Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Can I chnage my UPC Modem& Router

  • 03-12-2014 10:23AM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21


    my current UPC Modem and Router is terrible. Signal is poor. My horizon box is worse. Am I able to walk in and buy a modem/Router from Argos or PC World and will it work instead of UPC one. can anyone Recommend one if so


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Use the search function, answered many times already.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭Caliden


    Hi, I've the same question as the OP.

    Tried searching but the only threads I could find suggested asking to be switched back to the old router or another thread discussing UPC prices.

    My issue is that my laptop/phone can only get 70mbps on the wifi.


    I recently bought this powerline wifi extender:
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B009T67ZSQ?psc=1&redirect=true&ref_=oh_aui_detailpage_o01_s00

    as the Wifi didn't reach downstairs.

    Could I buy another one of these products, plug it into the router and use to to broadcast higher wifi speed upstairs?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭bealtine


    Caliden wrote: »
    Hi, I've the same question as the OP.

    Tried searching but the only threads I could find suggested asking to be switched back to the old router or another thread discussing UPC prices.

    One thread did discuss buying an access point but a poster pointed out that access points are just as expensive (if not more) than routers.

    You can't change the "modem" part (well you can but UPC won't play along)
    (cable CPE)

    Your best bet is to put the UPC supplied router in bridge mode, if it has it and supply your own external router and let that handle wifi/ethernet etc.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,211 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Caliden wrote: »
    Hi, I've the same question as the OP.

    Tried searching but the only threads I could find suggested asking to be switched back to the old router or another thread discussing UPC prices.

    One thread did discuss buying an access point but a poster pointed out that access points are just as expensive (if not more) than routers.

    Depends on the router, If you have the Trusty (but also ****e) Cisco 3925 you can bridge that router and use an access point to distribute your wifi.

    If you want the best of all worlds this is the best method and can be done inexpensively. If you do want to have good Wifi then go buy an access point none of the UPC OEM equipment is great.

    the likes of a TP Link Accesspoint or router can be bought on adverts for relatively little 20-40 Euro


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    You can bridge the Cisco 3925 and the Technicolor TC7200 and use your own router no problem. I recently bridged my Technicolor TC7200 and setup a Netgear R7000 Nighthawk and the difference is night and day.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,982 ✭✭✭Caliden


    Any solutions involving keeping the current Horizon box? I'm guessing the TP Link Accesspoint might be my best bet in that case?

    In the amazon link above would any of the selectable products be suitable to provide wifi speeds in excess of my current 70Mbps?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,697 ✭✭✭MaceFace


    TCP/IP - I'm going to have to get a new router and was looking at the Nighthawk you mention.

    In another thread you said it was a nightmare to setup.
    For someone who has the standard UPC Cisco router in bridge mode, it is a case of plug and play to get setup?

    recommend this router?


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    MaceFace wrote: »
    TCP/IP - I'm going to have to get a new router and was looking at the Nighthawk you mention.

    In another thread you said it was a nightmare to setup.
    For someone who has the standard UPC Cisco router in bridge mode, it is a case of plug and play to get setup?

    recommend this router?

    The Cisco router is very straightforward to bridge, you will have no problems at all. As for the Nighthawk its a great router, super wifi coverage and speed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,760 ✭✭✭degsie


    The Netgear R7500 looks like a beast!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,211 ✭✭✭✭listermint




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,001 [Deleted User]


    Has anyone bridged the Technocolor T7200? Upgraded to the 240mb pack but stuck with it on 2.4GHz because other people in the house have older tech, so I'm looking at adding my own dual band wifi router.

    If not would UPC allow me to send it back in exchange for the Cisco modem/router?


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    cisk wrote: »
    Has anyone bridged the Technocolor T7200? Upgraded to the 240mb pack but stuck with it on 2.4GHz because other people in the house have older tech, so I'm looking at adding my own dual band wifi router.

    If not would UPC allow me to send it back in exchange for the Cisco modem/router?

    I have bridged the Technocolor T7200 but on the 200mb package not 240mb


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    TCP/IP wrote: »
    I have bridged the Technocolor T7200 but on the 200mb package not 240mb

    Nighthawk will do in excess of 500Mbps lan to wan so you're golden on either package.


  • Posts: 2,001 [Deleted User]


    Cheers, looks like the R7000 is the way to go. Has anyone bothered flashing it with Tomato or DD-WRT firmware or is stock good enough?


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    cisk wrote: »
    Cheers, looks like the R7000 is the way to go. Has anyone bothered flashing it with Tomato or DD-WRT firmware or is stock good enough?

    Stock seems fine to me, have not had any issues at all.


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    ED E wrote: »
    Nighthawk will do in excess of 500Mbps lan to wan so you're golden on either package.

    Still waiting for confirmation from UPC that if I move to 240Mbps that I will not be moved to a IPV6 address as they seems to break the ability to bridge.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,211 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    TCP/IP wrote: »
    Still waiting for confirmation from UPC that if I move to 240Mbps that I will not be moved to a IPV6 address as they seems to break the ability to bridge.

    Dont say that, i just moved today have to get home for a reboot though.


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    listermint wrote: »
    Dont say that, i just moved today have to get home for a reboot though.


    Looks like your the guinea pig. Let us know how it went. Best of luck


  • Posts: 2,001 [Deleted User]


    Just won a auction for a R7000 Nighthawk so fingers crossed.


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    cisk wrote: »
    Just won a auction for a R7000 Nighthawk so fingers crossed.

    What did you get it for is it new?


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,001 [Deleted User]


    €121 + 15 shipping from Austria, i got a bit caught up in the bidding but it looks like a good price for it. Its described as new condition used for a few months. Time will tell.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,056 ✭✭✭✭BostonB


    TCP/IP wrote: »
    Y...I recently bridged my Technicolor TC7200...


    DMZ yes. But I didn't think you could bridge the TC7200. Is there a thread anywhere on boards?


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    BostonB wrote: »
    DMZ yes. But I didn't think you could bridge the TC7200. Is there a thread anywhere on boards?

    Nope bridged using SNMP


  • Posts: 2,001 [Deleted User]


    How about the Horizon built in modem can that be bridged?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    cisk wrote: »
    How about the Horizon built in modem can that be bridged?

    Nope, you have to get UPC to de-consolidate you first.


  • Posts: 2,001 [Deleted User]


    Yeah have mine de-consolidated, wish i could do away with the t7200 altogether :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,211 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    TCP/IP wrote: »
    Looks like your the guinea pig. Let us know how it went. Best of luck

    No change to bridge mode, everything working as before after reboot. Linux box all working VPN working.

    Only getting 150 though download right now 24 up. from my previous 120 line.

    Ill test it again later.

    All this has made me question my access point though only achieving 50% the wired speed. Will have to ditch it for something up to date.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 793 ✭✭✭Akula


    Hi,

    Two questions as I'm about to sign up to UPC as a new customer.

    1. Can anybody point me to a guide on how to bridge the TC7200. Lots of references to it not being able to be done, but I trust the posters who say they have done it.
    2. In terms of the IPV6 address. What do I need to say to them to be able to avoid getting this? I saw some reference before but now can't find it?

    Derek


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,170 ✭✭✭✭ED E


    Akula wrote: »
    Hi,

    Two questions as I'm about to sign up to UPC as a new customer.

    1. Can anybody point me to a guide on how to bridge the TC7200. Lots of references to it not being able to be done, but I trust the posters who say they have done it.
    2. In terms of the IPV6 address. What do I need to say to them to be able to avoid getting this? I saw some reference before but now can't find it?

    Derek

    1. It can be done, but you need to use SNMP and its not at all user friendly. There's a guide on boards you can google for.
    2. That's DSLite, its only in some areas as a trial. If you get stung by it you simply have to.moan to them until they turn it off.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,531 ✭✭✭✭Alun


    TCP/IP wrote: »
    Still waiting for confirmation from UPC that if I move to 240Mbps that I will not be moved to a IPV6 address as they seems to break the ability to bridge.
    I moved from 200Mbps to 240Mbps with a bridged Cisco 3925 and no IPV6 here, thank goodness.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,209 ✭✭✭moonboy52


    TCP/IP wrote: »
    Still waiting for confirmation from UPC that if I move to 240Mbps that I will not be moved to a IPV6 address as they seems to break the ability to bridge.

    Let us know what they reply back with TCP/IP.

    I am bridged on 240Mb (3925), but would hate to lose that option with IPv6


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    moonboy52 wrote: »
    Let us know what they reply back with TCP/IP.

    I am bridged on 240Mb (3925), but would hate to lose that option with IPv6

    Will do still no reply from UPC yet


  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    Did everybody that moved to 240mb have to pay the €60 activation fee even if you were an existing customer?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 27,833 ✭✭✭✭ThisRegard


    Nope. It showed up in the online form so I rang to check, once they realised I had an appropriate modem there was no need to send my a new one and charge the fee.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,211 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    TCP/IP wrote: »
    Did everybody that moved to 240mb have to pay the €60 activation fee even if you were an existing customer?

    Did you phone them? You have to phone them. I was trying to be nice but the girl on the phone did not have much a clue what i was saying to her.

    I told her that there is no 60 Euro fee as i already have the equipment.

    I explained that i she is giving me two options

    Pay them 1 Euro more per month and keep my 120Mb line and a small additional phone package.

    or save 4 Euro a month and keep my 120Mb line and the same phone package.

    so i either give them money or or save money and stay where i am. She could not see the logic.

    So i explained that the website has 45 pm for the 250 line and thats what i wanted to me on by giving them the 1 euro more.

    She went off on hold for a bit, then agreed.


    Job done.



    Dont do it online ! btw


  • Advertisement
  • Subscribers Posts: 3,704 ✭✭✭TCP/IP


    Called them just now. Moved to 240mb and no upgrade fee. New 12 month contract but that suits me fine.
    Cheers for the advice lads.


Advertisement