Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Supermacs

1457910

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20 Siobhan82


    Well of course charging for meals or uniforms is a joke.
    But he definitely has a point in saying that for some it was like winning the lotto.
    If you were making 80 - 100€ a week part-time before and now how you're on 350€ a week without working then for many it's looks like a win.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,907 ✭✭✭BENDYBINN


    Siobhan82 wrote: »
    Well of course charging for meals or uniforms is a joke.
    But he definitely has a point in saying that for some it was like winning the lotto.
    If you were making 80 - 100€ a week part-time before and now how you're on 350€ a week without working then for many it's looks like a win.

    Of course it’s a win..........that’s life.
    For a multimillionaire to try and stop it in order to line his own pocket is meaness and greed at it finest...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 957 ✭✭✭80j2lc5y7u6qs9


    Siobhan82 wrote: »
    Well of course charging for meals or uniforms is a joke.
    But he definitely has a point in saying that for some it was like winning the lotto.
    If you were making 80 - 100€ a week part-time before and now how you're on 350€ a week without working then for many it's looks like a win.
    you must have a very low idea of wealth if 350 euro seems like winning the lottery


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,874 ✭✭✭Edgware


    Vita nova wrote: »
    Haven't seen you on AH for a while but sure enough you would be back to call people "culchies"... thought you would have moved on / matured at this stage.
    He reached that level of maturity in 2015 after his fourth year in sixth class.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,750 ✭✭✭fleet_admiral


    I’ve been working in various jobs for the past 45 years. I’ve found that companies with a canteen charged for a meal, so why not fast food outlets.
    Many companies charge for uniforms, mainly because some new employees decide that they don’t want to work there and leave with the uniform, at a cost to the company.

    A simple deposit scheme works well there. Fully refunded when you leave the job and return the uniform


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭Woke Hogan


    There’s not a reason in the world why a company shouldn’t pay for the uniform their employees wear. The company are the ones insisting that the employees wear it and they’re usually branded to the employee wouldn’t wear it away from work. If the company wants them to wear it they should pay it. All of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 95 ✭✭Central Services


    A simple deposit scheme works well there. Fully refunded when you leave the job and return the uniform

    I would think that if the business is not providing lockers and changing facilities then its employees should be invoicing them for storage of uniforms. Storage at their houses.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 378 ✭✭newuser99999


    Woke Hogan wrote: »
    There’s not a reason in the world why a company shouldn’t pay for the uniform their employees wear. The company are the ones insisting that the employees wear it and they’re usually branded to the employee wouldn’t wear it away from work. If the company wants them to wear it they should pay it. All of it.

    Especially when they’re insisting on specific types of clothing. For example in Dunnes you’re only allowed wear a black dress shirt or a black half zip fleece and black dress shoes, no other type of black shoes allowed.


  • Posts: 14,266 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Woke Hogan wrote: »
    There’s not a reason in the world why a company shouldn’t pay for the uniform their employees wear. The company are the ones insisting that the employees wear it and they’re usually branded to the employee wouldn’t wear it away from work. If the company wants them to wear it they should pay it. All of it.




    Also keep in mind a uniform is a business expense so the cost of supplying it is ultimately offset against their tax take anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,630 ✭✭✭✭yabadabado


    I’ve been working in various jobs for the past 45 years. I’ve found that companies with a canteen charged for a meal, so why not fast food outlets.
    Many companies charge for uniforms, mainly because some new employees decide that they don’t want to work there and leave with the uniform, at a cost to the company.

    A work canteen isn't the same as a fast food outlet. What a strange comparison.

    If a company was losing so many uniforms that it became an issue its very easy to charge for one over the first few payslips and then return the fee when an employee leaves.

    Charging for uniforms is plain wrong and tight fisted.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭Woke Hogan


    yabadabado wrote: »
    A work canteen isn't the same as a fast food outlet. What a strange comparison.

    If a company was losing so many uniforms that it became an issue its very easy to charge for one over the first few payslips and then return the fee when an employee leaves.

    Charging for uniforms is plain wrong and tight fisted.

    They shouldn’t charge for any under any circumstances.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭LuasSimon


    Are all Pat McDonaghs poverty wage Supermacs back up and running ? ....our country is becoming full of minimum wage employments and their oligarch rich owners ....can’t be long before McDonagh will be flying people in from the poorest part of Bulgaria like Keelings ... he’ll be able to give them customers left overs and charge them 4 or 5 euro for them , drive up his profits and wealth further ..... Larry Goodman would be proud of his tactics .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,756 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Woke Hogan wrote: »
    There’s not a reason in the world why a company shouldn’t pay for the uniform their employees wear. The company are the ones insisting that the employees wear it and they’re usually branded to the employee wouldn’t wear it away from work. If the company wants them to wear it they should pay it. All of it.

    Its really tight stuff by McDonogh, I cant imagine the polo shirts they wear costing more than 7 or 8 euro yet he charges them every week that they work there for them. He's actually making profits off this.

    Anyway it shouldnt really surprise anyone, McDonogh has always been a cute hoor. He took a High Court case in 2011 to actually reduce the pay of his own employees. A mate of mine from Galway city was telling me that there is a certain breed from east Galway towns like Loughrea who are exactly like him, he said these people would put any notion of Cavan scabiness to shame.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭Woke Hogan


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Its really tight stuff by McDonogh, I cant imagine the polo shirts they wear costing more than 7 or 8 euro yet he charges them every week that they work there for them. He's actually making profits off this.

    Anyway it shouldnt really surprise anyone, McDonogh has always been a cute hoor. He took a High Court case in 2011 to actually reduce the pay of his own employees. A mate of mine from Galway city was telling me that there is a certain breed from east Galway towns like Loughrea who are exactly like him, he said these people would put any notion of Cavan scabiness to shame.

    Well I’m sure they’re not all bad in Loughrea, it’s not right to tar them all with one brush. I’m growing less and less impressed with Pat McDonagh the more I hear about him, however.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,630 ✭✭✭✭yabadabado


    Muahahaha wrote: »

    Anyway it shouldnt really surprise anyone, McDonogh has always been a cute hoor. He took a High Court case in 2011 to actually reduce the pay of his own employees.

    Whats this about?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,756 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    Woke Hogan wrote: »
    Well I’m sure they’re not all bad in Loughrea, it’s not right to tar them all with one brush. I’m growing less and less impressed with Pat McDonagh the more I hear about him, however.

    no not at all, he just said there is a certain breed or set there that are really tight with money, stuff like people doing work and then them refusing to pay or dragging it out


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭Woke Hogan


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    no not at all, he just said there is a certain breed or set there that are really tight with money, stuff like people doing work and then them refusing to pay or dragging it out

    Everyone I’ve known from Loughrea have been a bit of a miser as well. Tighter than a duck’s arse and grey in demeanour. And poncey. I can’t imagine there’s a lot to do there, to be honest, except keep a close eye on your purse strings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,756 ✭✭✭✭Muahahaha


    yabadabado wrote: »
    Whats this about?

    It was to do with the Joint Labour Agreements (JLAs) which were pay agreements for the most low paid workers in sectors like hotels or fast food restaurants. They were agreements between employers and government but were made locally county by county so could vary.

    In Supermacs case (iirc) Pats employees in Kildare were getting minimum wage but time and a half for working a Sunday whereas his Dublin workers were getting time and a third for the same thing. McDonogh didnt like paying his employees a penny above minimum wage so he brought a constitutional case to the High Court and successfully argued it wasnt fair that these agreements could vary by location. The judge agreed with him so overnight those Sunday benefits were wiped out for any new employees.

    It went further than that though- the High Court ruling basically overnight thrashed these Joint Labour Agreements for all new low paid employees. It gave incentive to hotels and fast food operators to sideline employees on current contracts and employ new ones on a lesser wage. In total the court ruling effected somewhere in the region of 200,000 of the lowest paid in the country.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭jippo nolan


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    no not at all, he just said there is a certain breed or set there that are really tight with money, stuff like people doing work and then them refusing to pay or dragging it out

    Some of it spread into Roscommon!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,990 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Some of it spread into Roscommon!

    Are they not just poor?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,003 ✭✭✭✭whisky_galore


    I’ve been working in various jobs for the past 45 years. I’ve found that companies with a canteen charged for a meal, so why not fast food outlets.
    Many companies charge for uniforms, mainly because some new employees decide that they don’t want to work there and leave with the uniform, at a cost to the company.

    Who is going to walk off with a fast food uniform and wear it outside of work anyhow? It's not like they get them from Louis Copeland or it's a criminal offense to impersonate a burger flipper.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭jippo nolan


    PARlance wrote: »
    Are they not just poor?

    Just the poor mouth!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,208 ✭✭✭LuasSimon


    Who is going to walk off with a fast food uniform and wear it outside of work anyhow? It's not like they get them from Louis Copeland or it's a criminal offense to impersonate a burger flipper.

    Supermacs staff could wear their uniform sitting on the ground begging after their shift , at least those passing by would genuinely know they have nothing and whatever they collect would be for basic provisions not drugs although pat Mcdonagh might drive them to it .

    The classic working poor outfit - Supermacs uniform


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 451 ✭✭hurler32


    The whole covid will see us all make changes , two of mine are
    1. Never to buy from Keelings strawberries slave operations .
    2. Never to support Supermacs poverty wage outlets .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,744 ✭✭✭Homelander


    hurler32 wrote: »
    2. Never to support Supermacs poverty wage outlets .


    I mean by all means boycott Supermacs because Pat McDonagh is a maniac, because staff aren't treated well, or even just because their food is bad, but the above doesn't really make much sense unless you plan boycotting a considerable majority of retail outlets surely.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,503 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Muahahaha wrote: »
    Its really tight stuff by McDonogh, I cant imagine the polo shirts they wear costing more than 7 or 8 euro yet he charges them every week that they work there for them. He's actually making profits off this.

    Anyway it shouldnt really surprise anyone, McDonogh has always been a cute hoor. He took a High Court case in 2011 to actually reduce the pay of his own employees. A mate of mine from Galway city was telling me that there is a certain breed from east Galway towns like Loughrea who are exactly like him, he said these people would put any notion of Cavan scabiness to shame.

    Galway folk are incredibly greedy in my experience


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭Osborne


    Wompa1 wrote: »
    Can you point to any that are actually local franchises? As in legit franchises not under control of Supermacs?

    Claremorris, Ballindine and Ballinrobe.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,704 ✭✭✭joebloggs32


    hurler32 wrote: »
    The whole covid will see us all make changes , two of mine are
    1. Never to buy from Keelings strawberries slave operations .
    2. Never to support Supermacs poverty wage outlets .

    In every country the cost of living is dictated by what the level of pay is given to workers who perform in jobs with basic or low skills providing g us with goods (keelings) and services (supermacs).
    We could set the minimum wage at €20 per hour, but the same workers would still be paid poorly relative to people with professional qualifications and trades.
    The cost of goods and services would rocket as those who provide said goods and services would all be getting paid €20 p/h. So any extra income earned would go be swallowed up and you're back to square one. The cost of living is the enemy of the low paid worker.

    Unless you want a communist society, there will always be workers who will be paid at the lowest level, doing jobs that will be commensurate to their skills and qualifications.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer


    LuasSimon wrote: »
    Are all Pat McDonaghs poverty wage Supermacs back up and running ? ....our country is becoming full of minimum wage employments and their oligarch rich owners ....can’t be long before McDonagh will be flying people in from the poorest part of Bulgaria like Keelings ... he’ll be able to give them customers left overs and charge them 4 or 5 euro for them , drive up his profits and wealth further ..... Larry Goodman would be proud of his tactics .

    Get a few caravans off the cousins😊


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,187 ✭✭✭FVP3


    Are you serious? Supermacs is absolutely disgusting. Yes I'm a Dub the fact you defend them shows maybe Dubs have a finer taste for food

    I found nothing wrong with their burger. I don't do fast food anymore but by far the worst burger is the cheap Macdonalds one. Of course that's because it is so cheap they keep reducing the meat.


Advertisement