Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

What MPG are you getting from your vehicle?

1234579

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,740 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,740 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    A lot of people in this thread seem to be beating their vehicles official fuel economy figures, by some margin. Which is interesting.

    On a long run I'm normally at the speed limit which gives worse fuel economy than sitting at 80-100kph.

    But on a recent trip mixed motorway and and lots of small country roads I was getting about 8L/100km in a 1.6 TDI MPV with a roof box and five people and luggage which matches my official figures. In our previous petrol version of the same MPV it's was always around 11L/100km. We rarely do long trips and never with only one person in that car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭Economics101


    I do a regular 160km trip in the Waterford direction (mostly M9) and consumption can be a s low as 3.7L per 100km. On other occasions it can be 4.2. A lot seems to depend on prevailing wind. I drive a VW Golf Diesel 2 litre, it's 11 years old and pervormance is as new. Mind you it's low mileage for a car of its age.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,930 ✭✭✭✭challengemaster


    Eco mode does sweet **** all. Tested it over a number of tanks, you might get +15km range on a 1000km tank.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    This happens all the time. Most of the numbers you see from people are BS and they give more positive numbers. No idea why.


    Personally mine is running at 9-10ltr/100km



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    Is that even possible in a 2.0ltr Golf? I had one years ago and never got in a arse roar of those figures. Also driving on motorway all the time. It was a 2009 2.0ltr 140Bhp(I think from memory).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭Economics101


    Yes, on average it would be very close to 4.0 or if cruising at 120kph maybe 4.2. I've also cross-checked by measuring how much it takes to refill against distance covered and it checks out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,795 ✭✭✭Isambard


    mines not BS, you can come over and look at my trip.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,481 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Excuse the dust, that’s 3.96 L/100km taking it handy on a 2.0 TDI Octavia estate. It’s done a little better than that, but you’re really relying on slow moving traffic.


    as said a few months ago, that goes out the window once you get up to 120-130


    my old Civic 1.8 petrol would do some great figures for a petrol too, but again you’d have to be driving like a saint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭passatman86


    I get roughly the same

    6.8L/100km

    Just serviced and good tyres

    These avensis aren't great at 42 mpg


    I do mostly city driving like a lot of taxis would - surprised so many taxi drivers use them at that mpg



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    Reliability was the main attraction to the PSV industry, they're a comfortable car to be in for lengthy periods too. Unfortunately reliability from 2012 onwards has taken a huge dip and they are starting to fall out of favour now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭passatman86


    Mines a 2010, i find since they went with the1.6 diesel option and also joined with bmw the issues got worse tbh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    Mine is between 5.0-5.5l/100 that's measured from fill to fill I don't know what the display says.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Approx 32 MPG and it's one of the most fuel efficient cars I've ever owned.

    2.0l petrol Audi MK3 TT Quattro.

    Life's too short to average 69 k/pH.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    It was a 29Km journey. What is your long term average speed? Probably not much higher.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,232 ✭✭✭TheRiverman


    You can save or waste litres of fuel by the way you drive. Excessive acceleration and too many unnecessary gear changes are two ways to waste those litres. I did a one day course some years ago on economy driving in a 1.9 diesel van with 6 speed gearbox, 1st to 2nd to 4th to 6th. 1st to 3 rs to 5th to 6th. Starting off downhill 1st to 3rd to 6th. Coming down through the gears, 6th to 4th, 6th to 3rd, even 6th to 2nd. Going through roundabouts in 4th. All this driving safely and within all speed limits in both urban and rural areas taking traffic, road and weather conditions into account. The results were amazing saving many litres of diesel. As I posted earlier I have a Ford Focus 1.6 diesel, it has 6 forward gears and I drive it all the time even on the very bad roads where I live the way I was instructed on that course. The same applies to 5 speed gearbox vehicles. I don't know about automatics as I have never owned or driven one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,019 ✭✭✭Buddy Bubs


    Long term on my audi a6 190bhp is 7 l/100kms or 40mpg. I can, if I really really try get 50mpg or 5.6l per 100kms but have to drive in such a way that I hate it.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Most of my driving has been motorway, dual carriage driving. I've not checked. If I drove into town it would be a lot lower.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've driven from Limerick to castlegregory and mostly stayed with traffic and managed 45 mpg, but it was an experiment never to be repeated. :)


    I should have added, mine is an automatic and 230 PS



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    Maybe, but go out on the roads and nobody is driving like that. I would be a lot more conservative than majority of the people on see on the road yet never get close to the numbers quoted on here. I am sure if you check a lot of them the manufacturer even with the old testing system they never got close to the claimed ltr/100km on here. Those tests got done in ideal conditions with no wind/rain etc. Impossible for any standard road user to achieve.

    Also majority of people like to drive for fun, sorry but that sounds incredible boring driving, to save what? maybe a two euro per 100km, personally don't think it's worth it. Enjoy your car.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,002 ✭✭✭Dufflecoat Fanny


    46 MPG 132 Lexus IS300h 2.5 litre petrol hybrid



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,232 ✭✭✭TheRiverman


    I love driving, enjoy my car and don't find it a bit boring driving that way. I never think about manufacturers claims or try to achieve them when I'm driving, I simply drive the way I was instructed on that course, which incidentally I was doing to a lesser extent with the same van for about six months before that course as it was owned by the company I was working with and they organised the course for their drivers. That was back in 2007.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,740 ✭✭✭✭Flinty997


    "...You can save or waste litres of fuel by the way you drive....."

    For sure.


    2.82 litres per 100km (100.31mpg)



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,291 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    2.8l per 100km really does show how wasteful cars are. 2.8l of diesel is 108MJ of energy.

    that's the same amount of energy required to lift a 1.5 ton car nearly 7.5km straight up into the air.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    I do enjoy my car and regularly give her the holly tipping 140/160 km/h, it still manages to easily achieve 1100/1200 km to the tank of diesel, it's just light on diesel and well serviced, I use millers diesel additive religiously at every fill which might or might not make a difference.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,679 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    The misses gets about 12.21 litres/100kmh out of her 1.6 VW Touran. Shes getting a electric car now as she’s fed up of garages


    she’ll go from €56 per 300km to €3



  • Registered Users Posts: 170 ✭✭JCN12


    I'm getting 5.7 litres per 100 km (49.5 mpg) in my 2007 1.4 Petrol Skoda Octavia (Normally Aspirated Engine).

    Really pleased, as I did not get much more out of the diesels I owned in the past with similar driving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭honda boi


    Thats actually amazing for the size of the car and small engine!



  • Registered Users Posts: 170 ✭✭JCN12


    Yes, it really shocked me too. In fairness I drive fairly light footed, but I've driven a diesel vectra, astra and 407 the exact same way and not faired too much better in the overall scheme of things.

    Also, not much difference between the onboard computer and doing the math after filling up when I checked recently.

    Makes me wonder why I stuck with diesel for so long 🤔



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,518 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    27 mpg. Big diesel and very short commute.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,420 ✭✭✭✭sligojoek


    2011 Octavia estate 1.6 diesel.


    I normally get 5.0 to 5.5 l/100km.

    Nice relaxed drive from Nenagh to Sligo yesterday via Athlone and Roscommon. 4.7l/100km.

    If I go via Tuam M17/M6 Loughrea Portumna Nenagh I get 5.0 to 5.3



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    Is that according to the display or are you actually measuring from fill to fill? What km's are you getting from a full tank? Anyone I know who had one of them found them very gutless and thirsty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,636 ✭✭✭ILikeBoats


    After 2500 km in the Golf R I'm getting 27.5mpg / 10.3 l/100km

    Not too many long trips lately



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,291 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i used to have the same car, and was getting similar (claimed) fuel consumption.

    they're certainly not powerful, but i didn't find it thirsty.



  • Registered Users Posts: 170 ✭✭JCN12


    Fill to fill and onboard computer are calculating about the same. I don't empty the tank so cannot say with regard to a distance covered from a full tank.

    They are not particularly powerful, but the gear ratios are short which help a lot.

    I could imagine it being thirsty if you like to drive hard.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    Have you tried with and without Millers out of interest? does it provide much additional KM's?

    From reading review it would suggest using half the correct quatity people seem to think works better?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    I'll be filling later this week. Will I try using half or going without? It certainly makes the engine much smoother and has made a huge difference to the amount of regens being done and also the amount of adblue that it's using.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,760 ✭✭✭dudley72


    Just interested. I googled and found

    Does Millers ecomax actually work?

    Results. Using Millers Ecomax at the recommended concentration (50ml per 50 L) or higher concentrations produced no improvement in economy. However, using the product at half the recommended concentration produced on average an approximate 5% improvement in fuel economy.

    I have moved to a diesel and not massively concerned with fuel consumption but if this actually works then maybe I should invest



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭honda boi


    I wonder would that miller's do anything for a petrol car?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    I'm going to try it at half concentration this fill and see is there any difference in consumption. As I said earlier the main difference I felt was less regens and the car is certainly a lot smoother, now it could be just down to the engine freeing up as it's only on 45,000 km but it isn't doing any harm using it either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 906 ✭✭✭Joe 90


    I seem to get about 12.5 around town and about 28 on the open road. That's going by the fuel computer, not checking properly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,481 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    What’s the science in it doing less regens I wonder, I’m sure the engine is still emitting particulates.

    on a related note, I did 380km on Sunday, and today it decides to do a regen! I’ll never interrupt it doing one, so had to go on an impromptu spin.

    I had it in getting some slight engine tweaks recently, guy checked on his computer and the DPF is as sound as a pound, which is nice after 210k



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    So feckin annoying when that happens, maybe the engine is running a bit cleaner with the millers I don't know tbh but it's definitely doing less regens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,481 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Is it the DPF cleaner additive you’re using or something else?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,352 ✭✭✭CoBo55


    It just says diesel additive, I'll check the can when I'm home. If I stay using the half dose I'll never use what's in the can. I got a great deal on 5 litres during the lockdown, a bit of a pain in the butt to dispense but I have it sorted now.

    Quick edit, I had a look on the Halfords site where I bought it first, it's Millers dieselpower ecomax.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,743 ✭✭✭honda boi




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 128 ✭✭Yarisbob


    I saw this thread and thought - A nice challenge ..!

    My commute is backroads for 30k and 30k of motorway - Just tipped along keeping up the gears and no harsh lifts

    Motorway kept to 105-110k.

    Car is a 05 Fabia vRS 1.9 TDi with a mild tune (Garrett 1756VK, FMIC and 120% Firerad Injectors)

    10 gallon or around 45 litre tank

    Kept the boost to around 0.4 to 0.6 bar for a full week fill to fill. Didn't check the figures on the computer

    61mpg or 4.6 l/100km, - God bless the 1.9 PD .. an absolute legend



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,020 ✭✭✭Gorteen


    Driving an Audi A6 2 litre diesel and I often drive with a heavy foot, I'm getting in the region of 5l/100km which is about 47mpg. This is by far the most economical car I've every driven.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement