Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brexit discussion thread XIV (Please read OP before posting)

1136137139141142333

Comments

  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 92,474 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,161 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The Express's raison d'etre appears to be to tell lies to its "readers" about the EU, foreigners and immigrants and without even bothering to justify why they are lying. You couldn't call it a newspaper at all - it's more akin to to a far right blog in printed form, but with showbiz, general chit chat and sports stories added.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,148 ✭✭✭✭Lemming


    The Daily Express can be best described as akin to citing Wikipedia as fact on a third-level post-graduate thesis, i.e. just ... don't. Across the lamentably wide selection of red/rag top tabloids available in the UK, it is quite possibly the worst offender by a few country miles.

    Edit: Strazdas beat me to it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 745 ✭✭✭ClosedAccountFuzzy


    The bit I find absolutely risible is the way Sky News an others will do a newspaper review where they’ll take random stories from the FT, The Guardian, the Financial Times, the Daily Express and they might as well include the Beano and Waterford Whispers.

    I also find it remarkably insular that they don’t even look at say the headlines from the Irish Times, Indo or Examiner once in a blue moon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,339 ✭✭✭✭Itssoeasy


    At this stage it’s just becoming sad with brexit and how their citizens and politicians are trying to use mental gymnastics to blame everyone else bar themselves for the mess they are in. I saw a documentary on a family of fishermen in I think the south West of England who catch shrimp and since brexit happened(the UK leaving the EU officially) there’s been changes to how things operate which include extra paperwork. They complain about the extra paperwork and also think the EU(the EU and it’s constituent countries didn’t force the UK to leave btw) needs to more flexible and also if given the chance they’d still vote for brexit. I mean how do you square that logic ?


    Also, the bitching and moaning over the Northern Ireland protocol is miss guided anger. I’m open to correction on this but isn’t the protocol in place a UK government construct ? That was their solution to the island of Ireland situation not the EUs position. It comes across as buyers remorse over doing a bad deal and trying to blame others.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,085 ✭✭✭✭BonnieSituation


    I mean, the way the UK media treated the Euros you never would have guessed that 2 non-English constituent UK Nations were in the tournament.

    Not a hope you'll get the IT, Cork Examiner, Indo or Belfast Telegraph...



  • Registered Users Posts: 745 ✭✭✭ClosedAccountFuzzy


    Or the Manchester Guardian. The Cork Examiner hasn’t been its name for a quarter of a century at this stage.

    I just find Sky News makes very little effort to cover anything from Ireland, despite claiming to broadcast here, they ignore things like newspaper reviews etc. Stephen Murphy does a good job, but the newsroom seems to ignore the place and you often get the impression he’s explaining basic facts to the presenters/audience.

    It is something they could do more of, particularly in the context of Brexit, as the impression given in the U.K. is that politics here is riven by Brexit, when in reality it’s not featuring as a political issue, other than being a general external annoyance. The major issues driving politics being domestic ones, notably housing, health care etc.

    Brexit is very much more of a thing beyond our control being driven by dogmatism in the U.K. - from what I can see of it is the entire political spectrum here is more or less on the same page on it. There’s certainly no party more likely to see it as anything other than an external risk.

    I even saw a french article in Le Point that was portraying SF’s rise in the republic as being driven by Brexit and Irish nationalism.

    It was like they did their research by reading British media. I could see how someone could conclude that, but only if they’ve never actually done any research or spoken to any Irish based or Ireland aware political commentator, political scientist, journalist etc

    You’d be surprised at how many people abroad form opinions on Ireland based on uninformed, confidently stated nonsense being published in the U.K. - There are a raft of British journalists and commentators who will “britsplain” Ireland who’ve clearly never set foot in the place, or one two prominent Irish connected ones who’ve odd axes to grind and keep getting published.

    Post edited by ClosedAccountFuzzy on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,035 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    Having cut foreign aid.

    The Tories really are the nasty party and they are using Brexit and Covid as cover for some very, very unpalatable changes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,161 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I sense though the whole thing may fall apart on them in the next five years or so. They're relying on the bigoted OAPs and the working class racists to keep them in power, but it seems flimsy enough and could fall away in time. Even the culture wars may not be enough.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    And yet another Brexit loss. This time, people cannot properly celebrate the successes of either Brexit or Freedom Day...




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,916 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Ireland will face an assault from the Tories this week on the protocol. I just listened to Frost giving evidence to an EU scrutiny Committee in the HOC.

    The moment of truth is nearing. Despite careful language they fully intend to renege on the protocol.

    So...what is the response of the EU going to be? We have seen no action so far to defend our interests. We have seen meek legal proceedings that mean absolutely nothing to the Tories.

    The only thing they will understand is economic sanctions.

    The EU is failing this country on this issue and needs to step up to the mark fast because we are being walked over on this now and a land border is becoming inevitable because it's what the Tories want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,754 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    If a land border is what the Tories want then there is nothing the EU or indeed Ireland, can do about it. it is their country, their decision.

    There are of course consequences to that of course, It would mean the end of the Brexit deal itself, as the NIP is an integral part of it. Tear that up and essentially the UK are back to the starting point.

    The EU will continue to try to point out the reality of the situation but if the UK refuses to listen no much we can do. But if the UK think that dealing with the EU is a PITA atm, wait until they have no deal at all. Are they really going to give up almost free movement from GB to EU for the sake of FM between GB and NI?

    Are they really going to give up the change of a US trade deal just to save business in NI red tape?

    Are they going to put potential membership of CPTPP in jeopardy, along with a potential Aus and NZ trade deals just to pretend nothing has changed?

    Frost will continue to bluster, continue to blame everything on a terrible deal that apparently he was tricked or conned or something into agreeing. But, as has been the case throughout Brexit, the reality of what the UK stands to lose is simply so great that they would be brave/mad to do it.

    Will they do it? They might, but so far they have climbed up the very same hill numerous times only to sulk back down.

    What makes you think that their rhethoric is to be taken seriously this time when it hasn't lead to anything before?

    Am I right in thinking that to withdraw from the NIP, and this the Brexit deal would actually mean a vote in parliament? It is one thing to demand something, quite another to have to put your name to it and vote for it and thus be held accountable.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    How exactly have the EU failed Ireland given that the Brits haven't deviated from the protocol (although have yet to fully implement it) and have applied for (and received) extensions. The only thing the UK have done is currently facing legal action from the EU.

    The Brits have come out with a lot of bluster and blame but it's really for the home market. I haven't seen them actually challenge the EU as I think they know they would not win.

    The EU aren't going to interfere in internal UK matters. If Sainsbury's are having difficulties filling shelves in Belfast, that is for the British government to resolve, not the EU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭54and56


    As inevitable as Irelands exit from the EU within 12 months which you recently asserted but wouldn't agree to a charity bet on?

    👋👋👋



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,386 ✭✭✭schmoo2k


    Within the protocol, there are clear channels for dispute resolution - I expect we will follow those?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    Its the torys, its boris and its frost. Frost will make a lot of noise and alot of lies to keep the yehaw we hate the eu chaps happy. but in reality they will roll over and over and over again.


    Its a long time since any Irish govt gave a fook about an assault from a tory govt, after all we gave them their name which has always been quite apt.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    The UK ask for an extension and get it so it depends on your point of view who is rolling over..The generally held view on this thread is to take a hard line approach to the UK but it has`nt happened to date imo.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The EU took a hard line to the UK for five years, skillfully sliceing the country in two. It drove the UK to the very brink of deadline day leading the UK to bend over in the face over no-deal and to sign anything put in front of their nose.


    Hasn't happened yet? Has all the above slipped by you?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,791 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    Is that the extension that kept you tied to EU rules for the moment? The same rules the Brexiters used as a reason to leave the EU as they were so terrible? By all means, get your "wins" from now until 2100 by extending to keep yourself tied to rules you have no say in. It is exactly what Brexit is all about, to be tied to the bureaucrats from Brussels. Take your win Rob, you won this round. Congratulations!



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    At least you quite rightly see this is just one round and is not done and dusted as many seem to think here.I don`t know how this is going to end(and despite assurances to the contrary,neither does anyone else on this thread).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    Are you aware of the definition of `red tape`? `Excessive bureaucracy or adherence to official rules and formalities.`



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    In fairness, the EU didn't pressurise the UK. It was the UK that chose to implement deadlines by triggering Art 50. It was the UK that refused all offers to extend the deadlines. It was the UK that couldn't actually articulate what Brexit would be.

    Where the UK are now is absolutely and completely down to the UK choosing to arrive there. The EU made no decisions for the UK.

    Post edited by Seth Brundle on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 933 ✭✭✭jamule


    or to put it more simply, red tape=leaving a free market 🤣



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    We know exactly how it will end, it will be the UK losing.

    Just like the UK lost its economic integrity, lost its right to FOM, lost its right to trade unhindered, lost a signifant portion of its unskilled labour force, lost its standing in the world and England lost the Euros.

    I see a pattern here.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,296 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Would this be the same red tape drawn up by the EU when the UK were members ansnprovided input into its final formation?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    Fully agree with that Seth.The only way things will change is when the population realise what an idiot johnson is,then perhaps a more harmonious relationship can be negotiated.Although it will never match what the UK had in the first place.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,864 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The UK said they would unilaterally extend the grace period. They were advised to neotiate an extension - and the EU agreed to a three month extension subject o conditions.

    So who rolled over?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,690 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    No, we just know how it has ended every time up to now. Bluster, bluster, bluster, bloviate, bloviate, bloviate, cave, claim famous victory. And the EU smiles quietly to itself.

    Frost's position is ludicrous. He pretty much told the House of Commons Scrutiny Committee yesterday that the EU takes treaties very seriously, negotiates them carefully in full consultation with affected stakeholders and expects them to be implemented, and that this causes "inflexiblity" and "purism", and is the reason the UK had to leave. To a man and woman, they just goggled at him. It's dawning on even the Brexit supporters on the Committee that the UK's Europe policy is being run by a carnival of arsewits.

    He went on to say that "there will always have to be a treaty relationship between us and the EU that covers NI because of the need to protect the special arrangements we all want to protect. It's inevitable. The question is what is the content". On the plus side, this does suggest that he's not going to advocate simply repudiating the treaty. On the minus side, he appears to have forgotten that the question of the content of the treaty was settled 18 months ago - the treaty was negotiated on behalf of the UK by Frost himself, signed by Johnson, ratified by Parliament and entered into operation. It's a done deal.

    With such massively incompetent people in charge of its relationship with the EU, the UK may succeed in causing confusion and chaos, but it's certainly not going to succeed in actually achieving anything positive for itself. Or, more worryingly, for Northern Ireland.

    As for the UK/EU relationship not being "done and dusted" - no, of course not. It will never be done and dusted. The UK's economic, strategic and even geographic position means that its larger neighbour will always be it's primary economic, trade and foreign policy concern. This will never change. The UK/EU relationship will require constant attention and maintenance and, as it's of paramount importance to the UK, it's vital that they put in in the hands of people with some level of competence and some appreciation of reality. Frost is clearly not such a person.

    Frost will have to go the way of Cummings before there is any chance of this coming right for the UK.

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,161 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I think Frost is mainly a fanatic. He actually seems to believe his own Brexit bluster rather than it being an elaborate smoke and mirrors job. He doesn't seem particularly intelligent though and is probably lacking in emotional intelligence, hence coming across as weird to many people.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The UK is rolling over when it asks for an extension because to get an extension the whole UK must commit to maintain alignment in EU SPS rules.

    The EU would be happy with a permanent extension with the UK compelled to follow said rules indefinitely.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,831 ✭✭✭RobMc59


    The futility of the 'pure'brexit mooted by the tories is starkly illustrated in this article about it's none existent benefits.

    https://www.hospitalityandcateringnews.com/2021/07/brexit-benefits-to-hospitality/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,380 ✭✭✭✭Professor Moriarty




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Whats your definition of 'excessive'

    The EU introduced rules and bureaucracy, but in general, the effect of this was to unify many markets into one single internal market. This did not increase bureaucracy, it reduced it, not only for EU members, but for trade partners with the EU

    The only reason why there is much more 'red tape' for the UK now, is because they're going from the position of being members of the low bureaucracy single market, to being a third country

    The UK voted to increase red tape, and are now complaining that they got what they voted for

    (well actually, if the Brexiteers were honest at the time and said voting for Brexit would mean leaving the CU and SM, they would have lost that referendum, but that's a different argument)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The EU has gotten rid of far, far more red tape inside the single market than it has introduced. Just look at how the UK now has to negotiate 27 different regimes when exporting to the EU rather than one, their own.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,754 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Therein lies the crux of the issue. The Breixteers, including Johnson and Frost, by their continuous complaining about 'red tape', difficulties with NI and all the other things they never stop moaning about, are unwittingly admitting that Brexit is a disaster.

    That things are worse than they were before. That Brexit has left UK with more issues, more red tape, less trade, less freedoms, less less less.

    That they can still not point to anything to make all these problems worth it. Sure FoM is gone so Granny can't live in Spain anymore, but X is far better. Except there is no X. There are vague notions of something in the future, vague statements about global Britain, but nothing that anyone can get excited about.

    For a cause that was delivered on sound bites and catchy slogans, suddenly they are talking about ideologies, about 50 year time frames, about nebulos concepts of freedom. Brexit was supposed to be the thing the delivered something for everyone, but now the discussions are into the boring concepts of trade agreements with Australia, about standards and regulations.

    There is a very simple reason why Brexiteers stayed away from such discussions in the ref, steering clear of actual in depth discussions and simply calling for Freedom and £350 pw for the NHS. It was because people really don't care. It doesn't impact their daily lives (or at least they cannot see the direct impact).

    A major failing of the remain side in the campaign was failing to highlight the benefits of EU membership. But that was, in part, down to people not wanting to bother to listen. It was boring, hard to understand. Now the Brexiteers, and Johnson and Frost in particular, are faced with the exact same problem.

    How to explain to people why Brexit is a good idea after all when there is nothing to show for it? How to keep people on your side when all your have is discussions about red tape and loss of freedom.

    And it is only going to get worse as the effects keep becoming clearer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 876 ✭✭✭reslfj


    When its about trade, the UK will negotiate with the EU in Brussels and not with individual EU members.

    But there will not be much negotiation as UK products (as other 3. country products) will simply have to follow EU standards, rules and regulations - end of story.

    Lars :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    In Brexit incompetence news

    Turns out, to nobody's surprise, that the Trade Deal signed between the Uk and Ukraine last year was full of mistakes and meant that the UK was legally obligated to retain alignment with EU rules that it didn't intend to sign up for


    While in Brexit Cruelty news

    A woman who has been living in the UK almost her entire life, having moved to Britain at the age of 11 months old, has been sacked by her employers because she does not have the correct 'right to work' evidence

    She says she had registered as an EU citizen but her case got lost in the backlog and despite multiple calls she could not get it processed in time

    "The 45-year-old woman, who arrived in Britain as an 11-month-old baby and who has never left the country, said she has tried more than 100 times to get through to the Home Office-run helpline in the past three weeks, but has never been able to speak to an adviser.

    She has applied for EU settled status, but her application is stuck somewhere in the backlog of over 500,000 cases the Home Office has yet to process. She is the main breadwinner, with two children to support, and said her dismissal has left her struggling to buy food.

    Charities helping EU nationals say the case is not unique. “We’ve seen this time and again when people with pending EUSS applications were asked to take unpaid leave, or were turned down from employment,” Dora-Olivia Vicol, CEO of the Work Rights Centre, said."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    And in Brexit incompetence mixed with Cruelty news:

    EU citizens hoping to clear up their settled status were being forced to pay a premium rate to call the government helpline

    ------------

    Callers to the “view and prove” immigration status telephone number, 0300-790 6268, also had to preauthorise a potential £5 credit on a bank card before talking to an assistant.

    Campaigners at the3million group have written to the future borders and immigration minister, Kevin Foster, to protest against charges that amount to £10.35 for 15 minutes of assistance.

    ----------------------

    The home office had previously made assurances to the courts that these phone lines would not charge for assistance



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,720 ✭✭✭serfboard


    The Home Office seems to be full of the nastiest of people.

    And in Pritti Patel, they seem to have their ideal minister in charge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    Not "negotiate with", just "negotiate" :-) The UK has to negotiate/navigate the systems of 27 different EU countries (plus the EEA one and CH) rather than negotiate their own system, which had to be accepted across the single market pre-Brexit. UK businesses now have to concern themselves with all sorts of different national rules rather than just sell stuff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 876 ✭✭✭reslfj



    The SM for goods and services is one set of common (minimum) standards, rules, and regulations.  

    They are (in relation to the outside world) controlled by the EU commission in Brussels. There are not 27 sets of rules and even where there are differences they are not subject to national negotiations.

    It's "follow every EU rule" or do not export to the SM. To a large degree it's also "import EU standard products" or do not import at all.  

    FoM for permanent stays and work in EU member states for 3. country citizens is (mostly) a national competency, with different personal registration rules and e.g. taxation rules. There can or will be areas where EU rules will cover. E.g. performing artist, where the EU did offer the UK common and easy rules, but were refused by Frost & Co. Lorry drivers will be offered special (non) visa rules too, if the UK reciprocates

    Lars :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    And anyone who wants to sell goods in the UK will have to conform to their stupid new UKCA standard

    This means either goods will be more expensive or just not available in the UK at all because it's just not worth it, or the goods will be inferior quality to the CE marked goods if the UK standards are not as high



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,161 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Trouble brewing : FT reports that Frost is about to up the ante and announce provocative UK plans to change the Protocol - "UK sets collision course with EU under plans to redraw Brexit deal" is their headline (behind a paywall).



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,418 ✭✭✭BluePlanet


    What's the EU's play after Britain triggers Article 16?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    We will Unleash THE HOUNDS OF HELL!!!!

    or else the EU will just follow the mechanisms within the NI protocol and the withdrawal agreement and take the UK to court

    The EU can afford to be patient as many others have pointed out. The UK want the EU to over react, but in reality, every time the UK renege on an international treaty, they're only harming their own international reputation


    The EU will follow the treaties to the letter of the agreements. Either we'll win in arbitration, or Johnson will be booted out, the Tories will lose an election and the EU will have some adults at the table who will agree to abide by the agreements or pursue a closer relationship with the EU.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 236 ✭✭ath262



    I cant see how this guy can actually claim be an international Trade Negotiator with any sort of straight face, all he seems to have done is is negotiated and signed a deal, that now claims he doesn't understand, and has spent the last few month threatening to break an international treaty... hardly promising for any other upcoming trade deals with the UK, not a good sign especially with the recent mix up with the Ukraine deal

    And in more 'Brexit's going so well' news, apparently earlier today Dominic Raab was rejecting the preliminary Gibraltar deal out of hand with some of the usual waffle about sovereignty.. https://www.politico.eu/article/european-commission-releases-draft-mandate-for-post-brexit-gibraltar-talks/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,161 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    A brief extract from the FT article :


    "The UK will on Wednesday put itself on a collision course with Brussels by unveiling a new set of demands that would radically overhaul post-Brexit trading arrangements between Great Britain and Northern Ireland. In a move that officials called a “wholesale change of approach”, Lord David Frost, Cabinet Office minister, will outline a strategy that seeks to eliminate most of the checks on the Irish Sea trade border that came into force in January. And in a warning that Britain could suspend the Northern Ireland protocol in its Brexit deal with the EU if the bloc does not give way, Frost will claim the UK is already within its rights to activate the Article 16 override clause in the agreement."



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,450 ✭✭✭McGiver


    On the red tape - it is important to mention that for most of the Tories any sort of sound and comprehensive regulation framework was, is and always will be an "excessive red tape" in their heads. The current incarnation of Tories have taken it even further.

    Tories are simply ideologically inimical to a proper comprehensive market regulation, of a German sort, which the Single Market regulation is modelled on. They want less market regulation, less consumer protection, less environmental protection, less social protection and also on top less international/supranational oversight so that any issues caused by the failure to properly regulate cannot be discovered, highlighted and challenged internationally.

    They claim they are the proponents of the free market and laissez-faire economic policies but in reality it is just chumocracy and institutionalised corruption.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,690 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    No. When it comes to imports, those 27 countries all share one system, so there aren't 27 different systems to negotiate; just one. Once you have complied with whatever it is you need to do to export from the UK to (say) France, the extra compliance needed to export to any other EU country is zero.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,690 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Most of the voices calling for the triggering of Article 16 have never read Article 16, have no idea what it says, have no idea in what circumstances it can be triggered, and have no idea of what the consequences of triggering it will be. (Or they have wholly false ideas about these things.)

    Article16 would allow the UK, in certain circumstances, to take "appropriate safeguard measures" to remedy "serious social, economic or environmental difficulties . . . or diversion of trade" resulting from the application of the NI Protocol. Those measures have to be limited to what is strictly necessary to remedy the situation, and they must also be limited in duration - i.e. they can't be permanent.

    The UK must notify the EU of its safeguard measures, if possible a month before implementing them. The two parties then "immediately enter into negotiations" with a view to remedying the situation (i.e. to avoid the need for safeguard measures). As long as the safeguard measures are in place, there must be continuing consultation with a view to limiting or abolishing them

    Separately from the consultations about the safeguard measures, if the measures create an "imbalance between the rights and obligations under the Protocol", the EU can take "proportionate rebalancing measures" (i.e. it can retaliate with counter-measures). if that happens, the counter-measures as well as the measures are to be addressed in the consultations.

    The first hurdle the UK has to cross is that Art 16 can only be invoked if serious difficulties etc result from the application of the NI Protocol. But the fuss at the moment is about the chilled meats rules, which the UK has yet to apply. You can't invoke Art 16 on the basis of a part of the protocol which hasn't been applied. So if the UK purports to do this it will be in breach of its treaty obligations, and the EU can retaliate severely - e.g. by suspending parts of the TCA. Nice car plant you've got in Sunderland there, Lord Frost; be a shame if any tariffs happened to it.

    Post edited by Peregrinus on


  • Advertisement
Advertisement