were poorly nourished and badly cared for?

    I have an aunt who is a staunch catholic.
    When the abuse by clergy was a leading topic on the news I heard her say 'why can't People just shut up about what happened, what good does uncovering all this do'
    to her mind protecting the church was more important than protecting children.

    I just cannot understand why and how people insist on Defending the indefensible .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    Anyone want to suggest alternate wording before I start it?
    We are calling for a full, official investigation of the deaths of the 796 children who's bodies were found in a mass grave in Tuam. The children are believed to have died while in the custody of the religious order of Bon Secours Sisters, between 1925 and 1961. The mortality rate for these children was 2 to 3 times higher than the national rate of infant mortality, and contemporaneous reports into the state of the home describe malnourished, uncared for children, despite the fact that the Irish State was providing financial remuneration to the Bon Secours Sisters for each child in their custody. The Gardaí need to fully investigate this without further delay and prosecutions must be made if anyone still living is found criminally liable. Anyone interfering with or refusing to cooperate with the investigation should also be charged.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,087 ✭✭✭Spring Onion


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    I see that even before any of us have signed the petition, the investigation is over for a lot of posters.
    Apparently exactly 800 babies were murdered by the nuns, nobody here on A&A really cares how where why or when.
    All that matters to some folk is that we seem to have the magic ingredients
    1. Dead babies
    2. Nuns
    Don't let's be bothered with a proper investigation . Don't show any sensitivity to the families of these babies who maybe still alive and suffering horrendously as a result of this discovery. Just get me my pitchfork im in a mood to lynch some religious. We don't need know investigation. Its murder! Murder I tells ya!

    I think you are losing it MrsB


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,088 ✭✭✭SpaceTime


    Cabaal wrote: »

    Watch as the Irish media and political sphere picks up on it once it goes international... Oddly enough they tend to need a kick in the rear with international public condemnation before they react.


  • Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators, Regional South East Moderators Posts: 28,560 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cabaal


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    I see that even before any of us have signed the petition, the investigation is over for a lot of posters.
    Apparently exactly 800 babies were murdered by the nuns, nobody here on A&A really cares how where why or when.
    All that matters to some folk is that we seem to have the magic ingredients
    1. Dead babies
    2. Nuns
    Don't let's be bothered with a proper investigation . Don't show any sensitivity to the families of these babies who maybe still alive and suffering horrendously as a result of this discovery. Just get me my pitchfork im in a mood to lynch some religious. We don't need know investigation. Its murder! Murder I tells ya!

    Have abit of respect will you?
    Its not the time to make light of such a situation in the manner in which you're trying,

    Only some very ignorant people have made some idiotic comments towards the women involved calling them dregs, nobody else has been insensitive to the women, baby's or the women's familys.

    People here want this whole thing investigated and anyone involved brought to justice and any victims still alive (the mothers) compensated, if that involves taking assets belong to the religious organisation then thats the way it needs to be done....

    As we know from previous investigations, every road block possible will be put in place by religious organizations to stop a full and proper investigation and compensation scheme. This is sickening and this is wrong when it comes to the victims and familys.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    I see that even before any of us have signed the petition, the investigation is over for a lot of posters.
    Apparently exactly 800 babies were murdered by the nuns, nobody here on A&A really cares how where why or when.
    All that matters to some folk is that we seem to have the magic ingredients
    1. Dead babies
    2. Nuns
    Don't let's be bothered with a proper investigation . Don't show any sensitivity to the families of these babies who maybe still alive and suffering horrendously as a result of this discovery. Just get me my pitchfork im in a mood to lynch some religious. We don't need know investigation. Its murder! Murder I tells ya!

    Well, they hardly neglected themselves to death, did they? Maybe some, maybe even most, died of natural causes exacerbated by their weakened state but they didn't put themselves in a septic tank, and the people who did put them there need to be held accountable.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    Lisha wrote: »
    What is your explanation for numerous childrens bodies in a septic/water tank?

    I don't have one. I expect, it's rather mundane, a place was needed to put these bodies and this was chosen. No more, no less sad than that.

    What's your evidence that people in the unmarked grave are murder victims?? That's a big claim.
    Lisha wrote: »
    What is your explanation for the written evidence of inspectors that the children were poorly nourished and badly cared for?

    My explanation?? I believe that is what they found. Why would I think otherwise? Many of these homes were brutal, uncaring places and I could beleive that malnutrition was an issue. Very sad.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,455 Mod ✭✭✭✭robindch


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    [...] nobody here on A&A really cares how where why or when [...] Its murder! Murder I tells ya!
    I suggest you read back through the thread before you make any further false and inflammatory comments.

    You can start your investigation with this post, on page one:

    http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=90628261&postcount=11


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    I see that even before any of us have signed the petition, the investigation is over for a lot of posters.
    Apparently exactly 800 babies were murdered by the nuns, nobody here on A&A really cares how where why or when.
    All that matters to some folk is that we seem to have the magic ingredients
    1. Dead babies
    2. Nuns
    Don't let's be bothered with a proper investigation . Don't show any sensitivity to the families of these babies who maybe still alive and suffering horrendously as a result of this discovery. Just get me my pitchfork im in a mood to lynch some religious. We don't need know investigation. Its murder! Murder I tells ya!

    Would you ever grow up? This is not about you or your religion.

    Not everyone is claiming murder but the circumstances are suspect and given the previous history of the church and the general view of children at the time, in particular children in institutions its not exactly a stretch to think there might have been mistreatment of the children that contributed to their deaths.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,870 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs



    My explanation?? I believe that is what they found. Why would I think otherwise? Many of these homes were brutal, uncaring places and I could beleive that malnutrition was an issue. Very sadCriminal act.

    FYP...


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    Tabnabs wrote: »
    FYP...

    Perhaps. It merits a full investigation at least.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    I don't have one. I expect, it's rather mundane, a place was needed to put these bodies and this was chosen. No more, no less sad than that.

    What's your evidence that people in the unmarked grave are murder victims?? That's a big claim.



    My explanation?? I believe that is what they found. Why would I think otherwise? Many of these homes were brutal, uncaring places and I could beleive that malnutrition was an issue. Very sad.
    Mundane? They needed somewhere to put the bodies? Are you honestly suggesting than for forty years the best place a religious order could find to put the corpses of babies who died in their care was a septic tank rather than consecrated ground?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    kylith wrote: »
    Mundane? They needed somewhere to put the bodies? Are you honestly suggesting than for forty years the best place a religious order could find to put the corpses of babies who died in their care was a septic tank rather than consecrated ground?

    I'm not saying it was the "best place", I'm saying it was the place they decided (for whatever reason) to use. I'm not defending it, I'm simply answering the question.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,917 ✭✭✭✭iguana


    Ok, here's the petition. Please share it on Facebook (and even Google Plus) urging as many signatures as possible. I've set it with a current goal of 2,000 signatures but ideally would like to increase that.

    https://secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Frances_Fitzgerald_Irish_Minister_for_Justice_and_Equality_A_full_Gardai_investigation_into_the_mass_grave_in_Tuam_Co_Ga/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,113 ✭✭✭shruikan2553


    kylith wrote: »
    Mundane? They needed somewhere to put the bodies? Are you honestly suggesting than for forty years the best place a religious order could find to put the corpses of babies who died in their care was a septic tank rather than consecrated ground?

    If they weren't baptised no consecrated ground for them. It would be a bit odd for a religious order not to clean these children of sin as soon as possible though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    I'm not saying it was the "best place", I'm saying it was the place they decided (for whatever reason) to use. I'm not defending it, I'm simply answering the question.

    They obviously decided to use it since that's where they ended up, but using it at all was an illegal act. You can't just go around dumping bodies wherever you like because the graveyard's a hassle to get to.

    IMO the fact that they were dumped in a cess pit shows exactly what the nuns thought of these children.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    I'm not saying it was the "best place", I'm saying it was the place they decided (for whatever reason) to use. I'm not defending it, I'm simply answering the question.

    Would you in your own mind say these children were buried or were they dumped?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    If they weren't baptised no consecrated ground for them. It would be a bit odd for a religious order not to clean these children of sin as soon as possible though.

    I'd find it very strange if they hadn't been baptised, especially since they weren't newborns. My grandmother gave birth to a son at around that time and he was pretty much baptised as soon as the cord was cut because he wasn't expected to live (he didn't).


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,076 ✭✭✭✭Czarcasm


    I am morally superior to someone who is trying to minimise the reality of the heinous crime that we are discussing on this thread. That is not me being arrogant or blowing my trumpet, but a simple statement of fact.


    Your moral standards are your own business Brian, but your claim to be better than another human being based on your own personal belief that you are morally superior to them is what I was pointing out was no different to the attitude of those people 50 years ago who allowed this tragedy to happen. They thought they were morally superior too!

    800 kids were murdered in this "care home" and their murders covered up by the perpetrators, and yet we've people on here declaring that the kids deserved to die because their mothers were "the dregs of society", or that because one person got a small detail wrong that the crime didn't happen or wasn't as bad as is being detailed (this would be the equivalent of somebody saying "Aha, there were no Jews killed at Auschwitz", simply because I got the Polish name for the town wrong). The fact that there are people willing to defend the criminals involved, and that I am shouted at for pointing out what they are doing, is frankly sickening in this day and age.


    Nobody here has tried to play down anything, nor are they trying to defend the actions of those involved. They are simply saying that a FULL investigation must be carried out, to determine the full facts of the tragedy and get the details exact, because every detail is relevant. It might seem insignificant to you whether it was a water tank or a septic tank, but in a prosecution case, a detail like that could mean the difference between a conviction and an acquittal.

    Nobody here suggested that these children deserved to die, and the 'dregs of society' really IS how these women and children were viewed BY society at the time. It wasn't that posters personal view, and you're certainly intelligent enough to have understood that, but you chose to twist it so you could yet again exert your moral superiority. That sort of twisting of opinions helps nobody.

    Everyone here wants to see the people responsible for allowing this tragedy to happen, that they be held accountable and answerable and are made take responsibility for their actions. But an investigation like that could take years, and massive State resources, and at the end of it, this still wouldn't change the fact that nearly 800 human beings perished to their deaths in a tragedy that could have been prevented had people not been so concerned with being seen to be morally superior to anyone else.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 613 ✭✭✭SeaDaily


    Perhaps. It merits a full investigation at least.
    We're encouraging investigations that will yield more facts, as much factual information as possible is what I want.
    But I reccomend we hold off on the trail and punishment (of who? We don't even know that) until a full investigation gets to the bottom of it.
    Agreed. But we should investigate to see how these remains were treated.
    So there should be a thorough investigation to find out.
    So, if we don't know, we should investigate the matter.
    That's why I say, time and again, that a proper investigation is required.
    Conclusion suggests an end to the story. I'd prefer a thorough investigation before I conclude.
    No. That's why I'm suggesting we investigate matters. The facts are important.

    The allegations of the historian are very, very serious, so they deserve a serious investigation, not internet guesswork.

    Sorry, your point has been unclear. What is it that you want?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,447 ✭✭✭AlanG


    This is very sad. Not trying to absolve the church in any way for responsibility for this but most of the responses here reflect the Governments success in making the church take the vast majority of the blame for these events.

    A large proportion of the blame should sit with the government of the day. Most of these were grandfathers, uncles or fathers of our current political representatives. Responsibility for the care of citizens ultimately lies with the state and yet many Irish people vote for people based on the great job that a candidates father, mother or uncle did. These were the people with whom responsibility for the care of these kids lay. The outsourced that care and chose to ignore or go along with the treatment handed out to these kids. Perhaps if they didn’t outsource education and health care to the church things would have been much worse or it would have been much better – we will never know.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,228 ✭✭✭mrsbyrne


    Cabaal wrote: »
    Have abit of respect will you?
    Its not the time to make light of such a situation in the manner in which you're trying,

    Only some very ignorant people have made some idiotic comments towards the women involved calling them dregs, nobody else has been insensitive to the women, baby's or the women's familys.

    People here want this whole thing investigated and anyone involved brought to justice and any victims still alive (the mothers) compensated, if that involves taking assets belong to the religious organisation then thats the way it needs to be done....

    As we know from previous investigations, every road block possible will be put in place by religious organizations to stop a full and proper investigation and compensation scheme. This is sickening and this is wrong when it comes to the victims and familys.

    I don't agree at all that I am the one who is being disrespetfull here. Posters are alleging murder and abuse and criminality before any investigation has taken place. No poster seems to be cogniscent of the possibility that parents of these dead children could be still alive and finding these allegations very traumatising. The rush to judgment here is alarming based on such scant evidence. And these allegations are allowed to go on pretty much unfettered. There is no doubt that a lynch mob mentality is very prevalent here and it is very troubling.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    bumper234 wrote: »
    Would you in your own mind say these children were buried or were they dumped?

    I'd say buried tbh. I don't know the full details though.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    I don't agree at all that I am the one who is being disrespetfull here. Posters are alleging murder and abuse and criminality before any investigation has taken place. No poster seems to be cogniscent of the possibility that parents of these dead children could be still alive and finding these allegations very traumatising. The rush to judgment here is alarming based on such scant evidence. And these allegations are allowed to go on pretty much unfettered. There is no doubt that a lynch mob mentality is very prevalent here and it is very troubling.


    Do explain then why the death rate was four times the national average.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,749 ✭✭✭Flippyfloppy


    Does a mass burial in an unmarked grave = unlawful disposing of body?

    Thanks for making the petition Cabaal Iguana.

    Obviously every single person here wants this matter investigated. This thread is a good thing- anything to create awareness ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    SeaDaily wrote: »
    Sorry, your point has been unclear. What is it that you want?

    I want what the guy who set up the petition wants - an investigation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 613 ✭✭✭SeaDaily


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    No poster seems to be cogniscent of the possibility that parents of these dead children could be still alive and finding these allegations very traumatising.

    I would imagine that any remaining parents of these dead children would be significantly more upset by your defence of the RCC than they would by people being justifiable outraged. It is posters such as yourself who are trying to play down this findings as if the RCC was, by some miracle, not directly involved in this atrocity. You are desperately trying to land the blame elsewhere where it just does not belong.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 613 ✭✭✭SeaDaily


    I want what the guy who set up the petition wants - an investigation.

    Haha really? I had no idea.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    Posters are alleging murder

    I'll leave this one for now.
    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    and abuse

    The children in The Home were reported at the time to be pot bellied and malnourished. This is child abuse.
    mrsbyrne wrote: »
    and criminality
    Improperly disposing of human remains is a criminal offence, as is neglect such as providing improper nourishment as above.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    I'd say buried tbh. I don't know the full details though.

    Ok

    From the details you have so far, making an educated guess, would you still say they were buried? Or dumped?


Advertisement