Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

M1 New Section of D3 (three lanes) at Swords

Options
1235736

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 78,404 ✭✭✭✭Victor


    KevR wrote: »
    it's the second biggest county in the Ireland!
    Ah, sorry, does this suddenly make you correct? :pac:

    I imagine this scheme might cost a million. How much Galway Bypass would you get for that?


  • Registered Users Posts: 18 Chubi


    Anyone have any idea how long these works are going to go on for? There doesn't seem to be any progress despite the right hand lane being closed off for almost a week at this stage. :confused:


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    Victor wrote: »
    Ah, sorry, does this suddenly make you correct? :pac:

    I imagine this scheme might cost a million. How much Galway Bypass would you get for that?

    Yes, I did say that they would both cost the exact same amount. In fact, that was the main point of my argument. You didn't miss the point I was trying to make at all.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    Victor wrote: »
    Ah, sorry, does this suddenly make you correct? :pac:

    I imagine this scheme might cost a million. How much Galway Bypass would you get for that?

    FYI - I also posted this:
    I hope the M1 widening does go ahead but I will never accept that delays on that short section of the M1 are worse than the delays around the whole of Galway City. I don't think either of the projects actually have any bearing on each other but I simply can't agree with someone who claims the M1 widening should have priority over the Galway Bypass if the two projects did have a bearing on each other. It seems some people actually get offended if it is suggested that somewhere other than Dublin has worse traffic than Dublin. I really wish Galway didn't have the traffic problems that it does - having worse traffic than Dublin is not something I am at all happy about or proud of.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭celticbest


    Sponge Bob wrote: »
    Bypass Galway first , delays on this stretch are minor league and widening a waste of money to my mind!!!
    celticbest wrote: »
    Galway has far less traffic to deal with compared to Dublin, also the M1 connects the two biggest cities in Ireland - Dublin to Belfast through some of the most densely populated parts of the country, if this road needs to be widened in order for traffic to flow then this should be done.

    Population of Galway 231,035 - area 6,148 km2 - density 37 per km2
    Population of Fingal region 239,813 - area 448.07 km2 - density 535 per km2

    Yes Galway does need to be by-passed but you can't say don't do this job or that job before you do this one or this is a waste of money.

    People in Dublin have had to live with the worst traffic in the country for years, we are only recently seeing an improvement in this thanks to the upgrade of the M50, as a result of this upgrade traffic is getting to the M1 in a much quicker and more steady flow, this is now causing this stretch of the M1 Motorway to clog up at peak times so yes this upgrade does need to be done ASAP so the people of Swords, Balbriggan, Gormanstown, Stamullen, Drogheda, Dundalk, Newry whom use this route to commute to and from work on a daily basis and then you also have the intercity traffic heading to Belfast, on a road of this importance you should expect traffic not to have to come to a standstill around Swords each and every evening.

    Lets not forget that this is a Motorway and slowdowns like this should not occur on a regular basis.
    KevR wrote: »
    I agree

    but...



    We're talking about a bypass of Galway City, not the entire County!! Population density in Galway City is obviously far greater than the density of the whole County (it's the second biggest county in the Ireland!).

    I do think the M1 widening should go ahead and I don't think it will ever be a case of either the Galway BP or the M1 widening only going ahead, both eventually will.

    However, if it was the case that one had to get priority over the other then the Galway Bypass would definitely have to be given priority. It wouldn't even come close to being a contest, no offence to the people of North Dublin/the M1 corridor.
    celticbest wrote: »
    As I stated before the M1 is a major route which connects city to city, the Galway bypass from what I can see doesn't connect to any other major route, correct me if I'm wrong.

    Attachment not found.



    Lets not forget that the M1 is the mainline link to Dublin Port and Dublin Airport, both of which are the busiest goods/people movers in the country.

    Dublin Airport is expected to have 20 million passengers this year, it's usually open 364 days a year (except for ash clouds) this equals an average of about 55,000 people using it a day, http://www.finfacts.ie/irishfinancenews/article_1016963.shtml

    Dublin port, the latest figures I could find (2003) Passengers through were 1.5 million this as per above standard would equal an average of about 4,100 passengers a day, also 23.5 million tonnes of cargo pass through it yearly, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dublin_Port

    It therefore goes without saying that the M1 is a higher priority than Galway City by-pass, Galway in the last census had a population of 72,414, Dublin Airport daily passengers numbers are 55,000+ Dublin port passengers 4,100 and the population of Swords 33,998 = 93,098 these numbers alone are greater than the population of Galway by over 20,600. This is without adding in the other commuter towns along the M1.

    As I said before Galway deserves a by-pass but you have to look at the numbers before you can say that it should be a priority over the M1.
    It will be a complete waste, as everyone that drives on 3 lane motorways drives in the middle lane/right lane, the left lane simply won't be used as the M50 and N7 proves:(.
    celticbest wrote: »
    I would have to say that I disagree with your above statement, it would not be a complete waste 'captainspeed', yes lane discipline in this country is very poor but it is up to the people in charge to start enforcing the rules of the road. However just saying that it would be a complete waste could not be further from the truth.

    As an example lets have a look at the M50.

    Since the adding of the extra lanes the motorway has been free moving. However in the one spot at Junction 6 Blanchardstown on the NB carriageway were for a short distance under the junction it reverts back to 2 lanes there is on more occasions than not a hold up at this point.

    Again per your statement above 'captainspeed', how does this hold up occur if everyone drives in the second or third lane?

    The more lanes that are in place then the quicker traffic moves even if the majority of people on the road do not know how to drive on it correctly.
    KevR wrote: »
    You don't know anything about me apart from 'Galway City' on my profile so you can't make an informed comment on whether or not I am biased.



    Hold on a minute. You are talking as if the M1 does not exist and that the old N1 is the only route which connects Dublin City/Airport/Port and Belfast.

    The reasons you give for the Dublin City/Airport/Port to Belfast route being more important than the Galway Bypass route are true and that is why the M1 was built long before the Galway Bypass!! The existing M1 also has a free-flow connection with the M50 (Dublin's Bypass/Orbital)

    There is already a motorway (M1) there which can handle large amounts of traffic and copes well with volumes most of the day. There are some delays at certain times of day - the majority of people who use the M1 don't even experience noticeable delays. These delays are minor when compared to delays in Galway - I have driven all around Dublin including the M1 in various levels of traffic; have you or Bluetonic ever driven fully across Galway at peak times?

    To put things into context for you - imagine what traffic in Dublin City would be like without the M50 because that's pretty much what Galway is like at the moment. I think widening the M1 would be the least of Dublin's traffic worries if the M50 was still only in the planning stages!

    "the Galway bypass from what I can see doesn't connect to any other major route, correct me if I'm wrong." The Galway Bypass will connect to the M6; the M17 and M18 are starting construction at the end of this year and they will both connect to the M6 (which as I mentioned connects to the bypass). The M6 currently ends at an at-grade roundabout in Doughiska - this roundabout was not in the initial plans, the bypass was supposed to have been built at the same time with the M6 feeding directly into it. The bypass didn't happen and the M6 now ends at a 'temporary' roundabout. Soon the M17 and M18 will feed into the M6 and all the traffic from 3 major motorways will arrive at an at-grade roundabout instead of the grade-seperated Dual Carriageway (the bypass).

    More context - imagine the M1 ending at an at-grade roundabout in Drumcondra and the M50 (including the Port Tunnel) not existing. That would be similar to the current setup in Galway.

    I hope the M1 widening does go ahead but I will never accept that delays on that short section of the M1 are worse than the delays around the whole of Galway City. I don't think either of the projects actually have any bearing on each other but I simply can't agree with someone who claims the M1 widening should have priority over the Galway Bypass if the two projects did have a bearing on each other. It seems some people actually get offended if it is suggested that somewhere other than Dublin has worse traffic than Dublin. I really wish Galway didn't have the traffic problems that it does - having worse traffic than Dublin is not something I am at all happy about or proud of.
    celticbest wrote: »
    My sister-in-law actually lives in Galway (Doughiska) so I'm down there on a regular basis, the traffic is not comparable to Dublin traffic in anyway whatsoever, yes it's just like any city once you get within a certain radius of the centre the traffic gets heavy.

    From my experience the heavy traffic only starts on the Headford road on the Dublin side & this is approx. 2.1km from the City Centre. I'm not sure about the far side of Galway?

    From O'Connell street in Dublin until you get to the M1(Port Tunnel) is approx 7.8km. So people in Dublin also have to sit in major traffic to get out of the city.

    Yes currently Galway has no ring road and as I've said before it should get one but as I've also stated before that the M1 needs this upgrade to keep traffic flowing.

    This upgrade is only a 2km stretch of road were only one lane needs to be added and by all accounts this job will only take about two months to complete as it is a straight forward lane lay in place of a grass median.
    celticbest wrote: »
    Has anybody had any update as to whether works are going to start anytime soon ??

    Traffic was as bad as ever again last night from the M50/M1 merge to Junction 4,

    M1NAfterAirportjunction070710.jpg

    Picture taken @ about 5:30pm just after Airport Junction.
    KevR wrote: »
    FYI - I also posted this:
    KevR wrote:
    I hope the M1 widening does go ahead but I will never accept that delays on that short section of the M1 are worse than the delays around the whole of Galway City. I don't think either of the projects actually have any bearing on each other but I simply can't agree with someone who claims the M1 widening should have priority over the Galway Bypass if the two projects did have a bearing on each other. It seems some people actually get offended if it is suggested that somewhere other than Dublin has worse traffic than Dublin. I really wish Galway didn't have the traffic problems that it does - having worse traffic than Dublin is not something I am at all happy about or proud of.

    Victor, that topic was covered early in this thread.

    As I've said to KevR the bottom line is that the NRA saw the need for a third lane on this section of the M1 which IMHO should go as far as Lissenhall J4 but it's better than nothing, this upgrade will cost very little compared to the cost of the proposed Galway by-pass.

    Yes, a by-pass of Galway City is required but not before the route between the two biggest cities in Ireland is able to operate to its full potential.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭celticbest


    Chubi wrote: »
    Anyone have any idea how long these works are going to go on for? There doesn't seem to be any progress despite the right hand lane being closed off for almost a week at this stage. :confused:

    The last I heard they will take until next February.....


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    celticbest wrote: »
    The last I heard they will take until next February.....
    That doesn't seem too bad really.

    No doubt they won't be working over Christmas when it won't be as busy on the M1.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    the speed limits are daft for these works.
    the limit from the M50W->M1N merge til past the Holywell junction is 60, yet there's no wok going on on the mainline northbound.

    Southbound, the limit only drops to 60 after the lanes have move left to the hard shoulder.

    This just shows these reduced limits are a sham.

    There was no sign of any work being done at 9:20 this morning.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    the speed limits are daft for these works.
    the limit from the M50W->M1N merge til past the Holywell junction is 60, yet there's no wok going on on the mainline northbound.

    Southbound, the limit only drops to 60 after the lanes have move left to the hard shoulder.

    This just shows these reduced limits are a sham.
    Can't see what the fuss is? There has been intermittent work northbound over the last week. i.e erecting the barrier, moving in gravel etc.., Do you expect the limit to be raised and lowered when there isn't and is work? The speed limit hardly makes a pick of difference and it makes sense to leave it in place until the end of the works, which have just been a little slow in starting, to allow motorists to become used to it and allow for consistency.

    In other news, and I may as well throw it in here, the NRA (I think it's them) have applied for permission to have the M1 closed northbound and/or southbound between J3 and J7 between 10pm and 5am at times over the period 15th November to 15th December to erect the over head gantries/sign they have been constructing this last while.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭Irish and Proud


    Bluetonic wrote: »
    <snip>
    In other news, and I may as well throw it in here, the NRA (I think it's them) have applied for permission to have the M1 closed northbound and/or southbound between J3 and J7 between 10pm and 5am at times over the period 15th November to 15th December to erect the over head gantries/sign they have been constructing this last while.

    ...yeah, the M1 must nearly be the only motorway in the state without overhead signage - of course, it was the first radial motorway to reach completion, so it's no surprise really.

    Hopefully, the new signage will be good!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    Do you expect the limit to be raised and lowered when there isn't and is work?

    Yes. Why are thousands of motorists subject to delay when there is no work? This is all arranged for bureaucractic simplicity and convenience of the contractor rather than in the interests of the road user, who is paying for it.
    It is not in the interest of road safety as the concept of the limit is discredited by having it there only for convenience.
    No doubt they won't be working over Christmas when it won't be as busy on the M1.

    But they'll probably leave the speed limit there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    ardmacha wrote: »
    Yes. Why are thousands of motorists subject to delay when there is no work?
    The delay caused is negligible.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    The delay caused is negligible.

    Well in that case why do they find it worth widening the road? The delay is small, but unneccessary and when 80,000 people are subject to a delay it does all add up.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    ardmacha wrote: »
    Well in that case why do they find it worth widening the road?
    What in Gods name are you talking about? They are widening the road to allow the traffic to move more smoothly between Drynam and the Airport of course.

    The 60kph limit on an already fully congested road at rush hour is negligible when the traffic seldom reaches above 60kph regardless of the limit. The vast majority of movements on the road are when it is heavily congested.

    Contemplating changing the limits every time their is a break in works, be it large or small, is bizzare. How would a court of law go about proving what was the legal limit at the time when a speeding case comes up? Think about it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,215 ✭✭✭cargo


    Well sorry if this is on-topic but just noticed a bit of real work going on this am SB. They are dismantling the steel barrier around the bridge supports and 1 machine was starting to rip into the ground.

    Traffic was crazy this am for some reason. M1 slowed to a standstill and crawl from between J5 - J4. way further back than normal and even the M50 SB from Blanchardstown on-wards was rammed across all 4 lanes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    ardmacha wrote: »
    Well in that case why do they find it worth widening the road? The delay is small, but unneccessary and when 80,000 people are subject to a delay it does all add up.

    And when you think about it, only a small percentage of the 80,000 (it's really more like 40,000 people X two journeys) actually get delayed. The majority who use the road for the other 20-22 off-peak hours don't get held up. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    KevR wrote: »
    And when you think about it, only a small percentage of the 80,000 (it's really more like 40,000 people X two journeys) actually get delayed. The majority who use the road for the other 20-22 off-peak hours don't get held up. :)
    Thats wrong. The vast majority of the journeys are during peak time so therefore vast majority of people get delayed.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,476 ✭✭✭ardmacha


    How would a court of law go about proving what was the legal limit at the time when a speeding case comes up? Think about it.

    How do you prove that a light was red or green? Proving what a speed limit was would be vastly easier than that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    ardmacha wrote: »
    How do you prove that a light was red or green? Proving what a speed limit was would be vastly easier than that.
    Breaking a traffic light is prosecuted by a Garda giving evidence to that effect. They saw it happen. It's a yes or no event.

    If you have a speed camera in a gasto van up the road and your letting workers manually alter the speed limits whenever they like how can you prove what speed limit was in effect at what time? The camera doesn't know what the speed limit is if it's been changed out if sight. Also as far as I know the local county council must approve by bye law special speed limits like we have at the moment on the M1, and these can't be variable. Again just think about what you are proposing. It's crazy.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,110 ✭✭✭KevR


    Bluetonic wrote: »
    Thats wrong. The vast majority of the journeys are during peak time so therefore vast majority of people get delayed.

    From the NRA's traffic counter just North of the Airport, I work it out to be 28% between 8am and 10am + 5pm and 7pm (roughly 14% in the morning peak period and 14% in the evening peak period); hardly a vast majority. It depends on what one's defnition of peak time is I suppose. I define it as 8am-10am + 5pm-7pm (the busiest 2 hours in the morning and evening).


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,588 ✭✭✭Bluetonic


    KevR wrote: »
    It depends on what one's defnition of peak time is I suppose.
    Indeed.

    Peak on the M1 in my mind would certainly be from just before 7am to just after 10am southbound and 4pm to just after 7pm southbound. This is when the congestion is. Also that sample covers a lot of summer days when traffic is light in the mornings.

    Another thing to note it that the counter is including in it's measurement traffic to and from J3 where the congestion is starting to ease due to the three lanes ahead outbound and the offramp northbound, and therefore doesn't give a view of traffic solely before and after J3.

    I suppose your small percentage quote is like my vast majority ;)

    Edited to add that on the NRA map they say the the counter you refer to to is south of J2 therefore takes into account all traffic to and from the airport from the city on the M1 and doesn't include M1 traffic which joins after or leaves before the airport, which is significant.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭celticbest


    Bluetonic wrote: »
    In other news, and I may as well throw it in here, the NRA (I think it's them) have applied for permission to have the M1 closed northbound and/or southbound between J3 and J7 between 10pm and 5am at times over the period 15th November to 15th December to erect the over head gantries/sign they have been constructing this last while.

    Saw the first of these today going SB from the Airport to M1, it's the same style as the sign for the new Services on the M1, only one probelm with it....they forgot to put the sign itself on it :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭marmurr1916


    KevR wrote: »
    From the NRA's traffic counter just North of the Airport, I work it out to be 28% between 8am and 10am + 5pm and 7pm (roughly 14% in the morning peak period and 14% in the evening peak period); hardly a vast majority. It depends on what one's defnition of peak time is I suppose. I define it as 8am-10am + 5pm-7pm (the busiest 2 hours in the morning and evening).

    That's 28% in a four hour period, averaging 7% per hour.

    That leaves the remaining 72% for a 20 hour period, averaging 3.6% per hour.

    In other words, peak periods (as defined by you) are almost twice as busy on average as non-peak periods.

    The road clearly needs to of sufficient capacity to at least cope with ordinary peak period traffic.

    Doubling capacity is not an option, but increasing it by one-third will go a long way towards reducing ordinary peak period congestion.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,092 ✭✭✭celticbest


    Doubling capacity is not an option, but increasing it by one-third will go a long way towards reducing ordinary peak period congestion.

    +1 & it's at a relatively low cost.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 185 ✭✭oharach


    Doubling capacity is not an option, but increasing it by one-third will go a long way towards reducing ordinary peak period congestion.

    An extra lane is 50% extra road space (although the capacity issue is more complicated than that), so even better than one third.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,779 ✭✭✭Carawaystick


    Drove North on this section today at noon at the speed limit, 'twas a bit scary how slow the limit was and how fast traffic passed and how much I was tailgated. I bet all three drivers taking the Holywell/R125 exit were annoyed by being stuck behind me.

    No width reduction on the road, only a barrier at the edge of the tarmac on the grass of the median....


  • Registered Users Posts: 207 ✭✭Hairy Nipples 87


    good point


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,215 ✭✭✭cargo


    Good bit of clearing work happening in the central reservation now. They're taking away all the barriers / supports and any hedging. Still no big dig happening but at least it's progress. Bit of a delay SB in the am now.

    I wonder do they need to go down as deep as normal to get a foundation in or was the road constructed with a base layer across the complete original cutting and then soil brought back in to construct the central median? i.e. will they have to dig out and remove soil for a foundation or just take off the 1st 600mm or something and then be able to start laying the new lanes base?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭Tech3


    Could someone take a few photos of the widening upgrade?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 68,792 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Site office cabins dropped on the median now.


Advertisement