Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Good news everyone! The Boards.ie Subscription service is live. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

New Alternative News Channel "GB News" chaired by Andrew Neil launching - read OP before posting

15758606263279

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,387 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    People can dislike the "content" but find the comedic element of the whole thing enjoyable.



    Not every viewer thinks its educational. Some appreciate the farce.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,659 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Obviously brexiters voted for various different reasons but some of them certainly were duped. I remember Farage waffling on and shutting down any questions on trade deals by saying the UK would be just like Norway. I remember him spending a whole Question Time saying it.

    As soon as Brexit happened he called anyone suggesting a Norway style deal a traitor.

    Its similar to how when he thought he was going to lose he promised multiple Brexit referendums and called anyone who wanted one after he won a traitor



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,044 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    How embarrassing for Andrew Neil all the same, for all the talk of free market the guy utterly failed everywhere but the lavishly public funded BBC



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,862 ✭✭✭Real Donald Trump



    Continue on moaning about it lol, it's obviously touching a nerve



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    It's kind of funny that you're getting annoyed about people getting annoyed about a certain news channel.

    Obviously got on your nerves...

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I haven't really seen much proof of anyone being particularly annoyed about it. Primarily posters waiting to see when it collapses from poor viewing figures. It's pretty amusing.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    GB News up 14,000 subscribers on YouTube since the first episode of Farage on Monday - from 158,000 to now 172,000.

    The positive aspect of social media is that, if GB News can dominate social media in ways other stations do not, it will translate into greater TV channel viewership figures in the coming weeks and months; a positive feedback loop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,980 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    how has that subscriber number translated into viewers? are you saying they will now have 14,000 extra viewers? what is the conversation ratio?



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Of course not.

    GB News is only 1-month old.

    Once the station is carried by social media, if they can continue the trend upward, it will in some way translate into greater TV viewership - which may be online, through their (excellent) mobile app, or through conventional television.

    These are early, but promising figures.

    In a year the landscape will look very different, of that I have no doubt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,980 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    the only thing that matters are their tv viewers. tv stations are not carried by social media. what does that even mean?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The fact you're relying on hypotheticals and can't point to any consistent viewership is pretty indicative of how poorly they are doing. Eg their YouTube subscriptions has had no impact of viewership of the channel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,132 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    One of the biggest trope that is often repeated by people that view the wealthy privately educated silver spoons as their betters.


    If only the people working two and three jobs knew that simply working hard was the path to absolutely nirvana. I mean it's all so simple now you've boiled it down Eskimo. Maybe I will watch this farage show hes alligning the stars in the cosmos .



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Figures are not as apocalyptic as you and others have suggested.

    For instance, take a look at the more recent figures:

    "Just weeks after coming on air, GB News' viewing figures fell to a low of 11,700 on Saturday, industry figures have shown. Last Wednesday the channel slumped to 13,300 and an average weekly audience rating of 14,900. In contrast, following the channel's opening on June 13, it hit an average of 45,529 in its first week.

    Due to the addition of Mr Farage, the channel received nearly an average of 100,000 viewers during his Monday evening slot."

    GB News is here to stay.

    People here were gloating and saying that the addition of Farage meant the end of the channel.

    I was one of the few who suggested otherwise, and I turned out to be right - again.

    Many here have references BARB stats, suggesting they are all that matter.

    Here is the report for the first month, and GB News is doing rather well for only it's first month!

    "GB News reached about 3.7m viewers on linear TV in its first month on air – just over a quarter of the BBC News Channel audience.

    However, the fledgling brand said social media engagement figures show it is resonating with younger audiences to a perhaps surprising extent.

    Head of digital and presenter Rebecca Hutson (pictured) said GB News is really a “digital media business that has a TV channel attached”.

    In the four weeks to 11 July GB News reached 3.7m viewers compared to 12.6m for BBC News, 8.4m for Sky News and 4.6m for Sky Sports News according to Barb (the Broadcasters’ Audience Research Board)."

    GB News is here to stay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,980 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    what is your source for the 100,000 number?



  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I did read the 100,000 figure for Farage but once again, the question arises on if his viewership will remain consistently high. Eg Andrew Neil's didn't... Also the very fact you're relying on an individual to get any viewers, that's not great news for a 24 hour channel.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Same old strategy. It's getting boring at this stage.

    Once a problem is answered, a new interpretation is raised.

    First, I never suggested that the station solely relied upon Farage. The almost 4 million viewer figure in the first month was achieved without Farage. The question actually becomes: what can Farage add to that already respectable figure in a station only 1-month old?

    The station is, like others, evolving.



  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The viewing figures for their first month were abysmal. They had a first good night and generally tanked after that. So ya, they very much so are treating Farage as their savior.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,333 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    Could do with a new shed actually, might tune in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,002 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The thread title provides some amusement with it's use of the word 'independent' in describing yet another media platform for Murdoch's right wing views.

    As if there weren't already enough of those.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,060 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    People voted for Brexit for a number of reasons and not every one of them is a Farage supporter or an actual voter of his either. There are plenty of people who don't like Nigel Farage and see him for the chancer that he is. They wouldn't support him, they wouldn't vote for him, but would be broadly in favour of Brexit. Or at least would have been at the time. I'd say there's a significant number of one time pro-Brexiteers that wouldn't cast their vote in that direction today.

    But People voted Brexit for a number of reasons. Some did out of pure self interest, some did because they believed it to be the right thing, some did because they're as thick as shit, and some did because they're just absolute cunts of various types. Either way, just because Brexit voters and Farage shared the same bed for a while, it certainly does not make them all one bloc. This is where Eskimohunt's reading of Timbrrrrrrr's post is demonstrably fallacious. Furthermore, his trying to play the racist card on top of that just makes his whole endeavour a complete falsehood.

    The post, repeated here, states - "I didnt call him a "right wing facist" you did, I personally think he is an odious little shìt who appeals to the people of England who are in the lower I.Q range."

    Now, one could interpret that as the 52% of people who voted Brexit and try to pretend that it's somehow "racist".

    But only if you wanted to and in spite of what was actually said.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,319 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    And an appalling subscriber to view conversion rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,918 ✭✭✭✭MisterAnarchy


    Perhaps I should change the thread title to something more appropriate.

    "The GB News trash talking thread for the perpetually outraged"

    or

    "Post in here if you hate GB News"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,980 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,916 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,556 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I get the impression that followers of GB News are trying to convince themselves more than the rest of us of its viability.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    I note the definition of "outrage" now appears to include incorrigible mirth and studied disdain. Has the OED been alerted yet? The dictionaries and thesaurus need to be updated asap.



  • Posts: 6,775 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I disagree.

    You are desperately trying to detach Farage from Brexit as if he and his supporters are some extremist fringe minority.

    Having closely watched the Brexit Wars over the past 10 years, I can safely say that the arguments that Farage trotted out were precisely the same arguments trotted out by those from across the length and breadth of the political spectrum, both Left and Right.

    The idea that there is something particularly ghastly about Nigel Farage is demonstrably false. He lives and died on his arguments, and it is those arguments that the British people backed on 23 June, 2016.

    Let's not forget that, in the two proportional representation votes in 2014 and 2019, Farage swept the board in the European elections - the first time since 1906 that a party other than Labour or Conservative managed to achieve.

    You can malign Farage all you wish, but I have every confidence that the vast, vast majority of Brexit voters have his back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,387 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    How did Sheeran do?



    Or is it ok to compare apples and oranges again?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    What does "have his back" actually mean? If 14-15m or so voters actually "had his back", then i would say with no little conviction that he would be a multiple GE winning candidate by now.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,556 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The vast, vast majority of people have his back but he failed to get elected to the House of Commons seven times in some of the most xenophobic parts of this country. Right.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement