Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

is rock n'roll dying

Options
2

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭Crucifix


    Check out Porcupine Tree. Give the song "Blackest Eyes" a listen to. ;)
    "Trains" on the list there is worth a listen too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,552 ✭✭✭Steoob


    crucifix i love your sig pic where did you get it?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,437 ✭✭✭Crucifix


    Steoob wrote:
    crucifix i love your sig pic where did you get it?
    It's a screenshot I took from the trailer for "A Scanner darkly".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,006 ✭✭✭Baggio


    rock and roll..is a veryyy broard term ...I cant think of a single band mentioned so far that Id like to go see....maybe ACDC or KISS for the fun of it all....but the rest?...ughhh groan their all sooo lame, the word DULL springs to my mind every time I hear of another "amazing line up" for oxygen or any other festivals here....waste of money and time going to see the amaturs that appear at the outdoor shows...maybe The Who may have been worth seeing...the rest??...not worth even mentioning.

    There are a few goood bands still around...but...yu need to go look for em...you all know my veryyy narrow music taste for a handfull of bands...who are now in their senior years at this stage...but what else is there?........rock and roll dying ? no.,.......in state of decay?..probably

    ciao' amigos....Baggio...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    Far too many scarf-wearing NME bands around.

    People have been saying that since about 1975! (Hot Press effect)

    For me 'rock' music came to an end about 15 years ago I dunno why but very little music by new bands since then has caught my casual ear.

    Mike.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12,135 ✭✭✭✭John


    It's all about the post rock and the avant rock if I should believe The Wire.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,525 ✭✭✭kona


    U2 proved to be the biggest crowd of shills ever flogging iPods...

    The only decent rock band out there now has got to be Radiohead. Cant actually think of any others.

    sadly yes it is dying,
    ha ha ha u2 and radiohead aint rock music, neither are arctic monkey-sh1t, franz ferdinand, or the new chilli peppers stuff, my farts have more melody to be honest.
    real rock is MOTLEY CRUE,VAN HALEN, GUNS N ROSES, KISS, PANTERA,NIRVANA,LED ZEPPLIN, MOTORHEAD,RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE, AEROSMITH,JUDAS PRIEST,METALLICA etc

    look up the stories of the crue and guns n roses and compare them to the arctic monkeys, they make 'rock' bands like the arctic monkeys look like daniel o donnel.
    the crue are real rockers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    kona wrote:
    sadly yes it is dying,
    ha ha ha u2 and radiohead aint rock music, neither are arctic monkey-****, franz ferdinand, or the new chilli peppers stuff, my farts have more melody to be honest.
    real rock is MOTLEY CRUE,VAN HALEN, GUNS N ROSES, KISS, PANTERA,NIRVANA,LED ZEPPLIN, MOTORHEAD,RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE, AEROSMITH,JUDAS PRIEST,METALLICA etc

    look up the stories of the crue and guns n roses and compare them to the arctic monkeys, they make 'rock' bands like the arctic monkeys look like daniel o donnel.
    the crue are real rockers

    I think we all acknowledge that the arctic monkeys, franz ferdinand etc. aren't rock, the post you quoted never even mentioned anyone besides U2(which they slagged off) and radiohead. Quite frankly the sentiment that Radiohead are not rock is stupid as their early albums(The Bands, Ok Computer) clearly are. Furthermore the bands you mention have little consistency and don't really prove your point. The Crue were glam rock, not "real" rock, same with KISS. Pantera, Motorhead, Judas Priest and Metallica are considered metal, not rock. So the only bands that are actually "rock" from that list are Van Halen, GNR, Nirvana(and you could argue and class them as grunge or something), ZeppElin, RATM and Aerosmith.

    I personally am a fan of elitist posts, but only when they're intelligent and have a consistant argument.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,405 ✭✭✭gizmo


    And from the latter list I'd say only VH, GnR, Zepplin and Aerosmith are proper Rock N' Roll with RATM being more metal imo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 55 ✭✭Charm Offensive


    Hmmm. What's changed since the "good ol' days" is obviously the proliferation of the modern media; the commercialisation of music. Music is a product, and the the mainstream is always going to be edging towards a superlatively efficient, cost-effective ideal - becoming more streamlined, vacuous and music-less as time goes on. However, the volume of original, genuine and truly worthwhile music being produced in any genre has not diminished in the slightest. I guess what you really mean by "rock and roll" though is as much the feeling of solidarity and having some sort of ethos and collective feeling of power to latch onto as well as enjoying the music. And yeah, that element of it has undoubtedly diminished, but having just turned twenty I never "felt" that happening so I'm not really qualified to talk about it. I grew up in the cold, bleak and dystopian musical landscape ( :p ) of the 90s... listening to people like Billy Corgan of the Pumpkins talking about how he saw, and felt, the revolutionary air that surrounded rock and roll music evaporating as he grew up. Personally, I've always had to furrow and investigate to find music that I loved and could really latch onto, it's never just appeared around me as part of the cultural landscape - aside from the recommendations of clued-in friends or siblings who themselves put a conscious effort into trying to find good stuff.

    All that aside, if I wanted to be a brat about it I'd just say that people who are moaning about the death of rock and roll are old farts who are channeling their lamentations of lost youth into a whinge about the musical climate, denying the reality that revolutionary musical movements, if such a thing still exists (it doesn't), are the domain of the young, and they're just out of touch. And hey, if a new "ROCK AND ROLL REVOLUTION" (eugh) came along, you wouldn't be celebrating it, you'd be calling all the bands involved a bunch of derivative tossers!

    P.S. Can we not turn this thread into a genre debate? There are few things in this world more utterly pointless. :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,525 ✭✭✭kona


    JC 2K3 wrote:
    I think we all acknowledge that the arctic monkeys, franz ferdinand etc. aren't rock, the post you quoted never even mentioned anyone besides U2(which they slagged off) and radiohead. Quite frankly the sentiment that Radiohead are not rock is stupid as their early albums(The Bands, Ok Computer) clearly are. Furthermore the bands you mention have little consistency and don't really prove your point. The Crue were glam rock, not "real" rock, same with KISS. Pantera, Motorhead, Judas Priest and Metallica are considered metal, not rock. So the only bands that are actually "rock" from that list are Van Halen, GNR, Nirvana(and you could argue and class them as grunge or something), ZeppElin, RATM and Aerosmith.

    I personally am a fan of elitist posts, but only when they're intelligent and have a consistant argument.

    twas just thrownin in a few more names of **** bands that think they are rock!! they call oxegen a 'rock festival' iwhich it aint.
    the crue started glam rock but they finished with it after 'theatre of pain', the crue say they hate glam too!!! id call Dr Feelgood and GirlsGirlsGirls rock albums as is , generation swine, motley crue, new tattoo. however they are usually found in the metal sections.
    GnR are metal not rock so ill take back my comments, but wasnt 80s rock the birth of metal???i.e GnR,Metallica, Motley Crue etc....
    and as for my list not saying rock bands , when i load my crue albums and the others they come up rock in windows media player , i know its a weak point but ill just put it there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    kona wrote:
    twas just thrownin in a few more names of **** bands that think they are rock!! they call oxegen a 'rock festival' iwhich it aint.

    As much as I hate those bands none of them call themselves rock, they call themselves "indie" and last time I checked Oxegen called itself a "music festival".
    kona wrote:
    GnR are metal not rock so ill take back my comments, but wasnt 80s rock the birth of metal???i.e GnR,Metallica, Motley Crue etc....

    GNR are hard rock, not metal..... but as Charm Offensive said, genre debates are pointless.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,525 ✭✭✭kona


    JC 2K3 wrote:
    As much as I hate those bands none of them call themselves rock, they call themselves "indie" and last time I checked Oxegen called itself a "music festival".



    GNR are hard rock, not metal..... but as Charm Offensive said, genre debates are pointless.


    yes they are pointless. in the papers oxegen is called a rock festival!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,397 ✭✭✭ANarcho-Munk


    kona wrote:
    yes they are pointless. in the papers oxegen is called a rock festival!!!


    Nail.Head.The.Hit.The.On


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,978 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    wasnt 80s rock the birth of metal

    Speechless. :eek:

    Mike.


  • Registered Users Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Check out Porcupine Tree. Give the song "Blackest Eyes" a listen to. ;)

    And while we're splitting hairs on genres, how come stuff like porcupine tree is labelled "prog"? ehhnobatman...that sound was progressive back in the late 60s when the bands steve wilson et al imitate were banging it out. Nowadays its just unimaginative retro cack :mad:


  • Registered Users Posts: 316 ✭✭LightofDarkness


    Good point Bambi. While we're at it, Dream Theater are progressive HOW??? Don't get me wrong, they're good musicians and all, but it's the same as Porcupine Tree, a few complex arrangements and one or two off-time segments doesn't make you progressive when your basically just writing generock music.
    GnR are metal not rock so ill take back my comments, but wasnt 80s rock the birth of metal???i.e GnR,Metallica, Motley Crue etc....

    I don't do this much, but LOL. You should probably sit this one out....

    The music scene sure does suck if you 're only counting the mainstream ballsack that dangles from the penis of MTV. Yes, there may be too many scarf wearing pseudo intellectuals that we call "indies" who think they know all there is to know about music because they read NME and knew about the Killers before the Lifestyle Sports ad, but that doesn't mean that's all there is. Go a-huntin', lads. I find plenty of good **** via trawling through websites. Is rock dying? GOD I hope so, then maybe people can just write music that they come up with and not play to a well-established blueprint. Like just yesterday I found a band called Alarum that I really like, plus I have an affinity for silly technical crazy bands like Sleep Terror, whom I find daily. Plus, if you don't like what's out there now, pick up a guitar and change it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    No idea, some bands just get called Prog that really aren't doing anything very prog.


  • Registered Users Posts: 207 ✭✭AlanOB


    Prog now seems to mean "reminiscent of the progressive bands of old" at times, rather than actually being used to denote bands who are truly doing "progressive" work.

    Which is fine. I do this myself. If a band is in the vein of Floyd or Yes I'll say they're prog. If they are genuinely being progressive I'll use the full word.

    There's no real need to be a pedant. People usually know what you mean.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    What is prog supposed to mean then? I always thought it was longer than average songs with complex structures.....


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    I think you might find a more indepth answer here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,794 ✭✭✭JC 2K3


    Yup I've read that and regularly go on that site, but how is a band like Dream Theatre not progressive?? They're even mentioned in that article as being prog :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 29,130 ✭✭✭✭Karl Hungus


    I think part of the magic of prog is it's so incredibly hard to define. ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,838 ✭✭✭Doomspell


    Nothing ever dies. It simply moves out of the public eye.

    Exactly!
    I hate the rock genre, die by my bath'leth!
    So what are you doing here?? Get out!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,838 ✭✭✭Doomspell


    kona wrote:
    yes they are pointless. in the papers oxegen is called a rock festival!!!

    Uh?!? I got a Ozygen poster and it says;
    'Oxygen 2006
    Music Festival'

    Just thought I'd clear that up!:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,525 ✭✭✭kona


    Doomspell wrote:
    Uh?!? I got a Ozygen poster and it says;
    'Oxygen 2006
    Music Festival'

    Just thought I'd clear that up!:)


    well done what do you want ??? a medal:p
    i said in the papers.....you know articles written by journalists....in black print...ring a bell....they are either tabloid(has tits in it) or broadsheet(bit more dry sh1te)...got it???:rolleyes:
    of course oxegen will try to pass that noise off as music but it aint its a glorified piss up, with ****e bands or has beens.
    Doomspell wrote:
    Just thought I'd clear that up!:)


  • Registered Users Posts: 207 ✭✭AlanOB


    You are correct sir!

    Anyone I know that went to Oxygen doesn't really like music. They think they do, like a lot of people, but they have about as much knowledge of it or passion for it as I do for ballet.

    And I hate ballet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,312 ✭✭✭pbsuxok1znja4r


    The people who call oxegen 'rock' are the same kind of people who call Daniel O'Donnell 'rock 'n' roll'. 'Nuff said.

    Oxegen is, indeed, a glorified piss up. Many a mate of mine came back saying they didn't watch a single band.

    For me, the word 'prog' on its own has always signified the "reminiscent of the progressive bands of old" thing. If someone says 'prog/progressive/post (insert genre here)' then I'll have a proper idea of what they're on about.

    I hope traditional 'rock' does die. Out with the old, in with the new.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,312 ✭✭✭Limerick Dude


    Well yes many little shíts go to oxegen for a piss up weekend. But i did go for the music!

    The Who, Placebo, Chilli's, Bellx1, Manu Chao, Dave Couse, sigur ros (who unfortunatly i didnt get to see)

    These are all very good bands imo.

    I have to admit it does hurt deep down when someone went "who the fcuk are these placebo fagotts, bring on the fcukin kaiser chiefs"

    something similar was said about the who, i watched many scumbage leave during the who......dickheads.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 158 ✭✭Its So Easy


    GNR were never a metal band. Hard rock.And i dont think rock n roll is dead. Just that all the genres seem to have merged a lot together and its kind of hard to be classed as one type or another. IMO anyway.


Advertisement