Changes in the GAA - super thread

ArielAtom wrote: »

A. But then it won’t be an AI that would be won. Asterisk doesn’t even get near what it would be described as. Pseudo AI maybe.

B. The funding issue has been dealt with. 2018 saw the balance happen with Dublin’s funding cut. Hopefully that satisfies you.

C. Yea right, all the country lads with their premium tickets going to stand outside Croker with banners. Looking forward to seeing you and the other lads here showing what your made of and mounting a protest outside Croker when Dublin has lay there next.

I do believe Dublin should play games somewhere else. I look forward to the GAA and the government matching the 50M Cork GAA received for the re-development of PUC.

Not at all

Dublin are not getting away “so easy” from the financial doping scandal. Are you crazy?

It’s going to take years of funding for the other counties and little to no funding for Dublin to bring it somewhere close to equality in terms of funds per individual player

Also, full investigation into the accounts and audit of the Dublin operation. Back handers etc rumours need to be addressed.

As someone said earlier on the thread Jim G is the coach of the central bank team at this stage.

Now regarding home away matches - dubs should play an equal number of home and away same as every other county. No more sweetheart pampering for them.

Let them win/lose their matches fair and square.

Now as for splitting Dublin into 4 that is to address the absurd and crazy advantages in terms of population that Dublin has over EVERY other county.

I’d like your preferred option to address this? If not splitting, what?

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

Not at all

Dublin are not getting away “so easy” from the financial doping scandal. Are you crazy?

It’s going to take years of funding for the other counties and little to no funding for Dublin to bring it somewhere close to equality in terms of funds per individual player

Also, full investigation into the accounts and audit of the Dublin operation. Back handers etc rumours need to be addressed.

As someone said Jim G is the coach of the central bank team at this stage.

Now regarding home away matches - dubs should play an equal number of home and away same as every other county. No more sweetheart pampering for them.

Let them win/lose their matches fair and square.

Now as for splitting Dublin into 4 that is to address the absurd and crazy advantages in terms of population that Dublin has over EVERY other county.

I’d like your preferred option to address this? If not splitting, what?

Showing your true colours there boss. Fair play to you.

Fann Linn wrote: »

Care to provide proof of the backhanders?

Loads of rumours around Ireland on it. No proof just have heard stories.

if I have heard the tales, I’m a nobody when it comes to gaa hierarchy, so I would guess the rumours are rife.

ArielAtom wrote: »

Are there any other issues that need to be changed in the GAA or can we just do the decent thing and re-name the thread to something that has Dublin in the title. Let’s get honest at least.

Someone else changed it to: Changes in the GAA- To stop Dublin.
Seems pretty apt.

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

Loads of rumours around Ireland on it. No proof just have heard stories.

if I have heard the tales, I’m a nobody when it comes to gaa hierarchy, so I would guess the rumours are rife.

Ah yes, you and your drunken mates after last years AI Final, in the Big Tree, with Jim Gavin sitting at the bar, but he had to keep 'schtum'.

That sorta rumour.
Must be true so.

ArielAtom wrote: »

Nice of you to acknowledge that you are interested in one thing only. Good man.

I’m interested in a fair and competitive football championship atom

Good man

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

Keep the deflection and the mockery going lads

God forbid you actually addressed the substantive issues MANY ppl more informed than me have raised on this thread ....

Rumours and drink talk are not substantive issues.

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

Keep the deflection and the mockery going lads

God forbid you actually addressed the substantive issues MANY ppl more informed than me have raised on this thread ....

I have answered you three points only for you to reply in a childish/mocking manner. Some boyo😂😂😂😂😂 Brazilian Kildare fanboy by any chance, deflection is his fav term.

ToBeFrank123 wrote: »

Lance Armstrong was considered the greatest cyclist of all time until recently. The East Germans held many world records in athletics until recently. People tend to put asterixes beside achievemnents attained by highly questionable means including financial doping.

So there's none against Dublin.

Fann Linn wrote: »

None of the above are matters for Dublin.

Ok.

Deflect and distract so. Fooling nobody.

ArielAtom wrote: »

I addressed your three points,
If you choose to ignore or deflect
From my answers then that’s your choice.

So on the Funding issue.

That’s the main one I’m personally interested in

What’s your solution to that.

Fann Linn wrote: »

They're not. Only GAA HQ can make those changes you're looking for.

So you admit Dublin has inherent advantages and also financial advantages (due to Govt funding and gaa funding) over everyone else?

Job done if so.

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

Ted or Tsd?

Hard to post when driving!

Beechwoodspark wrote: »

You didn’t address it at all

I asked u to address how to bring up all county players to the level Dublin enjoy???

I mean the full spectrum of what a Dublin player gets in terms of funding training condition etc -give me your plan to address this so that there is a LEVEL playing field

I asked u about home away matches for dub?

And I asked you if not splitting in 4, then what??

You might be better talking to Joe, his audience might get your argument. I’ve addressed, you’ve chose to deflect.

ArielAtom wrote: »

You might be better talking to Joe, his audience might get your argument. I’ve addressed, you’ve chose to deflect.

Not at all

address the funding. Post your answer as a reply

Please and thanks.