Sandy hook ref in batman movie + father caught 'acting'

Run_to_da_hills wrote: »

I would believe that they would be, a reason why only a selected few would be chosen.

How many of the parents have been interviewed other than Parker so far?

As already mentioned I am convinced that Parker is a fraud from the premature local press footage that slipped out before his "official statement" and the happy family portrait depicted of him with his family with Obama.

As someone said alreay its a bit far fetched, the whole town would have to be in on it if thats the case.

I do agree that it's strange that the parents apparently haven't been allowed see the bodies (though I don't think there's been any recent detail on that). However attributing it to a CT only creates more questions than it answers.

If you say there are no bodies, then you have to presume that either these children never existed (and their parents are actors), or that the bodies have been disposed of.

The former scenario creates even more complexity (i.e. was every child in the school acting? Were these fake names in a roll book?, etc etc) whereas the latter makes no sense - if there were bodies, then what was the point in disposing of them?

Some of the children were shot one or twice so the bodies cant be that bad that the parents should not see them.

I don't mean this in an aggresive way, but have you ever seen anybody getting shot that's not in a movie, or on the internet, so on so forth, or seen a body decompose that's not in a movie so on (neither have I btw).

And as strange as this will sound, bullets weren't made to hit children. If hit in the chest as an example, it could absolutely destroy the whole frame of their upper body, or gods know what to their face or legs.

And, especially during a high profile case, I don't think the parents are allowed to see the body until they've finished examining them.

are all the other kids in the school that were there that day actors as well?? for the love of fcuk mods close this thread

Leave it open, let people see some of things that some of the conspiracy theorists are saying. One of the posters on this has ruined any credibility he had, in my eyes.

m.j.w wrote: »

If your child had been shot would you not want to see them, granted some could be in a bad way buy alot of them being shot once would not. I cant see how this was set up but I find it very strange that the perants arent being shown thier bodies.

I definitely would. But the parents may have been advised against it. As Seamus says, we've not heard anything of this other than the first report. And the way things are in the CT world, it may have just been a case of one parent being told that it may be better for them not to see their child's body. If there has been an outright ban on anyone being able to see the bodies, then that would be suspicious. But we don't know what the parents have been told.

humanji wrote: »

I definitely would. But the parents may have been advised against it. As Seamus says, we've not heard anything of this other than the first report. And the way things are in the CT world, it may have just been a case of one parent being told that it may be better for them not to see their child's body. If there has been an outright ban on anyone being able to see the bodies, then that would be suspicious. But we don't know what the parents have been told.

Yeah maybe this is also the case

loveisdivine wrote: »

I've watched this vid a few times now and I just cant get my head around it.
Some people are saying that its natural in times of stress to be hysterical one minute and sad the next. This is true but to me it doesnt look like he's hysterical, he looks very calm and collected. Having some sort of joke with the people behind the camera. The way he looks behind the camera and laughs and mutters something to the people behind it. He just seems so at ease infront of the camera.

Then he starts breathing deeply and composing himself and puts on a slightly shaky voice.

I'm not saying I think its all a hoax and he's an actor, but somethings not right.

To be fair, it looks like he's responding to something that's been said to him rather than having a joke and a laugh. IMO then the part after that he's clearly attempting to keep his emotions under control rather than doing any kind of "prep". Actors warming up or getting into character don't look like they're completely terrified and about to break down. This guy does.

I'm one of these odd people that smiles or laughs in intensely sad situations. Obviously I've never done anything on this scale, but the couple of times I've had to tell someone that a person has died, I've had to work really hard to stop myself from smiling and breaking into laughter.

Im getting the feeling the whole idea that actors were involved might be a red herring.

All the government need is the media to show politicians having reasons to say the words "gun control".
Once they can say that over and over, in relation to anything, it will be impressed enough on the american collective minds that they can then implement it easier.

These shootings are a timely help for those seeking to put americans under more control by the gov,instead of the opposite which insanely hasnt happened in a long time i believe.

Have any of these shooters been accused of hating the government?
It seems to me that if they were that type, it would be unlikey someone like that would attack innocent children.
Im curious the motives in general anyway.I cant think of any motive for what was done, only insanity.

Jonny7 wrote: »

How can this all powerful government which controls the media not just pass a common sense bill to ban dangerous fully automatic weapons?

I would say the constitution for a start is an issue for them.
All powerfull might be the goal but not the current situation.

Juicee wrote: »

For me, the murder of any innocent people, adult or children is sick, repugnant and heartbreaking, regardless of whether they are afghan, pakistani or american or whatever. The perpetrators deserve the severest of justice whether they are a lone nut a president a military industrial corporatist or an elitist satantic paedophile or whatever.

Alas though, double standards, hierarchies of victim hood and utter hypocrisy abound.

Yup, we read this rhetoric a lot here, doesn't really well translate into reality however. It's usually just the victims of giant invisible energy weapons, or evil outlandish government plots, or "elitist satanic paedophiles" or whatever the flavour of the month is.