Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

New Alternative News Channel "GB News" chaired by Andrew Neil launching - read OP before posting

13031333536171

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Good luck to Nige, his show and his no doubt impressive legion of fans. But you'd swear reading some posts here that it was farage wot won it almost single handedly, that all those 52% were totally seduced by him alone and his particular brand of little england patriotic nationalism.

    Reality, in the list of those who influenced the result, he's comfortably behind Johnson and probably others too. Even cummings kept him away from the official vote leave campaign for fear his toxicity might repel voters. Cummings himself was a more vital figure to that campaign than farage.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    To condemn the majority of a specific population as stupid / low IQ is a racist remark.

    It is generalizing about the majority of the specific population in a negative light.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Cool... So is any of this reflected in their viewing figures?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,354 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    I’m starting to think the same thing about eskimos….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,656 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    A, I never said that

    B, I'm from England, I live in England.

    C, is it "racist" if I'm talking about my own people?

    D, Is English even a "race"? Or are you just throwing out controversial words to make yourself feel better?

    E, 52% voted for Brexit, that does not equate to a 52% vote for Farage.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,615 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There is objectively no such thing as a white English ethnic group. This is just the usual disingenuous right wing tactic of getting outraged at statements nobody made.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    I've seen a lot of stupid posts in my time. So many, many stupid posts. This one isn't the dumbest take but it's not far off. The post where it was suggested that settled people might be dumping rubbish in halting sites gets the top spot but your post is close.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    most likely

    Farage is doing 10 times better than anyone else on the GB news YT channel, it is expected that his tv views will be higher too



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    That's not a great omen for the tv station.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,225 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Not really.

    There's one group with facts and one smaller group with hopes and wishes.

    The facts are these :-

    News Channels don't make money anywhere really , so GB News is behind the curve right out the gate as it doesn't have other entertainment or sports channels in it's portfolio to provide the revenue stream.

    The channel is struggling badly , catastrophically so in terms of building viewer numbers. Their current trajectory is downwards.

    The Market they are aiming at appears to simply not exist in any great numbers thus far.

    Allied to the above , they also appear to be not very organised with a sustained period of gaffs and mistakes.

    So , based purely on the current facts available GB News is not doing very well and it's future prospects don't look all that great.

    The "hopes and wishes" are that the audience exists and they just need a bit more time to realise that GB News is what they are missing before they change channel in their droves.

    If Hopes and wishes can eventually bring facts to the table , then a debate can occur but until then it's reality vs. fantasy.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,225 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    To be fair , given their recent ratings it would be almost impossible for their to be less viewers for Farage.

    I'm expecting to see posts talking about the massive percentage increase in viewers now that Nigel is on board , neatly avoiding the fact that anything above the statistical Zero viewers they had last week is going to show a large percentage increase. I mean , if Nigels wife and kids watch his show that's a several hundred percent increase right there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    It's clearly a step in the right direction, the channel is very new and the addition of Farage is having a very positive impact.

    The video he posted today that did 10K while i was posting about it an hour ago, is now at 20K

    Moving fast



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You've been claiming the YouTube videos are a reflection of success since day one though...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,656 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    So what? There's video on YouTube of people unboxing toys with millions of views, does that make these kids who make the clips more successful than GB "news"?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    Those views on youtube aren't bad for a hobbyist channel. For a 60m TV station though... well now I can see why they point to number of tweets and youtube views. Should we tell them that a lot of those views on social media are from less gammony folk with no intention of watching the station? I myself have clicked on a bunch to read the trolling comments.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    And that video is also more popular than Sky News or BBC news videos.

    What's your point?



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    So, what did you learn tonight from Farage?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,656 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    My point is youtube video views do not equate to viewers of a TV channel.


    Care to reply to my other post after you wrongly called me a racist?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    Actually i was saying that the number of subscribers was growing, while you guys were saying that subscribers are irrelevant

    now that the streaming views are growing too, you are saying that they are irrelevant because they dont translate into tv views

    alghout you keep moving the goal posts, the numbers are still moving in the right direction ;-)

    And most importantly I'm enjoying the content



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I've always said they're irrelevant, you seem be claiming that I changed my position... They're a TV channel that nobody is watching. That's what is relevant.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    For anyone who missed it, the FULL episode of The Nigel Farage Show on GB News has just been published to their YouTube channel.

    It's even more important that those with a left-leaning perspective watch these shows, of course. I watch James O'Brien, for example; a creature of the Left. Not because I like him (I loathe him), but because it's important to expose yourself to the arguments of the opposing side. Not only to refine your own arguments but to find reasons as to why your arguments may be wrong, and to correct them accordingly.

    We can all be arrogant and conceited: assume that we are always right, only listening to those with whom we agree.

    But that's boring.

    It also means we learn nothing. And nobody is infallible. Not me, not you, not anyone. That, of course, includes Nigel Farage - of whom I have great admiration.

    But it strikes me as rather odd that those who condemn the channel of GB News also appear to be the same people with no inclination to listen to, let alone learn from, opposing views.

    It's invariably a la Owen Jones, "the right are effectively all far-right Nazis"-kind of perspective.

    What a simple minded approach. Perhaps it would be better if those who gyrate against GB News took the time to listen to, and learn from, opposing views rather than to take the easy approach: to gather like wolves around (what they consider to be) vulnerable prey.

    Here's hoping that will change. I take strong leave to doubt it, though.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,160 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Thats a frequent problem for GBNews denizens.


    Similar to how they definitely want free speech. Until someone dares take a knee then its cancelling time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    You call James O'Brien "a creature of the left". Interesting. I call myself a creature of the left, just about, and I've never considered him a fellow traveller of mine. Guess that makes me one of those far lefty extremists you hear folk ranting on about every now and again.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Unless you can show evidence to the contrary, James O'Brien has views almost entirely consistent with the Left.

    There's nothing wrong with that, of course, but that seems quite obvious to me?

    Then again, there are different forms of the Left; a spectrum, you might say. You have self-identified as far-left, which is not something I would ascribe to O'Brien.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    does it have subtitles? couldn't understand a word.



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    What about those of us who just want to be informed? I get that a lot of people like a talking head like James O Brien or Farage or Joe Rogan and so on but that sort of thing is for more for the chronically uninformed. I don't see how I would learn anything from a Farage video that I haven't already learned from an Al Murray skit.


    So what did you learn tonight or are you just as informed about the world after watching Farage as you were before? Or are you now even less informed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,160 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Maybe Farage explained what racism is so eskimo is now wiser than he was earlier?


    Although I'm doubtful Lord Nige actually knows what racism is to begin with.....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Yeah sure. I endorse genuine leftist principles to do with nationalisation of key public utilities, free broadband for all etc, protecting the unions and enhancing worker's rights and i believe, rightly or wrongly, that it is only socialist policies that will help get the planet out of its current mess in terms of the climate and other crisis. If you can show me evidence of James O'Brien sharing that view, then by all means call him a "creature of the left". Otherwise let's refer to him as the liberal centrist he is and maybe then i and my fellow travellers can shed the extremist label for simply supporting democratic socialist policies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,211 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack



    I had dismissed the channel early on it’s launch day as being amateurish petulant nonsense after I’d watched about half an hour of it. Then I watched a bit of the odd video on YouTube, and it was pretty much the same amateurish petulant nonsense.

    I got about 10 minutes into that Farage show when I just had enough of the constant repetition of “pingdemic”, as if they were fierce clever altogether…

    Only enough shìte too I’d expect anyone to be able to take. I couldn’t recommend anyone bother to watch it. It’s not clever, it shows no signs of intelligence whatsoever, it’s not even extreme enough to be compelling viewing for it’s actual intended audience of spiteful, begrudging malcontents.

    There’s far more compelling content for that audience on bitshyte and other social media shìte sites, and I can’t for the life of me figure out why anyone didn’t pull Andrew Neill to one side and tell him take his head out of his hole if he thought investors were going to let him piss £60m down the swanny, which explains Neill’s extended sabbatical from the channel - it appears he knows he’s ruined any credibility he had as a professional broadcaster and is now looking to distance himself from the whole shìtshow.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,237 ✭✭✭mcmoustache


    You're a braver man than I. Years ago in my student days, I would probably have watched it on the couch, stoned out of my mind, thinking that these people are talking a form of "sense" that we didn't get from the mainstream media but I'm a middle-aged man now with less free time and I have professional and personal obligations to know things when I'm not writing shíte on boards. I get that there's a cohort of people who don't really need to know how the world works and that there's an economic argument to be made that we, as a whole, benefit from having a section of the population be kept ignorant while the rest of us get on with things but these days, I think we're at risk dumbing down too many people and we could end up like the US or the UK where that stupidity is leading to very tangible, real life effects like thousands of unnecessary deaths. To some extent, we're lucky on this side of the Irish sea that this sort of thing doesn't show any signs of taking hold but it's always a concern.


    On Andrew Neil, I've mentioned before in this thread that I used to watch his show with Michael Portillo and Dianne Abbot (i think that's her name anyway). It was insightful and it kept me up to date with UK politics. I learned quite a bit from it and that was all down to the expertise and experience from Neil himself and to a lesser extent, the pair on the couch. It cut through the spin and politicking effectively and it wouldn't have worked without someone like Neil.

    I think that what happened with him is that he saw the state of the US and the opportunities there to make a lot of money from enough stupid people. It was a gamble and after Brexit, I can't blame him for thinking that the number of gullible people in the UK would be enough to sustain a TV station where they just get outraged by the antics of internet woke people and straight bananas. It was a gamble, and a brave one at that, but he obviously overestimated the number of people in the UK who would be satisfied to tune in to the same old outrage every day. The UK is a different market compared to the US where, let's face it, they have the broadcasting and cultural infrastructure ready to have the marks meet the needs of the conmen. For all its faults, the UK is in better shape than that and a FOX News without any news just isn't going to cut it. It'll attract the very bottom of the intellectual barrel in the same way that Baby Shark attracts toddlers with it's repetitive, yet catchy, shtick but that's simply not enough. They'll need to hire some heavyweights if they want to turn it around but that brings me to my next point.

    I agree with your guess that Andrew Neil's distancing himself from this whole shítshow and you can't really blame him. He knows what it's like to be taken seriously and I don't think he wants to be seen as a clown like the rest of the presenters have been made to look. Farage is comfortable acting the clown so I could see him stick around but his appeal is very over-stated. I'm not sure what Neil will do next but I don't think we've seen the last of him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,298 ✭✭✭✭Penn




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,951 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    It's as if he is trying to do his radio show on TV?

    His radio show that was cancelled by LBC, who lets face it. If he was pulling in advertisers to his timeslot would have been quite happy to let him carry on. It wasn't his opinions that had him shown the door there, it was his lack of revenue.

    I'd agree with the view that as a TV station, the only metric that matters for GB News is the BARB figures. If YouTube metrics matter? Well then become a YT only platform and instantly save a fortune and prolong the life of the channel.

    The entire premise of this channel as catering to some kind of silent majority really collapses when the simple facts bear out that a statistical audience share of zero, leaves one wondering? Where this majority is?

    Does it exist at all or is it a fugue created by the loudest voices, hoping to create an audience, rather than actually cater to one?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,592 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There are a tiny number or advertisers who will book irrespective of BARB, using unique domain names and phone numbers to assign a value to each station. Christmas hamper firms are one of them

    You won't support a cheapo music video jukebox on this income, let alone a 'news' channel with all its costs.



  • Registered Users Posts: 61 ✭✭livia21


    On saturday morning host Tonia Buxton and MP Esther McVey were drinking wine (British of course) discussing the hot topics.


    They had decided that they should reduce covid tests as the plastic was bad for the enviorment.A cynic might think they want less testing to keep their numbers lower.

    Andrew Neil tweeted a Spectator piece earlier this year claming Farage was now a pantomine act& had desrtoyed his own legacy in regards to cameo videos



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    ...which was an article written by a self-admitted, 'liberal Remainer'.

    The reality is that the history books are not going to mention Cameo or any of his other income streams. Instead, they'll focus on his overwhelming achievement to secure Brexit after 30-years of graft.

    And you can't shame a man for trying to earn an honest living.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,386 ✭✭✭schmoo2k


    Fact: 50% of the UK are below average intelligence...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,537 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    The point was that Andrew Neil, who is now presumably Farage's boss, chose to retweet it. it shows that Neil has a very low opinion of Farage. It makes you wonder if Neil was involved in the decision to appoint Farage. Perhaps Neil's involvement with GBNews has ended for good.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,615 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There's nothing honest whatsoever about him. He's nothing more than a deceitful grifter. Begging for cash on Cameo is a low even I didn't think he'd sink to but if he's struggling then I suppose he has to make ends meet somehow.

    Saying he accomplished Brexit while ignoring the last few decades of Tory party history is like saying Remain won in 2016 if you ignore the result.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,349 ✭✭✭✭super_furry


    He's Alan Partridge, if Partridge smoked 40 a day.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,430 ✭✭✭RWCNT


    *Slugs pint* "That should get the puritans screaming..."

    Yes, the woke left ARE known for their hatred of pints, Nigel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,537 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    My issue with it is that he only had one pint. What is the point of one pint?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,349 ✭✭✭✭super_furry




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,537 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm not sure if he'll get more than a few lines in the average history book tbh... What are you gonna say in a few weeks when GB News is still performing badly?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,578 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's certainly a very curious move by Neil to retweet his opinion of Farage. Perhaps he was anticipating someone else retweeting it and was just heading it off at the pass?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Neil having a low opinion of farage wouldn't surprise me one bit, indeed I'd be more amazed if it were any other way. One thing he shares with Cummings is a deep disdain for most politicians and populist types like farage, considering them so way below their own mighty intellectual powers, but that doesn't mean they'd have much of a problem using them for their own ends if needs be.



  • Registered Users Posts: 373 ✭✭Gentlemanne


    Please explain how that could be considered racist, I would love to hear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,656 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Ah he dropped that idiotic line straight after when he was questioned on it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,213 ✭✭✭Mic 1972


    if you have nothing to learn from Farage why do you bother with his videos then?

    Lots of people have a different view from yours and would rather hear Farage, that's diversity



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement