Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Triathlon Swim Training*

  • 16-12-2009 1:27pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 189 ✭✭


    Quick question for those who have trained for an IM swim:

    What kind of sets/sessions would you recommend in the pool?

    An example of one of my current sessions (I’m still 8 months from race day) would be the following:
    • 300m warm up
    • 12 x 100m with 8 seconds rest at the end of each 100
    • 4 x 25 m sprints w 25m recovery
    • 300m warm down,
    • Total distance: 2,000m
    I also do a session devoted to drills as well.

    Thanks a million!:)


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    Quick question for those who have trained for an IM swim:

    What kind of sets/sessions would you recommend in the pool?

    An example of one of my current sessions (I’m still 8 months from race day) would be the following:
    • 300m warm up
    • 12 x 100m with 8 seconds rest at the end of each 100
    • 4 x 25 m sprints w 25m recovery
    • 300m warm down,
    • Total distance: 2,000m
    I also do a session devoted to drills as well.

    Thanks a million!:)

    Hey
    would probably go with a longer warm up and encorporate some of your drills into that.

    I think the sets of 100's are good and my advice would be to target a time for your 100 pace that meets your race target time.

    So 60 mins for your IM swim = 3600 seconds / 38 (38*100) -> ~ 1.35 per 100
    If you can sets of

    10*100 on 1.45 coming in on 1.35
    2 mins rest
    5 * 200 on 3.30 coming in on 3.10
    2 mins rest
    3*400 on 7 coming in on 6.20

    Then imho you'll be training yourself to swim at the desired pace come race day. Whether your swimming 100's or 200's or 400's the 100 pace should be consistent ... Id drop the sprints from the sets and personally (unless you want to do long swims to build confidence before the day) I dont put too much value into really long 2k+ straight swims.

    Like any of the IM training - if you've an hour in the pool be focused on what you want from that hour ... again ... imho

    Obviously you cant factor in the OW variables yet- which race are your targeting ... Austria -> lake or ... something like Barca at the sea. But maybe if you post up the race you're targeting people who've done the swim may offer some more insightful advice that may help you before / on the day

    From what I heard the lake swim and the IM branded events with the mass starts can in some cases help swim times since you're effectively carried along. For now at least you're in control of your training pace in the pool so ...

    Im sure there's be more opinions along in a while but hope some of this helps.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 629 ✭✭✭Clum


    interested wrote: »
    If you can sets of

    10*100 on 1.45 coming in on 1.35
    2 mins rest
    5 * 200 on 3.30 coming in on 3.10
    2 mins rest
    3*400 on 7 coming in on 6.20

    Are all three of those sets to be done in one session? Or just one of the sets with a long warm up before and cool down after?

    Is that 2 mins rest after each 100m, or between the set of 10*100m and 5*200m?

    Thanks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,584 ✭✭✭✭tunney


    Clum wrote: »
    Are all three of those sets to be done in one session? Or just one of the sets with a long warm up before and cool down after?

    Is that 2 mins rest after each 100m, or between the set of 10*100m and 5*200m?

    Thanks.

    Its one session.

    2 min rest after the 10*100m is what he meant.

    Personall I think 2 minutes is way to long, 30 second, maybe a minute tops.

    I'm not sure about picking your target time and working you're going times off that. I would have thought it better to do a 400m or 100m TT and work the go times off that. If you pick too aggressive a go time you'll lose form very quickly.

    As interested has eluded to an IM swim set should be 4k minimum. Only one of these a week though for the average person.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    tunney wrote: »
    Its one session.

    2 min rest after the 10*100m is what he meant.

    Personall I think 2 minutes is way to long, 30 second, maybe a minute tops.

    I'm not sure about picking your target time and working you're going times off that. I would have thought it better to do a 400m or 100m TT and work the go times off that. If you pick too aggressive a go time you'll lose form very quickly.

    As interested has eluded to an IM swim set should be 4k minimum. Only one of these a week though for the average person.

    Sorry ... thanks Tunney - yeah - all in one session - and 2 mins was just an example. Again - it comes down to bang for your buck or what you want from a swim session with the time you have.

    And the idea of taking target times from a 400 m or 100m TT would work too. Although - maybe things are being lost in the medium here but you pace per 100 taken from 400m or 100m TT would be significantly faster than your intended pace over 3800 metre's ... unless the 400 or 100 TT is done at a pace and swim-form that you'd be confident of holding over longer distances.
    Hopefully Im not further confusing things ...

    I come from a swimming background and I generally look at my swimming as the fun part of the day. Ive only recently started back doing things with a bit of structure so ... apologies ... the reason i say this is that Id have better idea of my own pacing DURING a swim without the use of a clock based on feel sometimes ... so during a set Id back off since I know things a going slightly askew ... that said ... its not all about the stroke looking pretty ... especially in the open water - its often what happens under the water (as in your pull and finishing the stroke etc ..)

    re: distances per session (obviously dependent on speed)
    I rarely have more than an hour in the pool these days - but yeah once a week Id be in for an hour and do a 4k set ... at pace - something similar to above
    Most mornings Id have 40 mins - so I do 1 set of 100's or 200's at pace .. Id also use drag belts at pace to get more from my 40 mins.

    Im pretty sure Tunney has said it in the past - but the time management skills during an IM season are as important as alot of other stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    Thought a bit more about this ... whilst swimming ironically.

    Everyones target pace will be different whether swimming in a lake or the sea, whether its 3.8km at an ironman or 750m at a local sprint tri.

    I think its been said before on this forum and it should be pretty obvious that neither the swim or bike legs are where a triathlon p.b is done.

    The pace to employ in training in the pool during these months is that pace that enables you to keep your swim form and breathing stable for the distance you're taking on.

    That being said, the pace to get under the hour for a 3.8km IM swim leg may be tough to sustain now and you may feel that your stroke is falling apart during a set of 100's - but in 5 or 6 months time because you pushed yourself now the effort required to sustain the pace will be considerably less imho.


    Anyhow .. good luck with the training.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,145 ✭✭✭Bambaata


    some good reading here. cheers lads. Im not quite doing an IM but any advice on drills is good to get, i need to vary my own a bit more


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 593 ✭✭✭toomuchdetail


    Good post : done sprint tri's this year but swim needs a lot of work and the next question might explain why :
    When you say 10*100 on 1:45 coming in on 1:35 are you saying that get your 100m in on 1:35 and take 10sec rest to bring it up to 1:45 and the off again ?
    Why rest between sets ? obivously taking a running approach and going long for 1000/2000m is not recommended ?
    Would be interested on the drills info as I drag my legs and lack kick.
    There was a good dvd with the triathlon220 mag this month that was the best tutorial I have had yet .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    Good post : done sprint tri's this year but swim needs a lot of work and the next question might explain why :
    When you say 10*100 on 1:45 coming in on 1:35 are you saying that get your 100m in on 1:35 and take 10sec rest to bring it up to 1:45 and the off again ?

    Yep - doing a set 'on' a time ... is exactly that. Your pace will hopefully give you some rest - in the example above maybe 10 seconds. Too much rest and you can reduce the time you're doing the set on.
    For example - 10 * 50's f/s on 60 seconds - if you're coming in on 40 seconds then in that case 20 seconds is too much**

    If you're training for a 3.8km swim at the start of an Ironman you want to be able to swim as fast as you can - whilst maintaining good stroke, breathing and keeping your HR going above a target %. Since the example was related to IM swim training Id say 10 seconds on a set of 100's is as much as you'd want - but again it depends on how the individual - if your stroke is becoming sloppy etc on 100 no. 3 of 10 then increase the time the 100's are on to ensure you're getting more rest. If you're cruising and getting more than 10 seconds rest on the time the 100's are on ... reduce the time by 5 seconds etc ...


    If you're training to swim a faster 750 at a sprint event -
    Then at this time of the year there's no harm doing sets of 100's at about 60% to ensure any stroke work you are doing during stroke sets is being employed ...
    Getting closer to the tri its worth considering doing sets to 'sharpen' up ... 10*50's off 60 for example ... more rest between the individual 50's but faster 50's ... increased stroke rate ... and dare i say it (without opening the Triathletes kick or dont debate) increased kick frequency .. - the idea being that if you can haul for the first 300 metres of 750 and get yourself onto a good set of feet for the remainder you'll be in and out of T1 before the crowd
    If you dont have the base swim work done though doing faster 50's closer to the sprint tri will help you swim fast for the first 50 or 100 or so ... but the swim fitness wont be there for the remaining 600 or so ...



    Why rest between sets ? obivously taking a running approach and going long for 1000/2000m is not recommended ?

    2 mins is too long at this time of the year ... imho ... it was an example above. The reason that theres no harm taking a brief breather between sets is that it will allow you to take a sip of water and get yourself focused for the next set ... alot of pools are heated for different requirements that actually training these days i.e. they're often way too hot .. and if you're working hard there's no harm taking a sip of something between sets.

    assuming you're still talking about swimming above ...
    IMHO, doing long 1000 or 2000 swims in the middle of the session is a dangerous game. That said id generally do 1000 warmup ... then I get into more focused sets ... doing 1000 in the middle of your session can allow things to drift ... its not always about the distance done - if you're doing 1000 for a drill ... then why not break it up ... 5*100's, 2*200's and 2*50's ... 5 seconds rest between .. but it'll focus your mind into distance per stroke or high elbows or long full pulling under the water .. or kick to get your hips up to keep your body in flat and on top of the water ... etc ...
    Im guilty of it myself ... drifting through ... thinking about work etc etc .. when its more worthwhile if Im focused on what Im doing ... that said ... do what makes you happy ... it cant all be about hard work eh ;)
    Would be interested on the drills info as I drag my legs and lack kick.
    There was a good dvd with the triathlon220 mag this month that was the best tutorial I have had yet .

    Careful not to over read or analyse .. is my advice ..
    If you feel you lack kick you're not alone since this is a common thing in triathlon swimming that Ive seen - swimming with a wetsuit in the open water unnaturally gives you the bouyancy that brings your hips up higher and you'll get away with it ... back in the pool without a wetsuit if you're not kicking you're hips and legs are likely to sink and you'll be essentially carrying them ... think about how long it would take you to bike 40km only using one leg ;) the triathlon wont be won or lost in the water and for alot of people spending more training time on the bike or running is more fun .. but if you want to improve your swim times - get your kick going .. it helps put your body in the right position so that you can effectively use your arms ...

    One way to improve your kick (and please please please think about who else is in the lane when you do kick sets since it can disrupt things for those doing 100's on their target pace times;))... use a small kick board, think shallow, short kicks ... keeping you legs long and flex the ankles ... if you're hearing 'thump-thump-thump' then you're most likely bending your knees too much and your feet are leaving the water ... 'kick from the hip' is one expression coaches can use ... watch some youtube of Grant Hacket or the Phelps or Popov or the likes ... they're not blasting away (in the middle of the race at least) with their feet ... its all about control and putting their hips and body up on top of the water and enabling the arms to get going

    Anyhow - allegedly its as easy as 1-2-3 but its a useful drill to consider - although most distance swimmers do 1-2 per arm stroke ... only in a sprint for the finish do you want to turn on the 1-2-3 six beat stuff ...



    Probably waaaaaaaaaaaaay more than is useful ... apologies guys ..
    enjoy the training either way ... but dont read too many books and magazines about stroke etc ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,830 ✭✭✭catweazle


    Keep it coming Interested, compared to running and cycling tips it is much harder to come across dos and dont for swimming, although i will have to divide those times and distances you talk about by 4 to suit me


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    catweazle wrote: »
    Keep it coming Interested, compared to running and cycling tips it is much harder to come across dos and dont for swimming, although i will have to divide those times and distances you talk about by 4 to suit me

    No worries. Its all relative to where your at and what you're hoping to do. The better your body position, the better your stroke the easier it'll be to do the times in your sets - ironically its then you'll realise that theres no silver bullet to swimming ... its a case of putting in the time and getting what you can from each session. This could be a recovery from a long bike or run ... or a new p.b ... or swimming a straight 250 metres without stopping on the wall.

    Thing about swimming thats kinda hard for alot of tri-people to understand is that after a certain amount of stroke work ... theres no real silver bullet ... sure you can buy a fancy wetsuit for the summer ... but if you're only spending 60 mins a week in the pool and 8 hours on the bike and something similar running ... what % improvement can you honestly expect. The swim gets you to the bike and the bike gets you to the run ... but theres alot of people on here doing their second, third, fourth ... season of tri that are hoping to better their times (and still juggle life) - some .. small improvements ... in their stroke and a little more time in the pool could save valuable time that that might be alot harder to take of a 40km TT or 10k run...

    Im no coach ... but Ive spent alot of times in pools and ow - and am more than happy to offer and opinion .. although Fri tends to be coffee day .. hence the frantic typing ;) ... and the spelling mistakes ....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,830 ✭✭✭catweazle


    Thanks Interested, I actually really enjoy the swimming, probably more so than the other two, i suppose cause i couldnt swim at all really before i started. It was a great feeling running out of the swim seeing the distance I was just after doing, probably a lot more of an achievement for me in my eyes than the other two disciplines


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,584 ✭✭✭✭tunney


    interested wrote: »
    No worries. Its all relative to where your at and what you're hoping to do. The better your body position, the better your stroke the easier it'll be to do the times in your sets - ironically its then you'll realise that theres no silver bullet to swimming ... its a case of putting in the time and getting what you can from each session. This could be a recovery from a long bike or run ... or a new p.b ... or swimming a straight 250 metres without stopping on the wall.

    Thing about swimming thats kinda hard for alot of tri-people to understand is that after a certain amount of stroke work ... theres no real silver bullet ... sure you can buy a fancy wetsuit for the summer ... but if you're only spending 60 mins a week in the pool and 8 hours on the bike and something similar running ... what % improvement can you honestly expect. The swim gets you to the bike and the bike gets you to the run ... but theres alot of people on here doing their second, third, fourth ... season of tri that are hoping to better their times (and still juggle life) - some .. small improvements ... in their stroke and a little more time in the pool could save valuable time that that might be alot harder to take of a 40km TT or 10k run...

    Im no coach ... but Ive spent alot of times in pools and ow - and am more than happy to offer and opinion .. although Fri tends to be coffee day .. hence the frantic typing ;) ... and the spelling mistakes ....

    I was talkign to a guy about this recently - he has been at the sport 25 years and he of the complete opposite opinion - that the % gain from swimming is much less than biking or running.

    I'm not sure but I can see both points.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    tunney wrote: »
    I was talkign to a guy about this recently - he has been at the sport 25 years and he of the complete opposite opinion - that the % gain from swimming is much less than biking or running.

    I'm not sure but I can see both points.

    Just to be clear Tunney - 25 years in Triathlon ? or swimming ? or both ...

    I certainly respect anyones opinion .. especially if they've 25 years in any sport ... but just hoping you could elaborate a little more on above.

    If your saying is opinion is that the potential % improvement in swim times is much less than the bike and run then he's probably right. But context would help to clarify where he's coming from ...

    Is the opinion .. along the lines of ...
    A person who already gets out of the water in the top 5% of the field in a triathlon and doesnt finish in the top 5% of the race - increasing their time / effort and training in the pool is less like to see a % gain in a triathlon ?

    If so ... I agree .. since its a triathlon ...

    Although if somone is finishing middle of the road in the swim and nailing the bike and run ... improving stroke and swim time might help them improve their position overall in the triathlon ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,584 ✭✭✭✭tunney


    interested wrote: »
    Just to be clear Tunney - 25 years in Triathlon ? or swimming ? or both ...

    I certainly respect anyones opinion .. especially if they've 25 years in any sport ... but just hoping you could elaborate a little more on above.

    If your saying is opinion is that the potential % improvement in swim times is much less than the bike and run then he's probably right. But context would help to clarify where he's coming from ...

    Is the opinion .. along the lines of ...
    A person who already gets out of the water in the top 5% of the field in a triathlon and doesnt finish in the top 5% of the race - increasing their time / effort and training in the pool is less like to see a % gain in a triathlon ?

    If so ... I agree .. since its a triathlon ...

    Although if somone is finishing middle of the road in the swim and nailing the bike and run ... improving stroke and swim time might help them improve their position overall in the triathlon ...

    Apologies - 25 years in tri. Runner before that.
    22:30 1500m swimmer. He would have been (and still is) at the pointy end of things.

    I never said i agreed with either point, I think its very personal and depends on your skill set.

    Just think its very interesting to see the different points of view depending on the sport that the people came from.

    I do think though that if you want to make huge swimming gains it takes hours and hours in the water - while the same run and bike gains would come with less time on the bike or on the road. In my experience with N=1


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    tunney wrote: »
    Apologies - 25 years in tri. Runner before that.
    22:30 1500m swimmer. He would have been (and still is) at the pointy end of things.

    I never said i agreed with either point, I think its very personal and depends on your skill set.

    Just think its very interesting to see the different points of view depending on the sport that the people came from.

    I do think though that if you want to make huge swimming gains it takes hours and hours in the water - while the same run and bike gains would come with less time on the bike or on the road. In my experience with N=1

    Grand. Thanks for clarifying - for the record I agree - with the hours and hours in the water. As per previous comment 'there's no silver bullet' once the stroke is reasonable, the body position is reasonable - theres nothing but hours and hours in the pool that'll differentiate peoples results - in swimming (not in tri).

    For the record - I come from a swimming background -
    1500 short course - 16.14
    1500 long course - 17.00

    btw, these arent especially top end swimming times here in Ireland ... but were pretty respectable and one good enough for a senior title here in Ireland .. but ... to achieve those times I was training 11 times a week in the water (not including weight sessions and ground work) and at certain times of the year doing close to 80km a week. I was and am fundamentally the wrong shape for a swimmer - Im not tall ... I dont have long arms .. but I was dumb enough not to quit - which is kinda what it takes in some sports.

    From a triathlon point of view ... Ive 3 years .. so in my opinion a rookie. I do think though that unless your stroke is in good shape, i.e is efficient and consistently strong - where swimming reasonably fast doesnt feel like its an effort there are minutes to be had over 1500 metres and over 3.8km - that seem imho to be more difficult to come by on the bike and run.

    Ive seen swim sets and times from the likes of yourself Tunney and MCOS in his tread and I hand-on-heart applaud the progress and splits you guys are doing since you'd have a relatively short amount of experience swimming. But its a triathlon ... and thats where backing up your swim with a strong bike and equally strong run sets people apart from some people coming into the sport.

    Im entirely aware that my opinions re: swimming are coming from my background and there are things I take for granted but I think for the majority of new comers to the sport the biggest hurdle is the swim ..

    Anyhow - bon chance guys


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,051 ✭✭✭MCOS


    interested wrote: »
    Im entirely aware that my opinions re: swimming are coming from my background and there are things I take for granted but I think for the majority of new comers to the sport the biggest hurdle is the swim ..


    Thanks for all the swimming knowledge interested. Must be cool getting out of the water first in Tris :) I agree 100% that swimming is teh biggest hurdle into Tri. I wasn't really worried about cycling or running as these are skills you develop as a kid anyway but having never learned to swim before, the pool was a daunting place! I'm sure on 11 sessions of anything a week you will make serious strides of improvement. Maybe the difference of opinion that Tunney is referring to is the triathlon swimming from a swimmers perspective vs triathlon swimming from a Triathlete

    Much like a Cyclist vs a Triathlete. I thought some of the guys in my club were (the Tri guys) were strong riders until I saw some proper cyclists climb a hill :eek:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    MCOS wrote: »
    Thanks for all the swimming knowledge interested. Must be cool getting out of the water first in Tris :)

    That rarely happens (since I learned very quickly theres the bike and run to come and I could really improve in both areas) but now and again it just gives me a great spot to watch the race unfold ;) - I took a 10 year break from ALL activities after spending about 15 years training ... it tooks its toll - but Ive been under 18 mins for 1500 in the pool recently ...
    I agree 100% that swimming is teh biggest hurdle into Tri. I wasn't really worried about cycling or running as these are skills you develop as a kid anyway but having never learned to swim before, the pool was a daunting place!

    That just makes your progress even more impressive - and I take my hat off to anyone that takes on an open water swim since from a novices point of view its hard to find clear water and can be intimidating (which is one of the worst things about the sport imho - there are idiots everywhere I guess that turn everything into a contact sport)
    I'm sure on 11 sessions of anything a week you will make serious strides of improvement.
    As long as you've the fundamentals and the correct body position its possible to do those long hours and distances - only injury I ever got from swimming was a touch of tendonitus in a shoulder rotator ... but thats kinda comes with the territory when those distances and pace are involved.
    Doing countless sessions and hours in the pool with the wrong technique is entirely counter productive. Although - its better than sitting on the couch and it might make getting into the wetsuit come spring time and the first triathlon alot easier from a mental point of view.
    Maybe the difference of opinion that Tunney is referring to is the triathlon swimming from a swimmers perspective vs triathlon swimming from a Triathlete
    Dont think there was a difference in opinion - as above - Tunney said he could see both points of view - Triathlon and swimming are two different sports ... for example .. my swim leg for IM is at 60% or less that what I could swim the distance at in a pool or as a one off ... your own progress in the pool is coming along well this year as your stroke is improving and youre doing things technically more correct ... probably (since i obviously havent seen the before and after stroke) ... your times will plateau and then it'll be a case of deciding where time is given between swim/bike and run to maximise the gains in times for your overall season objective ...

    For many getting through the swim in season 1 is good enough - and a hell of an achievement for those who only learned to swim as an adult. I know a large number of pool swimmers ... wouldnt swim / race in the sea for love or money ... and yet ... there are some fantastic open water swimmers in this country ... some amazing channel swim performances this year alone ... largely unrecognized but since the 10k swim is an oly sport ... who knows ..
    Much like a Cyclist vs a Triathlete. I thought some of the guys in my club were (the Tri guys) were strong riders until I saw some proper cyclists climb a hill :eek:

    Yeah, I was lucky enough to train in the states when I was swimming with some of the best there was ... humbling .. but going back session after session and getting lapped ... is one way of making you realise there's always a bigger dog out there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,584 ✭✭✭✭tunney


    I didn't actually disagree with anyone MCOS :)
    All I was saying was bang for buck, assuming you are a competent swimmer, swimming training will deliver less gains than bike or run for the same increase in training. Saving five minutes on a swim versus 5 on the bike or run is alot tougher to achieve.

    However if you look for example at Dolans splits in Kona his easiest time win will be the swim, however for the likes of you and I, its the bike and run that will deliver more time savings.

    Depends on your standard of running, biking and swimming where you will get the most bang for buck in training.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,051 ✭✭✭MCOS


    Hi Tunney I know that, interested I'll just clarify that the difference of opinion I gathered was that of your take on it vs the 25yrs in Tri guys Tunney knows. I was not saying Tunney disagreed with anyone. I was just saying that it was clearly solid advise coming from a good triathlete and a good swimmer that sound different so I could see how it would be difficult to decise which one one agreed with.

    Far be it from me to input anything in a discussion about swimming :o

    btw interested 17 mins for 1500m :eek: I can't even get my head around how people swim that fast and the guys and gals on TV make it look effortless and graceful even.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    MCOS wrote: »
    Hi Tunney I know that, interested I'll just clarify that the difference of opinion I gathered was that of your take on it vs the 25yrs in Tri guys Tunney knows. I was not saying Tunney disagreed with anyone. I was just saying that it was clearly solid advise coming from a good triathlete and a good swimmer that sound different so I could see how it would be difficult to decise which one one agreed with.

    I think we're all cool at this stage with the differences :)
    Far be it from me to input anything in a discussion about swimming :o
    hey - its d'internet .. all opinions are valid
    btw interested 17 mins for 1500m :eek: I can't even get my head around how people swim that fast and the guys and gals on TV make it look effortless and graceful even.

    I know what you mean about graceful -
    although theres a world of hurt going on under the water - every stroke under the water and the movement off the walls at that pace hurts. It lasts for less than 20 minutes though .. its not like a marathon.

    re: Sub 17mins - they're not the type of times you can do regularly imho - I was lucky to have some good coaches who gave me good advice - which does translate to triathlons .. i think anyhow ... ->> you only really need to pull out the big races twice a year ... once to qualify for something the other when you're at it .. whether thats national or euro championships or an IM and Kona ... will all depend on where you're at.

    I think with the increase in draft legal races the importance of the swim is growing for some of the top people ... if they miss the leading bike group because of a poor swim they're struggling - I think ( from what I heard at least) the top guys are addressing this by training with swim clubs or national squads during this time of the year.

    Anyhow - I think this thread has drifted a little from the OP's original posting and subject - although entirely valid guys. Without seeing someones stroke its impossible to provide accurate input into their sets ... or sessions - and thats where a good triathlon coach comes in .. they'll stop former swimmers/runners/bikers focusing too much on the area that they can gain least from ... know any good ... really good coaches MCOS ;) sorry ... too soon?
    :)


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,051 ✭✭✭MCOS


    Not at all :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,377 ✭✭✭pgibbo


    Very interesting thread with some great points of view and food for thought.

    Out of curiosity interested, where are you based?

    MCOS, glad to see your sense of humour is still there! :cool:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    pgibbo wrote: »
    Very interesting thread with some great points of view and food for thought.

    Out of curiosity interested, where are you based?

    MCOS, glad to see your sense of humour is still there! :cool:

    Dublin - mostly ... work can put me about a bit .. the states and uk ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 593 ✭✭✭toomuchdetail


    Thanks -Interested , some of the better opinions/advice I have seen :appreciate it :
    I am not a fast swimmer and generally can get to 500m in 10mins in the pool comfortably and can keep this pace over 1500m, have done 750m in triathlone and Ballina in about 12mins but I would have done that but the current was strong so would have got that on my back .
    Based on my times 100 on 1:45 would be ambitious initally , in my position would you go for more reps of 100m at slower pace or few sets with a faster pace i.e 10 set of 100m on 1:55 or 7 sets of 100m on 1:45 .
    Again thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,957 ✭✭✭interested


    Based on my times 100 on 1:45 would be ambitious initally , in my position would you go for more reps of 100m at slower pace or few sets with a faster pace i.e 10 set of 100m on 1:55 or 7 sets of 100m on 1:45 .
    Again thanks

    Hey, no worries - happy to share an opinion ...
    The approach kinda depends on what distance you're targeting as part of your triathlon ... again imho

    If you're targeting a 750 early in the season and then moving towards a couple of 1500's at oly events later in the year then you might consider .. the following advice ..

    For something like the 750 ... you could try ..
    Maybe something like (5 * 100) * 2 with X rest between the two sets to help you recover but obviously not too much - and do them off a time that will force you to push the pace a little but try to keep the stroke as clean as you can - theres just 5 of them before you get a brief rest so you should be able to do them off a time where your getting 10 or less seconds rest.
    If you find you're getting more than 10 seconds then reduce the time the 100's are off. If you find you're only getting a couple of seconds less - then suck it up and work harder ... there's only 5 ;)

    so ... 5 * 100's on 1.45 - to get 10 seconds rest you'd want to be touching at around 1.35 - based on the time you pass along.

    For the 1500 ... initially, do them off a slightly slower time and increase the number of 100's in the set.
    So ... (8*100's on 1.50) * 2 - you'd want to be touching at around 1.40 - and ... importantly keeping control of your stroke and turns etc ... if you're struggling after the 3'rd 100 of 8 then maybe do them off 1.55

    Also, if looking at 1500's you might want to consider doing a set of (4*200)*2 - long enough to keep you pushing the fitness along but short enough to keep things focussed ... on stroke, body position, kick and of course time ...


    As mentioned previously - it can be all very personal - where your swimmings at, the quality of your stroke .. and your swim fitness .. which can differ from your bike and running and doesnt always translate between the sports (unfortunately ;))

    Anyhow - hope the suggestions help - dont be afraid to change the sets up yourself depending on how you feel - if you arent making the target times you set yourself - dont get too down about it - slow the stroke down again, concentrate on your pull, catch and kick etc .. it'll happen ... spinning the arms to make the times can be counter productive ... there's a reason why the likes of thorpe, phelps etc all made it look graceful - they're catching and 'feeling' the water as well as can be done.

    Good luck


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 593 ✭✭✭toomuchdetail


    Thanks again , now will give it a go over the next few weeks while I am off for teh xmas.


Advertisement